Skip to content

Drax: UK power station still burning rare forest wood

February 28, 2024
tags: ,

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Robin Guenier

 

 

image

A power company that has received £6bn in UK green subsidies has kept burning wood from some of the world’s most precious forests, the BBC has found.

Papers obtained by Panorama show Drax took timber from rare forests in Canada it had claimed were "no go areas".

It comes as the government decides whether to give the firm’s Yorkshire site billions more in environmental subsidies funded by energy bill payers.

Drax says its wood pellets are "sustainable and legally harvested".

The Drax Power Station, near Selby in North Yorkshire, is a converted coal plant which burns wood pellets. In 2023, it produced about 5% of the UK’s electricity. The site has become a key part of the government’s drive to meet its climate targets.

Its owner, Drax, receives money from energy bill payers because the electricity produced from burning pellets is classified as renewable and treated as emission-free

  • In fact, the power station emits about 12 million tonnes of carbon a year, but under international rules the UK doesn’t have to count these emissions.
  • All of the 6.5 million tonnes of wood pellets burned by Drax each year are produced overseas. Many come from Drax’s 17 pellet plants in the US and Canada.

    In 2022, Panorama revealed the company had obtained logging licences in the Canadian province of British Columbia and filmed logs being taken from what the programme said was primary forest to a pellet plant owned by Drax.

    Primary forests are natural forests that have not been significantly disturbed by human activity.

    Deforestation in Canada

    Panorama has found that Drax has taken whole logs from rare, "old-growth" forests that have been cut down by timber companies

    Following the BBC investigation, Drax denied taking wood from primary forests but said it would not apply for further logging licences in the province.

    However, the company still takes whole logs from forests that have been cut down by timber companies.

    Panorama has obtained documents from British Columbia’s Ministry of Forests that show the company took more than 40,000 tonnes of wood from so-called "old-growth" forests in 2023.

    Old-growth is some of the oldest forest which the provincial government says provides "unique habitats, structures and ecological functions".

    Satellite image showing forest cut down in British Columbia

    Satellite image showing an area of old-growth forest cut down in British Columbia

    One example is an 87-hectare "cut block" called EM807M – located 180 miles west of the logging city of Prince George – which was all classified as old growth. Although a timber company held the licence to cut down the site, logging records show that Drax took 26% of all the harvested wood.

    In total, Drax received 130 lorry-loads of whole logs from the site last winter. The wood was turned into pellets and some were burned at its Yorkshire power plant.

    Ninety per cent of the cut block had the even higher classification of "priority deferral area". This category is for old-growth forests that are "rare, at risk and irreplaceable", according to an independent panel of experts in British Columbia.

    The experts recommended that logging should be paused in priority deferral areas, but it’s still legal to cut them down. British Columbia’s provincial government says it is working to ensure more old growth is deferred and protected.

    Forests ‘almost gone’

    Drax’s use of timber from this "irreplaceable" forest was far from a one-off.

    Forestry documents show that in the first nine months of last year the company took wood from 30 different timber marks in British Columbia where more than 25% of the forest had been designated as old growth. Twenty-six of those timber marks included the even rarer priority deferral areas.

    Timber marks – codes beaten on to wood by specially made hammers – identify all of the wood cut under individual logging licences on one or more parcels of land. The timber mark paper trail meant Panorama could track logs to Drax’s pellet mills.

    In total, Drax sourced about 55,000 cubic metres of whole logs – that’s more than 1,100 large truck loads – from timber marks containing old-growth forest.

    Ecologist Michelle Connolly, from the British Columbia campaign group Conservation North, says making pellets from old forests can never be sustainable.

    "Old-growth forests in British Columbia are almost gone because of 70 years of logging to feed sawmills and pulp mills, and Drax is helping push our remaining ones off the cliff, along with our native biodiversity," she says.

    In response to the latest findings by the BBC, Drax admitted it has taken wood from old-growth forests. But it told Panorama that 77% of the material for its Canadian wood pellets came from sawdust and sawmill residues, with the rest coming from forestry residues and low-grade logs.

    A spokesman for the company says that it keeps its sourcing policy and practices under regular review so that they "take account of evolving forest dynamics, legislation, policy, and science".

    Drax says that it decided in October 2023 to stop sourcing wood from old-growth priority deferral areas, and that "work to implement this decision through the supply chain is ongoing".

    The company doesn’t dispute that it is still taking wood from old-growth sites that are not priority deferral areas.

    The burning of wood from old-growth forests contradicts the company’s previous claims. In a 2017 report about sustainability, Drax stated it would not take wood from what it called "no-go areas". It said: "We do not take from protected forests, old growth or primary forest, sites that have been classified as having a high biodiversity value."

