Skip to content

Biden’s energy counter-revolution

May 1, 2022

By Paul Homewood

 

From the Washington Times;

 image

America’s energy revolution was a game changer that turned us into the world’s pre-eminent energy power. Joe Biden is mounting a counter-revolution against it.

The president inherited an energy economy that was the envy of the world. He has spent the last 14 months working to dismantle that legacy. We are living with the consequences.

America’s energy revolution was an astonishing technical and entrepreneurial achievement. It made us energy independent for the first time since the early 1950s. It made energy more affordable, which made us more prosperous and more competitive. It also delivered geopolitical flexibility at a time when America was contending with several emerging threats that intersected with energy.

Driven by fracking, horizontal drilling, and advanced seismic imaging technologies, America’s crude oil and natural gas production shot up. From 2005 to 2019, oil and natural gas production jumped 116 and 89%, respectively. Over the same period, carbon emissions dove 19%.

That revolution came about because of a change of mindset toward policies that embraced energy abundance rather than energy scarcity.

Instead of welcoming America’s energy revolution, this president is mounting a methodical “whole of government” counter-revolution against it, all to achieve some completely unrealistic Green New Deal targets.

Practically every agency—from the Department of Interior and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Reserve—is being enlisted to starve fossil fuel companies of financing, deny them access to resources and infrastructure, tie them up in “green tape,” and tax them.

Personnel is policy, and Mr. Biden‘s picks for important positions in his administration are uniformly hostile to America’s energy revolution.

Attacking the fuels that provide four-fifths of the energy we use has had predictable—and dire—consequences for America’s families. This administration has wreaked havoc with America’s energy economy and added to inflationary pressures, especially hurting households with low or fixed incomes.

The administration has created enormous uncertainty that has contributed to the underinvestment in the oil and gas sector especially. Europe is giving us a preview of the energy fiasco that underinvesting in reliable and secure fossil fuels can create.

Democrats now see energy prices and inflation heading north and their poll numbers heading south. Desperate gimmicks like releasing more oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve or a gasoline tax holiday will not solve the fundamental problem: America’s energy crisis is a supply crisis. The solution is more American energy, but that is the one solution the administration will not allow.

At about 11.7 million barrels per day, U.S. crude oil output is running 1.3 million barrel per day below the pre-pandemic peak. In 2020, the Energy Information Administration forecast that producers were on course to hit 14 million barrels per day by 2022. We can realize that with the right policies.

It is not just fossil fuels. The Biden administration is so beholden to the environmental left that it is slow-walking or blocking permits for mines that would produce the minerals used in the energy technologies the president says he wants.

Wind turbines, solar panels, and batteries for electric vehicles use certain key minerals in much bigger quantities than the technologies they are meant to replace.

Existing supplies, however, are largely controlled by our adversaries. That has not stopped the administration from cancelling or delaying mining projects in places like Minnesota, Arizona, Alaska, and Nevada.

We should not have to rely on China and Russia for minerals we can mine here. We need to be energy self-sufficient. That’s true not just for oil, natural gas, and coal, but for the raw materials needed for nuclear, solar, wind, and batteries.

Biden‘s energy counter-revolution is counter-productive. What America needs is sensible policies that support more American energy and innovation.

The president has a stark choice. He can continue to throw away one of America’s biggest economic and geopolitical advantages. Or he can change course and unleash America’s entrepreneurs and workers to sustain America’s energy revolution.

Energy pre-eminence is central to realizing our economic and geopolitical interests. America is the world’s energy superpower. It is time we started acting like it again.

Senator John Barrasso, Wyoming Republican, is the Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. He also serves in Senate Republican leadership as Chairman of the Senate Republican Conference. During his 24 years as an orthopedic surgeon, he served as President of the Wyoming Medical Society and was named Wyoming Physician of the Year.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/apr/27/bidens-energy-counter-revolution/?mc_cid=4adf975885&mc_eid=4961da7cb1

18 Comments
  1. catweazle666 permalink
    May 1, 2022 6:10 pm

    Permitting the “Progressives” to steal elections has consequences…

    Who would have thought it!

  2. Harry Passfield permalink
    May 1, 2022 7:34 pm

    When the First Family and their supporters are in hock to the Russio/Sino complex the only capital they have to bail them out is the very country they pledged to serve. There is no other logical reason why a President would sell out his country on the ephemera that is global warming. Men and Women have served and sacrificed their lives for the country that Biden and his Son and cohorts have decided to sell out. It is the ultimate treason! /rant

    In other news, there may be hope that the UK will not follow suit. /wish

    • Mack permalink
      May 1, 2022 10:51 pm

      ‘In other news, there may be hope that the UK will not follow suit. /wish’.

      Harry, wishful thinking my friend. Rather than following suit, the UK government has been racing ahead of the Yanks as a nation. Not quite at the same speed as the Germans and South Australians (nor the Californians and New York Staters), but not far behind either. The slow realisation that once Year Zero policies bite the masses that they will neither be popular at the ballot box nor in the realms of media discourse has resulted in a frantic rush to shut down dissenting voices. The new Ministry of Truth in the US and the Online Safety Bill coming our way soon will double down on dissent so that only the officially agreed narrative will prevail. Just like the majority of the MSM is now. And all of the major UK political parties have signed up to the same suicide note. On the current trajectory, give it a couple of years, and this site will be confined to the dustbin of mis/disinformation history. I have no confidence that current government tinkering around the edges of ‘fossil fuel’ energy policy mark a substantive change in course. Particularly as the current PM continues to maintain that sunshine and breezes remain central to UK power supplies moving forwards.

    • Cheshire Red permalink
      May 1, 2022 11:21 pm

      I suspect there’s a LOT more to this angle than is being given credence. Just to ask ‘why’ would Biden so clearly betray his own country (and he IS betraying the US) is to provoke one heck of a debate.

      The Laptop from Hell revealed Hunter likely compromised himself horribly in China; imagine what they have on him and the Big Man? Well this energy policy appears to be one of the consequences. Treason, indeed.

      • Harry Passfield permalink
        May 2, 2022 1:47 pm

        Just imagine that had been Trump Junior’s laptop…..

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      May 2, 2022 8:00 am

      Progressives are people who sincerely but mistakenly believe they know what we should want and know how to plan our economies and lives to get it. Note how every problem, no matter what its causes, requires more government spending directed by Progressives. The Progressive mind is entirely closed, entirely fixed and entirely petty and vindictive. It hates many things and wants nothing more than to ban them. There’s no need to invoke anything more. These are people who should never be let near power of any kind but their simplistic claims of easy sutuons and virtue appeal to many.

  3. johnbillscott permalink
    May 1, 2022 7:38 pm

    November cannot come soon enough for the American people to vote for a GOP Congress which will make Biden and his greenies impotent.

  4. Robert Christopher permalink
    May 1, 2022 7:49 pm

    The Lib Dem leader of the Conservative Party is also making an important contribution to our dwindling industrial strength.

  5. May 1, 2022 10:01 pm

    Nutter on the loose. Americans will have to wise up or pay the price.

  6. tomo permalink
    May 1, 2022 11:06 pm

    I see the screencap photo has “SECRET TRICK THAT SAVES FUEL” advert – embedded…

    Over the last 5 to 6 weeks I’ve been bombarded via Google (and YouTube) with “Rain Fuel” promotions.

    Goldman Sachs, Airbus, North Sea oil are nothing compared to “Rain Fuel”

    I know they say there’s one born every minute and that fools and their money are soon parted but the hike in prices flowing from Biden et al’s antics has spawned quite an industry … – I wonder if the panic farming is real or part of a wider plan to simply discombobulate people?

    • May 2, 2022 9:11 am

      From the name it sounds as if they think the potential energy in rain is able to produce useful power. It is – in the form of a hydroelectric dam, which someone has already thought of. If they intend to build rain collectors on top of tall buildings and run what they collect through a turbine, then they will be investing millions to generate enough power to make a cup of tea. On the latest Cliscep open mic Mike Dombroski linked to a video “debunk” of another potential energy scam, this one using concrete blocks: https://youtu.be/XxGQgAr4OCo

      As to the photo of a laundry tab going in a fuel tank, the mind boggles.

      • tomo permalink
        May 2, 2022 12:47 pm

        @Jit

        Rooftop hydro is the next big thing – obviously

        The farcical RoI and efficiency absurdity, like piezo pavements and solar roads gets little attention in mainstream coverage.

        My first thought is that the advertising cost is non trivial and I wonder if the promoters of these scams are exploiting some kind of special deal from Google aimed at promoting renewables and cultivating energy panic…

      • Lorde Late permalink
        May 3, 2022 7:44 am

        Indeed!
        If thats not fraudulent advertizing I don’t know what is, I have seen several variants of that ad in different places, they all finish up at a site selling a device to plug into your cars EODB (diagnostic) port which alters the fuel map/setting of your cars ECU, doubful if that will improve things after the millions spent by car manufactures to get the best out of an engine. It may even cause damage by weakening of the fuel mixture too much and would certainly void any warranty in in a new car.

  7. jimlemaistre permalink
    May 2, 2022 1:30 am

    Clean Green energy puts the west into China’s pocket first . . . guess who makes all the components . . . and back into Russia’s pocket 10 to 15 years hence when the new ‘Green Revolution’ fails . . . Excellent strategy . . . ??

  8. Coeur de Lion permalink
    May 2, 2022 9:02 am

    O/T but our windmills are producing 1.75% of demand as I write

    • May 2, 2022 9:47 am

      Yes. When I can look out of the window and see that the tips of the branches of the mighty plane tree in the park are not even moving, I know we are experiencing the new “severe weather.”

      …the decarbonisation of the energy system is one of the most important climate challenges that we face at the moment, but what happens is as you increase the amount of renewables that you have in your energy system, erm, you’re also increasing the vulnerability of that system to adverse weather conditions.

      And what’s interesting about this is that these weren’t adverse weather conditions ten years ago, this was just nice, pleasant weather. It’s because we’ve got more and more wind power in the system that what we need to do now is think about ways in which we can strengthen that system and make it more resilient.

      –Mark Butcher of the Met Office. (This is a quote from last September, which I thought was so extraordinary I’ve used it again here.)

      I also call them windmills. But I’ve been wondering whether there is a name that better captures their essence. After all, the concept of using an intermittent energy source to grind something of limited supply that need not be done immediately was a rational approach in the seventeenth century – as was using them to pump water. Both were applications where the intermittency was not an outright killer, like using them to produce electricity is.

      “Bird choppers” is a phrase I see sometimes, but that doesn’t seem powerful enough to me.

  9. Harry Passfield permalink
    May 2, 2022 1:59 pm

    Just caught a nanosecond (I can’t take any more) of the cerebrally-challenged Vine on R2 talking about energy-saving. He, and the fools talking about ways of saving energy, are confusing ‘saving’ with ‘not wasting’. It’s not a good thing to waste energy, unless you can afford to, so it’s a good thing to save it. But to tell people in the 21st C that there is not enough cheap energy to go round is a huge admission of failure. Unfortunately, TPTB who are responsible for this have found a way of making users feel guilty about their usage – instead of feeling guilty for not delivering what they should have done. I truly despair.

  10. Richard Jarman permalink
    May 2, 2022 3:33 pm

    Sometime soon electors in the ‘west’ are going to clamour for a meaningful vote on energy in its broadest sense and its a case of when sensible political parties are going to have to make a u turn – I think the Republicans in the US have got the message I wonder whether Boris will have the nerve to clear out the environmental sect from his own party in the way in which he purged the anti Brexit faction

Comments are closed.