Skip to content

50 Years Of Climatology At The South Pole

May 28, 2014
tags:

By Paul Homewood

 

 

 

 

Back in 2012, a paper was published, analysing 54 years of climate data from the Amundsen-Scott Research Station at the South Pole.

 

Fifty-year Amundsen–Scott South Pole station surface climatology

 

Lazzara et al

 

ABSTRACT

Fifty-four years of Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station meteorological data have been analyzed to develop a comprehensive climatology from the station’s meteorological observations. In reaching the goal of a full climatological analysis, a meteorological station history was required and a full quality control review of the data was conducted. Analysis of the general fifty-year climate is presented for temperature, pressure, wind speed and wind direction along with averages (means), extremes and records, daily ranges, trends and discontinuities. Additional investigations include how often the temperature reaches − 100 °F and changes in the flying season as seen via acceptable temperatures. The analysis found slight decreases in the temperature and pressure over the 1957–2010 time period that are not statistically significant. The wind speed, however, does show a significant downward trend of 0.28 m s− 1 decade− 1 over the same period. The seasonal time series of temperature and pressure illustrate how longer term oscillations are superimposed on shorter-term fluctuations. The seasonal mean wind speed over the 54 year period shows a consistent pattern of decreasing speed for all seasons. In contrast to the mean wind speeds, the maximum wind speeds are increasing for the summer and transition seasons, and the increases are statistically significant. Finally, for the period 1983–2010, the average annual snow accumulation is decreasing at a statistically significant downward rate of − 2.9 mm year.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169809512002256

 

 Two interesting points emerge.

 

1) The decrease, albeit slight, decrease in temperature.

The authors have paid particular attention to potential discrepancies in the original data, especially the averaging of maximum and minimum temperatures to get the mean. While this is an accepted procedure for lower latitudes, it is felt inappropriate for polar regions, where the diurnal cycles are generally absent.

Consequently, they have calculated means from with the full number of daily observations.

This is the result they ended up with.

 

1-s2.0-S0169809512002256-gr6

 Annual mean temperatures for 1957–2010 (blue), 10 year running mean (black), and least squares linear regression line

 

 

2) The decreasing trend for snowfall.

Although the period, 1983-2010, is quite a short one, and this is just one location, decreasing snowfall could have an impact on the balance of ice mass across Antarctica.

 

1-s2.0-S0169809512002256-gr18 

 Annual snow accumulation (1983–2010) from South Pole snow stake field (blue) and least squares linear regression line

7 Comments
  1. May 28, 2014 2:28 pm

    Thanks, Paul. The Amundsen–Scott South Pole station seems to have been doing good work under very difficult circumstances.
    Antarctica is seems like a separate planet, even the birds are different. 😉

  2. May 28, 2014 2:58 pm

    Did they report the snow water equivalent?

  3. ronhave permalink
    May 28, 2014 3:37 pm

    Any atmospheric data such as CO2 ppm?

  4. May 28, 2014 5:01 pm

    It seldom snows at the South Pole. Due to the altitude and cold most of the precipitation falls as ice crystals (diamond dust). Snow blows there from other places, but like all polar regions it is difficult to measure amounts. Anything left on the surface gets buried. There was a C-130 crashed in 1974 and by the early 1990 it was completely buried.

    One source gives average annual snow accumulation 9 inches (23 cm), average annual liquid equivalent 3.4 inches (8.6 cm)

    http://antarcticsun.usap.gov/features/contenthandler.cfm?id=2563

    Because of the low bases of the clouds it is a great place to see halos, sundogs or parhelias.
    .
    http://optics.kulgun.net/Halos/

  5. Brian H permalink
    June 13, 2014 11:40 pm

    “1) The decrease, albeit slight, decrease in temperature.” How many decreases is that?

Comments are closed.