Climate change ‘to make transatlantic flights longer’ – Or Not!!

By Paul Homewood 

  

h/t Dave Ward

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35533761

 

Matt McGrath falls for the latest piece of junk science!

 

Flights from the UK to the US could take longer due to the changes in the climate, according to a new study.

Global warming is likely to speed up the jet stream, say researchers, and slow down aeroplanes heading for the US.

While eastbound flights from the US will be quicker, roundtrip journeys will "significantly lengthen".

The University of Reading scientists believe the changes will increase carbon emissions and fuel consumption and potentially raise ticket prices.

The study has been published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

 

Speedy streams

High altitude jet streams in the northern and southern hemisphere are the powerful winds that help move weather systems around the globe.

Air traffic normally tries to take advantage of these speedy flows of the Atlantic jet stream from west to east to reduce journey times on routes between Europe and North America.

This is one of the world’s busiest routes with around 600 flights every day.

Previous studies have shown that climate change is likely to increase turbulence on these transatlantic flights. In this new study researchers modelled how atmospheric winds would change given a doubling of atmospheric CO2.

They fed the results into the same route algorithms that airlines routinely use to plan their transatlantic journeys.

They found that the winds on the New York to London route will become 15% faster on average.

Flights from London will become twice as likely to take over seven hours while flights from New York will speed up and will become twice as likely to take under five hours and 20 minutes.

While on average, flights will only gain and lose a few minutes each way, the cumulative impact is "significant" says the study.

"If you look at the round trips, the eastbound flights are getting shorter by less than the westbound flights are getting longer," lead author Dr Paul Williams from the University of Reading told BBC News.

"So there is a robust increase in the round-trip journey time, which means planes spending longer in the air, when you add that up for all transatlantic aircraft you get an extra 2,000 hours of planes in the air every year, with $22 million extra in fuel costs and 70 million kg of CO2."

The researchers say the extra CO2 is the equivalent of the annual emissions of 7,000 British homes.

 

Blowing hot and cold

While at present there is no firm observational evidence of changes in the jet stream, scientists point to the fact that the record time for a non-Concorde flight from New York to London is currently 5 hours and 16 minutes, set in January last year.

"We know what drives the jet stream, it’s the temperature difference between the warm tropical regions and the cold polar regions at flight levels," said Dr Williams.

"We understand what that temperature difference is going to do in response to global warming, it’s increasing, we are very confident that the jet stream is increasing as a consequence."

The researchers believe that as well as worsening the environmental impacts of aviation, airlines are likely to increase ticket prices to cover their costs.

And while the study only applied to the London-New York route, the impacts on flights of changes in the jet streams are likely to be felt all over the world as these critical winds are found in both the northern and southern hemispheres.

Other scientists in this field welcomed the study.

"This study builds on the concept that my team published last year showing that there is a two-way relationship between climate change and air travel," said Dr Kristopher Karnauskas, from the University of Colorado, Boulder.

"I think these results are an important step forward in filling in the overall puzzle that is this intricate relationship that we humans have with the climate system."

Dr Gregor Leckebusch from the University of Birmingham said the study was sound and the findings were easy to comprehend.

"My meteorological basic instinct would exactly have predicted such a result (shorter eastbound times while longer westbound times), but it is difficult to quantify the net effect without a detailed study using a conceptual model and detailed computational efforts," he said.

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35533761

 

Only one slight problem! 

It is no great secret that global warming theory expects Arctic temperatures to increase much more quickly than the mid latitudes. Even HH Lamb knew this forty years ago, when he realised this was why the LIA was much stormier.

But don’t take my word for it, we can check out what the satellites tell us has been happening. 

 

First, the Mid Troposphere, which runs from about 2 miles to 6 miles up, just the region where the jet stream runs and the aircraft fly. This is from RSS: 

 

 

http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.html

 

And we see just what we expected, that the Northern Polar region has warmed up much more.

 

And, just for good measure, the Lower Troposphere, up to 2 miles:

 

http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.html

 

Exactly the same.

 

This is just another example of the sort of junk science served up these days, only made possible by obscene grants and a corrupt system of peer review. And, of course, the refusal of the likes of Matt McGrath to call it out for what it is.

 

 

 

FOOTNOTE

We might recall what another junk scientist, Jennifer Francis, was telling us a couple of years ago:

 

Francis said a growing number of studies, including her own, suggest that the melting Arctic is having knock-on effects on the jet stream, the river of air that snakes around the northern hemisphere at an altitude of around 5 to 6 kilometres, and which has a profound impact on the world’s weather.

The jet stream is driven by the flow of air between the cold Arctic pole and warmer air that moves upwards from nearer the equator. As the warmer air advances polewards, it is swung eastwards by the Coriolis force which comes from Earth’s spin, creating a snake-like stream. “It’s a fast-moving river of air, a very messy creature,” says Francis.

The strength of the jet stream depends on the temperature gradient between the regions of cold and warm air – the wider the difference, the faster and stronger the jet stream.

The Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the planet, an effect enhanced when the sea ice that normally cools the Arctic air melts away. Because of this, the air currents that come from that region are getting disproportionately warmer too, narrowing the temperature difference between the Arctic and southerly winds, and thereby weakening the jet stream itself. “The winds have weakened by 10 per cent over the past three decades in the west-to-east wind of the jet stream,” says Francis.

Francis thinks that, as the cool air of the Arctic becomes warmer, the jet stream is slowing down, almost to the point of stopping trapping weather systems in one place for prolonged periods. Instead of swirling round the world, winds reverberate back and forth in the same place, creating what she calls “extreme waves”.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26278-crazy-weather-traced-to-arctics-impact-on-jet-stream#.VCgmrxawSpO