Skip to content

The Climate Censors

June 9, 2021

By Paul Homewood


 John Stossel on the Facebook climate sensors.

Please circulate this on Facebook, who clearly wish to suppress the truth:




  1. peter schofield permalink
    June 9, 2021 12:14 pm


  2. June 9, 2021 12:34 pm

    So much for what passes for “science” today.

    Science never has been and never will be based on consensus. Science requires basis in fact. Over the years, when new data or methods of investigation bring about different information, then science should follow that data/facts after testing the methods and results.

    In my lifetime, we have recognized Wegener’s Continental Drift Theory which he first published in 1912. However, it was in the 1960’s when it was accepted following the discovery of the ocean trenches. It validated what botanists, zoologists and geologists had pondered for years about the distribution of plants, animals and rocks.

    It seems that we are now at a time when, for political reasons, science is being forced to conform to wishes of the powerful rather than inquiry, facts and honest debate. And that, boys and girls IS NOT science. Rather science has been relegated to propaganda.

    • Jack Broughton permalink
      June 9, 2021 1:07 pm

      Political science rules, True science RIP.
      What happened to Scientific debate?????

      This video is a terrifying example of what happens when a group assume control and deny any argument. Goebbels was probably first to recognise this. The junk science that we get day in and day out in the press and UK media is purely fear-campaigning.

  3. Mad MIke permalink
    June 9, 2021 1:00 pm

    Not confined to Facebook. Here’s where Twitter cancelled one of the founders of Moderna for saying that their vaccine had a fault albeit that, in his opinion, it didn’t pose a threat. He was cancelled because they said he was giving out false information about his own vaccine.

    Apart from arguments about climate change, vaccines etc, we have entered a very dangerous time for our society and perhaps mankind. Censorship and therefore information is in the hands of very few people. If we survive this period history will look back on this period and consider this mad time when mankind lost it’s way, if it’s not censored then.

  4. Cheshire Red permalink
    June 9, 2021 1:20 pm

    The ‘false information’ threshold is nonsense, as many subjective issues elicit multiple opinions on causes, outcomes and so on. That’s the nature of science and discovery.

    Just about any contentious or subjective issue could therefore be branded as being ‘partly false’. It’s obviously a deliberately low threshold to enable them to censor any view they don’t like.

    • Gamecock permalink
      June 9, 2021 1:29 pm

      Correct. Being wrong is simply no reason to reject statements, nor their authors.

      The rule should be, “Can it be said in a public square?”

      A social media platform is a public accommodation. Being kicked off should result in denial of service law suits.

    • Cheshire Red permalink
      June 9, 2021 1:41 pm

      Jones is pitched as ‘the victim of cyberterrorism’!

      When Julian Assange and Edward Snowden released confidential but devastating government intelligence they were the darlings of the Guardian classes.

  5. Cheshire Red permalink
    June 9, 2021 1:27 pm

    O/T….Get your notebooks ready because this is going to be a right old bun fight.

    BBC will revise history to suit their agenda, which is already on show as per their claim to fight the ‘devastating consequences of climate change denial’.

    My prediction is they’ll regret this drama, as it’ll revisit a long-dead issue while their interpretation and probable revisions will trigger an outpouring of sceptical fury.

    The Law of Unintended Consequences looms large.

  6. Broadlands permalink
    June 9, 2021 1:40 pm

    What is most concerning is that the leadership of these social media outlets have more power than elected politicians that they can and do also censor. It’s all about ideological battles and propaganda. It is not restricted to social media… there are others, Researchgate, the AAAS and many closely moderated blogs. Even academic peer-review when the topic is controversial.

  7. GeoffB permalink
    June 9, 2021 2:00 pm

    In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

    attributed to George Orwell, but maybe Antonio Gramsci

  8. Jack Broughton permalink
    June 9, 2021 2:34 pm

    GB News starts on Sunday, I have high hopes that this will kick the woke, (London dominated) establishment hard, if it does not it will disappear very quickly.

  9. Athelstan permalink
    June 9, 2021 6:31 pm

    When the wokeists, soshul meejah children grabbed the censor’s blue crayon, any remnant of the western model did then croak its last and thus cease to function.

  10. Luc Ozade permalink
    June 10, 2021 7:09 am

    I feel that current censorship and the purge of free speech is of enormous worry. One (online) magazine/newspaper with brilliant writers is Spiked who constantly fight the battle for freedom of speech. I cannot praise them highly enough. They deserve all the support we can give them.

  11. June 10, 2021 12:03 pm

    I receive two emailed news alerts daily from Google – one for wind farms and one for wind turbines – and have noticed increasingly that links to US news items opposing wind energy are unavailable when I try to access them. It used to be because we are (were) in Europe so allegedly something to do with GDPR but now they’re often just unavailable. Doesn’t happen with links supporting wind energy.

  12. Gerry, England permalink
    June 10, 2021 5:49 pm

    Well done to Patrick Brown for taking the risk of appearing and putting forward a fairly reasoned view.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: