DOUGLAS MURRAY: Terrifying children with climate propaganda is abuse
By Paul Homewood
Douglas Murray has that awkward trait of telling home truths, even if they are not politically correct, as his latest piece in the Mail shows too well!
Have your children got eco-anxiety? How would you know if they had?
According to a variety of psychologists and psychiatrists, talk of a ‘climate crisis’ has led to an upsurge in young people reporting feelings of anxiety, helplessness and guilt.
The symptoms of this newly coined syndrome are real enough, according to the Royal College of Psychiatrists – and why wouldn’t they be in a world pumped full of one-sided propaganda?
We saw this over Christmas when Channel 4 screened a special edition of Gogglebox called Gogglesprogs, which featured viewers as young as six.
In recent weeks alone, a number of friends have told me of children feeling depressed or listless because they are falling for the lies of these abusers who claim that young people have no chance of ever growing up .
The children were shown watching as the BBC parroted untrue claims by Extinction Rebellion (XR) that ‘scientists say we have only 11 years to act’. And their response was all too understandable.
One child looked especially pained as she counted on her fingers how many years she had left to live and worked out that, according to the BBC, the world could end when she was just 19.
Later, a little boy reacted to the fanatical claims of XR by saying to the viewers: ‘That’s sad. Why did we have to be born at this time?’
They are growing up, of course, in a world where Greta Thunberg is preaching her gospel of imminent hellfire and in which world leaders queue up to approve her message.
According to a variety of psychologists and psychiatrists, talk of a ‘climate crisis’ has led to an upsurge in young people reporting feelings of anxiety, helplessness and guilt.
Supposedly serious politicians like to pretend that what the Swedish teenager is saying (we’re all about die) is true, that her proposed response (destroy free-market capitalism) is reasonable, and people who ought to know better are trying to outdo each other in hysteria. The results are hardly surprising.
In recent weeks alone, a number of friends have told me of children feeling depressed or listless because they are falling for the lies of these abusers who claim that young people have no chance of ever growing up.
One mother recently described how her daughters had asked what the point was in taking their GCSEs if they weren’t even going to be here a few years later.
You might have thought that, rather than whip them up still further, any remaining adults in the room should offer children the perspective and insight that age might bring, but I have been repeatedly struck by how few people there are willing to take up that role.
Meanwhile, cynical politicians such as Jeremy Corbyn and anyone who aspires to lead the Lib Dems have played a huge role.
Natural phenomena, including disasters such as the recent fires in Australia, are presented as though they have never happened before and they are presented as though they are solely the result of this ‘climate emergency’
The Guardian paper went so far as to warn that by 2020, Britain would be plunged into a ‘Siberian’ climate. I need hardly say that we are not yet staggering around an Arctic wasteland wearing bearskins
They have spotted a cynical opportunity to appeal to young voters and latched on to the issue, giving the claims of XR great weight in the eyes of the young and impressionable.
Too many of us kowtow to children or treat them as some special source of truth, yet the reason why so many are becoming ill with anxiety is precisely because so many adults in a position to know better are telling them that they should be terrified.
Take a headline from the BBC website last summer: ‘Climate change: 12 years to save the planet? Make that 18 months.’
They are growing up, of course, in a world where Greta Thunberg is preaching her gospel of imminent hellfire and in which world leaders queue up to approve her message
This kind of scaremongering is so commonplace that it barely registers. Most of us have lost count of the number of eco-doomsday ‘deadlines’ we have passed. Yet we are still here.
In 2000, the now-defunct Independent newspaper ran a story claiming that within a few years, children in countries such as ours were not going to know what snow was.
Two years later, the anti-capitalist activist George Monbiot was using the pages of The Guardian to claim there would be famine within ten years unless we all gave up eating meat, fish and dairy products. Well, 2010 came and went but most Britons remain well-fed.
Two years later, The Guardian was warning that climate change would cause millions of deaths in the succeeding years.
The paper went so far as to warn that by 2020, Britain would be plunged into a ‘Siberian’ climate. I need hardly say that we are not yet staggering around an Arctic wasteland wearing bearskins.
But that was always the way with climate alarmists. One day we were going to never see snow again – the next we were due to be covered in the stuff. And all the time we were expected to trust them and destroy the economy on their wobbly say-so.
None of this, of course, is to say that there are not environmental issues, most importantly to do with pollution.
Many of our responses remain inadequate. But you have to be, if not ignorant, then very young to fall for everything that people tell you about the climate.
It hardly helps that those who have been making the direst predictions are people who really ought to know better.
According to former US vice president Al Gore, the polar ice caps ought to have melted away completely by 2013.
The Prince of Wales claimed that we were coming to the end of our days a full 11 years ago. Those 11 years came and went and we’re still here.
Young people are not merely being encouraged to expect catastrophe, they are told it is good to do so. They are told that they should feel alarm.
That they must feel panic. And that the threats of imminent destruction should sweep away all other legitimate concerns.
