Skip to content

Port Talbot has been sacrificed to the angry god of net zero

January 20, 2024

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Ian Magness

 

 image

How to murder a town. The Port Talbot steelworks is not part of Port Talbot, the steelworks is Port Talbot. They say 12 per cent of the residents work at the plant but, if you only count those of working age, it’s more like a third. Tthe Indian owners Tata Steel announced the loss of up to 2,500 jobs, many of them the main breadwinner in their families.

The knock-on effects on the delicate ecosystem of the wider community – on the cafes, the hairdressers, the corner shops, the gym, the pubs where the men get a beer after a long, thirsty shift – will be as devastating as they are inevitable. It is a knockout blow for South Wales which has had to soak up so much punishment over the years.

Everyone who cares about that small corner of our country is enraged, sorrowful. My Welsh barrister friend sent a one-word text: “Democide”.

During the Seventies, my family used to drive through Port Talbot at night as we neared the end of the long journey to visit my grandparents.

What a thrill it was to see that great castle etched on the skyline, a Hogwarts of industry with a solitary gas flame flickering atop a thin tower. As a child, I imagined a fire-breathing dragon lived in the steelworks, but it must have been the red glow of the two blast furnaces. As part of a transition to “greener, cheaper” steelmaking operations, we learnt they would be closed. That mighty Welsh dragon was slain.  

Why? The high price of UK energy makes Port Talbot uncompetitive but other countries heavily subsidise their steelworks.

Ultimately, this human catastrophe is a political choice. Make no mistake; some 141,931 people (the population of greater Neath Port Talbot) have been sacrificed on the altar of net zero. That absurd and misanthropic creed which calls British workers losing their jobs “progress” while their carbon will now be emitted in India and China.

Never mind that Nato has just warned there will be a war with Russia “in the next 20 years”. Clearly, this is the ideal moment for the UK to shut one of the best steel-making furnaces in the world, start producing “net zero steel” out of Steptoe and Son scrap, while importing the higher quality steel needed to make weapons from – Oh, dear! – our enemies and competitors. The only G7 nation with no first-class steel manufacturing – are they serious? You might almost get the impression the nation was run by a fifth column plotting its downfall.

Unfortunately for Port Talbot, those who should be defending the plant against the green globalists are heavily-compromised hypocrites. Little relief is to be expected from Wales’s First Minister Mark Drakeford and his fatuous 20mph speed limit. “For lower emissions” as a sign on the M4 which runs above the town boasts. (Driving slower can actually produce more emissions, but science must never get in the way of virtue signalling.)

Stephen Kinnock, Labour MP for Aberavon, did attack the decision to “follow the Conservative business model of managed decline for British steelmaking” which would destroy the jobs of thousands of people, “each of whom have dedicated their lives to an industry which underpins Britain’s automotive industry, railways, defence sector, consumer goods, construction, wind turbines and so much more.”

Stirring words, although Stephen has somehow forgotten that the policies of his own eco-zealot party are entirely in tune with the annihilation of Port Talbot. When Sir Keir Starmer promises “thousands of green jobs”, he leaves out the part about the destruction of nearly all our remaining manufacturing jobs to appease that angry god, net zero.

The Tory government, too, is complicit in this vast act of national self-harm. Euthanising Port Talbot steelworks will make diddly squat difference to the UK’s relatively low CO2 emissions while causing incalculable human suffering. Still, looking on the bright side, something to boast about at the next Cop summit, eh Rishi?

When I was in Port Talbot before Christmas for a party, people I met from the plant were cautiously optimistic. They still had good jobs with good wages. They still had hopes and plans. “We can manage if we have to go down to a four-day week,” one said, reassuring himself.  After the announcement, I’m told the mood in the plant staffroom was “funereal, throwing up with fear”.

Obviously, I feel this keenly because Port Talbot is in my beloved homeland, but the place that you love is next. The Welsh are generally rather a mild, gently humorous people. They often conclude a dispute by saying, “Fair play to him.”  

This is not fair play. Even with its steelworks still alive, Port Talbot was ailing. To close the plant is to switch off life support. A friend who grew up there, now a Home Counties matriarch, emailed me in distress when it was first mooted that Tata would shut the plant. “The town is already a distressing basket case,” she wrote, “and the people look so old, tired and ill. It’s shocking.”

It is shocking. Sixteen per cent of Port Talbot’s children live in dire poverty. Not genteel, cost-of-living poverty, but scary, damp, asthmatic, food-bank, lucky-to-get-to-adulthood poverty. The kind of poverty we should be ashamed to have in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The kind of poverty the UK spends billions in foreign aid to relieve in “poor countries”.

So this is my question. Why are our people treated like this? How many livelihoods have to be lost to achieve that crazy 2050 goal? We need more energy security, more steel security, yet generations of skills, passed down from father to son, are about to be lost in Port Talbot. Once British steel-making has stopped, it won’t be easy to revive.

China opens new coal-powered power stations and thousands of Welsh working-class people have to take the hit for the obsessions of a millenarian cult. There may be other words for it, but mad and disgusting come to mind.  

Correction. The population of greater Neath Port Talbot sacrificed on the altar of net zero is not 141,931 people. It’s 141,932 if you count my cousin’s beautiful new baby daughter.

And she should count, I think. Her future, her life chances blighted on the whim of Indian billionaires in another continent. The life support plant of her community switched off to make the planet cleaner. The humans poorer and sadder. That lovely baby girl; the apple of her steelworker daddy’s eye.

51 Comments
  1. ralfellis permalink
    January 20, 2024 9:46 am

    Closing of Port Talbot.

    There is NO climate emergency that requires the closing or changing of Port Talbot steel works. So the sacrifice of this town and its people (and our nation) is completely unnecessary. Where will we be, if the claimed war with Taiwan breaks out, and we can no longer import steel?

    My Video – Debunking Climate Narratives (with real data).

    If anyone spots any errors in my video, please let me know.

    My Paper – Modulation of Ice Ages (without CO2).
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987116300305

    Ralph

    • ralfellis permalink
      January 20, 2024 9:55 am

      This is the Tom Nelson version of my ‘No Climate Emergency’ talk. Perhaps a little more detailed and polished.

      R

    • nevis52 permalink
      January 21, 2024 11:22 am

      Your video is excellent Ralph.

      • Quill permalink
        January 21, 2024 12:50 pm

        Most of our military equipment is bought in, planes, vehicles, ammunition, electronics, clothing, even boots! Always over looked, medical equipment and drugs are massively foreign. When (not if) the war with Russia and China starts in ten or fifteen years within weeks we will have run out of stocks.
        Worst, the Russians know where our under sea electrical and has supplies run and will close them in weeks.
        As things stand we will have to surrender in a month or two.

        If wake up now and save our steel works and get our factories turning again and fossil fuel generators turning we might buy time to put up a decent fight, albeit one that will quickly turn nuclear.

        Should we say goodbye London – and Moscow?

      • ralfellis permalink
        January 21, 2024 12:59 pm

        Actually, we make our own aircraft, vehicles, and ammunition. The problem is the supply of important components, like microchips – most of which come out of Taiwan.

        And that is a problem if China has a regional war.

        R

      • January 21, 2024 1:40 pm

        ” Actually, we make our own aircraft, ”

        AIUI: for manufacturing, the Typhoon is a multi-national project, as is the F-35.

        There is definitely a range of RAF aircraft based at Coningsby that were manufactured in the UK.

      • Quill permalink
        January 21, 2024 4:06 pm

        How many single seater fast jets are we making? How many heavy transports do we make? How many private jets do we make?

        Where is the Aluminium made?

        Where are the materials to make our high explosives?

      • ralfellis permalink
        January 21, 2024 5:21 pm

        Aircraft might be international projects, but we have the designs, plans, and ability to make the complete aircraft. And its engines. And our submarines, and frigates etc: etc:

        What we have always lacked, is the raw materials – same as in WWll. This is always a problem. Even more so, since the government closed our Anglesea aluminium smelter.

        (And the chips.)

        R

  2. David V permalink
    January 20, 2024 10:18 am

    The real irony is that even if there is a climate emergency requiring humanity to reduce CO2 output closing the Port Talbot plant can only increase world CO2 production. It’s no more than political virtue signalling.

    • incywincysales permalink
      January 20, 2024 10:34 am

      Absolutely. All this is doing is shifting the £500 million given to Tata for this India, along with the 2500/3000 jobs and the so-called carbon footprint following the money. Losing us the capacity to produce certifiable quality steel essential where safety is paramount – impossible with recycled scrap for which there is net zero paper trail. And, as the grid is working to capacity, the electricity to drive the electric furnaces can only come from generators which can be turned up, which discounts wind and solar.

      • incywincysales permalink
        January 20, 2024 10:43 am

        To correct my typo, should read:
        “All this is doing is shifting the £500 million given to Tata for this to India…”

    • In The Real World permalink
      January 20, 2024 11:04 am

      A lot of politicians are clueless about how anything works and have given in to the Green insanity , but some of them are deliberately following the Marxist / Socialist agenda of destroying our economy to bring about their ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.
      https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism/
      And a lot of it will be to make everything much more expensive [ Net Zero ] , and to send a lot of our money abroad by shifting manufacturing out of this country .

      • HarryPassfield permalink
        January 20, 2024 12:52 pm

        I repeat that my MP, Sir Jeremy Wright, when asked by about his membership of the CEN and support for NZC, told me, in writing, that NZC was needed to reduce pollution. When I wrote to ask if that was in fact what he said – claiming CO2 was a pollutant, an assistant in his office confirmed that he did in fact write that.
        As far as I’m concerned the CEN is the Green party in all but name.

      • Tammly permalink
        January 23, 2024 8:32 am

        If only we could convince the Netanyahu government to drop what it’s doing in Gaza and send the IDF to do the same in Whitehall.

    • ralfellis permalink
      January 20, 2024 11:58 am

      Absolutely.
      Chinese steel production emits far more emissions of all kinds, than Port Talbot.

      I think the goal of these politicians is to impoverish the Uk. The car and ship building industries were decimated, and now the rump of steel manufacture.

      Humza is working for PaIestinians.
      Sharma is working for lndia.
      Khaan is working for the Umma.
      And this will only get worse.

      R

  3. The Informed Consumer permalink
    January 20, 2024 10:35 am

    How much does the UK give to India, the home of TaTa, every year?

    • It doesn't add up... permalink
      January 20, 2024 12:54 pm

      Ta Ta and thanks for the subsidy. Didn’t they already make £1bn selling off carbon credits following earlier steel closures?

  4. HarryPassfield permalink
    January 20, 2024 11:08 am

    If replacing Port Talbot coal-fired blast furnaces reduces their carbon-footprint by 1.5% (I read) and the UK’s is currently 3% it will hardly make a dent in the overall emissions on a global basis. And all for £500,000,000. I wonder if the government got Lammy and Miliband to calculate the benefits.

    • nevis52 permalink
      January 20, 2024 11:28 am

      I thought the UK’s emissions were 1% of global carbon dioxide. Not that I think it matters as carbon dioxide has no effect on climate. To keep to the point on Port Talbot though – madness.

      • In The Real World permalink
        January 20, 2024 12:14 pm

        UK emissions are 1% of all human CO2 emissions .
        Which are about 3% of all of the CO2 emissions , which is 0.04% of the atmosphere .
        Making UK emissions 0.00001% of the atmosphere .
        And there have been hundreds of scientific papers showing that all of the CO2 has almost no effect on climate .
        https://notrickszone.com/2024/01/18/nearly-160-scientific-papers-detail-the-minuscule-effect-co2-has-on-earths-temperature/

      • HarryPassfield permalink
        January 20, 2024 12:56 pm

        So, the overall reduction in CO2, Intherealworld, is 1.5% of 1%. Even worse than I thought.

      • It doesn't add up... permalink
        January 20, 2024 12:56 pm

        I think the latest figures show we are down to just 0.8% of the alleged anthropogenic contributions.

      • dennisambler permalink
        January 20, 2024 2:58 pm

        “Since 1990, global CO₂ emissions (assume anthropogenic) have increased by more than 60 percent.” https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissions/

        The UN and IPCC would have us believe that all increases in atmospheric CO2 since 1850 are anthropogenic. In 1990, Mauna Loa showed CO2 at 0.0354% of the total atmosphere. Currently it is claimed to be 0.0419%. That is a difference in absolute terms of 0.0065% in 33 years, or 18% in relative terms, or 0.54% per annum. Annual increase is roughly 2ppm year on year, or 0.0002% of the total atmosphere every year.

        Anthropogenic CO2 doesn’t seem to be doing an awful lot to increase atmospheric CO2.

    • teaef permalink
      January 20, 2024 2:22 pm

      3%? No!

    • gezza1298 permalink
      January 21, 2024 12:00 am

      That is assuming they will ever open ant electric arc furnaces given the sky high coast of electricity in the UK.

  5. Quill permalink
    January 20, 2024 12:01 pm

    I gave my life to my vocation which was Mechanical Engineering to give people a place in the bread queue and a future. I had barely graduated when the City of London began its progress towards to monetising industry finding ways to sell it off not invest in it. They were good at it, they taught upside down economics (it is for the shareholders not the country) notably in Oxford. They invented the new fangled Business Schools who taught how to milk cash out of the business regardless of the other stake holders; they had no responsibility to them. They were good at it and all the family silver was sold.

    Then along came Tata a loss making Indian steel maker and the government gave British Steel away. Did they really think Tata were going to develop our business? Not a chance. Tata were going to take it to India, of course they were, and will. They have made fools of us, as did the Germans with Rover and the French with our aero business and … I can go on and on.

    Now we cannot any longer defend ourselves and will be defeated by the Russians or Chinese within two decades.

    I hold the Oxford PPE graduates almost wholly responsible. Their club is happy and rich collecting their ill gotten gains with not a thought for tomorrow. A profit today is worth more than a promise for next week.

    • HarryPassfield permalink
      January 20, 2024 12:06 pm

      If I remember correctly, Quill, the UK even lost the ability to make its own ammunition (basics like rifle-bullets).

      • January 20, 2024 12:31 pm

        We won’t be needing rifle bullets. Our military are planning to sit in the road and hold up an offensive banner.

      • gezza1298 permalink
        January 21, 2024 12:04 am

        We can’t make complete artillery shells as we no longer make the explosives. Part of the great EU ideal where we could buy what we need from other members. By the time we have ramped up the production of dud shells for Ukraine, the war will be over.

      • January 21, 2024 5:01 pm

        ” By the time we have ramped up the production of dud shells for Ukraine, the war will be over. ”

        If the Apache helicopter is as good as it’s supposed to be then any large-scale Russian mechanised military advance into Europe will be wrecked.

  6. Gamecock permalink
    January 20, 2024 12:32 pm

    ‘her life chances blighted on the whim of Indian billionaires in another continent’

    This isn’t the Indian’s fault.

  7. January 20, 2024 1:38 pm

    Jobs lost and communities impoverished by those who believe. There must surely be someone directly involved in this mess who will ask the question:

    “Where is the proof that humans are responsible for dangerous climate change ? “

  8. dennisambler permalink
    January 20, 2024 2:22 pm

    This was the response from my CEN MP to my pointing out the massively increasing coal use in India:

    “I appreciate your concern that India appears intent on using coal to fire its’ steel production, and that this may put the UK at a disadvantage.
    Steel employs around 32,500 people and supports up to a further 40,000 jobs through its supply chains in the UK, providing high value employment in economically deprived areas, including in Port Talbot. By 2050, emissions from industry will need to fall by around 90 per cent from today’s levels to meet our climate ambitions.

    The UK Government remains committed to supporting the decarbonisation of the UK steel sector and to improving its global competitiveness. Industrial sectors (including iron and steel) have been encouraged to bid into government competitive funds worth more than £1 billion to support them in cutting emissions and improving their energy efficiency.

    The Government’s commitment to finding solutions to enable the ongoing sustainable and decarbonised production of steel is underlined by the £1.25 billion joint-investment package with Tata Steel to secure a decarbonised future for steelmaking in Port Talbot.”

    Any reply will be futile, but I may yet do so.

    • teaef permalink
      January 20, 2024 2:25 pm

      Climate ambitions! Ridiculous phrase!

    • HarryPassfield permalink
      January 20, 2024 2:29 pm

      Dennis. I fail to see how the first and second parts if your MP’s quote are logical:
      “The UK Government remains committed to supporting the decarbonisation of the UK steel sector and to improving its global competitiveness”

    • Gamecock permalink
      January 20, 2024 2:42 pm

      Gamecock can translate: “We are killing domestic steel production.”

  9. HarryPassfield permalink
    January 20, 2024 2:23 pm

    Only a little off-topic…
    But the Steyn-Mann trial opened the other day (17th, I think) and the opening speech by Mark is on his website. It is glorious!! It’s actually voiced by an actor sounding very like him and the piece runs fir about 30+ mins. Very well worth a listen. https://www.steynonline.com/14032/a-nobel-mann

  10. catweazle666 permalink
    January 20, 2024 3:56 pm

    In the 1950s and 1960s Britain built the World’s fastest motorcycles – Vincents, the Manx Norton, the fastest production cars – Jaguar XK and Aston Martin, held the land and water speed records – Campbell’s Bluebirds, air speed record – the Fairey Delta 2, fastest interceptor – English Electric Lightning, built the first convincing SVTOL strike aircraft – the Hawker Harrier*. almost complete was the Miles M52 which was a proper Mach 1+ jet capable of sustained supersonic flight and the first plane designed with an afterburner courtesy of Frank Whittle, scrapped and the technology and gave it to Bell who used it to make a whiz-bang rocket plane, sold state-of-the-art combat planes such as the Hunter and Canberra and armour such as the Centurion tank all around the World.

    We built the first grid scale nuclear power station – Calder Hall from inception in 1952 to official opening on 17 October 1956, it closed on 31 March 2003, the first reactor having been in use for nearly 47 years.

    It’s called “managed decline”, a result of inter alia Soviet Socialism and Corporate Socialism – Benito Mussolini’s favoured synonym for Fascism, the bedrock of the EU.

    It is all intentional of course, essentially we won the war with Europe and could not be permitted to win the peace, we have been betrayed by successive Governments since around 1970 and we are still.

    * Its successor the Hawker P1154, a Mach 2 capable version almost reached prototype level before it was scrapped fifty years ago, now half a century on we have ended up with an inferior airplane – the F35.

    And there was the Armstrong Whitworth 681, a four engined swept wing SVTOL transport using four Pegasus engines, perfect for intercity transport…

    • Quill permalink
      January 20, 2024 4:58 pm

      … exactly right catweazle666 but remember we had TSR2 (blocked by US) actually flying, with Concorde. We built the first proper electronic programmable computer (stolen by America), we had Blue Streak ICBM and potential space launcher. We were building the world’s fastest electric and diesel trains and lead the world in creative new car design like Mini and had an NHS which was quick and efficient. We made more motor bikes than any one.

      Those parts of the world still in the Empire were still enjoying their longest period of peace and growing prosperity since ever before or ever since.

      • rossobx permalink
        January 20, 2024 6:09 pm

        Wasn’t the mini designed or some of it by an Italian?

      • catweazle666 permalink
        January 20, 2024 6:27 pm

        “and potential space launcher”
        Not just potential, we actually launched a satellite on 28 October 1971 when a Black Arrow rocket placed a Prospero probe into orbit round the Earth.

        And no, rossobx, the Mini with its rubber cone suspension to save height and weight and gearbox under the engine to save length was pure Alec Issigonis, a British-Greek.

    • HarryPassfield permalink
      January 20, 2024 10:22 pm

      Cat, don’t forget the TSR2 that a Labour government cancelled. In its original spec as a fighter-bomber it was a great concept, until politicians thought they’d get a better return if they could make it low level as well. It turned out to be the legendary camel: a horse designed by a committee. I remember it well because my brother worked on the prototype gears for it at the time.

      • AC Osborn permalink
        January 21, 2024 12:07 pm

        Most aircraft being designed at that time were cancelled because we wouldn’t need them, as missiles would be all we would need.
        Another moronic decision.

      • Quill permalink
        January 21, 2024 12:59 pm

        Yes AC, that was the argument pushed by the Americans with the threat that if we didn’t buy their rockets they would not supply missiles for our nuclear subs.

        Our idiot Oxford PPEs didn’t see that coming and even less the consequences.

      • January 21, 2024 12:35 pm

        Another interesting OT diversion!

        The TSR2 had to go low in its strike role after the Gary Powers U2 was shot down by the Soviets. The US “version” of the TSR2 was the delayed and expensive F-111, which performed well after many initial problems.

        The Buccaneer (UK) was perhaps the world’s best low level strike aircraft in the 1960s and 1970s. The “Super Buccaneer” (never built) could have been spectacular, see Red Flag 1977 for the superior performance of the Buccaneer.

        The biggest burden on the UK in recent years has been winning and maintaining freedom in Europe.

    • gezza1298 permalink
      January 21, 2024 12:07 am

      Don’t forget the key role a British scientist played in the nuclear Manhatten Project who was airbrushed out of the American film Oppenheimer.

    • Mikehig permalink
      January 24, 2024 9:12 am

      catweazle: I share your lament over the demise of the British aero industry. Your list of manufacturers reveals one of the main causes of the decline: far too many small and medium size companies chasing too little business, barely surviving on small govt orders and funding for prototypes. We had 3 V-bombers!
      There were a few honourable exceptions that did win business overseas; Hawkers and English Electric come to mind. The massive consolidation that was eventually forced on the industry should have happened many years earlier. The irony is that, early in the war, there was a focussed approach on a few key aircraft which would have served us well in the years after.
      Btw, we can’t claim the credit for the afterburner. The Italians and – I think – the Germans were testing the concept in the early years of the war. We tend to over-emphasise our role in the development of the jet; but for the critical shortage of key metals the Germans would have had their axial-flow designs in volume production well ahead of us.

  11. michael shaw permalink
    January 20, 2024 4:52 pm

    An excellent video presentation by Mr Ralph Ellis at the start of this post.

  12. nickrl permalink
    January 21, 2024 9:21 am

    Hang on Drakeford called for a decade of change to deal with climate change back in Oct 21 this is what it looks like in action. Oh and where do they see the steel coming from the 1000’s of windmills they want to erect. When oh when are these numptys going to see the folly of this eco vandalism. By all means recognise the threat (i dont but you have to play the audience now) but come up with a plan that takes the rest of this century to implement so there is something left for the next generation. I we can hope here is that when people see themselves being sacrificed on the green altar they will think twice about who they vote for.

    • January 23, 2024 9:46 am

      ” Hang on Drakeford called for a decade of change to deal with climate change back in Oct 21 this is what it looks like in action. ”

      Does Drakeford and his cronies in the Welsh government support the proposed reduction in CO2 production at Port Talbot with the associated loss of local jobs and the substantial cost to the local economy ?

      I can’t see much involvement from the Welsh government in this process, they should be all over it, acting in the best interests of Welsh people.

  13. January 22, 2024 11:44 am

    It’s appalling and so short sited bit like Beeching in the 1960s. All politicians are so short term thinking and incompetent that someone should put them all in the blast furnace….

Comments are closed.