Pylons to be forced on public to hit net zero goal
By Paul Homewood
h/t Philip Bratby
Increasingly the public are simply being left out of the loop of decision making as far as Net Zero is concerned:
Hundreds of miles of overhead cables and pylons are expected to be fast-tracked through the planning system despite local opposition, so Britain can meet its net zero targets.
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) is devising sweeping planning reforms that industry leaders say are needed for the UK to hit milestones such as eliminating fossil fuel generation by 2035.
Ministers are increasingly concerned the growing demand for energy could outpace the capacity of the national grid, as households switch to electric cars and heat pumps while there is also a massive national expansion in wind power.
John Pettigrew, the chief executive of National Grid, told TheTelegraph it would be “incredibly challenging” to expand the existing network to meet the Government’s targets without major planning reforms.
Currently, the UK generates up to 14GW of energy from offshore wind farms. The Government’s net zero plan includes raising that capacity to 50GW by 2030.
Mr Pettigrew said: “Without planning reform, if you’re trying to get to 50GW by 2030, that’s going to be difficult … You have to see a shortening of the planning process.”
He added that by 2035, when the sale of petrol and diesel cars will be outlawed in favour of electric alternatives, the grid “is going to need to meet a demand that is 50 per cent higher than it is today”.
DESNZ, run by Grant Shapps, the Energy Security Secretary, is said to be supportive of detailed plans submitted by National Grid for radical planning reform. It would be designed to allow construction of additional overhead cables and pylons in as little as half of the current seven-year period that usually elapses before such projects receive formal consent.
However, the proposals advocated by DESNZ are facing resistance in the housing and environment departments, where officials fear a public backlash to a significant loosening of planning restrictions for energy projects.
Under the plans, ministers would issue formal guidelines – known as a National Policy Statement – later this year, effectively mandating planning inspectors to approve projects needed to help the UK to meet its targets.
This would be followed by a separate document setting out specific schemes, including electricity transmission cables, pylons and wind farms, that form part of the Government’s net zero plans – in order to put the “full weight of planning law” behind each of the specific proposals.
Ministers would also slash the seven-year planning process to build new transmission cables and pylons.
The final 18 months of that period is the Development Consent Order process, when the Planning Inspectorate decides whether to approve the project.
“Three to six months could be shaved off that,” said Mr Pettigrew.
John Armitt, the chairman of the National Infrastructure Commission, which advises the Government, suggested plans would always draw some local opposition.
But he added: “You can’t really accept that those local concerns are going to prevent the major transitions that this country has got to make over the next 20 years in dealing with net zero, dealing with climate change, and fundamentally in terms of the transmission lines, electrifying our country in a way that it’s not relied on electricity to such a large degree in the past.”
Mr Pettigrew added: “The more clarity you have in the policy and the easier it is for the inspector to then make a decision.”
He added that currently, “if there are local communities that feel that the balance hasn’t been structured correctly between where it’s landing and how it impacts their community, then they can take a secretary of state to judicial review”.
But he said: “That in itself can be a two-year process. More clarity around the need case, more clarity around the urgency and that it supports [government] policy, and you are minimising the likelihood of that legal challenge.”
National Grid has told the Government that an initial draft National Policy Statement failed to adequately set out the “pace and urgency” required. It submitted a formal response to a consultation on the document, which closed a week ago.
Mr Pettigrew said: “What that statement needs to do is be absolutely clear about the need and the pace and urgency of the energy-related infrastructure that is needed, to recognise the critical urgency of extending the networks to support net zero.
“By doing that, then, if the Planning Inspectorate follows that policy, then there’s less ambiguity and therefore less likelihood that it will be legally challenged, which quite often happens in these processes.”
National Grid has proposed that the Government wins support from local communities with incentives such as lower energy bills for those living near new energy infrastructure.
Barney Wharton, director of Future Electricity Systems at Renewable UK, the renewables industry body, said: “I think there needs to be a kind of a national debate about what infrastructure we need and where and how we build it. Because it is a fundamental change in the way we design our power system.
“And there are going to be areas of the country, as we’re seeing in East Anglia, where you haven’t had electrical infrastructure before and now you’re going have a lot more – and that’s a change.”
Maps drawn up by National Grid show hundreds of miles of new pylons and overhead cables which it says need to be completed by 2030, including a 112-mile power line between Norwich and Tilbury to connect two wind farms off the Suffolk coast.
The project, which runs through Therese Coffey’s Suffolk Coastal constituency, already has significant opposition in East Anglia.
Last week, National Grid published plans for 55 miles of new power lines between North Humber and High Marnham, in Nottinghamshire.
Bottlenecks in transmitting power from Scotland to England are expected to increase to as much as £2.5 billion by the mid-2020s, as National Grid is forced to pay wind farms to switch off and buy more gas-generated power.
The net zero department is expected to publish a “connections action plan” in the summer and a review is currently examining ways to halve “delivery times” for grid infrastructure, such as overhead cables and pylons.
A spokesman for the department said: “Since 2010, we have increased the amount of renewable energy capacity connected to the grid by 500 per cent – the second highest amount connected in Europe.
“We want to go further as part of our plans to power up Britain with cleaner, cheaper and more secure homegrown energy.
“That is why we’re working to cut the time it takes to connect projects, building upon work already under way by network operators and Ofgem.”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/07/01/pylons-forced-on-public-net-zero-goal-environment/
And then of course is the cost of all this!
Comments are closed.
Are these guys for real?
Do they seriously believe in these net zero target dates.
Please send me the dealer for the stuff they are smoking or drinking.
Their jobs, incomes and positions in the Establishment depend on it.
When it doesn’t happen it will be a case of the HarryMegan Syndrome: somebody else’s fault.
So says a man totally incentivized by regulation and his bonus structure to cover the UK with cables and pylons. We are being royally screwed.
Indeed, National Grid’s profits are tied to the amount of infrastructure they build. So more renewables means more grid, which means more profit, which means bigger salaries and bonuses for the executives and more fuel poverty and blackouts for the citizens.
They won’t be needed. In a decade the bioweapon scandal of Covid will likely have decimated the population and the demand will fall dramatically.
Been coming to that conclusion myself since hearing about 30% of the vax was placebo, but still need to check that one out.
Got to be careful in case I / we get de-banked 😦
I have seen reference to sites that list the batch nos of the vax and how bad they are. Rather than a deliberate policy the likely explanation is that quality control of production was appalling.
So to go green we have to cover the green and pleasant land with solar panels, wind turbines, pylons by the thousand and hundreds(?) of miles of cables most of which will only actually be functional for 30% of the time ! I now know that the world of politics has gone completely mad and I am so glad I am the wrong side of 70!!
You forgot the hundreds of square miles now used to grow maize etc for anaerobic digesters. And more recently, thousands of acres covered with dangerous and polluting battery energy storage systems, which add to electricity bills but do little for the stability of the grid (the instability brought on by asynchronous and intermittent wind and solar). Truly our politicians and bureaucrats are either mad or ignorant (or making lots of money at our expense).
All three I’d say Phillip
Department for Energy Security OR Net Zero
Pick one.
So a week ago, we hear from National Grid that they need to spend £200 billion to upgrade the grid.
‘National Grid’s five priority actions set out in the report are:
1. Reform the planning system, centred around a strategic clean energy vision.
As an immediate step, finalise the National Policy Statements by the summer, ensuring they provide clarity and certainty to support urgent delivery of net zero infrastructure.’
This Telegraph article details it.
‘Clarity and certainty’ they say. What they mean is totalitarian power to do whatever they want, the public be damned. One wonders who the Reichsleiter in charge will be. He will have more power than the King.
I think our politicians are under threat. You can see the fear in their faces.
Yep I remember the ‘Hunted Look’ on Cameron’s face when campaigning during the Brexit vote (which has never as yet fully been implemented)
Betrayal & treachery they don’t care even fully try to hide it anymore.
Tice & Nigel’s campaign for another referendum on Net Zero was quickly snuffed out by the ‘mob’
Any modern day Oliver Cromwell’s out there ?
Tories would once fear being de-bagged: now they fear being de-banked – a la Farage.
According to Debden’s CCC
“The report concludes that UK greenhouse gas emissions, including international aviation and shipping, were 46% below 1990 levels in 2022. This is a roughly 1% increase from the previous year, but 9% lower than pre-pandemic levels.”
All we have to do is change the “climate change act” from 100% to 50% (remember PM May as her final vindictive act changed it from 80% to 100% without a vote). No chance, but we are going to run out of money pretty soon, and something is going to snap, a harsh winter would do wonders to de bunk the net zero zealots.
Yes, I believe that, unfortunately, we’ll need a harsh winter, power blackouts and some people dying from cold before our politicians will finally be forced to row back on their imbecillic net zero plans.
This only covers getting energy going into the grid. With the increasing use of EVs and the changeover to electricity for heating and cooking, the last few miles of distribution to the final customers will also need upgrading to carry more power, since they will be requiring both more kW and more kWh per day, especially in Winter.
It seems unlikely that there will be enough people to do this installation of new local transformers and to dig up and replace the many local distribution cabling runs to allow the extra amps needed. Also unlikely that enough new beefed-up transformers for the local distribution can be made fast enough.
Looks to me that this is going to be rate-limited by the availability of qualified people and the parts and materials, no matter how much renewable energy you can put into the grid.
“the last few miles of distribution to the final customers will also need upgrading to carry more power”
AND, the last inch. Many – most? – residential main breaker boxes don’t have the capacity to handle the additional load of an EV charger and heat pump.
Instead of boosting the economy by breaking windows, they break breaker boxes.
Ive said it on here before but when I tentatively thought I might enquire about an EV in the days when charger installation was ‘free’ (only a vague thought mind) UKPN sent a nice man to look at my house. his eyes widened at the age of everything and finally declared that just to upgrade the feed from the pole in the road to my house (without anything else needing doing) would be £12500 plus the V+T.
That was the end of that. I quite like all my old ICE transport anyway.
If the country needs qualified people the government will use that as an excuse for yet more immigration instead of actually investing in training people who are already here.
Some weeks ago I sent a list of questions to the LionLink team at National Grid. It’s a proposed interconnector starting from somewhere near Sizewell and hooked into one or more windfarms in the Dutch sector before a landfall at a completely unspecified site in the Netherlands.
From the Dutch point of view perhaps it looks like offshore nuclear backup for their offshore wind. From the UK point of view if it is to be used to import Dutch wind (it doesn’t seem that it will conveniently connect to a Dutch (coal fired) power station as BritNed does) there will need to be extra lines to deliver power to London and the SE. If it to be used to export wind surpluses there would need to be lines from at least the Killingholme area to the Suffolk coast, but as the Dutch connected wind would presumably be operating it’s hard to see that the export would be of much value, if indeed it was wanted.
It appears they have been walked all over by the Dutch. Unsurprisingly I have yet to receive any reply.
This is long overdue. Look at today with less than 20GW of the 50GW wind target constructed and the grid can’t cope with the output on offer so is spending a fortune to switch it off and replace it with fossil fuels. We can’t even give it away to Europe as are in the same boat too much wind output for demand and transmission system constraints.
If we are to have this ludicrous policy at least have a strategy that at least allows what is being generated to be used first before we waste anymore money on windfarms.
What about the new pylon design in the form of a great big white “T”? they do not blend into the landscape like our present structures. They will be visible for miles!
It should be a big V.
😂
When is a sufficiently large number of people going to realise that: There is no significant climate change. We do not need to reduce our CO2 output to stop a thing that is not happening. We have spent many billions of taxpayers money on chasing an impossible programme to do so, the cost of which will substantially reduce our standard of living, consume masses of precious resources and destroy many desirable things in our country at the same time filling pockets of ruthless and unscrupulous operators with our cash and virtually halting new enterprises which would have some value?
This is HERESY! Prepare for the Inquisition! You would be burned at the stake, but that has too large a Carbon Footprint!
‘power up Britain with cleaner, cheaper and more secure homegrown energy.’
One out of three is a poor score.
‘the major transitions that this country has got to make over the next 20 years in dealing with net zero,’
But we don’t, that is the problem.
The new pylons are as nothing compared to the express train bearing
down on us. In order to supply the electricity to every domestic
dwelling ALL existing underground cables will have to be replaced.
This means digging up, in every city, town and most villages, every
single road. The estimated cost will be at least £300 billion.