Skip to content

Inside Barents Ice Crystal Ball

November 16, 2015

By Paul Homewood     

 

image

https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2015/11/15/inside-barents-ice-crystal-ball/

 

More from Ron Clutz on how changing North Atlantic currents affect Arctic ice extent:

 

 

On a previous post (here), I linked to a recent study positing that variations in Barents Sea ice extent are predictive of Arctic extent for at least 1-2 years later. In other words, they concluded based upon measurements of ice extent and ocean heat transfers: As winter ice extent goes in Barents Sea, so goes annual ice extent across the Arctic ocean. The physical cause is changing fluxes of warm North Atlantic water penetrating through the Barents Sea into the rest of the Arctic. They acknowledge that other factors, especially winds are also in play, but believe that the ocean influx (also affected by winds) makes the largest influence. The full study is here.

Arctic Ice Dynamics

Here’s how researchers are connecting the dots:
NAO (North Atlantic Oscillation)► BSO(Heat transport by Atlantic Water (AW) through Barents Sea Opening)► Winter ice extent in Barents Sea► Winter ice extent in Arctic Ocean► Annual ice extents in Barents and Arctic Ocean.

A key scientist in this work is Randi Ingvaldsen of Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Institute of Marine Research. Several of her published articles are part of her doctoral thesis available here.  It comprises an informative look into the extensive body of research in this area.

The Barents Sea climate fluctuates between warm and cold periods. By comparing decade by decade we found that although the 1990s had high temperatures, both the 1930s and the 1950s were warmer. This indicates that the warming of the 1990s may very well be related to natural variability rather than anthropogenic effects.

The above results indicate a positive correlation between the NAO winter index and the area occupied by AW, a result clearly evident when investigating the total area across the BSO occupied by AW (Figure 6d). Earlier investigations have shown a positive correlation between the NAO winter index and the mean AW temperature in the BSO (also evident in
Figure 6e). This means that both the temperature and the extent of AW increase with increasing NAO winter index (Figure 6 a and d-e), although with different lags.

In summary, this preliminary investigation has shown that both the mean temperature and lateral extent of AW in the BSO is positively correlated to the strength of the Icelandic low, although with lags.

 

 

Read the full story here.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. NeilC permalink
    November 16, 2015 3:12 pm

    An interesting bit of proper science. Observe, hypothesise, model, predict, learn, change if it doesn’t fit. Shame CAGW advocates don’t do the last two parts.

  2. November 18, 2015 4:23 am

    Alan Longhurst has discussed the subject of Arctic climate at length in his FREE book: Doubt and Certainty in Climate Science reviewed by Judith Curry.

    http://judithcurry.com/2015/09/20/new-book-doubt-and-certainty-in-climate-science/

    Worth reading twice for anyone interested in knowing what causes cyclical warming and cooling in the Arctic: oceanic oscillations.

    About the author:

    http://store.elsevier.com/Alan-R.-Longhurst/ELS_1000530/

    http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alan_Longhurst2

    Ecological Geography of the Sea

    https://books.google.com.my/books?id=QdJZezzrCfQC&redir_esc=y

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: