Kathryn Porter: The myth of affordable green energy is over
By Paul Homewood

The pervasive narrative about offshore wind in recent years has been that costs are falling and that wind power is cheap. But scratch below the surface and you find that things are not quite so rosy. Turbine manufacturers have been losing money hand over fist in recent years. Collectively over the past five years the top four turbine producers outside China have lost almost US$ 7 billion – and over US$ 5 billion in 2022 alone. Last year the chief executive of turbine-maker Vestas said that the company lost eight per cent on every turbine sold.
Some of these losses are down to warranty issues – this means the turbines have not performed as expected requiring the manufacturers to compensate windfarm developers and rectify problems. Privately this is attributed to the pressure for ever larger windmills which are harder to get right. Insiders now suggest that the growth in capacity per turbine has peaked, at least for the time being.
But the losses have also been driven by pricing structures designed to win market share, and aggressive windfarm developers who have refused to pay up, often while pocketing billions in subsidies. The market has started to look, if not like a Ponzi scheme, then like a house of cards built on the shakiest of foundations. Turbine producers are all busily re-negotiating contracts and insisting on better terms to stem their losses, otherwise they will simply shift to other, more profitable, activities. This is putting pressure on developers who are now going cap in hand to governments, begging for more subsidies and more tax breaks, all of which must be paid for by tax-payers or bill-payers.
To combat the growing threat from Chinese turbine makers, the EU is considering launching an investigation into China’s use of subsidies to promote the country’s turbine manufacturers. The EU has already imposed tariffs on Chinese glass fibre fabrics, which are used in wind turbine blades. Acting EU competition commissioner Didier Reynders has said that cheap Chinese imports could threaten European businesses. A decision on whether to go ahead with an investigation is expected later this month, despite an angry reaction from Beijing over a similar probe into electric vehicles.
Offshore wind projects have been drying up around the world. During the whole of 2022 there were no offshore wind investments in the EU other than a handful of small floating schemes. Several projects had been expected to reach financial close last year, but final investment decisions were delayed due to inflation, market interventions, and uncertainty about future revenues. Overall, the EU saw only 9 gigawatts worth of new turbine orders in 2022, a 47 percent drop on 2021.
Comments are closed.
” Acting EU competition commissioner Didier Reynders has said that cheap Chinese imports could threaten European businesses.”
And today’s award for stating the bleeding obvious goes to……
No doubt avoiding the reason for EU companies are uncompetitive.
In a recent press release Wind Europe noted that a recent wind energy auction in Serbia, Chinese firms won the biggest projects and stated one reason why was “They are offered on deferred payment terms that companies headquartered in OECD countries are not allowed to offer”
‘Security, jobs and autonomy – why we need our turbines made in Europe’
Press Release 25Sept 23
Darn forgot https://windeurope.org/newsroom/
Doubtless with insidious Belt and Road terms attached. Serbia will be singing for China and Russia.
If the manufacturers of wind turbines have made such losses, who or what is covering their debt and why haven’t they gone out of business?
The answer to both your questions is the subsidies gouged out of taxpayers’ pockets in pursuit of an unachievable and unncessary, virtue signalling political wet dream.
The first rule for ALL industrialists and anyone selling any product is: DO NOT INDULGE IN UNPROFITABLE BUSINESS!!!
You may find these posts useful:
https://edmhdotme.wpcomstaging.com/the-minor-greenhouse-gasses-carbon-dioxide-methane-nitrous-oxide/
Please reuse or reference their content at will.
Meanwhile New York has refused to agree higher prices on several offshore wind farms.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/ny-rejects-orsted-equinor-bp-requests-to-charge-more-for-offshore-wind/ar-AA1i7RUg
Eventually reality will hit home hard as electricity supply is squeezed between no new wind and closures of fossil fuel plants under Biden’s IRA, which truly is a terrorist act.
“Biden’s IRA, which truly is a terrorist act.”
Yep. Spending trillions to fight inflation.
Typical leftard logic.
New York are moving rapidly up the crash test dummy chart as they are mandating the use of electricity only in new buildings while not increasing the supply of electricity. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?
Probably moot. With the Democrats killing off the cities with their fairyland policies, there is a glut of commercial office space in cities across America.
Reasons?
Chinese glass fiber and resins are coal-powered, instead of wind-powered, and thus cheaper.
Chinese labour is still pseudo sIave-labour, and thus cheaper.
Tariffs should be placed on all Chinese imports, to reflect these huge disparities – just like Trump imposed tariffs in America.
R
The economics of running two systems in parallel – power stations and renewables (so-called) – were always dire.