Skip to content

42 Days & Counting

March 11, 2015

By Paul Homewood

 

On the 28th Jan, I emailed NCDC to ask for an explanation of the GHCN temperature adjustments I had discovered in Paraguay. On the same day, I received this acknowledgement:

 

image

 

 

A couple of weeks later, I chased and also asked them to look at the Arctic and New Zealand adjustments, and again received acknowledgement:

 

 

image

 

I have heard nothing more since.

It is clear that they cannot justify their adjustments.

14 Comments
  1. March 11, 2015 1:30 pm

    Hmm…they cannot adjustify. –AGF

  2. March 11, 2015 1:56 pm

    Thanks, Paul, to the willingness of you and a few others to challenge dogma, the AGW bandwagon momentum was too weak to ignore reports of altered temperature data.

    Data were altered to hide the solar force that produced, in solar cycle #24, the lowest number of sunspots recorded since 1750.

    (Sunspots appear when powerful, deep-seated magnetic fields from the Sun’s compact core emerge through the photosphere, as explained in this 2002 paper on “Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate”, Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)]):

    http://www.springerlink.com/content/r2352635vv166363/

    The AGW fiasco thus confirmed the secret decision in 1945 to save the world from nuclear annihilation by forbidding public knowledge of the energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of:

    1. Heavy atoms like Uranium
    2. Some planets like Jupiter
    3. Ordinary stars like the Sun
    4. Galaxies like the Milky Way
    5. The expanding Universe

    The lingering question is just this: Can dogmatic skeptics and believers now work together to restore contact with reality and avoid the selfishness that threatens the survival and advancement of society?

  3. March 11, 2015 1:56 pm

    I expect they will delay a reply and hope you will eventually forget and go away.

  4. March 11, 2015 2:08 pm

    Thanks for your tireless efforts Paul.

    Such massive adjustments call for an explanation – and it is legitimate to image that the explanation would point to something simple, convincing, and obvious.

    Lack of a ready explanation, along with what appears to be government agency stone-walling speaks volumes.

  5. March 11, 2015 3:14 pm

    That is pretty shocking, they should have off-the-shelf verifications for all adjustments, how could a reputable organisation publish results without such justifications, at least to convince themselves that no errors had been made?

  6. 1saveenergy permalink
    March 11, 2015 3:29 pm

    Well done Paul,

    teeth clamped on, jaw locked, & hang on like a pitbull….& snarl !!

  7. A C Osborn permalink
    March 11, 2015 4:36 pm

    I think that they thought Zeke & Mosher had it covered.
    Big Fail.

  8. Chris C permalink
    March 11, 2015 5:36 pm

    jay.lawrimore@noaa.gov

  9. March 11, 2015 5:50 pm

    Hi Are you implying that GHCN have adjusted the already adjusted (by our National Institute of Water and Atmosphere- NIWA) the NZ temperature record?

  10. Pragmatist permalink
    March 11, 2015 6:46 pm

    Might want to CC William’s and Jay’s bosses in your next follow up…

  11. meto permalink
    March 11, 2015 8:25 pm

    Paul…thank you, indeed, as noted by others for your efforts.
    Obviously, the data are to be transparent to us all…as the data are paid for with U.S. Taxpayer monies. Sadly, the Executive Branch of the current administration is unresponsive by design. This is where the minnions, e.g. the KHayhoe types who spread the AGW propaganda, come into play; reminiscent of the Facist youth movements and Soviet style propaganda tactics. This is direct from the highest levels. The minnions are interlinked with every so-called Green youth movement that is buoyed by “liberalists” (my word for old, rich liberals who want to control the entire society, yet live off the oil/gas stocks of their parents/grandparents who built this country). They are out in force and actively swarmed the audience after the KH “talk” in September 2014, as previously noted.

  12. March 12, 2015 12:32 am

    Lying by omission .. again ?
    – Circling the wagons instead of honest debate. Those seem to be the characteristics of CAGW religion.
    I’d have every respect had any CAGW preacher chose to come out and say “that actual 97% statistic is rubbish”.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: