As predicted, wind industry blackmails the UK – demands yet more subsidies
By Paul Homewood

London, 5 July – Net Zero Watch has urged the Government to stand up for consumers and businesses by rejecting the wind industry’s latest demands for more subsidies.
In a move that gives the lie to years of propaganda claiming falling costs, the wind industry’s leading lobbyists have written to the Government, threatening to abandon the UK unless there are hugely increased subsidies for their companies (see RenewableUK press release).
The industry is claiming that unforeseen rising costs now necessitate and justify three actions:
1) A vast increase in the budget for the fifth auction (AR5) of Contracts for Difference subsidies, with an increase of two and half times the current levels for non-floating offshore wind alone;
2) Special new targets and thus market shares for floating offshore wind, one of the most expensive of all forms of generation, and, most importantly of all,
3) a revision to the auction rules so that the winners are not determined by lowest bids but by an administrative decision that weights bids according to their “value” in contributing towards the Net Zero targets.
This would in effect not only increase total subsidy to an industry that was until recently claiming to be so cheap that it no longer needed public support, but also provide it with protected market shares, all but entirely de-risking investors at the expense of consumers.
It would also be an open invitation to graft and corruption.

The Government should reject these self-serving demands on three grounds:
1. The UK economy cannot be expected to continue to subsidise a sector that is still uneconomic after nearly twenty years of above-market prices and guaranteed market share. The wind experiment has failed and must be wound down.
2. UK consumers of all kinds, from households to businesses, are already experiencing extreme pressures on budgets, and a further burden on the energy bill simply cannot be tolerated. Government must recognise that households and businesses are unable to afford yet more subsidies to the wind industry.
3. The industry’s current cost difficulties are neither unforeseen nor unpredicted but have been obvious to careful observers for over a decade.
Dr John Constable, NZW’s energy director, said:
"It would be both absurd and counterproductive for government to bail out the wind industry in spite of the evident failure to reduce costs. A refusal to learn from mistakes will be disastrous."
This is the key paragraph in Renewable UK’s press release:
CFD prices are no longer cost reflective! We’ve known that for a while!
Comments are closed.
The wheels are coming off Net Zero!
“It would be both absurd and counterproductive for government to bail out the wind industry in spite of the evident failure to reduce costs.”
Dunno. Government has said for years that wind is your future. Warts and all. And when you are saving a planet, does cost matter?
‘The wind experiment has failed and must be wound down.’
Succinct. Government isn’t ready to accept failure yet, but Constable’s assertion should be repeated frequently, until everyone gets the message. The sooner government accedes, the better off you will be.
The Tories should declare victory, “We have saved the planet!” Then go about undoing all the stupidity.
‘Wind wind down’ has a certain ring to it, although it does look a strange sentence.
the wind wind down is not a wind-up?
It’s not only subsidies for wind. It is the entire “climate”, “green” and “net zero” scams and their associated invented taxes, regulations and even bans that are making life worse for ordinary people and businesses.
>>Net Zero Watch has urged the Government to stand up for consumers and businesses
What a surprise (not). Only a few weeks ago we were told that wind power was 9 times cheaper than gas power, then a week or so later it was changed to 3 times cheaper and now it seems to be at least two and half times as expensive (and that does not include the added cost of infrastructure and backup).
We can’t use the wind we generate now certainly don’t need anymore. Over the weekend 150GWh was constrained off partly as grid couldn’t absorb it but also the Europeans were having a fire sale giving it away at -E500/MWh on some half hours. Hopefully most of the AR4 sites will never get started and AR5 will be quietly dropped by the Torys.
And Labour will cover the countryside with the things!
150GWh constrained off!!! So these win(d)gers are getting paid for power we can’t use but not charged for tge cost of balancing the grid when they over-supply it. My heart bleeds for the poor grifters! (Among whom I would bet there are a few MPs (allegedly)).
Nicholas, do you have a source for this data? It seems rather high. I can’t figure out BMReports!
In winter, October to March, wind rarely if ever goes above 15GW. In summer April-September it rarely if ever goes above 10GW. This is despite there being 28GW of wind installed. To me that suggests that on windy days, winds about 20mph, there will be too much wind. Weekends demand is 10% lower than weekdays at the moment. The interconnectors are used less at weekends. Solar is peaking during daylight at around 6GW. So nuclear + Wind + Solar supplied 21GW out of about 26GW on Sunday, Gas was at about 4GW. Gas rarely if ever goes below 4GW presumably for Grid management reasons.
Long way round to say it’s quite likely that there was a lot of surplus wind generation last weekend. The German data confirms that last weekend was windy
https://enact.lcp.energy/ run a rolling count from BM actions and ESO publish daily reports of BM actions https://data.nationalgrideso.com/balancing/daily-balancing-cost-report-balancing-services-use-of-system.
ESO spent over 20m each on Sat and Sun dealing with too much wind
Thanks Nicholas.
“threatening to abandon the UK”
Threat or promise? Bug or feature?
If our politicians want to keep wind farms they should subsidise them out of their own pockets, to the relief of millions of long suffering consumers. As for Grant Shapps, has he ever done ANYTHING useful in his career?
There never was, and never will, be a business case for users of renewables. Business cases are based on subsidies to the producers. Renewables are all unreliable and this must be compensated by having, at least 80% conventional fossil fueled energy to pick shortfall, of dispatchable and eliable energy. The Government must abandon all future “renewable energy” projects. The plan for the future can only be nuclear and in the meantime rely only on reliable dispatchable energy providers The windmills and solar panels will be ready for the scrapyards in 15/20 years from commissioning date and it may be less based on Siemens problems. Any modifications to the grid should only meet a nuclear plan.
There is a reason why Warren Buffet said if there were no subsidies he would not invest in wind.
Some time ago I laid in a 2 megawatt 3 phase 450volt supply to a factory I was building. It cost £50,000 and there was a standing kWh charge. Now, if I own a wind farm is the connection to the grid free issue? I distinctly remember that in Scotland this was the case.
Off Shore Turbine Random Intermittency Can’t Help
Electricity Maybe Uncertain
Heads in the sand at DESNZ.
The industry has major problems with mechanical failures of all of the latest 8Mw+ windmill designs as there has been a rushed development of these larger designs.
I have a cunning plan, get the Govt to embrace Net Zero, close down coal, demolish coal fired power stations………. receive huge handouts to build windmills, massively overplay the benefits case, repeat daily the mantra “cheaper than gas; line” …………. sit back and wait for the backlash from business and consumers as people wise up to the inevitable problems pursuing Net Zero will bring.
Now with the Govt fully committed: with no other plan play the Joker (blackmail) card knowing the Govt has no choice but to pay up.
Play the blackmail card repeatedly in years to come!
It’s extremely unlikely that any form of mechanical generation will substantially reduce in price over time; at least solar panels have a chance of that, having also the added benefit of minimal maintenance costs.
Mechanical generation was & never will be on a decreasing cost trajectory.
At least solar PV has a chance at that, having very low maintenance costs, unlike all things mechanical.