Lock Deniers Up, Says Climate Hysteric On BBC Verify Correspondent’s Course!
By Paul Homewood
Chris Morrison exposes the latest
Further and better particulars have emerged about the green billionaire-funded course run by the Oxford Climate Journalism Network (OCJN), which has to date attracted over 400 participants from around the world. It recently signed up Marco Silva, the climate ‘disinformation’ specialist employed by BBC Verify. To “hit closer to home”, course participants are told to pick a fruit such as a mango and discuss why it wasn’t as tasty as the year before due to the impact of climate change. Noted climate hysteric Saffron O’Neill has been a past speaker and she is on record as speculating on the need for “fines and imprisonment” for expressing scepticism about “well supported” science. There is something very disturbing about a climate activist from a State-reliant broadcaster attending a course funded by narrative-driven billionaires with a speaker who has suggested that sceptical climate scientists and writers be locked up in prison.
As the Daily Sceptic disclosed, the OCJN six-month course is run by the Reuters Institute, which is funded by the Thomson Reuters Foundation. Direct funding for the course, which started last year, has been provided by the Laudes Foundation and the European Climate Fund, the latter heavily supported by Extinction Rebellion funder Sir Christopher Hohn. Immersion in the correct political narrative surrounding climate collapse, the so-called ‘settled’ science, and the need for extreme Net Zero measures, whatever the cost, is the order of the day. It would appear that the aim of the OCJN is to insert constant fearmongering messages into media stories, as global elites press ahead with a collectivist Net Zero political agenda.
Full story here.
Comments are closed.
NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT 
No one is surprised the current government has nothing to say against this. No suggestion that tax payer funded institutions should not fund this through fees or send their staff. No suggestion charity benefits should be removed.
Indeed, no criticiosm at all.
After so many years in office we can only conclude the Conservative Party approves all this stuff.
“Jail the non-believers!”
Unfortunately, this doesn’t defy belief. The believers frequently exhibit a religious fervour, which becomes almost frenzied on occasions.
Perhaps we should be locking up the irrational believers in the new religion of climate change extremism.
Section. They are plainly insane.
This was written: It would appear that the aim of the OCJN is to insert constant fearmongering messages into media stories,
This aim to insert constant fearmongering messages into media stories has clearly been very successful.
Instead of locking me up, why not just provide me with the evidence to prove to me that I’m wrong?
They can’t, they deceive
Because they know that man-made climate change is nonsensical!
It is about Control, the way people think, needs to be changed. The political Left think that their governance is essential, however political Leftist domination was shown to be wrong in the 1960-70’s, it was an ideology, not a workable construct and it still is!
Nothing has changed, the Left continue to throw their toys out of the pram, because, they have the “its’ not fair” mentality!
I agree it isn’t fair, but it never, ever will be, accept it and make the most of it!
Instead of penalising, financial success, emulate it!
Impoverishing the well-off, doesn’t benefit the poor, it never has, nor ever will!
If you think that your are being lectured to by a rich entrepreneur, please think again?
Before I retired, I was a 99.99% NHS dentist working and living in NE England, in a financially deprived area. The vast majority of my patients were exempt from NHS Dental Charges. I loved my job and if there was an option to re-do my life, I would not change it!
GB News the other evening described the batter ahead as liberalism versus authoritarianism but given that liberals these days are fascists perhaps it should be conservatism. With this in mind you can see how badly our 2 main parties are arranged with members of both camps in both parties.
” Because they know that man-made climate change is nonsensical! ”
There are various opinions and there are various beliefs, but there is no proof that humans are responsible for dangerous climate change.
Why does the BBC need a special journalist to prove that it is telling the truth? Verify/Pravda – is there any difference?
“Why does the BBC need a special journalist to prove that it is telling the truth?”
That ‘special journalist’ must be spectacularly incompetent considering the number of instances Paul and other of his readers have proven it lies.
It doesn’t, it has one to cover up for its lies.
Just remember, it is the cover up that gets you.
Fortunately, the BBC and its biased verifications are due to be terminated, not by Govt decree, but by licence cancellations – I’m sure the BBC can verify this
“attracted over 400 participants”
Has anyone suggested throwing each of these “cases” into a lake?
If any make it to shore, that will prove they are evil and should be stoned.
(just kidding :))
Galileo Galilei would recognise our world quite clearly. How tragic that we have not moved on from his time.
Taking an AGW denier to court might be just the platform needed to show the alarmists how wrong they are.
“We want to shoot them, but we can’t get approval.”
We’ve seen this all before. Santayana weeps. Big Brother deems climate skepticism wrong think. This is literally 1984.
The Climatist’s objective is the elimination of freedom. You don’t lock people up for simply disagreeing; you lock them up for blocking the new way. It’s war . . . that most don’t know has started. These people preen for Klaus Schwab and his One World Government. It’s not about science. It’s not about weather.
“Now that you’ve got the picture
What you going to do?”
Mother nature, father physics, uncle engineering and auntie economics are all climate sceptics. I guess the extremists in the climate brigade want to lock them up now?
Gosh, mankind hasn’t changed from the Dark Ages!
And I see that “Covering Climate Now” is offering free “training” for US journalists. “Co-founded by the Columbia Journalism Review and The Nation in association with The Guardian and WNYC in 2019, CCNow’s 460-plus partners include some of the biggest names in news, and some of the smallest, because this story needs everyone. In addition to three of the world’s biggest news agencies — Reuters, Bloomberg, and Agence France Presse — each of which provides content to thousands of other newsrooms, our partners include CBS News, NBC and MSNBC News, Noticias Telemundo, PBS NewsHour, Univision, Al Jazeera; most of the biggest public radio stations in the US; many flagship newspapers and TV networks in the Americas, Europe, and Asia; and dozens of leading magazines and journals, including Nature, Scientific American, Rolling Stone, HuffPost, Teen Vogue, and Mother Jones.” https://coveringclimatenow.org/
Yet freedom persists.
Don’t know how long we can hold out against Teen Vogue.
How’s their Arctic summer sea ice death spiral prediction going? ‘Rapid melting’ can’t go on forever without a result.
What else can we expect from the fascists of the Climate Mafia? Next call will be, “Off with their heads.”