The symptoms of this newly coined syndrome are real enough, according to the Royal College of Psychiatrists – and why wouldn’t they be in a world pumped full of one-sided propaganda?
Natural phenomena, including disasters such as the recent fires in Australia, are presented as though they have never happened before and they are presented as though they are solely the result of this ‘climate emergency’.
It is a cynical and dangerous trend. And so the hyping-up of a generation continues, all encouraged by adults.
Caroline Hickman, a teaching fellow at the University of Bath, recently claimed that eco-anxiety had increased massively in the past year.
‘We’ve been talking to teachers and head teachers about how to help children and young people,’ she said. Some children have reported waking up with eco-nightmares. Her response? ‘Parents can’t just say, “Everything will be all right” as it won’t be.’
And there we get a glimpse into the real project here: a new generation is being terrified into agreeing with a specific and fringe eco-lobby.
This lobby does not care if it damages the mental health of a generation because it seeks to recruit that generation as foot-soldiers.
It is time we called this what it is: an abuse of children on a massive and unforgivable scale. Something that the generations that will succeed us will look upon with shame.
WOW!!
Congrats to the Mail for printing this, given the slavish reporting of some of their juvenile eco reporters.
Are now finally seeing an outbreak of common sense in some parts of the media? In recent weeks we have seen sceptical contributions from Charles Moore, Sherrelle Jacobs, Ross Clark, Dominic Lawson and Peter Hitchens, in the Mail and Telegraph.
But what it really needs now is a David Rose style factual analysis, to strike down some of the climate untruths spread by BBC and the rest of the eco lobby. Come on David, are you up for it?
What is encouraging is the preponderance of sceptical views made in the comment sections of all of the aforementioned articles, and indeed other climate reports. My gut feeling is that most ordinary people out there, outside of the hoodwinked younger generation, are mostly sceptical. But they badly need a regular dose of the real facts, to counter the constant propaganda pushed their way.
Comments are closed.
I was hoping that Douglas Murray would take on climate stupidity and associated double think next. I do genuinely hope that the tide is turning. Unfortunately, I know a number of 60, 70 and 80 year olds who are fully signed up to the ‘climate emergency’ nonsense. The BBC has a LOT to answer for. As do the politicians (from all parties) who passed the latest climate change act last year in the blink of an eye.
The 60, 70 and 80 year olds have a lot to answer for too. They should know better. If they gave their lives to the government, that’s their problem. A cruel government only works with the cooperation of the those it abuses.
Well this 72yr old smelt a rat when Gore began touting his ‘Inconvenient Truth’ nonsense, and I’ve been accumulating data ever since, combatting alarmists diatribe whenever it pops its head up. And not all young folk are following the Gore mantra either.
Well done Douglas Murray and ‘The Mail’.
Virtue-signalling!
Paul, I’m looking forward to the day you are invited onto a tv programme to put forward arguments to counter the ones from the eco-loons.
Sherelle Jacobs has another excellent article in today’s DT and is getting a fair amount of backing in the comments.
Douglas Murray is one of the best writers at the Spectator. I have not known him to write anything but commonsense. Example:
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2020/01/the-terrifying-parable-of-laurence-foxs-question-time-appearance/
Check him out here:
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/author/douglas-murray/
The council built our Infants school on the flood plain, then everyone wonder why it gets flooded, quite alarmingly quickly sometimes, I have seen the little uns paddling out several times. But climate change is to blame!
Of course this was all pointed out before they built it there,but it was the cheaper option. Lets just declare a climate emergency, what could possibly go wrong.
Excellent article and thanks for re-posting it. I don’t know whether it is me but have some sentences in the original been reposted twice in the piece above?
No, it’s not you.
Paul Fantastic content by the way. Many of your posts are shared by us on twitter @uk_ecology and interest has spiked this week. Perhaps the worm is turning? Regards David
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
I’m on the Daily Mail science page every day commenting on all the bogus climate stories. The vast majority are skeptics and their comments and arguments are well thought out and presented. The few warmists, short of arguments, soon make things personal with insults instead of arguments.
There are some notorious climate alarmist trolls on there but they get as good as they give and lots of Red arrows showing what the majority think of their childish commentaries.
Douglas hinted at having this on his radar in an introduction to “The Madness of Crowds”. Hopefully more to follow as it somewhat fits into the category.
The Mail is a bit mixed as they had an editorial comment a couple of days ago claiming that the bush fires proved the climate emergency.
It’s not just children but also impressionable adults. A UK judge says the climatist who climbed Big Ben has Extinction Rebellion Psychosis.
Article: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/01/22/climate-activist-climbed-big-ben-has-extinction-rebellion-psychosis/
My Synopsis: https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2020/01/23/extinction-rebellion-psychosis-patient-zero/
Fortunately, children very quickly grow through phases and stages, climate fear being one of them. Once they get to uni or a job and mix with more sane members of the community, they will understand that they have been fed fearful rubbish of which they they do not need to fear. Then they can join the growing ranks of sceptics who will help sort out the real problems facing the planet.
Assuming they ever stop living with that electronic soma in front of their faces. Children LIVE in their cell phones and social media. I am not hopeful they will give this up since social media is 100% behind the lie.
No, when they get to uni they can go to eco-anxiety classes.
Derby staff and students given climate change anxiety therapy
3 hours ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-51222924
You couldn’t make it up. Or you could, but you would be joking – but they’re not.
This in unbelievable, is it not? What on God’s Earth is wrong with people’s brains these days?
I suppose, in a way, it points up the well-known (to us anyway – one wonders whether the general populace has even heard of it) examples of the ‘madness of crowds’, herd- and group-think.
Here is another link to another unbelievable BBC article from the same page as oldbrew’s one above:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-49836830
(Mothers believing all the eco-nonsense and feeling guilty about having a child and then joining XR to ‘do something about it’!).
This fascist eco-babble nonsense has permeated throughout western civilisation, it appears. Worse than cancer – at least cancer has a genuine malignant cause and is not contagious. But I wonder how many cancers will be caused by all the unnecessary worry and anxiety?
Daily Mail have a weakness for climate scare stories so it’s refreshing to see Douglas Murray’s article there. He makes an important point that adults have a duty not to terrify children. I would add that the BBC, as a presumably adult organisation, have an equal duty to avoid editorialising when reporting climate stories and make it clear that climate science is not settled and there is another point of view other than the alarmists.
This by the sensitive and caring left who have long ago dismissed the threat of hell as morally corrupt manipulation. But consider the parallels. . . do bad things and you’ll be sent to an abnormally hot place in which you will be continually tortured. . . . is there really any difference between the hellfire and brimstone preachers of the previous centuries and our current crop?
Climate Change is a red herring! Its air pollution, water pollution, food security, soil security, plastic in the oceans, rising sea levels, population growth, expanding deserts etc that are causing our environmental problems. Climate Change will just make all this much, much worse…so is it worth the risk to keep denying it? Why not act to address our environmental issues rather than fighting against it. Its not our future we are dabbling with. And if the kids have anxiety about it i’m not surprised!
The UK’s air and water is probably cleaner than it has been for centuries, sea levels are rising at about 8 inches a century, with no acceleration, and I don’t know what “deserts” are expanding.
Instead of wasting trillions fighting “climate change”, would it not make more sense to spend a tiny proportion fighting the real environmental issues?
As before, I’ve read it would cost $10 Billion to provide the world with clean water, tens of thousands of children die from malaria every year.
Nobody’s died from ‘climate change’ yet we’re spending >$1Trillion a year on it.
I wish those who are sceptical of the alarmist claims would give more coverage to the articles of Judith Curry who in my opinion is one of the
most balanced commentators on so-called man- made global warming.
I think we should expect more sceptical articles in MSM and the reason is that shock stories sell. Its nothing to do with what the editors think. Up to now the shock stories have been led by the alarmists but they are getting so mainstream they are not shocking and, more importantly, not attracting readers any more. What are editors to do but find more shocking stories and articles like the above fit the bill nicely.
Have no fear mes camarades, cynicism will prevail in MSM. Not to mention the truth.
I have long held the view that Paul expresses in his footnotes: the ordinary man is naturally skeptical about the outpourings of politicians, experts and scientists. However, the pressure groups have the meja sewn-up: listened to Today for the first time in ages this morning and CC was mentioned frequently in almost every item: even “Thought for the day” tried to hit at Trumps speech (apparently he is a “false prophet”- the radio just survived …… never again.
Tony Heller at realclimatescience.com produces some good factual videos showing official data, either demonstrating the false claims of the media, or identifying where official data has been “adjusted” (often more than once) at which point he produces news items from the time showing the “new improved” data is wrong.
The problems are, how does one get this in front of the general public and, given the alarm is aimed at emotions, will facts/logic do the trick?
“an upsurge in young people reporting feelings of anxiety, helplessness and guilt.”
FTR – it’s not just young people [children] suffering from such; rather there are mass numbers of actual grown-ups [ adults, supposedly] who are in the same boat.
While the alarmist scientists and politicians are the leads in this misinformation crisis, it’s the global mainstream liberal/activist media that needs to be help accountable for not vetting any and all of this crap, thus resulting in immense an unjustified mental anguish – anxiety – and depression for perhaps 100’s of millions of fellow human beings world wide.
But – the child abuse is the most alarming of the lot.
this is nothing short of Child Abuse and should be treated as such, it is a disgrace to allow these actions to continue.
I think pedophrast is the appropriate word for people who abuse children for political purposes. Whilst on the subject, Greta has clearly been severely abused and I do hope that the Swedish Police are investigating and will in due course lock the pedophrasts up for a long time. I cannot see why we should punish sexual abuse but not mental abuse.
I now refer to the BBC accurately as the the British Bullshit Corporation. The most galling thing of all is we are forced to fund blatant lies and propaganda and currently we have no opt out unless we ditch our TV’s. If we don’t pay the fee they’ll be a sinister, Orwellian knock on the door and the threat of fines.