    Drax has told BBC Panorama that the 2017 document is "now obsolete" and that its current policy and practices are "more sophisticated".

    Drone footage of deforested area in BCI

    Drax says the emissions released by burning wood are offset by the planting of new trees

    The company’s latest sourcing policy, published in 2019, makes no mention of protecting old growth or primary forest, instead it talks about avoiding "damage or disturbance to high carbon forest".

    The UK subsidy scheme for Drax Power Station is due to end in 2027, but the government is consulting on plans to extend it to the end of the decade, which could cost bill-payers an additional £4bn.

    The company says the emissions released by burning wood are offset by the planting of new trees. But critics say it takes decades for the new trees to grow and that the new forests may never be able to capture that much carbon.

    Drax helps the UK government meet its climate targets because, on paper at least, the power station is treated as emission-free. This is because international carbon accounting rules state that greenhouse gas emissions from burning wood are counted in the country where the trees are felled as opposed to where they are burned.

    Any additional subsidies would be to support Drax while it tries to install carbon capture technology to reduce emissions at its power station.

    Previously, the government’s scientific advisors on the Climate Change Committee – an independent non-departmental public body – warned that subsidies for burning wood pellets should not be extended beyond 2027.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68381160

    There is not a cat in hell’s chance that Drax’s subsidy won’t be extended. The government has painted itself into a corner, and simply cannot do without the dispatchable power Drax brings.

    As for Drax’s protestations, they have lied before, so why should anybody believe them now?

    35 Comments
    1. February 28, 2024 10:14 am

      It’s strange that in this BBC article there is no mention of the fact that a few years ago the BBC (Tom Heap of ….) was eulogising about Drax burning imported wood chips to save the planet! Of course the sensible course would be to convert all the Drax units to burn gas or coal, but with Sir Kneeler (and Milliprat) in charge, nothing sensible will happen.

        • saighdear permalink
          February 28, 2024 11:18 am

          No, EMPHATICALLY NO !  – what is there to like, nowadays about ANYTHING the bbc does … as Philip B said above …
          and yes I’ve looked at your links, Good for you thnx. from  Thursday, 6 September 2007 to 17 July 2013 “one” could have been forgiven for thinking the bbc was straight up the middle ( Cor .. critical thinking … wazzat?  never gave it much critical anything then unless it was the Uniparty already governing us)
          Aye, for sure , so much threatened snake squirming and biting from them and their type. and to think we may have Sr Kneeler & Pratt getting back in … Ya godda jis luvv the nonsense of green politics.
          Howzit go now? Vote SNP get green, vote labour get green, vote conservative get woke, vote liberal get no very much, Get REFORM , vote …..well who ?

    2. February 28, 2024 10:21 am

      Wasn’t the conversion of Drax from Coal to Wood one of Ed Davey’s projects when he was Energy Minister in the Coalition government?

    3. Mrs Green permalink
      February 28, 2024 10:37 am

      The CO2 delusion is China’s best-ever decades-old psyop. Huge numbers of ‘intelligent’ people have fallen for it.

      • February 28, 2024 12:31 pm

        Yes, all those clever people! I remember when the news of the conversion came out most people I knew thought it was daft. “You mean cut down trees in North America, chip the wood, kiln dry it and send it across the atlantic – stupid” If I and other ordinary people can see that why can’t the politicians and experts?

        One reason I think is because to the politicians and experts it doesn’t matter so long as it makes our CO2 emissions look good. It’s like when a British company closes a manufacturing plant in the UK and transfers production to China our so called Production Emissions fall even though global emissions are unchanged or increased.

    4. Douglas Dragonfly permalink
      February 28, 2024 10:58 am

      New gigafactory will be built near M5 creating 4,000 new jobs

      The government announced in July 2023 that Tata would be building a new electric vehicle battery ‘gigafactory’ on the Gravity site near Bridgwater

      https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/new-gigafactory-built-near-m5-9129639

      This news report includes the following :-

      ‘Somerset Council has big plans for the next five years. They’re going to invest in infrastructure, skills, site access and connectivity needed to make sure Somerset benefits as much as possible from Agratas’ investment. The good news is that the money for all this comes from the business rates the factory will pay when it starts working.

      The council and central government are wrapping up an ‘in principle’ agreement for support. This will allow a huge long-term economic boost to Somerset to happen without extra cost to the council, and with no negative impact on the council’s finances.

      The council’s corporate and resources scrutiny committee will discuss these proposals on March 7. Then, the executive committee will consider them for approval on March 12. Later in the year, the full council will make further financial decisions on the level of investment.’

