Skip to content

New Footage Reveals Netflix Faked Walrus Climate Deaths

November 19, 2020

By Paul Homewood

London, 19 November: In a GWPF video released today, Dr. Susan Crockford, a Canadian wildlife expert, provides new evidence that the 2019 Netflix documentary film series, ‘Our Planet’, withheld facts behind the controversial walrus story it promoted as evidence of climate change.

  1. Philip Mulholland permalink
    November 19, 2020 2:37 pm

    The whole of climate science is a manipulative sham with no resemblance to reality.

  2. MrGrimNasty permalink
    November 19, 2020 3:03 pm

    As I commented at the time, the effect of the lie was seen on Gogglebox, by the end they were all crying and saying we must do something about climate change.

    The BBC and Netflix climate lies/propaganda reach millions, the truth won’t even reach 1 in a thousand of those.

    WWF uses ‘climate change’ to get your cash:

    • Nancy & John Hultquist permalink
      November 19, 2020 4:31 pm

      Years ago I read an article (no link saved; or maybe in print) explaining that editors and staff (?) of many well-known environmental groups (such as WWF **) get together to “select” the next year’s poster/cover animal. Photos and articles are sought, and the multiple stories that simultaneously appear about 6 months later have an effect, or are believed to.
      That is, Jane & Joe public think: “Wow, look at all the Penguins on the news stand magazines – this is a serious issue.”

      **WWF – – – Note that in the beginning there was an emphasis on “wildlife” – now the emphasis is on “funds.”
      Below from Wikipedia####
      The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is an international non-governmental organization founded in 1961 that works in the field of wilderness preservation and the reduction of human impact on the environment.[4] It was formerly named the World Wildlife Fund, which remains its official name in Canada and the United States.[4]

      Read Wikipedia’s page for Joanne Nova.
      I won’t donate to Wikipedia until all their climate pages are rewritten without the bias, snark, and misinformation.

      • MrGrimNasty permalink
        November 19, 2020 5:05 pm

        Interesting, never noticed the WWF subtle name change.

      • November 19, 2020 9:18 pm

        Ditto what MrGrim wrote.

        Thanks, John.

  3. Ian Simpson permalink
    November 19, 2020 3:05 pm

    Will you be demanding a retraction of the narrative in the BBC documentary and prominent publication of the same by the BBC and Sir David Attenborough – they will have to either admit their respective guilt ( doubtful in the case of the BBC ) or dig themselves an even bigger hole; that is a win win if ever I saw one?

    • Ben Vorlich permalink
      November 19, 2020 5:35 pm

      If Prince William fails with his problems with the BBC and Martin Bashir then the likelyhood of BBC showing any remorse and issuing any retractions and apologies on anything else seems very remote

  4. November 19, 2020 3:10 pm

    A simple observation. IF the claim, all the claims are real meaning supported by empirical data based science, why the need to LIE?….unless…..

  5. Joe Public permalink
    November 19, 2020 3:26 pm

    Attenborough “has previous” when it comes to being economical with the actualité:

    • Mike Jackson permalink
      November 20, 2020 1:08 pm

      It strikes me as a bit senile not to be able to remember which lie you told from one voice-over session to the next!

  6. StephenP permalink
    November 19, 2020 4:01 pm

    Isn’t the BBC busy with some damage control elsewhere over some faked documents?

  7. Vernon E permalink
    November 19, 2020 4:14 pm

    Events of the last few weeks have driven home just how embedded this ideology is – its not going away. Best we can hope to do is find a strategy that will mitigate in the long term against the worst of the madness. AEP paints a glowing picture of nett zero today – no problems whatsoever. Looking forward to Paul’s commentary on his favourite hack.

    • November 20, 2020 9:38 am

      “how embedded this ideology is”

      And how much money from mysterious sources is funding it…. all the way to the great reset.

  8. MrGrimNasty permalink
    November 19, 2020 5:30 pm

    NETFLIX – remember folks, this particular travesty was NETFLIX, not BBC, although DA+BBC have done equal and worse disservice to their viewers on similar ground.

  9. It doesn't add up... permalink
    November 19, 2020 5:53 pm

    Those who recall the previous thread on Arctic wildlife about the shooting of a brown bear may realise that I posted the link to the footage there, and alerted Benny Peiser and Susan Crockford to it.

  10. Farmer Sooticle permalink
    November 19, 2020 6:57 pm

    Excellent video by Ben Pile summing up the problem with Boris’s Green Plan:

  11. November 19, 2020 7:11 pm

    Nearly every episode of Woman’s Hour (BBC) this week has featured a “climate activist” of some kind. I intend asking them if next week they will give equal time to some opposing views, e.g. Susan Crockford or Naomi Seibt (what happened to her?) . Highly unlikely of course.

    • Devoncamel permalink
      November 19, 2020 7:56 pm

      Brenda, that’s because of BBC policy. They do not allow the questioning of the doctrine that is AGW. That’s impartiality for you.

  12. November 19, 2020 9:01 pm


    Fake science to provide bad theory and tampered data as an excuse to call for resource theft.
    Fake voting to put leaders in place who will facilitate the theft.
    Censorship by (anti)-social tech giants to cover for the crooks.
    Fake media to attempt to manipulate public opinion to get them to support it all.

    That doesn’t cover it all by any means, but it hits the high points, which, if any weren’t in place, the historic heist might be at risk of being prevented. Can’t have that, now, can we.

    • Duker permalink
      November 19, 2020 10:04 pm

      If there is ‘fake voting’ , how come there isnt a trace of it…and no there isnt any servers in Germany controlled by Venezuela.
      georgia is doing a full manual recount to check on the Dominion voting machines. The discrepancies so far involve small republican counties that just missed some batches of ballots…not the big problems alleged in large democratic cities
      Most of the claims are about procedural matters, whether they allowed this or that in different counties, but the remedy asked for is to disqualify certain votes in certain counties which judges arent buying as it contradicts common legal doctrine. Even Guiliani cant keep his story straight and make consistent legal arguments and yet he was a former top level federal prosecutor.

      • November 19, 2020 11:15 pm

        “If there is ‘fake voting’ , how come there isnt a trace of it…” – Duker

        Which fake media outlet troughs are you feeding from? There’s plenty of evidence that it took place, and that they didn’t want us to see it taking place

        ” Even Guiliani cant keep his story straight and make consistent legal arguments “ – Duker

        I’ve seen no evidence of that, nor do you provide any.

      • November 20, 2020 4:07 am

        Addressing the evidence we have is Trump’s legal team.

        It was fake, and Donald Trump won the legitimate vote.

        I’m wondering how the UK votes, and if they use the same or similar systems used to tamper with, and attempt to steal, the US election?

      • Duker permalink
        November 20, 2020 6:06 am

        How come Trump was saying in Sept he was going to ‘win’ the election come what may in the courts or in congress.
        there is no evidence because they are making it all up…thats what courts do , expose the Charlestons and sore loers

        Doesnt sound like you know much about elections, Britain uses paper ballots, no ‘voting machines’. The general election mostly doesnt have dozens of choices from President to dog catcher like they do in US. They directly elect Mps in 650 single member constituencies

    • November 20, 2020 6:58 am

      “Doesnt sound like you know much about elections,…” – Duker

      It’s not like I didn’t admit I didn’t know how the UK elections were run, which is why I asked about it.

      Doesn’t sound like you know much about what’s going on here in America, though you keep pretending to.

  13. M E permalink
    November 19, 2020 9:22 pm

    I read on line that the New Culture Forum where concerns such as yours are aired in now on as Worth a look .

  14. November 19, 2020 11:36 pm

    P.S.- In a court of law, a sworn affidavit is admissible as evidence. Here’s just one of many examples of such evidence.

    Voting machines and software that were designed to steal elections were used in the USA. More evidence in the form of an affidavit.

    • Mike Jackson permalink
      November 20, 2020 1:31 pm

      I used to have a lot of time for Americans. Not so much since they became salesmen for ConspiracyTheories ‘r’ Us!

      I still remember how long everyone had to wait 60 years ago for Mayor Daley to call the Cook County result so nobody believes that the possibilities for electoral fraud don’t exist. I also know that the US is a big place and there are an awful lot of places where the polling booth isn’t just a 10-minute walk away! I would have thought by now that in the age of the internet and the one-time passcode the US, of all countries, would have found a way to enable its people to vote in one 24-hour period, which to my mind is one of the pillars of democracy — a snapshot of how all the country feels ON THAT DAY!

      (And the idea that voting software has been designed so as to screw electoral results is so fantastical that it does pose questions about some people’s sanity.)

      • Paul H permalink
        November 20, 2020 9:37 pm

        Mike, I guess by your reckoning, my sanity is questionable. We’ll see in the coming day which of us has the insanity lable to cope with.

    • yonason permalink
      November 24, 2020 1:58 am

      Ditto what Paul H wrote.

  15. gseattle permalink
    November 23, 2020 1:52 am

    Good to have that cleared up. My theory is that alarmists are not able to write or speak without adding deception.

    Meanwhile, does anyone have an instance to mention of a time in history when warming was not good and/or cooling not disastrous for a culture and people?

    One possibility, warming with drought?
    1932 – 1937 Exceptional precipitation absence in northern hemisphere exacerbated by human activities[citation needed] causes the Dust Bowl drought of the US plains and the Soviet famine of 1932-1933 (harsh economic damage in US and widespread death in USSR).


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: