
The Chinese coal industry and stock market debutant Saudi Aramco have been named as the world’s biggest emitters of carbon dioxide.
As new data claims to have identified the top 100 emitters of greenhouse gases over the last three decades, a leading NGO has warned that natural resources companies need to transform their business models to adapt to a low-carbon future.
Just 100 firms are responsible for 71pc of carbon dioxide gases released into the atmosphere since 1988, the year that climate change was first recognised as an international problem, according a report by the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP).
Despite growing awareness of the role of fossil fuels in global warming, the CDP points out that the industry has “expanded prodigiously” since 1988, with coal use becoming even more prevalent. Approximately 833 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent were emitted between 1988 and 2015, compared to 820 gigatonnes between 1988 and the start of the industrial revolution in the 18th century.
The Chinese coal industry is by far and away the biggest culprit in CDP’s list, responsible for 14pc of emissions, followed by oil giant Saudi Aramco, on 4.5pc, and Russian company Gazprom, on 3.9pc. London-listed giants Shell and BP chart ninth and eleventh, with responsibility for 1.7pc and 1.5pc of emissions respectively.
The CDP is part-funded by private benefactors, governments and companies and counts former Financial Services Authority boss Lord Adair Turner as an advisor. To calculate its list, it used mostly publicly available data, and attributed all the fossil fuels burned in industry back to the producers that originally took them out of the ground.
“Our purpose is not to name and shame firms, our purpose is to provide transparency and call attention to the quite extraordinary fact that just 100 companies played a crucial role in the problem,” said Pedro Faria, technical director of the Carbon Majors Database. “It’s obvious they have a share of responsibility in the solution.”
While corporate transparency and self-reporting around emissions had improved, Mr Faria said that oil giants and mining companies needed transition plans in place for the shift to a low-carbon economy.
“There will be a shock in demand for their products and they should be preparing for that,” Mr Faria said. He suggested that companies needed to think about diversifying their portfolios away from fossil fuels, adopt more renewable energy, and invest in carbon capture and storage facilities, which take harmful CO2 out of the air and trap it.
CDP’s warning comes as more and more countries consider carbon pricing systems that will charge companies for each unit of harmful gases they produce.
A spokesman for BP said that it was “determined to be part of the solution” to climate change.
“Specifically, we’re calling for a price on carbon, increasing the proportion of natural gas in our business, investing in renewables and low-carbon innovation, and pursuing increasing energy efficiency,” he said.
A spokesman for Shell said it backed the goal of a “net-zero emissions world by 2050”. “The greatest contribution we can make in the near term is providing more natural gas to replace coal in power generation, which reduces overall emissions in the global energy system,” he said.
Diamond giant De Beers, part of Anglo American – which charted 31st on CDP’s list – recently announced plans to be the world’s first carbon neutral miner within five to 10 years. It wants to use waste rock from mining to absorb carbon in the atmosphere through a process called mineral carbonation.
“Since the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change, there has been a huge jump in carbon pricing schemes,” said Dr Evelyn Mervine, a geologist at De Beers. “What’s clear is there will be carbon pricing by 2030s – it will be a cost of doing business.”
Those 100 companies are *merely* satisfying needs.
A new report by a source recently quoted by Greenpeace (so it must be reputable) finds “Climate Change Caused By 7 Billion Key Individuals”
http://www.theonion.com/amp/34658
Aramco produces oil, not CO2. I convert that oil to CO2 when I drive my car.
Sheesh, this is even worse than Booker being relegated to the back page of the recipes section of the Sunday Telegraph. Sadly the MSM is now driven by clicks and keeping up with the pack, so this activist drivel will get copied and pasted, along with free marketing for Tesla and the Wind Power Subsidy Farming industry.
According to the article “The CDP is part-funded by private benefactors, governments and companies and counts former Financial Services Authority boss Lord Adair Turner as an advisor.” Apart from Paul Simpson, the CEO, I cannot find who the people are running the CDP. It seems like one of those shadowy not-for-profit international oganisations with tentacles around the world. But with Turner advising it, it has to be a bit suspect.
A couple of sh((ehawks:
http://worldclimatesummit.org/paul-simpson-ceo-co-founder-cdp/
https://shareaction.org/our-team/paul-dickinson/
Bath uni and some rot or other and BS green agenda begets BS reports and keeps the profile high and commission rolling in, and hey day, go day, it’s bloody pay day! and it’s not like working for a living………….. is it?
From Wiki:
Nuff said.
Any organisation with “Red” Adair Turner in it is *highly* suspect. That man has form.
have a 1000 upticks.
Phillip
Agree about the egregious Turner.
Although as, (in his ‘day job’ at the FSA), he was famously ‘The Watchdog that Never Barked”, perhaps he’ll unfortunately forget to advise the crooks no doubt behind this Greenie Cabal about his findings, even ignoring whistleblowers’ revelations.
A faint hope.
A friend of Banksters. An enemy of ordinary folk.
He was also first chairman of the “independent” Committee on Climate Change, appointed by Ed Millipede. That says all you need to know about this establishment trougher.
Adair is perfect, he neither knows which way is up nor, who he is supposed to be shilling for.
I have never been forced to use fossil fuel by any evil company, unless me and my family needed the benefits.
I would have liked if they gave me that for free use, but i have allways had to pay for it.
I appreciate they make it available, and in the end it is my own decison to use it.
If no one would use it, no one would dig it up.
Those that oppose fossil fuel most, would be outraged if the gas station was empty or the light went out and the stores empty.
It must have been real haleluja when most of New York went dark after Sandy.
I could have, and would have, chopped down every tree in sight if it kept my family warm.
How devastating would that have been across the planet had fossil fuels not been discovered?
“And invest in carbon capture and storage facilities”
Considering there hasn’t been a single one of these projects (to date) which actually works as planned and costed, I can’t see many companies pushing their investment portfolios in that direction…
Shell stopped when the taxpayer cash stopped.
It will be such a laugh when these companies are lauded in the future for their contribution to CO2 fertilisation of the atmosphere, leading to ‘unprecedented’ crop growth, global prosperity and the elimination of famine and disease.
I wonder what will happen to the 97% then? Does that mean they’re not invited to the party?
I’m compiling the invitations right now 🙂
Headline is “too wow to be true”
I feel from a first glance.
If only half of this is true then we have a *much* more effective route open to work on constructive change, as with a significant reduction of emissions. Let’s ask these companies directly, instead of (or in addition to) our representatives, to cut emissions and act with more responsibility.
Is the Telegraph trying to become a profit making version of the Guardian? (that assumes the Telegraph does make one).
This is obviously rubbish. Perhaps those companies’ customers could be blamed, if indeed there is anything to be blamed for, but the companies themselves simply did what their customers wanted.
rehashing the Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/nov/20/90-companies-man-made-global-warming-emissions-climate-change
a good graphic..why is Exxon the only ‘evil’ one – vs Chevron, BP, Statoil, etc,etc,etc
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/interactive/2013/nov/20/which-fossil-fuel-companies-responsible-climate-change-interactive
Hard ti believe that modern urban and industrial civilization relies on only 100 companies.
Since our survival depends on fossil fuels, we ought to be shocked that to find our health and welfare rely on such a narrow fioundation.