      There is no reporting of the negative side, health or financial, to this decision.

      • revdphilipfoster permalink
        February 28, 2024 12:11 pm

        They might do better to pile all the (sorry, our) money into the Drax burners.

        This factory will go down the drain quicker than British Volt.

      • Devoncamel permalink
        February 28, 2024 1:26 pm

        I’m not sure how close to the M5 the site is but the risk of fire to traffic must’ve been considered surely. For reference the tragic fire in 2011 demonstrates what can easily go wrong

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_M5_motorway_crash

        • gezza1298 permalink
          February 28, 2024 4:15 pm

          There is a big difference between agreeing something, and building and operating it. Given the wholesale collapse of the demand for battery vehicles there must be some doubt at Tata about the viability of this factory especially as UK electricity costs are the highest in Europe. I feel that the only reason it isn’t being built in Spain is down to the amount of taxpayers cash on offer.

      • John Hultquist permalink
        February 28, 2024 4:24 pm

        This project will be one to watch. Other such factories around the world are on hold or cancelled.

      • February 28, 2024 7:41 pm

        In the last week Somerset has had the Solar panels on the roof of a Lidl warehouse catch fire and now a lithium ion factory

        Fire destroys roof of industrial unit in Chard – BBC News

        On the bright side the Somerset Fire brigade will have lots of expertise in dealing with electric fires and will be able to charge consultancy fees to other forces.

    5. Will permalink
      February 28, 2024 10:59 am

      Drax would emit less CO2 overall if it burned the coal from the coalfield that it sits on. No transport costs, a significantly higher thermal efficiency from coal versus wood etc. But we cannot do that, it is against the elite religion!

    6. jeremy23846 permalink
      February 28, 2024 11:15 am

      The ridiculous notion that burning wood is “sustainable” really annoys me. Wood releases far more CO2 than coal when burnt. The sustainability argument is a fallacy. If you cut down a tree and replace it, that tree will take years to grow sufficiently to absorb as much CO2 as the old tree. But there is nothing stopping coal fired power station operators planting a tree for the equivalent amount of coal burnt. The only difference with is that with burning wood, theoretically you could plant the new tree exactly where the old one was, but it still doesn’t make it “sustainable.”

      • gezza1298 permalink
        February 28, 2024 5:02 pm

        Given Net Zero is all about sending mankind backwards, why would the fascist elite notice that people moved from burning wood and charcoal to coal due to better supply and energy content.

    7. iananthonyharris permalink
      February 28, 2024 11:18 am

      This is virtue signalling at its most blatant. The harvesting, pelleting and transporting produce more CO2 than burning coal. Hardwood takes 40 years to maturity, so calling it renewable is a cynical joke.

    8. tomcart16 permalink
      February 28, 2024 11:34 am

      It’s softwood that takes 40 years to maturity. The harvesting is of grants and subsidies as we all well know. Most types of subsidies often fail to buck the market and except in time of war or a need for self sufficiency cannot be justified .

      And the political classes whinge about the decline in public regard for them.

      Is it education ,conceit or cupidity?

      • gezza1298 permalink
        February 28, 2024 5:27 pm

        If you are growing trees for the biomass market then the quicker you harvest them then the quicker you make some money and since the growth rate of trees slows as they age then take them early. You can also choose fast growing species that may be alien to the region and have little nature benefit such as eucalyptus. Pawlonia is about the fastest growing tree and I find that goat willow grows well and seems to coppice very well so you can get multiple crops from the same stool. I have no idea about pawlonia but eucalyptus is limited to 3 coppice cycles as the stool gets weaker.

    9. Gamecock permalink
      February 28, 2024 12:13 pm

      some of the world’s most precious forests

      A human evaluation, not Nature’s.

      Anywho, the protestors are ignorant twerps.

      There is absolutely nothing rare nor precious about the forests.

      https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/old-growth-trees-british-columbia-1.6045289

      The province says there are currently 13.7 million hectares of old growth in British Columbia, and 10 million of those hectares are protected or not economical to harvest. For reference, the entire province is roughly 95 million hectares in size, with approximately 57 million hectares of forested land.

      Around 20 million hectares of public forest in B.C. is available for harvesting, according to the province, of which 3.6 million hectares is old growth.

      Each year, 200,000 hectares of forested lands in B.C. are logged. The province says 27 per cent of this annual harvest comes from old growth.

      BWTM:

      With almost 362 million hectares (ha), Canada ranks as the country with the third-largest forest area in the world. Much of this forest grows in the boreal zone.

      Boreal means MOST of it is beyond the reach of humans.

      Canada has 1.4 million square miles of forest. All of Drax’s horses and all of Drax’s men can’t dent the forest. The protestors are handy, easy-to-use tools.

