Study Finds Extreme Winters Not Due To Global Warming – They Should Have Asked HH Lamb!
By Paul Homewood

http://phys.org/news/2015-03-climate-extreme-winters.html
A new study has found that cold snaps like the ones that hit the eastern United States in the past winters are not a consequence of climate change. Scientists at ETH Zurich and the California Institute of Technology have shown that global warming actually tends to reduce temperature variability
WUWT has the full detail, but their logic is that, because the poles are expected to warm faster under GHG theory, temperature differentials between high and low latitudes will decrease, and therefore extremes in temperature will become less.
What particularly struck me though was the lead author’s comments about jet stream meridionality, which is claimed to result from Arctic warming, and leads to weather blocking and the cold snaps we have seen in recent winters.
Just a quick reminder of the difference between zonal and meridional jet stream patterns.
http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/159/
Tapio Schneider, professor of climate dynamics at ETH Zurich, who led the study has this to say:
The waviness of the jet stream that makes our day-to-day weather does not change much." Changes in the north-south difference in temperatures play a greater role in modifying temperature variability.
None of this would come as any surprise to HH Lamb, who had this to say in his book, “Climate, History and The Modern World”, about what was know as the Little Cooling period between 1940 and 1980. (Lamb’s book was published in 1982).
ANOTHER TURNING POINT
Over the years since the 1940’s, it has become apparent that many of the tendencies in world climate which marked the previous 50 to 80 years or more have either ceased or changed…. It was only after the Second World War that the benign trend of the climate towards general warming over those previous decades really came in for much scientific discussion and began to attract public notice.
VARIABILITY INCREASES
Such worldwide surveys as have been attempted seem to confirm the increase of variability of temperature and rainfall [since 1950].’’
In Europe, there is a curious change in the pattern of variability: from some time between 1940 and 1960 onwards, the occurrence of extreme seasons – both as regards temperature and rainfall has notably increased.
These variations, perhaps more than any underlying trend to a warmer or colder climate, create difficulties for the planning age in which we live. They may be associated with the increased meridionality of the general wind circulation, the greater frequency of blocking, of stationary high and low pressure systems, giving prolonged northerly winds in one longitude and southerly winds in another longitude sector in middle latitudes.
Over both hemispheres there has been more blocking in these years… The most remarkable feature seems to be the an intensification of the cyclonic activity in high latitudes near 70-90N, all around the northern polar region. And this presumably has to do with the almost equally remarkable cooling of the Arctic since the 1950’s, which has meant an increase in the thermal gradient between high and middle latitudes.
Lamb, of course, did not need computer models to come to this conclusion. Instead, he used detailed knowledge, developed by himself and others over many years, about how climate works, and actual observations.
It is a sign of just how far backwards climate science has gone when his work is ignored.
Comments are closed.
Reblogged this on the WeatherAction News Blog.
the idea that the polar regions are warming, never mind warming faster, is completely wrong. For example, as a test, I looked at Alaska, which lies in the arctic region.

I took a sample of 10 weather stations and here I measured -0.055K/annum since 1998, on average. That is almost -1K down since 1998.
Antarctic ice is increasing, so I am asking:
where do they find extra polar warming?
Alaska temps turned down when the PDO switched, just as they went up in 1976.
You’d need to take a wider sample across the Arctic.
To understand what is going on and to understand what is coming up you only need to look at a global sample of weather stations, around 50 stations are enough, balanced by latitude and balanced 70/30 @sea/inland and plot the [average] speed of warming/cooling found against time.

It is so simple, a first year stats student class should be able to duplicate my results in no time at all…..
Here is my summary of minimum temp. results,
The key factors for weather/climate are the ocean cyclical oscillations, not CO2.
CO2 is the key factor in this new leftist power grab.
but then I will ask you what is governing the ocean’s intake of energy?
I propose that it has something to do with this graph:

you get what it is?
Ya, its the pattern of solar field switches of polarity.
typo: it’s the pattern ….
Seems to me you do not get the clue. Can you see that you can draw in your head a binomial (hyperbolic) from the top to the bottom and a binomial (parabolic) from the bottom to the top, both coming to the bottom/top around 2016?
the other thing that you must understand is where (what radiation) the oceans get most of their energy from?
I have a video of the winter of 1942 in Holland., where they said that never before temps. dropped as far below zero, < -20
but I have no idea how to load it- up here.
It shows you what is waiting for w-Europe, around 2030