Skip to content

Borenstein Tries The Daily Records Con

March 23, 2019
tags:

By Paul Homewood

 

Another remarkably dishonest and deceitful piece, even by Seth Borenstein standards. That it should be aided and abetted by NOAA is shameful:

image

Over the past 20 years, Americans have been twice as likely to sweat through record-breaking heat rather than shiver through record-setting cold, a new Associated Press data analysis shows.

The AP looked at 424 weather stations throughout the Lower 48 states that had consistent temperature records since 1920 and counted how many times daily hot temperature records were tied or broken and how many daily cold records were set. In a stable climate, the numbers should be roughly equal.

Since 1999, the ratio has been two warm records set or broken for every cold one. In 16 of the last 20 years, there have been more daily high temperature records than low.

The AP shared the data analysis with several climate and data scientists, who all said the conclusion was correct, consistent with scientific peer-reviewed literature and showed a clear sign of human-caused climate change. They pointed out that trends over decades are more robust than over single years.

The analysis stopped with data through 2018. However, the first two months of 2019 are showing twice as many cold records than hot ones. That’s temporary and trends are over years and decades, not months, said National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration climate monitoring chief Deke Arndt.

We are in a period of sustained and significant warming and — over the long run — will continue to explore and break the warm end of the spectrum much more than the cold end,” Arndt said.

A new Associated Press data analysis shows that over the past 20 years, Americans have been twice as likely to sweat through record-breaking heat rather than shiver through record-setting cold. (March 19)

Former Weather Channel meteorologist Guy Walton, who has been studying hot and cold extreme records since 2000, said the trend is unmistakable.

You are getting more extremes,” Walton said. “Your chances for getting more dangerous extremes are going up with time.”

No place has seen the trend more clearly than the Southern California city of Pasadena, where 7,203 days (more than 19 years) went by between cold records being broken. On Feb. 23, Pasadena set a low temperature record, its first since June 5, 1999.

Vermont native Paul Wennberg felt it. He moved to Pasadena in 1998 just before the dearth of cold records.

“Even with the local cold we had this past month, it’s very noticeable,” said Wennberg, a California Institute of Technology atmospheric sciences professor. “It’s just been ever warmer.”

In between the two cold record days, Pasadena set 145 hot records. That includes an all-time high of 113 degrees last year.

“Last year was unbelievable here,” Wennberg said. “The tops of a lot of the hedges, they essentially melted.”

image

Scientists often talked about human-caused global warming in terms of average temperatures, but that’s not what costs money or sends people to the hospital. A study this month found that in just 22 states, about 36,000 people on average go to the hospital because of excessive summertime heat.

“The extremes affect our lives,” Arndt said, adding that they are expensive, with hospital stays, rising energy bills and crop losses.

National Center for Atmospheric Research climate scientist Gerald Meehl, who has published peer-reviewed papers on the rising hot-to-cold ratio, said people pay more attention to climate when records are broken.

The AP counted daily records across 424 stations starting in 1920 and ending in 2018. The AP only considered daily — not all-time — high maximum temperatures and low minimum temperatures and only used stations with minimal missing data. Temperatures that tied previous records were counted in addition to temperatures that broke previous records.

More typical than Pasadena is Wooster, Ohio. From 1999 on, Wooster saw 106 high temperature records set or broken and 51 cold ones. In the previous eight decades, the ratio was slightly colder than one to one.

At MW Robinson Co., people are lining up for air conditioning installation as the climate seems to get have been getting hotter over the years, said Lori Bowersock, who coordinates the firm’s HVAC installations.

“It’s more and more every year,” Bowersock said. “Usually we don’t have them lined up like this.”

Texas State Park police officer Thomas Bigham walks across the cracked lake bed of O.C. Fisher Lake, in San Angelo, Texas, on Aug. 3, 2011. (AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez, File)

The AP’s other findings:

— Since Jan. 1, 1999, just under half the stations had at least twice as many hot records set than cold ones, including Wooster.

— In all, 87 percent of the weather stations had more hot records than cold since 1999. There have been 42 weather stations that have at least five hot records for every cold one since 1999, with 11 where the hot-to-cold ratio is 10-to-1 or higher, including Pasadena.

— All nine of NOAA’s climate regions have seen more hot records set than cold ones since 1999, with the West, Southwest and Northeast having a 3-to-1 ratio.

— All four seasons have had more hot records broken than cold for the same time period.

— Most decades in the 20th century had close to an even ratio of hot to cold. The 1930s, driven by Dust Bowl summers, had about 1.4 hot records for every cold. The 1960s and 1970s had about 1.5 cold records for every hot. The 21st century has a 1.9-to-1 hot-to-cold ratio.

“As a measure of climate change, the dailies (temperature records) will tell you more about what’s happening,” said climate scientist Chris Field of Stanford. “The impacts of climate change almost always come packaged in extremes.”

https://www.apnews.com/7d00e38b9ba1470fa526b1da739c5da8 

 

 

I have highlighted in red some of the more misleading claims, but first let’s look at the graph:

image

 

Note that it starts in 1958. Why should that be? After all, the stations used in their analysis all have data going back to 1920.

What are they trying to hide?

Secondly they state “As time goes on, records become harder to set”. This would be true if ties were not included. But, as they also state, “The AP looked at 424 weather stations throughout the Lower 48 states that had consistent temperature records since 1920 and counted how many times daily hot temperature records were tied or broken and how many daily cold records were set.”

In other words, ties are included, and consequently records should, in theory, be evenly distributed throughout the time scale.

Given this, you can see straightaway that hot records have actually been declining since 1958. This, of course, rather destroys their argument that we are breaking the “warm end of the spectrum” more and more. All that we are seeing is that cold records have become much less common.

 

They present Wooster, OH as a good example.

So let’s look at the full record there, which actually goes back to 1893.

The CLIMOD2 climate tool supported by NOAA gives temperature records for each day of the year.

image

 http://climod2.nrcc.cornell.edu/

 

Using this database, I have graphed both the daily highs and lows:

image

 image

 

The reason why AP decided to hide the data prior to 1958 becomes immediately obvious. Hot records were far more common not only in the 1930s, but 1950s as well.

We also see far fewer cold records since around 1990. It is that lack of cold records which has skewed the ratio of hot/cold, and not an increase in the hot ones.

We can see this more clearly if we combine both on the same graph:

 image

 

According to Guy Walton:

You are getting more extremes. Your chances for getting more dangerous extremes are going up with time.”

In fact, the opposite is true. The number of extremes, hot and cold added together, have been getting fewer in recent years.

 

image

These are, of course, daily records for the whole year, but what about summertime itself? What about that “record breaking heat”, or all of those air cons the good folks of Wooster are buying, as the climate seems to get have been getting hotter over the years,

 

It turns out that there is no evidence of this either, at Wooster at least.

The chart below the highest temperature recorded each year, and we can see that were routinely much higher in the past. The second chart gives the number of days each year above 90C, and shows a similar pattern.

What does stand out in the latter is the run of cool summers in the 1960s and 70s.

 chart-2

chart-3

http://climod2.nrcc.cornell.edu/

Maybe Wooster is not representative of the rest of the country, so let’s look at the other example used, Pasadena.

The first thing to note is that the weather station there is slap in the middle of the city with a population of 142,000. It is surrounded by large buildings and close to roads.

Certainly not a proper site to measure climate trends at!

 image

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/homr/#ncdcstnid=10100112&tab=LOCATIONS

But even there, we find no evidence that summers are more “sweltering”:

chart-4

 chart-6

Borenstein claims that we are seeing more and more “record breaking heat” and “more extremes”.

The opposite is true. Hot records are less common than in the past, and cold records have become even rarer. As a result, we are seeing a reduction in extreme temperatures.

 

FOOTNOTE

Tony Heller has also done his usual demolition job on the Borenstein report.

He has plotted daily records at all USHCN sites, and comes up with very similar results to the Wooster analysis, both on an annual basis and during summer:

Tony’s post is well worth a read here.

26 Comments
  1. March 23, 2019 7:19 pm

    Reblogged this on Climate Collections.

  2. SirClive permalink
    March 23, 2019 7:57 pm

    As Tony states, every time you hear these sorts of claims, believe the complete opposite and you’ll probably be closer to the truth!
    Also i see Attenborough will be presenting “Climate Change – The Facts” on TV shortly(BBC online story)- i look forward to your similar critique of this undoubtable nonsense.

    • bobn permalink
      March 24, 2019 2:20 am

      Taking advantage of vulnerable children is child abuse. when the BBC takes advantage of a vulnerable senile citizen is that senior abuse?

    • JCalvertN permalink
      March 24, 2019 12:40 pm

      Sir Dave’s documentaries played a pivotal role in me (initially) becoming a true believer in climate alarmism – until I realised that his key point was a gross over-simplification.

      The key half-truth (that I took away) was that in bygone epochs, especially the Carboniferous, living organisms had removed a huge proportion of atmospheric CO2 by converting it into coal and petroleum. And if all coal and petroleum was burned, the Earth’s atmospheric CO2 would return to Carboniferous levels – and that our climate would revert to that of the Carboniferous era.

      He failed to mention carbonates, calcium carbonate in particular. I suspect that when it comes to climate change, he is a way off his home-patch of knowledge (geology and zoology)

      I wonder if he will try to use the argument in the forthcoming series.?

  3. A C Osborn permalink
    March 23, 2019 8:45 pm

    Even with just natural warming coming out of a mini Ice Age you would expect lots of broken Warm Temperatures as the world warms.
    In fact your graphs and Tony’s show very little change and not as hot as the 1930s.
    Hardly a fingerprint of CAGW.

  4. nickreality65 permalink
    March 23, 2019 9:01 pm

    Figured don’t lie, but liars figure.

  5. Broadlands permalink
    March 23, 2019 10:09 pm

    When old records were made, they broke even earlier records. What was the cause, and why the delay for the next warm record if steadily rising CO2 is the cause?

    But, is the real reason for such articles to continue to scaremonger? To keep pointing by implication to the “urgent” need to do something? If so, why no discussions to address what specific actions should be done, how long they would take and what it might cost. It’s much easier to play climate chicken little day after day than calculate how much CO2 should be captured and buried…somewhere.

  6. rah permalink
    March 23, 2019 10:57 pm

    “Note that it starts in 1958. Why should that be? After all, the stations used in their analysis all have data going back to 1920.
    What are they trying to hide?”

    Short answer: The 1930s

  7. March 24, 2019 1:47 am

    “Over the past 20 years, Americans have been twice as likely to sweat through record-breaking heat rather than shiver through record-setting cold, a new Associated Press data analysis shows.”

    Isn’t that just the kind of thing that one would expect in an interglacial? Interglacials are not static but with often violent changes mostly warming with melting ice, rising sea levels, and acceleration in sea level rise and so on and so forth.

    https://tambonthongchai.com/2018/12/21/eemian/

  8. Stonyground permalink
    March 24, 2019 7:48 am

    Elsewhere I have come across a story about a lefty headmistress claiming that her school is woefully strapped for cash due to evil Tory cuts. The BBC have of course run with the story without doing any investigation whatsoever and it has turned out to be the most blatant pack of lies that I have ever seen.

  9. tim leeney permalink
    March 24, 2019 8:00 am

    “The AP looked at 424 weather stations throughout the Lower 48 states that had consistent temperature records since 1920 and counted how many times daily hot temperature records were tied or broken and how many daily cold records were set.”

    Did they really count the ties for hot temperature and not for cold as this states?

    • dave permalink
      March 24, 2019 8:36 am

      “Stable climate” includes climate with decadal cycles, which can be both steadily forced and forced by cumulation and convolution of exogeneous shocks.

      Stable and “unchanging” are different concepts.

      Students of Economics were equally confused at one time, but worked out all the categories necessary for analysis (I do not assert that they are actually any good at the analysis!)

      Why does everybody keep trying to “re-invent the wheel”? I think hyper-specialization has destroyed general education.

      A freely swinging pendulum is unstable on short time scales, stable on medium time scales, and very stable once the air slows it to nothing.

      • Phoenix44 permalink
        March 24, 2019 10:14 am

        Yes my cars wheels are stable when I drive but the very opposite of unchanging!

