Skip to content

Europe faces industrial wipe-out

February 22, 2024

By Paul Homewood

 

 image

In the United States, there are massive subsidies. In China, there is an industrial strategy pursued with ruthless effectiveness. And yet in Europe, there are just “deadlines and fines”.

Luca de Meo, the boss of the giant French car manufacturer Renault, didn’t mince his words when he called this week for a coherent response from Britain, France, and the rest of the major European industrial nations, to the threat posed by imports of cheap foreign electric vehicles.

Sure, it would be easy to dismiss that as just another industrial leader calling for soft loans and tariffs to rescue an uncompetitive industry. And yet de Meo is on to something. Net zero has turned into a Chinese weapon aimed right at the heart of Western competitiveness.

If we don’t wake up and recognise soon that we have to figure out a better way of combatting climate change, our industries are about to get wiped out.

The transition from petrol to battery-powered vehicles is not working quite as planned. It was meant to spark a wave of investment, create a swathe of “well-paid green jobs” and dramatically cut carbon emissions at the same time.

Renault, in turn, looked set to play a leading role. With models such as the ZOE, the company was an early pioneer in the space of relatively affordable EVs. It looked as if it was all set to become a global leader.

Right now, that seems far from the case. Chinese firms are about to dump millions of cheap EVs on the European market.

“The UK may no longer be part of the EU, but on this issue I think we face the same challenges together,” argued De Meo in an article for Autocar.

“With the internal combustion engine, our leadership was undisputed…and it was a barrier to entry for newcomers. Today, Europeans find themselves in a position of relative fragility”. His argument is that the EU and the UK have to work together to fight back, and protect what remains one of the continent’s most significant industries.

He is certainly right about that. In the US, President Biden has launched a tax credit scheme that will pour nearly $400bn into subsidies, and while not all the money will be well spent it will give America a chance to build a substantial industry.

Meanwhile, China has funnelled massive amounts of money into building EVs, it has taken control of critical minerals needed to make them cheaply, and it is now about to flood the West with models that could well outcompete European manufacturers on both quality and price.

Instead of sparking a manufacturing renaissance in Europe, the pursuit of net zero is leading instead to imminent deindustrialisation. It might be starting with the mighty automotive industry, in which the Continent once led the world, but it is being repeated again and again elsewhere.

Indeed only this week a group of major European industries launched the “Antwerp declaration”, calling on the EU to relax regulations, lower energy costs and increase investment, while it still has some industry left.

Signed by 73 major companies, from 17 sectors including chemicals, pharmaceuticals and engineering, it argued that “sites are being closed, production halted, people let go…Europe needs a business case urgently.”

Here’s the problem, however. All the major European governments, including the UK of course, are still fanatically committed to net zero, and that stops them from responding properly.

Take cars for example. Normally, the EU or Britain would likely launch an “anti-dumping” action against cheap imports of Chinese EVs, and impose tariffs to allow our manufacturers to compete.

But how can we do that when we have banned the sale of petrol cars from 2035, and we are committed to phasing them out as fast as we can?

image

Likewise, we could put restrictions and tariffs on Chinese solar panels, which now dominate that particular market. But how can we do that when we have legally mandated targets to increase the share of alternative energies?

The price tag is already fearfully high, and we have miserably failed to build up the capacity to make our own equipment at competitive prices. If given a choice between net zero and economic success, our politicians are disturbingly clear which takes precedence.

It’s the same story throughout the economy. We have allowed energy prices to soar, planned to close down our own offshore oil fields, and held back the growth in fracking even as it has delivered economic booms in North America.

We have ignored the fact that these choices are putting companies out of business – and are allowing Chinese rivals with far lower power costs to trample all over European businesses.

The harsh truth is that China has weaponised net zero, and turned it into a way of seizing industrial leadership. America is responding, admittedly perhaps too late, and with too much state control. But Europe has been left floundering, and it is about to get wiped out.

The Continent has made a complete mess of the transition to net zero, naively assuming that it would create jobs, and that its rivals were only interested in saving the planet, and not in securing an edge for their own industries.

It is perfectly possible to combine the two objectives, but it won’t be done simply through “deadlines and regulations”, or with naive rhetoric about “green jobs”.

Both the UK and the EU need a complete reset, working out what industries need to be protected, how to keep costs competitive and, where necessary, figuring out how to cut carbon emissions over a realistic timetable.