    10. Gamecock permalink
      February 28, 2024 12:25 pm

      Drax: UK power station still burning rare forest wood

      Maybe I misunderstand English English, and ‘rare’ means something different than in American English. Is 13.7 million hectares ‘rare’ in English English?

      It appears there is also BBC English. When they use a word, it means just what they choose it to mean — neither more nor less.

      I do remember a few years ago that Drax claimed that they were just using scrap wood sourced from wood processors. Branches and bark. Millions of tons of it. Whole trees? Never!

    11. tomcart16 permalink
      February 28, 2024 12:25 pm

      Anyone seen Roger Harrabin on this topic. I suspect that Panorama trumps him so is keeping his head down.

    12. John Hultquist permalink
      February 28, 2024 4:15 pm

      The removal of old-growth forests in Western North America led to issues identified if you search ‘images’ with this phrase: shoot_shovel_shut-up

      Also see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotted_owl

      • Gamecock permalink
        February 28, 2024 6:59 pm

        I heard it tastes just like chicken.

    13. Curious George permalink
      February 28, 2024 5:34 pm

      Don’t use the acronym Drax, spell it out: Dr. Ax.

      • Gamecock permalink
        February 28, 2024 7:00 pm

        I never forgave them for killing Corinne Dufour.

    14. Joe Public permalink
      February 28, 2024 7:10 pm

      Guido has an interesting observation:

      “BBC PANORAMA ‘SCOOP’ ON DRAX LIFTED WHOLESALE FROM HARD LEFT CAMPAIGN LEAFLET”

      <blockquote>”The BBC dropped a Panorama ‘exclusive’ this morning on UK energy firm Drax, claiming that it burns the wrong type of trees from Canada. At first glance the BBC’s story – bylined by BBC One Show talking head Joe Crowley – looks like a piece of mind-numbingly technical environmental journalism. But if you check the receipts, all is not as it seems…

      The BBC’s claims are uncannily similar to those contained in a report by hard left campaign group BiofuelWatch – which was published simultaneously. Funded by a raft of eco nut left-wing foundations, this group of greenie campaigners has been present on joint demonstrations with climate loony ambulance blockers Extinction Rebellion. The BBC report seems to lift statistics straight from BiofuelWatch’s research:

      The BBC’s news piece (and accompanying Panorama programme) also relies on ‘timber marks’ to trace the origin of the offending trees. The BiofuelWatch report reveals these ‘timber mark case studies’ were originally carried out by another group of lefty campaigners….

      To be fair to BiofuelWatch, they are a public campaign group aiming, in their own words, to “call for an immediate end to most of Drax’s subsidies” and effectively put the company out of business. The BBC does not mention BiofuelWatch’s findings as a source for their report. Has Panorama and the BBC splashed ‘research’ by a left-wing environmental campaign group all over its website without admitting a group of greenies are the primary source for its ‘investigation’? Just how much reporting did Panorama actually carry out? Surely silently taking a hand out from a group of eco warriors and badging it as journalism would breach the BBC’s high ethical standards…”</blockquote>

      https://order-order.com/2024/02/28/bbc-panorama-scoop-on-drax-lifted-wholesale-from-hard-left-campaign-leaflet/

      • Gamecock permalink
        February 28, 2024 8:57 pm

        Since Drax is supplying 5% of Britain’s electricity, it might be good to wait til summer to campaign to shut them down.

    15. 4 Eyes permalink
      February 28, 2024 9:54 pm

      Drax says its wood pellets are “sustainable and…” Utter lying garbage. Trees burn quicker than they grow and little trees absorb a lot less CO2 than the mature trees that it burns. There must be a few in Drax who know this so the sustainable defense is deliberate, misleading spin.

    16. February 29, 2024 8:56 am

      BBC promotes the end of British farming. BBC demands biofuels … only the googles at the BBC wouldn’t be able to work out what was going to happen to the Amazon.

    17. February 29, 2024 12:57 pm

      Faraday and Parsons could walk around DRAX today and recognise the core processes, although they would certainly question the burning of wood rather than coal.

      • February 29, 2024 1:30 pm

        Thus showing that power technology advances at a very slow snails pace … whereas according to the Googles in Academia, power technology is going to change beyond all recognition in the blink of an eye to achieve Nut Zero.

        • February 29, 2024 3:30 pm

          power technology advances at a very slow snails pace

          The use of steam to generate electricity has indeed been around for a few years! Steam is very useful.

          When controllable energy-efficient fusion finally arrives, will it be used to heat water to generate steam to move copper wires through magnetic fields ?

    Comments are closed.