    • March 24, 2019 9:58 am

      No. I’m sure they will have included ties for cold.

      If not, that would explain why there many far fewer!

  10. Phoenix44 permalink
    March 24, 2019 10:16 am

    More people buying AC is because it’s hotter not because people get richer every year then.

    • March 24, 2019 11:21 am

      When I moved back to the home where I grew up in Morgantown, WV to care for my mother, I requested we AC the house. It is an 1880’s farmhouse on 5 acres with a lot of trees my late father planted after they purchased the old Koontz Farm in 1937.

      As a child, I remember we used box fans in the windows in the ’50’s. As thunder storms can pop up here and it was prior to current more “accurate” (or not) predictions, we usually closed all the windows when going away, even for the afternoon. One of the main problems was moisture. The spines on books might mildew as did some draperies.

      AC is now readily available and prices have come down. Although I keep the temperatures in the upper ’70’s, the house is oh so comfortable with the drier air. When temperatures allow, I open the windows, but it is nice not to play the close the windows when leaving for several hours game.

      • dave permalink
        March 24, 2019 5:13 pm

        Thurber wrote a piece which involved a description of a hot summer, in the country, in the USA in the 1930s. Essentially, he was driven into psychosis by the relentless waves of hot air. His description of it makes you think, “Wow! That was real heat!”

  11. March 24, 2019 10:23 am

    Since 1999, the ratio has been two warm records set or broken for every cold one.

    Easier to set warm records when so many of the old ones have been ‘adjusted’ downwards for spurious reasons.

  12. tom0mason permalink
    March 24, 2019 11:53 am

    Meanwhile Kenneth Richard’s post over at http://notrickszone.com/2019/03/22/busted-hockey-sticks-35-non-global-warming-papers-have-been-published-in-2019/ shows us ‘Busted Hockey Sticks: 35 Non-Global Warming Papers Have Been Published In 2019’

    Some consensus? Parts of the globe have been cooling.
    Does anyone know where all this warming is supposed to have happened in the last 30 years (disregarding the adjusted temperature records for some areas)?

    • March 24, 2019 12:44 pm

      The Arctic was supposed to lead the way, but forgot the script in the last ten years or more.

      • tom0mason permalink
        March 24, 2019 1:34 pm

        Also of note is that if the climate is truly heading away from the era of the LIA then the Arctic ice should reduce as temperatures should rise.

      • rah permalink
        March 24, 2019 3:01 pm

        Things aren’t looking too good for the scammers. The AMO appears to be headed for negative territory and when it gets there…………..

  13. Eoin mc permalink
    March 24, 2019 1:18 pm

    Paul. Can I thank you for all the incredible work you and the handful of other climate science sceptics are doing free gratis.The content of your blog, along with a handful of other such American climate science sceptical websites,have enabled me deprogramme myself over the past fifteen years since I first started looking for evidence on climate science. Unfortunately such is the extent of the relentless propaganda machine in Europe and America that it is practically impossible to even get back to an equilibrium of an open debate on the issue that last prevailed twenty years ago. I have regularly texted a friend of mine evidence of data tampering and adjustments over the last decade with a view to him hopefully realising that his belief in anthropogenic climate change is misguided. He also is an accountant. His view continues to be that C02 is dangerous. He simply cannot understand that an anthropogenic ratio of 1:8,000 in the athmosphere is utterly meaningless with regard to having any effect on temperature.

  14. March 24, 2019 4:53 pm

    Climate variation is the record of the world. We know it. Taking that line of thought means all those succeeding by the false claims would give up the teat of government outlays.

    • rah permalink
      March 24, 2019 5:06 pm

      I’m 63 years old and the thing is from what I see in the weather records and the paleo evidence it appears I have been lucky enough to live through a period when the weather and climate has been exceptionally stable,

  15. Marvin Torwalt permalink
    March 26, 2019 4:23 am

    I know nothing about weather trends but my research on an aircraft called Glacier Girl tells me that the”rapidly melting” Greenland Ice Cap gained 265 feet of ice between 1942 and 1992. A further 65 feet were added between 1992 and 2012. This was from people who could care less about climate change or global warming. This, to me, is the truth!!!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: