Skip to content

NCDC Inflating US Temperatures

November 22, 2012
tags: ,

By Paul Homewood


NOAA, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service


Year to Date (Jan – Oct) Temperature
Contiguous United States


According to NOAA, the USA, (or at least the contiguous part), is heading for its warmest year on record. Their records show that the YTD mean temperature at the end of October was 58.36F, or 14.64C, and running about a degree fahrenheit above the previous hottest year of 1998.

But can their figures be trusted? Their data is so full of temperature adjustments as to make the original historical records unrecognisable. Steve Goddard, for instance, has identified the extent of the adjustments that USHCN make. On a more local level, I have shown NOAA’s claim, that Virginia broke the state record temperature for July this year, simply was not borne out by the actual temperature records.

One of the problems many of us encounter is that NOAA seem very reluctant to divulge how they actually arrive at their results. When I challenged NOAA’s Deke Arndt about this, he admitted he did not know himself and could not replicate the calculation for Virginia in 1934, as I had asked.

But we don’t have to take their word for it. Satellite measurements by both UAH and RSS provide atmospheric temperature data for the USA 48. According to them, the temperature increase from last year to this year is not as great as NOAA have made out.


Taking UAH as an example, Figure 1 shows the change in temperature from each month last year to the corresponding month this year.



Figure 1

For most months this year, NOAA/NCDC show much larger increases than UAH do, and, at the end of October, the YTD increase over the same period last year is 1.35C and 0.89c respectively. In other words, NCDC has found an extra 0.46C of warming that UAH cannot find, or 0.83F.

How reliable are the UAH numbers? For a start, they correlate pretty well with RSS, who give a figure of 1.00C. It is possible that there could be short term variations between satellite and surface temperature measurements. However, it is worth noting that, since the satellites started up in 1979, the gap between their measurements and NCDC’s has steadily grown, as the following table makes clear.


     NCDC Mean Temperature / UAH & RSS Temperature Anomalies –USA 48
                                                     Degree Centigrade
  1979 2011 Increase
UAH -0.68 0.12 0.80
RSS -0.48 0.22 0.70
NCDC 10.52 11.77 1.25


Bear in mind that these figures are up to 2011, i.e before the latest divergence. Including the figures so far this year, the total divergence since 1979 amounts to 0.91C between NCDC and UAH, and 0.90C when compared with RSS.

If NCDC figures have been overstated by this sort of amount, the claim that 2012 is likely to be the warmest year on record simply does not hold water.








  1. November 23, 2012 12:36 pm

    Reblogged this on Real Science and commented:
    Paul Homewood Shows Another approach To Exposing NCDC Fraud

  2. tckev permalink
    November 24, 2012 12:19 pm

    With these unaccountable adjustments America has decided to not to be a scientific, by this deed they have chosen an anti-science path.

  3. November 24, 2012 7:41 pm

    Does “total divergence” mean a difference corresponding to those shown in the last column of the table? (I.e. does the table show a divergence of 0.45 between UAH and NCDC by 2011 ?)

    If so, this means there will have been a doubling of the difference (“divergence”) in one year!

    • November 24, 2012 8:32 pm

      Yes, that’s right. The divergence has gone from 0.45 to 0.91 in the space of 10 months.

    • Brian H permalink
      November 26, 2012 4:50 am

      Double the creativity, double the fun!


  1. ‘Climate change played no role in 2011 Thailand floods, other factors set scale of the disaster,’ NOAA, UK Met Office scientists report « Impeach Obama Today

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: