Skip to content

Green Deal energy loans had ‘abysmal’ take-up: MPs

July 21, 2016

By Paul Homewood

 

 

h/t Joe Public/Philip Bratby

  

image

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36833235

 

From the BBC:

 

 

The government’s energy efficiency loan scheme had an "abysmal" take-up rate because it had not been tested with consumers, MPs have said.

The "Green Deal" ended last year after providing just £50m in 14,000 loans to households to boost energy efficiency.

That was far less than the £1.1bn predicted by the government, with each loan costing taxpayers £17,000.

In a highly critical report, the Public Accounts Committee said projections for the scheme were "wildly optimistic".

The MPs said the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s figures gave a completely misleading picture of the scheme’s prospects to Parliament.

The committee urged the government to learn from the mistakes made with the scheme, which provided loans to meet costs of installing efficiency measures that householders repaid from savings on their energy bills.

When the scheme was introduced in 2013, it had not been adequately tested with consumers, the report said.

"Householders were not persuaded that energy efficiency measures were worth paying for through the Green Deal and take-up of loans was abysmal," MPs said.

It was too complex, with excessive paperwork, while people were also put off by interest rates of up to 10% on the loans – far more expensive than other lending, the report said.

Marketing also focused on the financial benefits of installing energy-efficiency measures, rather than emphasising the comfort of having a well-insulated, energy-efficient home, which may have interested more people, according to the report.

 

‘Truly dismal’

Committee chairwoman Meg Hillier said: "Not enough work went into establishing the scheme’s appeal to households, nor to its implementation, nor to examining the experience of governments setting up similar schemes overseas.

"This blinkered approach resulted in a truly dismal take-up for green deal loans and a cost to taxpayers of £17,000 for every loan arranged."

The Department for Energy spent £240m on the scheme, including £25m in loans to the Green Deal.

The committee also criticised another scheme, the Energy Company Obligation (ECO), which required big energy firms to make homes more efficient.

MPs found the government was unable to determine whether the scheme helped to reduce fuel poverty.

The UK’s 27 million homes account for more than a quarter of the total energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. The housing stock is among the least energy efficient in Europe, which meant higher energy bills, harm to the environment and poorer health for those living in colder homes.

A spokesperson for the new Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said: "This government took action last year by stopping public funding to the Green Deal Finance Company and setting up an independent review of the energy efficiency sector.

"The lessons that we have learnt will help us to develop simpler, better value for money policies, targeting people who need support most."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36833235

 

Call me unsurprised!

 

Far from householders were not persuaded that energy efficiency measures were worth paying for through the Green Deal, they were only too aware of the inherent flaws in the scheme, and voted with their feet.

I suspect the Green Deal was Ed Davey’s baby, but where was the National Audit Office when DECC were busy spending £240 million on it, including apparently £215 million of admin costs?

Hopefully, now DECC has been wound up, we might see an end to this nonsense.

7 Comments leave one →
  1. July 21, 2016 12:19 pm

    A wonderful result for the tax payer.

  2. July 21, 2016 12:31 pm

    “The government’s energy efficiency loan scheme had an “abysmal” take-up rate because it had not been tested with consumers,”

    I hope the UNDP knows about this because they have launched a global initiative along the same lines called SDG. It is a green development plan that is expected to generate economic growth in poor countries.
    It too is untested.

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2812034

  3. roger permalink
    July 21, 2016 2:07 pm

    No doubt a large part of the £215M admin costs were the incessant nuisance calls that I had all starting with the preamble ” government records show”.

  4. Swisspeasant permalink
    July 21, 2016 3:09 pm

    Makes a change rom the DECC (RIP)being wildly pessimistic about warming.

  5. CheshireRed permalink
    July 22, 2016 11:28 am

    Well done Sir Edward, a tremendous contribution…

  6. Derek Buxton permalink
    July 22, 2016 11:46 am

    I recall sending a message to my then MP, Andrew Stunnell about the high cost of energy. His reply was that later that year the “green deal” would save me more than it would cost me. After I replied that he was talking nonsense he shut up. Thankfully he and most of the limp dims lost their seats but I am sure their pensions are a bloody side higher than mine.

  7. catweazle666 permalink
    July 24, 2016 12:26 am

    with each loan costing taxpayers £17,000…

    …while people were also put off by interest rates of up to 10% on the loans.

    Er, why did extra-high interest loans cost the taxpayer £17,000 apiece?

    That seems like the sort of “deal” that only a bunch of politicians and ‘civil servants’ could dream up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: