Slash ‘£84 green carbon tax’ to help households, Tory MPs demand
By Paul Homewood
As well as the better known green taxes, which pay for subsidies to renewables, there is also the much more surreptitious emissions trading scheme, which is effectively a carbon tax:

The Net Zero Scrutiny Group’s letter said the UK’s carbon emissions trading scheme was ‘a hidden tax during a cost-of-living crisis’
A “hidden tax” adding up to £84 on energy bills must be slashed to help struggling households, Tory MPs have said.
Companies which produce energy by burning gas to create electricity are charged for every tonne of carbon they produce, under a government decarbonisation policy aimed at helping the country reach its “net zero” goal.
The cost is passed down to households through their energy provider, potentially imposing up to £84 a year at current rates, according to analysis in a letter signed by 33 Tory MPs and peers calling for carbon costs to be reformed.
The new figures come as Rishi Sunak faces pressure to help households struggling with rocketing mortgage rates, stubbornly high energy costs and an inflationary spiral pushing up prices.
The letter, coordinated by Craig Mackinlay, the chair of the Net Zero Scrutiny Group, says the UK’s carbon emissions trading scheme “could annually be adding as much as £84 to household bills; a hidden tax during a cost-of-living crisis.”
Mr Mackinlay said that carbon costs had to come down as the current policy was doing “nothing to improve our environment”.
On Sunday, the Telegraph revealed that the Government would reintroduce green levies, which add £170 to annual household energy bills and include costs of insulation schemes and older wind farm contracts, from July.
The day before, Grant Shapps, the Energy Security Secretary, told the Telegraph that households will be spared a levy on their energy bills to fund the hydrogen industry.
Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, the former energy secretary and Sir Iain Duncan-Smith, the former Conservative leader, were among signatories to the letter, which said that power generators who create electricity from gas were passing down the carbon costs imposed on them by the Government to households.
“While the ETS was intended to encourage industry to decarbonise, costs have spiralled in an unsustainable way,” they warned.
Sir John Redwood, an environment secretary under Theresa May, who also signed the letter, said carbon costs should be suspended until the energy burden on households and businesses comes down.
“Carbon dioxide is a world issue, not a national issue,” he said. “We import things that require a lot of CO2 and claim that it’s nothing to do with us.”
Full story
Comments are closed.
People might want to ask what they’re getting for their £84, apart from a lighter wallet.
Why should any of us have to SUBSIDISE hydrogen strategies? When H2 (ever) becomes a (forecourt) fuel then I’m sure they will get plenty of revenue from extending fuel duty to cover it.
The daily bulletin board about the shipping world – gCaptain –reports that £442 was the income from marine wind turbine generators in 2022 located on the Crown Estate. As you may know this income goes direct to H M Treasury.
An industry passing on taxes imposed by government to their customers? Who’d have thought? I seem to recall when another Tory moron Osborne raised the insurance tax and was asked if this would not just raise premiums he replied that the insurance companies didn’t have to pass the increase on. Seems a very long time ago that the Tories were considered the party of economic competence as opposed to today’s Blue Labour tax & waste bunch.
The ETS scheme is one of the most hidden carbon taxes they have invented .
Wind and Solar generators are given Carbon Credits , and companies which use a lot of fossil fuels have to then buy them .
It is a very cunning way of disguising the total subsidies to unreliable generation .
But it was the main reason for the doubling of energy costs for everybody , as well as putting extra costs onto everything else . Road fuel , transport costs , flying as well as just about anything you have to buy ..
So it is good that this stealth tax is finally being mentioned , but I will bet that very little of the truth will get told .
ETS net auction proceeds are paid over to the Treasury (technically the Consolidated Fund). So much industry has been shut down that we have seen declining auction prices for the allowances, which are now down to about £50/tonne CO2.
https://www.theice.com/marketdata/reports/278
In consequence the government is seeking to bolster prices again by heavily restricting availability.
Just one of the reasons our electricity rates are the highest in Europe. We need clean sweep, some news ideas and a bit of fracking.
Finally some TINOS who have started remembering that they are supposed to be Tories. What is actually needed is scrapping ALL “green” and “carbon” taxes ideally with refunds
Who return 25% directly to the current Prince of Wales. Hence Charles’ and now William’s enthusiasm.
£442 income in a year?
HoHoHo.
Very droll.
I want to see OFWAT mandate all energy bills to have a pie chart showing fuel cost/standing charges/taxes and then ALL subsidies differentiated NOT amalgamated. Chances of success as Gimli might say….?
I’m with Octopus the much trumpeted only energy provider recommended by UK “consumer champion”, WHICH? From experience, Octopus CS leaves a great deal to be desired, and they have been nominated by me for the 2023 The Beacon Of Bullshit awards.
Recent communications include:
“Why no email informing me, as an existing customer, of the existence of their Octopus Tracker tariff, only available to …existing customers?” Reply was pure unadulterated BS. (Martin Lewis figures on the MS website don’t exactly stack up…)
“Why do you persist in stating all your energy supplies are from “green, renewable” sources when all UK back up capacity for when their “sources” cannot satisfy grid demand is powered/satisfied by either gas, coal, biomass or nuclear power from France via interconnectors?” Reply an object lesson in gaslighting (NPI).
“Please show me the specific methodology and workings of your review of my DDM payment as you are mandated to do by OFGEM” – obfuscation over several emails and then “NO” > complaint>further refusal>they close the complaint as “resolved” for their internal admin process……
Most recent communication refers to an email from them regarding the then upcoming (July 2023) cap review; Octopus mentioned that their (OFGEM mandated) ongoing reviews of my DDM payment had “taken into account” falling wholesale prices meant a cut of ~17% to “consumers”. Despite this, they confirmed my DDM payment would NOT reduce….I replied showing that UK wholesale gas and electricity cost peaked in Aug 2022 ( both falling by a factor of 5). My DDM payment HAD reduced earlier in May 2023, but this was by the exact amount of the (age related) energy support payment I had received – no evidence of the beneficial effect of falling wholesale prices there. When I point out ( last week) that my account pages on their online pages show the new, wef July 1st 2023, Octopus Flexible tariff prices which THEIR own calculations, based on my usage to date, show they will REDUCE my DDM by £60 pm…..”Why have you not informed me of that “review” and the lower DDM payment”……reply waffle basically “we have not got round to it yet….” Despite my DDM payment being more than a week away at that time, they cannot amend the DDM request in time for July 3rd payment….
Nothing to do with the £1bn payment they have to make “soon” then…
I am in credit for most of the month, now that Octopus brought forward the DDM demand sometime ago by ~ 1 week…..that is what made me very suspicious; and significant negative balance I pay off immediately.
Anyone recognise this pattern of piss poor CS or “is it just me?”
Apologies, OFWAT should be OFGEM….