Climate History Began Eight Years Ago
March 27, 2022
By Paul Homewood
Tony Heller hits the nail on the head again:
https://rumble.com/vylgye-climate-history-began-eight-years-ago.html
8 Comments
Comments are closed.
“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. – J Robert Oppenheimer.
Recent Comments
Phillip Bratby on ‘Green’ renewable… vickimh234 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… vickimh234 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… vickimh234 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… Phoenix44 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… Phoenix44 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… Phoenix44 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… bnice2000 on Global Heating Will Increase P… vickimh234 on How Wet Was The Spring? vickimh234 on Labour’s Green Obsession…
NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT 
Honest? Warmists? They don’t know the meaning of the word.
It’s very tricky to be honest when your salary/grant/tenure etc. depend on you being dishonest
Well, at least to be ‘seen’ towing the consensus view that humans can be responsible for the Climate . . . Peer review is such a load of horse hockey . . . but it is ‘The Gospel’ in intellectual circles and most of all . . . in and among our Scientifically Ignorant Media Establishment with their Degrees in letters . . .
https://www.academia.edu/73566289/The_Irony_of_The_Written_Word
My Thoughts . . .
My guess is that break up of the ice sheet is related to strong offshore winds or maybe the result of tsunami from a distant event. Either way, the initial event may take months or years to make it’s impact visible, so correlation would be extremely difficult.
‘Peer Review’ – Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet.
“Peer review to the public is portrayed as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most objective truth teller, but we know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong”
I guess he knows what he’s talking about?
“My truths based on lived experience” seems to be infecting the quasi science of climate change which now concentrates on contemporary short term events and ignores the past. No more hindcasting for them, only the present matters and forecasting is now based on this short period. As we now know, questioning “My Truths” by people outside my “bubble” is not allowed. Robust scientific enquiry on environmental matters is a thing of the past.
The MET’s digitization of old records with its real time observations (lived experience) is great news. However, I wonder how long it will be before some Climate Wizard decides to fiddle with the data so that it is less disruptive to contemporary thinking.
Sorry O/T again must stop doing this but Boris’s precious wind is producing 2.5% right now. This is March boys and girls! Season of equinoctial gales! Not the Christmas calm nor the Summer High. It’s been five days zero now! Catastrophe.
Quel désastre!
Heh.