The Real Victors of the ECHR Climate Decision are Green Billionaires
By Paul Homewood
Chris Morrison exposes the green billionaires behind the ECHR climate judgement:
The old ladies of Switzerland have had their day in the sun – treble Factor 50s all round – but the real plaudits for the recent idiotic climate change verdict from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) belong to the elite billionaire paymasters behind lawfare activists such as Greenpeace and Client Earth. Greenpeace bankrolled the Swiss ladies and Client Earth supplied some of the legal arguments. The case is likely to throw a spotlight on the role that a few moneyed forces are playing in using the judicial system to enforce their insane Net Zero collectivisation on populations around the world. In Europe, the billionaires, who happily fund XR vandals as well as high-earning lawyers, are seeking to redefine the meaning of democracy. In the United States, as we shall see, extensive judge grooming is being undertaken to help the judiciary come to the correct political verdicts in the growing number of climate lawfare cases.
Full story here.
This comment by Chris goes to the heart of the matter:
Comments are closed.
NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT 
I am still wondering why these misguided Swiss Ladies think that the climate of 1678 was better than today’s.
Now that is an interesting perspective – Human Rights versus Democracy.
History is awash with examples of Democracy prevailing over Human Rights but this often occurred when the there was not universal representation eg Suffragettes
As somebody once said , ” Its not the votes that count , but who does the counting “.
Real democracy has long gone in this world now .
Stupid delusional women. Look at them all. Wealthy! Can’t they find something constructive to do? How about helping with their grandchildren who will be harmed by this asininity. Fools and idiots!
The Swiss have the only true democracy in the world as I see it. If enough Swiss petition then they have to call a referendum. I expect that will now happen, with many affronted Swiss calling for a referendum on leaving the ECHR. Unfortunately the UK is not a democracy so the elites in power will not allow a referendum. However we need to campaign for one to show up the UK’s hypocritical anti-democracy ruling parties.
VOTE LEAVE THE ECHR! Dont vote for a Party that isnt pledging to leave.
So we have some stupidly rich Kamikaze Pilots who still believe the earth is flat & so we must destroy mankind be removing all the atmospheric CO2, there is little enough now, 480ppm is circa now and as the graph continues the CO2 is diminished, anything below 200ppm is the start of ‘Death of Plants’ no plants, no food, no PEOPLE, so who is to benefit from this Kamikaze action, extra terrestrials?
Affluent white women who still can’t figure out the meaning of their lives. So they dedicate themselves to making the world over, in an image that seems to have come from the Harvard faculty lounge.
WEF isn’t about money. It’s about the fabulously wealthy making themselves relevant. Remaking the world is the point. That they will create a horrid mess and kill billions is beside the point.
When you are remaking the world, there is no requirement that you make it better.
I still cannot understand why Zurich, which now is still far cooler than New York, Phoenix, Athens, Madrid, Dallas, LA, Seville or Naples 30 years ago, has some sort of heat problem?
If Europeans can safely and comfortably live in Madrid what’s the claim here?
As is said, this judgment, like the numerous Brexut Court cases, is about Elites getting what they want. We are in a world where democracy is a sham.
Bobn mentions the referenda in Switzerland. They held one last year on “fighting climate change” and voted not to commit massive funds to this. How does the referendum stack against ECHR. In half of the world’s countries these mad women would be locked up (or worse); maybe a suitable asylum could be found and save Switzerland a lot of legal fees / consequential costs?
Democracy no long works, the referendum assisted system is the best but who phrases the question and how many referenda are you allowed? We need 365 a year.
Every politician goes into politics for what can be skimmed off or diverted, or maybe just an easy income if they’re able to waffle clever sounding words.
It’s a joke.
From the Telegraph…
Sunak criticises ‘complete overreach’ of ‘illegitimate’ ECHR ruling
A British judge, Tim Eicke, issued the sole dissent, writing: “I fear that in this judgment the majority has gone beyond what it is legitimate and permissible for this court to do, and unfortunately, in doing so, may well have achieved exactly the opposite effect to what was intended”.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/04/13/rishi-sunak-criticises-echr-illegitimate-ruling-net-zero/
At least the Brit made sense 👍🏽
Came across this video on Youtube, outlines an advisory regarding the placing of batteries in the home. Suggests they should be outside and certainly not in the loft. If inside, say under the stairs then fire protection methods to be included and adequate ventilation provided. Perhaps the ECHR would like to make a ruling on this. 🙂
The greenfoolery billionaires are responsible for the whole climate crisis cult – plenty money, zero humanity
In actual fact, girl-bullying billionaires are deservedly alienating female voters. Look how the Texas law tanked Tesla stock!