Skip to content

Study Finds Climate Change Means Less Drought In US

October 15, 2022
tags:

By Paul Homewood

 

 

More one-sided reporting from the Capital Weather Gang!

 

 

image

When it rains, it pours.

A paper published Tuesday in the journal Geophysical Research Letters finds that it’s raining harder in most of the United States. The study, written by researchers at Northwestern University, tied the results to climate change and to warmer air’s ability to hold more water.

The findings echo the fundamental laws of physics and thermodynamics, as well as the evidence from decades of research, and highlight the real-time effect that humans are having on the weather and climate.

The research offers confirmation of what atmospheric scientists have been warning of for years: a warmer world is, on balance, a wetter world. And as global temperatures continue to rise, an uptick in precipitation extremes is expected.

The study reports “consistent shifts from lower to higher daily precipitation intensities, particularly in the central and eastern United States.” The authors compared rainfall over two periods — 1951 to 1980 and 1991 to 2020 — to see how patterns evolved.

In the study, the authors examined daily data from more than 1,700 weather stations distributed in the Lower 48. Each had to have a continuous record dating back to at least 1951 to be included in the study.

In the eastern United States, the researchers observed a 4.5 to 5.7 percent increase in average daily rainfall on days when it rained. That does not say there are more days with rain, or more rain overall.

Despite strong trends in the central and eastern United States, the authors noted that there were a few places where rainfall did not appear to be growing more intense. The paper does detail “mixed signals in the western U.S.,” but for reasons the authors are still trying to identify.

“That [trend] didn’t hold true for the western U.S.,” said Harp, especially in the Pacific Northwest. He explained that changes in the overall placement of weather systems are “suppressing” any tendency for heavier precipitation in the West. A slight change in the location at which high and low pressure systems are anchored can have an enormous bearing on steering currents, and subsequently on how much precipitation falls in a given location.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2022/10/11/rain-increasing-climate-change-us/

 

 

As Steve Milloy points out, the paper itself makes no claim that climate change is responsible. It may just be all due to natural cycles.

But regardless of the cause, let’s consider what “more intense rainfall” really means. (The calculation used is average rainfall per rain day)

The Washington Post would like us all to think that more rainfall is some sort of disaster, backed up by photos of floods. In fact that extra rainfall has arguably been wholly beneficial, as it has served to prevent the sort of severe droughts, which used to be common place in much of the US.

Below are the annual rainfall trends for the four NWS regions, as mapped underneath:

 image

image

image

image

 image

Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) (noaa.gov) 

 

 

As is blatantly clear, severe droughts were a common feature of the 1951-80 period in the first three regions. Droughts like these are now much less common.

In the West Region however, there has been little overall trend, which explains why the authors also could not find evidence of any trends in rainfall intensity. This factor alone should make anybody suspicious about the “global warming” explanation of heavier rain in the other regions.

Long lasting droughts can be far more damaging, both economically and in human terms, than short lived spells of heavy rainfall. And there is absolutely no doubt at all that the farmers who suffered in the dustbowl years, or the arguably greater droughts in the 1950s, would have the heavier rainfall we have nowadays.

 

 

The Washington Post headline should really have read:

 

 

“Study finds climate change is bringing less drought to U.S”

12 Comments
  1. It doesn't add up... permalink
    October 15, 2022 5:55 pm

    It’s bring a lot more drought – of common sense and basic truth.

  2. Janice Moore permalink
    October 15, 2022 5:58 pm

    Re: “The authors compared rainfall over two periods — 1951 to 1980 and 1991 to 2020 — to see how patterns evolved.”

    — Without a VERY GOOD explanation and justification for choosing these exact two periods’ data to compare, this paper is junk.

  3. Ken Bond permalink
    October 15, 2022 6:19 pm

    Anybody considered the enormous increase in agticultural irrigation since the war, particularly in the arid south western states? Where do they think that water goes (of that which isn’t wasted by immediate evaporation, 97% of that taken up by crops is transpired, and not incorporated in the crops).

    • Thomas Carr permalink
      October 15, 2022 9:56 pm

      Quite right , Ken. Follow also the rainfall deficit that has critically reduced the navigable depth of the Mississippi and the Rhine. Then again the Indus has flooded mush of low lying Pakistan and the Ganges is shallow because of lack of snow in the Himalayas and the low spring melt. Nothing in climate science is to be relied upon.

  4. Martin Brumby permalink
    October 15, 2022 6:50 pm

    Matthew Cappucci. You For Coffee? DimWit.

  5. October 15, 2022 10:15 pm

    Duh, Earth’s atmosphere isn’t a greenhouse full of hot steam, but a refrigerator full of frigid air and clouds, hence rainfall from the frigid sky cools the Earth’s surface way more than the solar radiation that warmed it, lowering the average.

    https://www.quora.com/IPCC-August-2021-estimates-current-global-warming-at-1-07C-per-century-with-temperatures-now-still-below-those-of-6-500-years-ago-This-is-around-one-tenth-the-difference-between-day-and-night-temperatures-Why-should/answer/TL-Winslow

  6. Gamecock permalink
    October 15, 2022 11:08 pm

    ‘tied the results to climate change and to warmer air’s ability to hold more water’

    If you have more rain, the air isn’t holding more water. If it were holding more water, you’d have less rain. Or the same.

    Dumbasses.

    ‘The findings echo the fundamental laws of physics and thermodynamics, as well as the evidence from decades of research, and highlight the real-time effect that humans are having on the weather and climate.’

    Nah. Not really.

  7. October 16, 2022 9:20 am

    A slight change in the location at which high and low pressure systems are anchored can have an enormous bearing on steering currents, and subsequently on how much precipitation falls in a given location.

    No kidding 🙄

    • Gamecock permalink
      October 16, 2022 4:52 pm

      Yep. They should be asked to define ‘climate change,’ then explain how ‘climate change’ caused slight changes in the locations where they were anchored.

      . . . record scratch . . .

      In the US, high and low pressure systems move. They are not ‘anchored.’ US weekly weather forecasts show a parade of weather systems marching across the country.

  8. AC Osborn permalink
    October 16, 2022 9:21 am

    Nothing to do with the AMO then?

  9. europeanonion permalink
    October 17, 2022 8:40 am

    They keep on finding evidence of fish and fishing in the middle of the Sahara and Saharan sands, wafted over the Atlantic, help Brazilian farmers immeasurably. Coral that once grew in warm shallow seas is now limestone reefs in Derbyshire. If all that points to a stable climate, a stable earth…

  10. Gamecock permalink
    October 19, 2022 1:53 pm

    ‘Harp said the fact that reality matched simulations lends credence to climate models.’

    “A dead clock . . . .”

Comments are closed.