It is not yet too late to do that – but by the time Renault has closed down, and even the French are driving around in Chinese-made BYDs, it will be.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/02/22/china-weaponised-net-zero-aimed-at-vulnerable-west/

56 Comments
  1. tomcart16 permalink
    February 22, 2024 11:03 am

    It’s like watching the tide go out.

    • Nigel Sherratt permalink
      February 22, 2024 11:05 am

      A lot further than normal, followed by a tsunami.

      • Eric Blaauw permalink
        February 22, 2024 4:08 pm

        nothing to add to that…..

  2. John Palmer permalink
    February 22, 2024 11:04 am

    An excellent and very accurate summary. It should be a wake-up call to our wilfully ignorant leaders, but……

    Oh, sorry, I forgot, they’re “saving the planet™” FFS!!!

    • cunningfox12 permalink
      February 22, 2024 11:07 am

      Unfortunately, their own ‘virtue’ is more important to them than anyone else’s prosperity or survival.

    • PostBREXIT permalink
      February 22, 2024 11:17 am

      UK politicos are too busy debating more important issues like calling for a one sided ceasefire in Gaza!

      Thankfully. the IDF know what they have to do to ensure Israel’s future whereas the UK has a very bleak future under Net Zero.

  3. Nigel Sherratt permalink
    February 22, 2024 11:08 am

    Article still assumes that transition to net zero is necessary rather than the root cause of the disaster.

    • glenartney permalink
      February 22, 2024 11:13 am

      That is hard wired into 97% of politicians and journalists brains. There’s no sign of a recovery yet

    • February 22, 2024 11:14 am

      They still think we have to combat climate change. The propaganda is still working with most of the Telegraph ‘reporters’.

      • February 22, 2024 12:29 pm

        And this is the key belief we have to crush, as it’s at the core of everything else. Whilst our MPs, media, etc. believe this climate propaganda point, the rush to implement increasingly destructive Net Zero policies will continue. Until they understand that climate is not an issue and it’s their policies that are doing the damage, it won’t change.

      • Devoncamel permalink
        February 22, 2024 1:07 pm

        Precisely, there’s nothing we can do to change the climate.

  4. glenartney permalink
    February 22, 2024 11:10 am

    I told my three sons thirty years ago to learn trades that couldn’t be exported to China. I’m telling my grandchildren the same thing today.

    I was correct back then and more so now. Those BYDs can’t be sent back to China and houses have to repaired and renovated in situ. The opportunities for scrapping renewable energy facilities will be available too.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 22, 2024 12:31 pm

      Sorry but that’s a bit silly. Nobody knows what jobs will be needed in 20 or 30 years time. If China can do stuff more cheaply than us, great. They can only make so much, everything else they will have to buy from others. Each car worker can’t be a software engineer as well or a newthingmaker.

      • The Informed Consumer permalink
        February 22, 2024 4:24 pm

        So many articles written with the undercurrent (at least) that it’s all China’s fault we left the stable door open.

        We created the market for China, what do we expect, for them to ignore it?

      • JohnM permalink
        February 22, 2024 4:29 pm

        ….but each car worker can train to be a plumber, window cleaner, furniture remover, etc all are in short supply.

      • glenartney permalink
        February 22, 2024 5:07 pm

        A car worker can indeed retrain but the person doing the retraining will be a plumber with 30 years experience. Same for electricians and joiners even if the technologies and materials have changed over that time.

        A car worker can also retrain to be a car repair technician be it ICE, BEV, Hydrogen or whatever.

        All of these can retrain to be Lithium recyclers.

        But the experience of Clydeside shipbuilders, Yorkshire miners, Sheffield and Scunthorpe steel workers and Yoevil glove makers suggests that when an industry closes there is a long time before JD Sports, Amazon and the rest turn up offering jobs that are very different from those that disappeared.

        Same applies to jobs lost to automation.

        All the while joiners, leccies, brickies, kitchen fitters have been working or moving to where the work is like fitting out warehouses.

  5. February 22, 2024 11:22 am

    Far too late. It was obvious this was going to happen a decade ago.

    Our ‘leaders’ are useless, our societies turn out ‘software’ rather than ‘hardware’. Even if there was a real movement to change it would require decades to change mindsets. Engineers don’t grow on trees.

    But the mindless , madness of net zero in Europe has now been reinforced by the equal madness of Russophobia, which has resulted in the ridiculous situation of expensive Russian LNG replacing cheap Russian NG.

    German ‘green blob’ leadership was closed down nukes, replaced by coal which is now going to be replaced by CCGTs powered by that gas 3 times the price of pipeline NG.

    Meanwhile coal and gas fired generation powers the economies of China , India and Russia who have not forgotten how necessary ‘hardware’ is for a thriving economy.

    Energy equals economy and vice versa. Replace low entropy energy sources with high entropy ones, and your already declining economy will collapse.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 22, 2024 12:32 pm

      I simply don’t understand why intelligent people thing manufacturing is somehow better or more valuable than services. Do car workers earn as much as software engineers? Can cars even be built without software?

      • Robert Christopher permalink
        February 22, 2024 2:35 pm

        “Do car workers earn as much as software engineers?”

        Car manufacturing plants can employ those that can’t become successful software engineers.

        And both types of job keep them off the streets.

      • The Informed Consumer permalink
        February 22, 2024 4:30 pm

        I don’t entirely disagree with you, but manufacturing generates so many high paying service jobs now.

        The electronics in cars alone are designed and constantly upgraded by well educated people. The SatNav alone has evolved beyond all recognition from less than 20 years ago.

        Production of a car is far removed from what industrial processes used to look like with barely a component made on the assembly lines. There is a huge supply chain involved with making a modern car.

    • Dave Ward permalink
      February 22, 2024 2:11 pm

      “Engineers don’t grow on trees”

      “Can cars even be built without software?”

      I’ve just returned from a few days in the Midlands – our industrial heartlands – and visited Claymills Victorian Pumping Station, the Midlands Air Museum and the British Car Museum at Gaydon. They all heavily depend on retired engineers and volunteers, people with traditional skills and know-how. The BCM also displays numerous cars which not only don’t need software to run, but were built without it as well! As I watched one of the guides explaining to a group of children how designers & engineers used slide rules to do their calculations, I couldn’t resist saying “I’ve still got mine” (and I think I can remember how to use it!)

      • The Informed Consumer permalink
        February 22, 2024 4:38 pm

        Nope, car’s can’t be built without software. Electronic Fuel Injection was a massive step forward from even mechanical fuel injection and is why we can run clean diesels achieving 50mpg.

        I used to be chuffed when I could squeeze 30mpg out a 1,000cc BMC Mini with a top speed of 80mph. My current car will do 60mph in 4.7 seconds and is governed to 155mph. It’s a relatively modest 2 Litre SUV and will get 35mpg on a run. It’s 4WD will kick in automatically when it’s needed.

        None of that is achievable without software and a sophisticated ECU.

        And the Mini, and most other cars then, stank of unburned fuel which none of us noticed because we were so used to it.

  6. tony522014 permalink
    February 22, 2024 11:24 am

    The whole Climate Change scenario has been pushed (and funded) by Putin and Xi ever since they realised what an excellent anti-West weapon it was. And they were right.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 22, 2024 12:34 pm

      If they were right, they were also totally wrong. Poor countries are terrible markets to export to. XI is a mercantlist, and Adam Smith showed how stupid that was 250 years ago.

    • Robert Christopher permalink
      February 22, 2024 3:25 pm

      China’s EVs are powered by Coal, as they have a shortage of Oil.

    • The Informed Consumer permalink
      February 22, 2024 4:44 pm

      @tony522014

      Utter nonsense.

      This whole thing evolved from the Club of Rome and people like Maurice Strong. All China and Russia had to do was stand back and laugh as we committed national HariKari.

      Why would Russia want to scupper it’s principle Gas and Oil markets by encouraging the west to stop burning fossil fuels?

      Why would China wan’t to impoverish the west? It’s China’s largest market. If we get poor the Chinese starve.

      The west blew up Nordstream, not Russia.

  7. saighdear permalink
    February 22, 2024 11:26 am

    Why’s nobody marching in the streets to oust the whole lot – including the MSM for participating in promoting this rubbish. Ours is becoming a silent household – no radio or TV switched on: Getting triggered (sarc) by the nonsenses uttered in UK and in Euroland about just about anything that takes in Climate change … Those Germans especially, but kind enough to broadcast to us FOC unlike the bbc. But why listen to it… 
    Meanwhile in the real world, our industry is grinding to a stop under LOLA & PUWER regns  11n’safety regs implies scrapping older machines which were perfectly functional and new ones cost an arm & Leg to maintain … Have to get Wife n Bairns out in Bare feet to tow the lines or push the Fork ….

  8. tomcart16 permalink
    February 22, 2024 11:28 am
    • Some wag may say that the Deben-Milliband compound in the presence of Green gas is the latest destructive product of the chemists’ fume chamber.
  9. February 22, 2024 11:39 am

    The fracking bans are a self-inflicted economic disaster.

  10. Gamecock permalink
    February 22, 2024 11:43 am

    In the United States, there are massive subsidies.

    [citation needed]

    • In The Real World permalink
      February 22, 2024 12:25 pm

      Try this one .https://mishtalk.com/economics/biden-caught-in-huge-rigging-of-ev-carbon-credits-at-taxpayer-expense/

      A lot of the subsidies are being hidden up , but over the years , nearly all of Tesla,s profits have come from subsidies .

      • Gamecock permalink
        February 23, 2024 1:21 pm

        Carbon credit sales, while ridiculous, meet no definition of ‘subsidy.’

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 22, 2024 12:35 pm

      The Anti-Inflation Act.

      • The Informed Consumer permalink
        February 22, 2024 4:45 pm

        Inflation Reduction Act.

      • Gamecock permalink
        February 23, 2024 1:23 pm

        Inflation Reduction Act? Can you be a little more specific? What are some of these subsidies, beyond Obama Care extension?

  11. Jack Broughton permalink
    February 22, 2024 11:57 am

    I used to think that the UKs massive industrial decline would lead to us being incorporated into the USA, as the poor relative: now I suspect we will soon become an overseas colony of China. Fortunately, I prefer Chines food and beer to the USA’s offerings.

    • Artyjoke permalink
      February 22, 2024 12:21 pm

      Unfortunately, perhaps, colonies tend not to be able to choose their coloniser but given a choice I would opt for the chopstick ones rather than the choppy ones. Cooler tech and less kneeling down looking at other men’s bottoms.

    • ThinkingScientist permalink
      February 22, 2024 12:31 pm

      Think Texas or Montana.

      Think STEAK!

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 22, 2024 12:40 pm

      Until very recently, there was no decline, let alone a massive decline. By gross Value Added, manufacturing in the UK was over twice as high by 2010 as it was in 1960. As for becoming a colony, we need to be as wealthy as we are now to buy the same level of stuff from China as we buy no – that’s obviously true. If China wants to export more to us, we have to become more wealthy, not less wealthy.

      • The Informed Consumer permalink
        February 22, 2024 4:46 pm

        100%

  12. Penda100 permalink
    February 22, 2024 12:17 pm

    A weapon pointed at the West – isn’t that what Net Zero was always intended to be? Surely that’s what Maurice Strong and the UN intended all along?

    • chriskshaw permalink
      February 23, 2024 12:30 am

      i got the impression that strong was a communist sympathizer hell bent on self enrichment. 

      • Penda100 permalink
        February 23, 2024 2:20 pm

        Strong was most definitely a communist and a crook. I referenced him because of this:

        1992 Rio
        We know that there is no Climate emergency, it is a fabrication started by the UN at the Rio Conference in 1992. Since that time, as Maurice Strong who was a proponent of World Government by the UN. He visualized the best way to accomplish the goal was to collapse Western societies was by creating mass hysteria proselytized by the willing dupes in our education system that CO2 is going to destroy the world because allegedly it will cause the temperature to go up 3*C.

        The politics behind the IPCC is not about Climate according to the UN policy makers – is is all about redistribution of wealth which is a necessary step to realize Strong’s dream. The IPCC has admitted that Climate is not a problem, but, is a tool to be used for redistribution of our wealth through taxation of carbon as a start.

  13. February 22, 2024 12:22 pm

    A zillion miles off topic!!! But has PM (Penny Mordaunt) taken over as PM?

    • gezza1298 permalink
      February 22, 2024 4:21 pm

      I hope not as she is an alphabetty-spaghetti trans fan.

  14. Mikehig permalink
    February 22, 2024 12:30 pm

    The “Antwerp Declaration” mentioned in the article is worth a look. While the language is green gobbledegook, the underlying message is one of massive concern, even panic. The 70 signatories include many of the biggest companies and trade associations from a wide range of sectors.

    Every UK MP should get a copy: we’re in the same boat.

  15. micda67 permalink
    February 22, 2024 12:39 pm

    As with most things, the political class is made up in the main of individuals who have never run a business let alone a manufacturing business- low on ability but high on theory. Any study of how first Japan, then Taiwan and now China have outclassed Western industrial strength will clearly show that it consists of a battle plan, first you scope out the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, then you attack – the car market of the early 70’s is classic – American & European car manufacturers was just turning out poor quality vehicles to the mass market, the Japanese entered the market offering higher spec vehicles, got over the initial issue regarding rust caused by winter salt – result, American and European manufacturers invested in “out Jappanning” the Japanese to the extent that Japan started to build local factories. If we want compete, then we have to make a hard decision- is it a no go for ICE or are we going to risk further investment into BEV – one issue not discussed is disposal costs regarding BEV and fire risk – each BEV regardless of place of manufacture should have a additional cost imposed of 75% of purchase price to cover the cost of disposal of the battery pack, each BEV should have a fire risk excess applied at 50% of purchase price to cover the risk of multiple damage potential (neither charge applies to ICE as these vehicles are highly recycled and a exceptional low fire risk), this should make BEV’s a snip at nearly £100,000, most of which can be banked upon despatch from factory.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 22, 2024 12:46 pm

      The European (in reality French and British) and US car industries were ripe for attack because (i) they were very low quality because of a lack of competition due to import restrictions and nationalisation and (ii) very high costs due to high social costs and unionisation, which prevented modern labour practices and modernisation of plant. The Japanese (and Germans) built local factories to get around import tariffs and other barriers. Having learnt the lessons, Europe and the US shook off the constraints and prospered, only for politicians to forget the lessons and impose costs and barriers once more.

      • gezza1298 permalink
        February 22, 2024 6:42 pm

        High labour costs in Japan came into it as well as lots manufacturing was done in cheaper countries. Years back my father bought a Japanese 3 part hi-fi and none of it was made in Japan. Malaysia and even here I think. Shipping costs played a part as well for heavy things like CRT TVs. A lot of small ones were made in Turkey at a factory that served many makes while Sony ran their own. Big widescreen TVs were made very close to the end market – Wales being one – but that all changed with flatscreens.

  16. Phoenix44 permalink
    February 22, 2024 12:49 pm

    If we have to have Net Zero, let’s do it as cheaply as possible. Our labour and capital can do other stuff if we can’t compete with China, provided we don’t make ourselves poorer in the meantime.

  17. Derek T permalink
    February 22, 2024 1:03 pm

    Don’t forget that the UK is also going to subsidise these Chinese imports as reported here: UK To Subsidise China Car Manufacturers | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT (wordpress.com)

    Industrial suicide seems about the right phrase. The Climate Change Act must be scrapped. Maybe losing the court case (Hasn’t Gummer Done Enough Damage Already? | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT (wordpress.com)) may cause the sensible MPs to have a re-think?

    • malfraser9a75f35659 permalink
      February 23, 2024 7:39 am

      Sensible MP’s?

  18. John Bowman permalink
    February 22, 2024 2:09 pm

    ”…  a coherent response from Britain, France, and the rest of the major European industrial nations, to the threat posed by imports of cheap foreign electric vehicles.

    Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations 1776: consumption is the sole end and purpose of all production; the interests of producers are to be considered only as much as they serve the interests of consumers.

    The coherent response then is: Hurrah! Cheap cars for consumers = makes them wealthier as they will have more money to spend on other things and this will boost economic activity generally, creating jobs too.

    But as UK & Europe follow Benito’s Law of welfare for corporate cronies, and State direction of the economy, the corporations will expect their political bedfellows to protect them and impoverish consumers. 

    And they still don’t understand it seems, that if BEVs were free most people still wouldn’t want one. 

  19. gezza1298 permalink
    February 22, 2024 3:48 pm

    In the United States, there are massive subsidies. Or huge wads of taxpayers cash as they really are which is hardly sustainable. The Chinese battery car bubble may burst soon as they have just found out how crap they are in cold weather as the range plummets, the charge time increases, queues build up, drivers light bonfires to keep themselves warm as the battery car is of no use. On the upside it says that drivers were able to push their cars whereas here they have to lifted and taken away.

    • The Informed Consumer permalink
      February 22, 2024 4:51 pm

      The Chinese battery car bubble may burst soon as they have just found out how crap they are in cold weather

      It’s little known that EV’s are worse in hot climates than in cold. They lose charge more quickly with overheating than cold.

  20. Jack Broughton permalink
    February 22, 2024 8:06 pm

    Regarding UK manufacture, a note to the Informed Consumer and Phoenix 44: the UK used to sell power stations world wide a generation back. We can no longer even manufacture the components of CCGTs such as large gas turbines, steam turbines and boilers, we also import our nuclear power stations, windmills, solar panels etc, 

    During covid we could not make the simple PPE or testing equipment needed. Yes, we are still good in some business sectors like cars (with help from India). However, our manufacturing security is now negligible: imported gas and electricity are easily stopped (as are offshore windmills) and we will soon not be able to make quality steel at all.

Comments are closed.