Skip to content

OFGEM To Warn Of Blackouts

June 25, 2013

By Paul Homewood

 

image

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/10136903/Energy-regulator-to-warn-over-blackouts.html

 

According to the Telegraph:-

 

The regulator is expected to publish electricity supply and demand forecasts within weeks, showing that spare capacity has fallen as more gas-fired plants have been mothballed. It is likely to reiterate warnings that even if blackouts are avoided, power prices will rise steeply.

Britain’s spare power margin will be so narrow by the winters of 2014-15 and 2015-16 that unexpected events such as more plant closures, nuclear reactor outages or unusually cold weather could drive household electricity bills up by as much as 20pc, Peter Atherton, an analyst at Liberum Capital, has warned.

Last year, Ofgem’s assessment showed that margins would fall from 14pc to 4pc by mid-decade and the risk of power cuts would increase from near-zero in 2012 to one-in-12 by 2015 and one-in-two if demand was very high.

   

OFGEM have every right to be concerned. Let’s look at some of the basic numbers. The latest electricity capacity figures, issued by DECC and based on 2011, are below. I have also listed the capacity due to be taken off line by 2020, due to EU emissions regulations for coal/oil power, and obsolescence of nuclear.

 

 

  2011 Due for closure by 2020 Net
Coal 23 8 15
Oil 4 4 0
Gas 37   37
Nuclear 11 7 4
Hydro 4   4
Others 4   4
Total excl wind/solar 83 19 64

UK Generating Capacity – GW

   

I have ignored wind/solar as their nameplate capacity is utterly relevant. It simply is not guaranteed to be there when it is needed.

Average electric output runs at about 41 GW, but at peak times during winter months it regularly gets close to 60 GW. So, barring a large influx of new capacity, the spare capacity margin could be down to 4GW, or 6%.

Worse still, these capacity figures are the theoretical maximum. Taking into account downtime, the practical figure could be less. Of course, most planned maintenance can be done in lower demand, summer months. But in the real world, things don’t always go to plan.

As for timing, with the exception of 1 GW of capacity at the Dungeness B nuclear plant, itself due to close in 2018, all of the closed capacity will be gone by 2016. So, basically, we have just three years to address the problem.

The government’s hope is that enough new gas capacity is brought on stream to fill the gap. However, energy companies are not prepared to build new plant, only to see it lie around underutilised during the time when the wind is blowing.

Hence, the Capacity Market Mechanism, which is included in the Energy Bill currently going through Parliament. In simple terms, this will enable the government to pay power companies to keep their gas plants on standby, and ready to switch on when needed. The cost of this is then passed onto all electricity suppliers, and then onto consumers.

Everything has a price, and I have no doubt deals will be struck, but it certainly won’t be cheap, so watch out for much higher bills. Even then, it seems increasingly unlikely that sufficient capacity can be built in such short timescales.

 

Footnote

Incidentally I asked DECC whether the estimated cost of the Capacity Market Mechanism was ever included in the Impact Assessment of the original Climate Change Act in 2008. (Remember, the government’s own estimate of the cost of this Act was £18.3 bn a year.)

I was informed that no, this extra cost was not allowed for.

The mind boggles.

9 Comments
  1. Joe Public permalink
    June 25, 2013 6:26 pm

    At least senior managers within Ofgem can have a clear conscience knowing that they’ve instructed gas & electricity companies on just how many tariffs (4) each may have.

    BTW – “I have ignored wind/solar as their nameplate capacity is utterly irrelevant.”.

  2. June 25, 2013 6:29 pm

    “I was informed that no, this extra cost was not allowed for.”

    Ha, that’s peanuts. When the Germans build their Energiewende they never planned nor costed for a grid to transport the energy. Idiotic plans like using the railway cables were even considered in view of the shocking cost of installing a grid to handle the ginormous power peaks form the wind and solar farms

  3. Curt permalink
    June 25, 2013 8:19 pm

    Capacity figures are power, not energy, so the units are GW, not GWh.

    • June 25, 2013 9:39 pm

      Thanks, Curt.

      I’ll correct.

      You should get a job at DECC, it sounds like you know more about energy than they do!

  4. tckev permalink
    June 25, 2013 10:29 pm

    Looking at the monthly and yearly graphs at http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/ it looks as if the UK’s electricity production is barely keeping up, and seem to be almost to the point of instability. Indeed I find that E.M. Smith at ChiefIO has the same feelings.

    Is The UK Grid Approaching Instability?

  5. tckev permalink
    June 26, 2013 12:10 am

    Paul,
    Are my last comments made at 10:29 stuck in moderation till…?

  6. June 26, 2013 5:48 pm

    Reblogged this on CraigM350.

Comments are closed.