Skip to content

We must put a stop to the electric vehicle revolution – before someone gets hurt

October 19, 2023

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Philip Bratby

 

 image

What the blazes is going on? We are familiar with the stand-up rows caused by a chronic lack of charging points for electric vehicles (EVs) but, so far, there has been remarkably little debate about their safety. Manufacturers deny that EVs have an unfortunate tendency to burst into flames, but fire brigades across the world beg to differ. They have taken to producing an amusing annual calendar with a different Tesla in flames for each month of the year. So frequent are these blazes that the ‘Burning Tesla 2024’ calendar is already full. 

One wag posted a video of an EV with a small bonfire on the backseat with the caption: “Tesla Holiday Version with built-in fireplace”.

In the past couple of years, two huge ships carrying thousands of cars have gone up in flames, apparently because of battery electric vehicles. A fire on board car carrier Felicity Ace in February 2022 led to the vessel sinking in the Atlantic, along with its cargo of 4,000 vehicles. Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries were cited as a factor in keeping the fire ablaze.

More recently, the Fremantle Highway cargo ship caught fire in the North Sea. It was alleged that batteries in EVs on board had overheated. During the salvage operation, all the cars were washed to remove any chemicals from the fire before they came off the ship. One charred vehicle, in which the fire appeared to be extinguished, actually reignited as it was lowered into the water. Investigators were quick to say: “No fire on board a ro-ro [roll on/roll off] or PCTC [Pure Car Truck Carrier] has been proven to have been caused by a factory-new EV.”

It was the same nothing-to-see-here story with the towering inferno this month at Luton airport. At least 125 flights were cancelled after a huge fire, which started on level three of the airport’s multi-storey car park, caused the entire £20 million structure to collapse. Up to 1,500 vehicles are unlikely to be salvageable. A huge deal, you might think. A topic for a heated debate at the very least, particularly as people could have been hurt but, once again, the conflagration has been tamped down. Authorities said the blaze “appeared to have been accidental and began in a parked car, believed to be a diesel vehicle”. 

Well, not according to one witness, who managed to snap a picture of the vehicle that was suspected of causing the fire, which looked very like a Range Rover Evoque. There was none of the thick black smoke you would expect with a diesel fire. Instead, the blaze was focused on the front left seat of the car under which – well, I never! – the lithium-ion battery happens to be located in some hybrid Range Rovers.

It’s not just cars. My gardener friend says he knows of two gazebos that burnt down when the battery pack powering their fairy lights burst into flames, causing third-degree burns to one owner.

Such fires can be fatal. An e-bike left charging is believed to have caused the house fire that tore through a maisonette in Cambridge over the summer, killing a mother and her two young children. The London Fire Brigade (LFB) has warned that e-bike fires are up 60 per cent this year. Firefighters have been called to an e-scooter or e-bike fire every two days since the start of 2023. At least 12 people have died and a further 190 have been injured in suspected e-bike and e-scooter blazes in the UK since 2020. (Data from the London Fire Brigade for 2019 showed an incident rate of 0.04 per cent for petrol and diesel cars fires, while the rate for plug-in vehicles is more than double at 0.1 per cent) The LFB has even started a campaign called #ChargeSafe to alert people to the potential dangers of the bikes’ lithium-ion batteries.

They say there is no smoke without fire, but vested interests are creating as much smoke as possible to obscure the cause of these fires, I reckon. Why? Well, meeting the notably insane and economically disastrous net zero target by 2050 is predicated on the UK giving up fossil fuels. Rishi Sunak recently pushed the ban on new petrol and diesel cars back to 2035, but even meeting that will require a huge number of us to switch to battery electric vehicles powered by lithium-ion batteries. What if those dense concentrations of electrochemical energy and lithium are prone to catching fire unexpectedly or exploding and the ensuing inferno is very hard to put out? To maintain the momentum in decarbonising transport, I would guess it’s rather convenient if that question doesn’t get answered.

Someone who really does know the answer is Professor Peter Edwards. He holds the chair in inorganic chemistry at the University of Oxford and tells me he is extremely worried about the “real danger” posed to the public and emergency services by lithium-ion batteries which were developed by his predecessor in the chair, the late Professor John B Goodenough, the so-called “Father of the Lithium Battery”.

“Lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles can develop unstoppable so-called ‘thermal runaway’ fires which burn uncontrollably,” says Prof Edwards. “As well as intense heat, during a battery fire, numerous toxic gases are emitted, such as hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen fluoride. The emission of these gases can be a larger threat than the heat generated.”

Sounds really good for the atmosphere, doesn’t it? Just to add to the fun, Prof Edwards says a “potential catastrophe” awaits with all the large-scale lithium-ion battery storage sites sprouting up all over the country, especially on solar farms.

“These are not normal fires,” he says of the recent blazes in electric vehicles. “They are triggered and fuelled by an internal chemical reaction that generates and releases a huge amount of heat and, in complete contrast to a conventional fossil fuel car, can continue without a supply of oxygen or indeed a visible flame. Furthermore, the large amount of stored electrical energy presents significant challenges in any attempt to mitigate these battery fires.”

Basically, they’re a bugger to put out. One fire brigade used 20,000 gallons of water to bring a single EV fire under control.

Imagine if an EV were to self-combust in the Channel Tunnel, in an underground car park or in the garage next to your house. It would be disastrous, so where is the official investigation into the safety of these vehicles? Silence.

Prof Edwards believes there is a “concerted campaign” to demonstrate how safe EVs are, regardless of the evidence. “Official statements discounting any possibility of battery fires are issued in unwarranted haste after any such event. One has a clear feeling that any fatalities, injuries and environmental damage are seen as acceptable collateral damage for a transition to a renewable energy future.” 

Ironically, the Father of the Lithium Battery foresaw all this. When Prof Edwards was working with Prof Goodenough, he says his Oxford predecessor “did wonder whether safety issues with lithium might preclude the battery’s widespread adoption. Particularly so, given the fire brigade had been called to his laboratory to put out a lithium battery fire… nowadays politely called a thermal runaway event.”

What a fiasco the whole electric car thing has become. Too few charging machines and then too many charging machines out of service, forcing people to drive around for a viable charging point, only to end up calling breakdown services for run-down batteries. The mileage the cars can do is a lot lower than advertised, unless you drive at 20mph (perfect in Wales, but hopeless everywhere else). The cars are too expensive, their second-hand value is risible, the batteries only last about 15 years and cost thousands to replace. If, that is, you get lucky and they don’t burst into flames first.

Towards the end of his distinguished life, the Father of the Lithium Battery told colleagues in Oxford that he didn’t think a mass rollout was wise because of the considerable fire hazard. How lucky we are that our country’s entire future energy strategy isn’t riding on an invention that can explode at will and cause fires it’s impossible to put out…

Oh dear. Time to go into reverse gear, don’t you think?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/columnists/2023/10/18/electric-cars-ev-sleepwalking-into-disaster-battery-fires/

The Telegraph includes this instant poll. Maybe not very scientific, but I suspect not far from the truth!

image

35 Comments
  1. gezza1298 permalink
    October 19, 2023 1:35 pm

    Watching GB News they have said that the town of Brechin has been told to evacuate because of the coming storm. Anyone else wondering if this will turn into a complete clown show for the activists of the Met Office?

    • Nigel Sherratt permalink
      October 19, 2023 1:43 pm

      Not wondering because it obviously will and has largely done so already.

    • Chris Phillips permalink
      October 19, 2023 3:42 pm

      I hope it does, but if Storm Babet turns out to be just normal Autumn wind and rain, can we trust our media to call out the Met Office for crying wolf – again?

  2. Dave Ward permalink
    October 19, 2023 1:42 pm

    “Prof Edwards believes there is a “concerted campaign” to demonstrate how safe EVs are”

    No surprise there – we’ve been bombarded with similar claims for certain “medical” products during the last 3 years…

    • gezza1298 permalink
      October 19, 2023 2:54 pm

      Yep battery cars are ‘safe and effective’….

      • Harry Passfield permalink
        October 19, 2023 3:17 pm

        Did you miss the /s?

  3. Realist permalink
    October 19, 2023 2:05 pm

    Still pathetic range even if the EVs actually did the advertised mileage. And even now still only half the range of petrol cars from the sixties last century. Yet petrol and diesel cars have improved significantly since then.
    >>mileage lower than advertised

  4. David permalink
    October 19, 2023 2:25 pm

    Surely electric cars should be banned by car ferry companies. A fire on Brittany Ferries half way across the channel would put the passengers’ lives at serious risk.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      October 20, 2023 7:14 am

      I can see ferry companies and Eurotunnel banning EVs and hybrids. Do the batteries became less safe over time I wonder?

      • M Fraser permalink
        October 20, 2023 8:19 am

        I would doubt there has been any research into the effects on health while sitting on top of these batteries. A former colleague sat on top of the batteries in a telephone exchange for 30 years and ended up with a nasty life ending cancer, unprovable of course, but worth some thought.

  5. Wodge permalink
    October 19, 2023 2:40 pm

    I sincerely hope that underwriters are taking a long hard look at the risks, if they don’t they deserve the losses coming their way. If you can’t insure a ship or the channel tunnel for carriage of ev’s it would stop the whole thing overnight. It will all come down to money in the end.

    • 4 Eyes permalink
      October 19, 2023 3:44 pm

      Wodge, exactly. Money, the integrated measure of peoples’ productivity, eventually decides everything in the material world. It’s a shame that a huge amount is wasted on things we haven’t thought through. Politicians don’t give a damn because they deal with other people’s money but in the end, individuals do care ‘cos it’s their money, even the money they spend on insurance premiums!

  6. gezza1298 permalink
    October 19, 2023 2:56 pm

    A 15 year battery life sounds very optimistic not to mention the gradual decline in performance just like when your mobile phone needs more and more charging.

  7. gezza1298 permalink
    October 19, 2023 3:07 pm

    The Luton fire has been investigated by Geoff Buys Cars who has unearthed a whole host of incidents of Jaguar SUVs catching fire to give credence to the source of the fire being a Jaguar. But he failed to get conclusive evidence as to whether it was a hybrid or not. A new X account appeared claiming to be of the fire and noting the numberplate. However, despite much effort, Geoff could not resolve what the plate was. Nobody has come forward to claim ownership of the car but that could be a legal thing given there are nearly 1500 scrap cars to pay for and a car park. The longer the mystery goes on the longer it will look like a cover up. Geoff did make the point that regardless of the cause, the majority believe it was a battery car of some sort and it will hard to change that.

    • glen cullen permalink
      October 19, 2023 6:16 pm

      10 days later and we still haven’t had it confirmed if it was a diesel or diesel hybird ….why. just ask the owner

      • teaef permalink
        October 19, 2023 8:02 pm

        Who is……….?

      • October 19, 2023 8:45 pm

        Apparently they want to stay anonymous!!!

      • gezza1298 permalink
        October 23, 2023 11:56 am

        I think there could be a big insurance discussion going on in the background given the costs at stake, so the owners have probably been told to keep quiet. I presume the ‘fire’ part of your insurance relates to a fire started in your vehicle and doesn’t relate to your vehicle then destroying nearly 1500 cars and the car park.

  8. Harry Passfield permalink
    October 19, 2023 3:14 pm

    Allison Pearson is writing some stunning pieces lately. Her take on the Israel/Gaza conflict – I mean, war – is deserving of A Pulitzer.

  9. glen cullen permalink
    October 19, 2023 4:53 pm

    It doesn’t matter if they go on fire, lack range, are slow to recharge, can’t find a working ev charger station and are ridiculously expensive ….its all about consumer freedom of choice, the govt should be banning ICE cars, they should be banning any vehicle – freedom of choice should rule

  10. October 19, 2023 5:40 pm

    One of the sadder aspects of this excellent article by Allison was that a good deal of the commentators thought that the likely dangers and loss of life was just a price to be paid for progress.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      October 20, 2023 7:11 am

      The very same people who hid from a virus that was no risk to them and now wail for restrictions on food that poses no threat to them.

  11. glen cullen permalink
    October 19, 2023 6:21 pm

    Interesting, has the bubble burst
    ‘’Despite announcing that sales of its EVs were up by more than 14 percent in the third quarter of 2023, the number of all-electric F-150 Lightning trucks that the Blue Oval shifted between July and September was down by a massive 45 percent.’’
    https://jalopnik.com/ford-might-cut-shift-at-f-150-lightning-plant-as-sales-1850929267?utm_campaign=Jalopnik&utm_content=1697475602&utm_medium=SocialMarketing&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR0O12S1jPIRwYNHaQADfeL2W33iSgdk2fxm3dOi6olqW7ozzQhwvFWdXag

    • Gamecock permalink
      October 19, 2023 10:40 pm

      My sources say it’s a supply issue. Demand is there; Ford can’t make ’em.

      • glen cullen permalink
        October 19, 2023 11:07 pm

        If the shift throughput is down 45% …well thats a massive planning and supply problem

  12. October 19, 2023 7:50 pm

    Religious ideologies invented yesterday never was and never well be a sound basis for rational thought or sound economic planning.

    They make it up as they go along and oh how it shows!

  13. October 19, 2023 8:22 pm

    It is not just EVs or batteries that are the problem. There seems to be a situation where “Green” out trumps all other considerations including safety. An anaerobic digester at Cassington, Oxfordshire recently exploded allegedly due to a lightning strike. Anyone remember gasholders blowing up just because of a thunderstorm? Thought not….but this was not the first time this had happened there – lightning seemingly does strike green installations twice because they likely do NOT meet previously required safety standards.
    And want to deal with sewage in a soil improving way? Apparently it’s okay to kill people along the way, no questions really asked.
    https://www.mrw.co.uk/news/hse-investigates-explosion-at-avonmouth-recycling-complex-04-12-2020/
    The Project Fortress (really is their name) battery complex near Faversham is more dangerous than reinstalling Chernobyl reactor 4 there for a rerun of the testing. It is that bad.
    And of course hydro power is safe because it is “Green” despite causing the world’s deadliest power plant failure (by several country miles) that the vast majority have never heard of. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
    And again as we all know domestic cats allegedly kill more birds than wind turbines but when was the last time moggy took out a Cormorant or Sea Eagle or almost any migratory bird larger than a house sparrow?
    EVs taking out massive ocean going car transporters or car parks, the Channel Tunnel, Dartford crossing et alia is mere bagatelle compared to the grand scheme of destruction instore for us….because “Green is Good”

  14. lordelate permalink
    October 19, 2023 9:14 pm

    Surely this can’t be.I thought it was diesel cars spontaeniously combusting all over the place. It said so in the press.

  15. Tony Taylor permalink
    October 19, 2023 9:50 pm

    Don’t leave out charging golf carts.
    “A ferocious blaze that destroyed a large golf clubhouse in Victoria’s Yarra Valley was caused by charging lithium-ion batteries, firefighters have ruled.”

  16. Epping Blogger permalink
    October 19, 2023 10:57 pm

    As the number of battery farms increases it is important for the public to have better information about their safety. Land owners need to know if the release of pollutants is likely as do local authorities and various waterways management and regulatory bodies.

    If a materil amount of a battery farm were to be damaged by fire or any other hazard (perhaps one of the claimed more frequent wind storms) then who would clear the shipping containers full of obsolete electronics and unpleasant chemicals. As I understand it, these battery farms are often ultimately owned offshore and usually through single purpose companies with no other assets or business activities, so don’t look to them to clean up any future mess.

  17. kzbkzb permalink
    October 20, 2023 1:06 am

    They will say the EV industry is switching over to “safe chemistry” batteries, so it is a non-issue going forward.

  18. 2hmp permalink
    October 20, 2023 9:05 am

    Some insurance companies are refusing cover for EVs until more thought has been given to the problem, Where do house insurers lie with this issue ? Are you covered if the EV is in your garage part of the house, next to the house etc etc.

  19. October 20, 2023 9:57 am

    Safety? … but who cares about safety unless it’s a way to push through undemocratic policies?

  20. glenartney permalink
    October 20, 2023 12:35 pm

    Putting a “Fuel Duty” on electricity used to charge an EV would help. About 26p per KWh for a start

  21. energywise permalink
    October 20, 2023 6:33 pm

    You mean before someone dies? It’s an increasing probability as more virtue signalling, BIK dodgers put their new company car on the road – putting your citizens into a high hazard, high risk situation is not what a decent, responsible State should do – as with smart motorways, they will be complicit in any related incident

Comments are closed.