Skip to content

Netflix, Attenborough and Cliff-Falling Walruses: The Making of a False Climate Icon

May 17, 2019

By Paul Homewood



David Attenborough’s walrus porn has already been well covered, but Dr Susan Crockford has produced an excellent video to summarise it all.

It’s definitely worth circulating to your family and friends.





  1. Mack permalink
    May 17, 2019 9:49 pm

    Excellent rebuttal from Susan Crockford. I expect Sir D.A. to thrust his hands in the air very shortly and say, ‘You got me there!’ After all, he is a, supposedly, honourable man, being a knight of the realm etc and a long time observer of completely natural carnage in the animal kingdom. Ok, maybe not. He wouldn’t have another agenda in supporting such tripe, would he?

    • Bertie permalink
      May 18, 2019 8:16 am

      The ‘political’ agenda highlighted by Anthony Watts. He is, after all, a socialist.

  2. Gerry, England permalink
    May 18, 2019 11:05 am

    Interesting that Attenbollocks right at the beginning wants people to thrive. But as has been recalled recently, he wanted food aid to starving people stopped as part of his desire to see people culled. So good to see he has no principles when Netflix wave the cash.

    Excellent piece of work by Dr Crockford and the GWPF in exposing Netflix.

  3. tom0mason permalink
    May 18, 2019 7:16 pm

    Watching Addledborough is little more than a mental massage for the hard of thinking.

    He said the only way to save the planet from famine and species extinction is to limit human population growth.

    “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now,” he told the Radio Times.
    Malthusian nonsense of an cranky old man.

    He especially appears to dislike Ethiopians —

    “We keep putting on programmes about famine in Ethiopia; that’s what’s happening. Too many people there. They can’t support themselves — and it’s not an inhuman thing to say. It’s the case. Until humanity manages to sort itself out and get a coordinated view about the planet it’s going to get worse and worse.”

    He appears to be promoting a ‘them’ and ‘us’ campaign against those caught in periodic natural hardship especially Ethiopians.
    By that logic:
    We keep putting on programmes out about the demented old and the disabled. There’s too many of them. They can’t support themselves — and it’s not an inhuman thing to say. It’s the case. Until humanity manages to sort itself out and gets a coordinated view of the nation and the planet it’s going to get worse and worse.

    So in both cases Addledborough’s and mine should we just let them perish because that is what it looks like he’s saying to me. Can his “humanity manages to sort itself out” without humanity to the individuals?

    “There is no absolute knowledge. And those who claim it, whether they are scientists or dogmatists, open the door to tragedy.”
    ― Jacob Bronowski, The Ascent of Man

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: