Skip to content

Global Sea Ice Trends

March 23, 2015
tags: ,

By Paul Homewood  

 

According to the February 2015 sea ice report from the NSIDC:

 

image

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2015/03/possibly-low-in-the-north-definitely-high-in-the-south/

 

I wonder why our Claire has not got around to updating it for 2014?

 

global.daily.ice.area.withtrend

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/

from → Climate Change
6 Comments
  1. Jeffery permalink
    March 23, 2015 11:59 pm

    Waiting for my informed friends who look at this blog to confront the latest claims about satellite data and the warmest Dec.-Feb in the satellite record. Not looking to complain or debunk, but would appreciate some direction on the veracity of the reports and what, if anything, they do for the current debate.

  2. Scott Scarborough permalink
    March 24, 2015 12:19 am

    The plot you show from Cryosphere today does not show any net trend for 2013 either… so where does this B.S. about negative trend report from 2013 come from?

  3. climanrecon permalink
    March 24, 2015 7:32 am

    It looks to me like the heartbeat record of a normal healthy person, but one that NASA and others are saying is seriously ill and needs to be cured. Follow the money.

  4. Richard111 permalink
    March 24, 2015 8:06 am

    I have read comments on other blogs about Arctic ice coverage being some 2 million square kilometres down this year. The implication being this is a direct result of ‘climate change’.
    Seawater freezes at -1.9C (271.25K) and ice surface temperature is about -25C (248.15K). Work out the radiated energy of those two temperatures over 2 million square kilometres and marvel at how much heat was radiated away from the north polar region.
    What will be the future impact of this huge energy loss?

  5. meto permalink
    March 24, 2015 10:00 pm

    I think the iPhone only animation is a SOS image of only 2015 data. Without the iPhone, I cannot be certain. But, the warmists are all using the image blithely.

    I want to mention we only have data on 2 AO; a point not readily mentioned by warmists.

Comments are closed.