Another Arctic Scare
By Paul Homewood
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-34324439
From the BBC:
Oceanographers have gathered fresh evidence that turbulence in the Arctic Ocean, driven by the wind, is stirring up heat from the depths.
As dwindling ice exposes more water to the wind, this turbulence could close a vicious circle, accelerating the melt.
The research team has measured heat rising from below that matches what is arriving from the autumn sun.
They spoke to the BBC by satellite phone as their month-long voyage headed back into port.
Although their findings are preliminary, the "ArcticMix" team has been taken aback by what they’ve seen in the raw data.
"The strength of heat coming up from below the surface has been as strong as the heat coming down from the Sun," said the mission’s chief scientist, Jennifer MacKinnon, of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California San Diego.
"Admittedly, the days are getting short here, and so the sunlight is not incredibly strong at this latitude. But still, that very rarely happens; that’s kind of blown us all away."
The source of that deep heat is a layer of warm water that is saltier – and therefore denser – than water at the surface.
"There’s a reservoir of heat in the Arctic Ocean, well beneath the surface, that historically – when there’s been a lot of ice – has been fairly quiescent," Dr MacKinnon explained. "It’s just been sitting as a warm, salty puddle beneath the surface."
Now that shrinking sea ice is exposing more water to the air, scientists are worried that this warm, salty puddle might get stirred upwards.
My first reaction is that they have a new toy, and think they are therefore seeing things that have never happened before.
But what this report really highlights is a total lack of appreciation of just how the Earth’s energy budget actually works, something we come across time and time again when people talk of “Arctic warming” .
NASA explain:

The amount of sunlight the Earth absorbs depends on the reflectivness of the atmosphere and the ground surface. This satellite map shows the amount of solar radiation (watts per square meter) reflected during September 2008. Along the equator, clouds reflected a large proportion of sunlight, while the pale sands of the Sahara caused the high reflectivness in North Africa. Neither pole is receiving much incoming sunlight at this time of year, so they reflect little energy even though both are ice-covered.
The differences in reflectivness (albedo) and solar illumination at different latitudes lead to net heating imbalances throughout the Earth system. At any place on Earth, the net heating is the difference between the amount of incoming sunlight and the amount heat radiated by the Earth back to space . In the tropics there is a net energy surplus because the amount of sunlight absorbed is larger than the amount of heat radiated. In the polar regions, however, there is an annual energy deficit because the amount of heat radiated to space is larger than the amount of absorbed sunlight.

This map of net radiation (incoming sunlight minus reflected light and outgoing heat) shows global energy imbalances in September 2008, the month of an equinox. Areas around the equator absorbed about 200 watts per square meter more on average (orange and red) than they reflected or radiated. Areas near the poles reflected and/or radiated about 200 more watts per square meter (green and blue) than they absorbed. Mid-latitudes were roughly in balance.
The net heating imbalance between the equator and poles drives an atmospheric and oceanic circulation that climate scientists describe as a “heat engine.” (In our everyday experience, we associate the word engine with automobiles, but to a scientist, an engine is any device or system that converts energy into motion.) The climate is an engine that uses heat energy to keep the atmosphere and ocean moving. Evaporation, convection, rainfall, winds, and ocean currents are all part of the Earth’s heat engine.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/EnergyBalance/
Put simply, the process discovered by the oceanographers is actually the Earth’s heat engine working just as it designed to, transferring heat to the high latitudes, where it will radiate into space.
Forget about talk of a rapidly warming Arctic; the warmer the atmosphere there, the faster heat will radiate into space. In other words, it is cooling the Earth down.
Ocean cycles and processes dominate the Earth’s climatic system, and there are times such as now when excess heat is transported to the Arctic to escape. At other times, the process slows down, allowing sea ice to increase and insulate the ocean.
In this way, the Earth maintains its equilibrium.
Comments are closed.
I believe that the warming and cooling in the Arctic is a cyclical process. There are many accounts of warming in the Arctic in the early part of the twentieth century.
Thanks, Paul. It’s good to look at data.
And yes, “Ocean cycles and processes dominate the Earth’s climatic system”, as you write.
I think man-made climate change and its ‘tipping points’ is trying to negate that “the Earth maintains its equilibrium”; By increasing the atmospheric content of CO2 we are supposed to have broken the back of our camel, even though we could still save the planet by going green. It does not matter what would happen to CO2-based life forms, for the alarmist the thing is to save Gaia. Such a fragile god! Such a horrible cult!
Those Ice Breakers do not help the Ice either.
Paul, Off topic but very interesting. See this letter of Resignation.
http://yournewswire.com/top-scientist-resigns-admitting-global-warming-is-a-big-scam/
Looks to me they’re trying to invent another reason to warn of a “death spiral” seeings how their predictions for the last one worked out so well.
Why is it always about the Arctic, never the Antarctic? Or if they ever do go there they get stuck in the ice 😉
ACO: that letter was written 5 years ago.
Yes I missed that it was a re-cycled story.
Because they claim that ever changing sea ice at the Arctic will be a primary canary in the coal mine to prove global warming? Never mind the fact that required “hot spot” in the lower troposphere in the tropics never has showed up.
But since the Arctic isn’t cooperating right now and the ice didn’t melt away the way they expected it to it seems they decided to concentrate their attention on glaciers. And then came this flooding from North Carolina down to Florida and so now THAT is where AGW is right now as expressed in supposed acceleration in sea level change you know. If you haven’t noticed AGW is a very mobile thing and moves all over the world at different times to where ever there is weather or wild fires, or ice melting, or flooding or many other things at any given time. If tomorrow a chunk of the western Ice shelf let loose at the Antarctic then that is where AGW would be. If in several days hurricane Joaquin does actually get to the Irish coast as a tropical system then that will be were AGW is for that time.
AGW is omnipotent. It even causes wars, refugees, and the tongues of bees to shorten don’t you know!
Reblogged this on Climate Collections.
ummm.. if the warmth is being released, that means it is cooling !!
Here’s how to whip up a scare.
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2015/10/04/ice-house-of-mirrors/
It seems this report got it wrong when they said there was no mechanism for the heat to rise to the surface. Some extracts from
http://www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=83436&tid=3622&cid=44586&c=2
So perhaps not AGW but MNGW Mother Nature Global warming?
“A research team led by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) has uncovered evidence of explosive volcanic eruptions deep beneath the ice-covered surface of the Arctic Ocean.
Do explosive volcanic eruptions on the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean contribute to the melting of the Arctic ice cap? No, not at all. The Arctic Ocean is a huge reservoir of water that can readily absorb and disperse the heat and volatile gases from the volcanic eruptions at the seafloor.
The water in the Arctic Ocean is stratified—layered like a cake—with lighter layers lying atop denser layers of water, like oil atop water. (Colder and/or saltier seawater is denser than warmer and/or less salty seawater.) Waters in the Arctic depths remain trapped near the bottom. They do not mix much with surface waters. Almost no heat is transmitted all the way up to the underside of the ice.”
Not following your thought. The quote says the heat doesn’t rise to the surface.
Hi Ron
This bit says the heat is rising to the surface
“Oceanographers have gathered fresh evidence that turbulence in the Arctic Ocean, driven by the wind, is stirring up heat from the depths. ”
This bit says there is no mechanism-
“Almost no heat is transmitted all the way up to the underside of the ice.”
Thanks for clarifying. I agree that wind effects are superficial, and currents are the actors in the depths.
Paul: latest Halloween treat from the “New York Times”: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/27/world/greenland-is-melting-away.html?emc=edit_tnt_20151028&nlid=4912725&tntemail0=y&_r=0