Geoffrey Lean Does Not Bother To Check Facts
By Paul Homewood
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/countryside/10539470/Flood-defences-get-wise-or-get-wet.html
It seems that the ludicrous Geoffrey Lean does not get any better. He claims in the Telegraph today:
They called it the nightmare before Christmas but – despite yesterday’s encore – it’s not over yet. Further heavy rains are due in the South-West tomorrow night, with yet more strong winds expected on Tuesday, threatening to extend one of the stormiest Yuletides into a tempestuous new year.
That would round off a month battered by six big storms, though none as destructive as the bruiser that struck on Monday, the most intense recorded for 127 years. Winds reaching 92mph brought some 200 trees crashing down on railway lines, paralysing services on one of the year’s most important days, while up to two inches of rain in 24 hours caused floods across southern England.
Some 300,000 homes suffered blackouts; 50,000 spent Christmas Day without electricity, and some were still powerless at the end of the week. Nearly 1,000 were flooded out. Six people died in even more devastating weather than the supposedly once-in-a decade St Jude’s Day gales of two months ago.
Apparently, Environmental Correspondents don’t have to bother with checking facts these days, so here is what the Met Office had to say about the St Jude storm.
Autumn storms of this strength are less common than in winter, but, nevertheless, the Met find that, for southern England, it was still on average a once in 4-year event.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/interesting/2013-octwind
And Monday’s storm , that Lean describes as “even more devastating than St Jude’s Day gales”? Away from exposed headlands, the strongest gusts reached 76 mph at Langdon Bay.
In October, the same place registered 81 mph, according to Philip Eden.
Elsewhere on 23rd December, gusts approaching 75 mph were recorded, which equates to 65 knots. As the map below of the St Jude Storm shows, gusts at this speed and higher were widespread in October.
http://metofficenews.wordpress.com/2013/12/24/wind-and-rainfall-data-23-to-24-december-2013/
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/interesting/2013-octwind
Geoffrey Lean makes some valid points about improving our flood defences and infrastructure. And it is certainly true that the UK has suffered from an unusual series of storms this month, because of the position of the jet stream.
It is a pity, though, that he feels he has to make such hysterical claims, without seemingly bothering to check his facts first.
Footnote
Lean also comments:
Even more violent December tempests have struck in the past. The 140-knot winds of the Great Storm of 1703 toppled the newly built Eddystone lighthouse, and washed a small boat (with a man and two boys on board) clean out of Cornwall’s Helford estuary, dumping it, 175 miles away, on the shores of the Isle of Wight. But experts say that they seem to be becoming more frequent: there was a similar spate of severe gales in December 2012. And we seem to suffer serious floods every year.
I am quite sure we do suffer serious floods every year, just as we always have, and exacerbated by building on flood plains. But, according to the Met Office, winter rainfall trends are , if anything, decreasing.
But, perhaps, I had better not confuse him with too many facts!
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/actualmonthly
Comments are closed.
There is more truth and facts in christmas crackers than in the guardian.
Lean lies, it is not that he doesn’t bother to check facts, he modifies them to suit his own purpose.
He seems to have forgotten all about the 1987 Storm with over 15 million trees uprooted, he also forgets the North Sea flood of 1953.
Saxon. What you say is correct – however, Lean writes for the Daily Telegraph.
Of course the big global warming theme of a few short years ago was that we would be in perpetual and increasing drought in Southern England so we all have to save water or buy a camel. Funny how the story changes with the weather. Lean is a zealot……no facts needed.
Sorry, forgot the reference:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthcomment/geoffrey-lean/8010048/Britains-big-problem-with-water.html
I complained to the BBC regarding their website coverage of the “St Jude” storm. This is part of their response:-
The “worst” storm is a subjective term which doesn’t rest on the strength of the storm alone but on a range of factors.
That said the report did also include the line that:
“The most powerful storm to hit the UK in decades has swept across southern and central parts of the country…”
We accept that it’s a fact that we have seen 2 or 3 similar storms of the magnitude of this one in the last 10 years in the UK and so this line was inaccurate and it would have been better for our script to have described it as “one of the worst storms in decades.”
They also claimed that it was a mistake and not part of a policy of an “alleged bias in favour of climate change” as I’d suggested in my complaint.
I’m not sure that “one of the worst storms in decades” is any better!
I thought I’d done well to get even that out of the BBC. Never admit anything seems to be an unwritten motto.
Geoffery is not alone. In general, science and environmental reporting in MSM is poor, to say the least. Also, many so-called extreme weather events around the world are not really anything out of the ordinary. See my blog for an example (based on peer reviewed literature)
The worst since the St. Jude’s Day storm is also technically correct, as it means not as strong as that one.
He is saying it was “even more devastating the St Jude storm”
True. He was wrong, though, I gather.