The Heart of Climate Deception Temperature
April 28, 2024
By Paul Homewood
This is a very thorough summary of a number of issues surrounding global temperature measurements:
13 Comments
Comments are closed.
“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. – J Robert Oppenheimer.
Recent Comments
Phillip Bratby on ‘Green’ renewable… vickimh234 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… vickimh234 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… vickimh234 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… Phoenix44 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… Phoenix44 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… Phoenix44 on Labour To Keep Strategic Reser… bnice2000 on Global Heating Will Increase P… vickimh234 on How Wet Was The Spring? vickimh234 on Labour’s Green Obsession…
NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT 
I’ve asked on many sites for links to research that proves CO2 to be a potent greenhouse gas. After all that is the founding block on which all the climate models , and therefore the alarmism, is based on. Apart for Tyndall’s experiment in 1859, nobody so far has supplied any links. You’d think there was a wealth of research papers available but I’ve seen none. Strange that.
Oh Mike! It is Sunday and so an excuse to repeat my rant.
“There exists no statistically significant empirical data of any kind which supports the claim that CO2 released by the actions of man back into the Carbon Cycle since the end of the Little IceAge, can in any measurable way be shown to be responsible for all or any part of the current welcome, the FOURTH warming in recent human history.
You would think this would be the most famous data in the world….if it existed.
I have challenged the BBC and their partners in crime at the Grauniad countless times with this statement. They have NEVER replied. I have also challenged countless activist groups via their websites and other than being called a denier one time, I have never received an answer to the question because I am sure “some” of them know that the data does not exist.
Science only exists when a theory is supported by statistically significant data exists obtained by a repeatable and falsifiable methodology. There is no empirical data to support the CO2 control knob so they have no science QED.
Strange do you not think that it is that we being constantly berated by screeching activists to “follow the science”? Perhaps it is THEY who need to heed their own words?
Also could it not be a coincidence that NONE of the front men/women/furry things for the Climate Industrial Complex are scientists of any kind let alone the relevant kind?
A recent study by 3 Polish Physicists clearly shows atmospheric CO2 has reached saturation, ie, any further increases will not affect temperature
https://notrickszone.com/2024/04/23/3-physicists-use-experimental-evidence-to-show-co2s-capacity-to-absorb-radiation-has-saturated/
A good presentation to watch on a wet Sunday. He states the facts and links the information together in a common sense way, BUT getting the eco loons to watch it, is just not going to happen.
Do not confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up. OR We cannot U-turn on the Net Zero, because we are making a lot of money and would lose credibility if we backed off.
I do not see any way to stop implementation of Net Zero, in fact when labour get in and mad Ed Miliband gets to be the top climate change minister, expect an acceleration.
By 2030 the UK will be a bankrupt third world country, No industry, a population demoralised, surviving on benefits and fentanyl, and looking forward to assisted suicide.
That pesky data!
But see what they do in the US when “data” does not agree with their industrial scale fantasy….they ignore it. Note also how the climate attribution nonsense is being promoted by the usual suspects as if in someway being grounded in reality which they most certainly are not. It is all just models and they control the input.
The scale of this criminal fraud is breathtaking. Some go along with it to keep their lousy jobs. Other dark people in the shadows are using this as a political weapon against the West, while their weasel friends in the various houses of representatives look forward to noses in the trough with promised seats on boards of companies they green light which are receiving hundreds of millions for doing nothing more than sewing the emperors clothes with dollars and pound notes.
It’s fairly long by present day standards but I now have a much clearer picture of what is going on, although not why. The section about ocean oscillation was especially interesting. It’s definitely one for my bookmarks.
For even more in depth understanding I would recommend oceanographer Alan Longhurst’s book published shortly before he died aged 98. I have a fairly good understanding of the atmospheric physics e.g. Wijngaarden and Happer, but it is greatly enhancing my understanding of the wider picture.
He’s done a very fine job of evaluating the accuracy of the temperature measurements and their shortcomings, something the climate crowd that receives money desperately avoids. He manages to pick out the central point of all variables confusingly tracked in the climate change discussion.
Why do non-Marxists act so tolerant and even sheepish when they dump garbage in their faces and order them to eat it?
Global Marxists are busy trying to subvert and take over the West every day, and have captured the entire EU political brass along with the U.S. Democratic Party brass and a lot of the Repub. Party brass. Only hero Pres. Trump stands up against them openly, and you can see them throwing everything they can at him to stop him from returning to the White House. Even if he does, they will just get dirtier, requiring us to solidify our support for the strong measures he will have to take, mindful of their ultimate goal of putting us all in camps or worse.
Why did it take so long since the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union to get this powerful? Their real power comes from the CO2 global warming scam run by the global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC octopus, which they’ve eagerly used to bilk trillions, with plans to make it hundreds of trillions, funneling money into all their Marxist projects like border erasing.
(1034) TL Winslow’s answer to Is there any evidence to support the claim that global warming and climate change are scams? – Quora
When you’re dealing with Marxists, all they want to know is if you’re a non-Marxist so they can dump garbage in your face and hope you like it. That’s what the greenhouse effect is, a shameless attempt to frame their archenemy Big Oil as being evil so they can become our saviors by foisting govt. policies to tax and sue them out of existence, i.e., make you pay to destroy your children’s future. The crusade against Pres. Trump and against Big Oil are by the same conspirators, with the same validity, NONE.
It’s almost ridiculously easy to disprove the greenhouse effect, but they never cared because they manufacture Marxists who never think for themselves but just take orders, making it futile for us to try to reach them. We should realize that we are heavily suppressed in trying to reach the remaining non-Marxists and face even stiffer odds trying to motivate them into organizing to fight back because they are trying to make “climate deniers” into enemies of the state.
Physicists’ Lab Experiment Shows A CO2 Increase From 0.04% To 100% Leads To No Observable Warming (notrickszone.com)
(1034) TL Winslow’s answer to What could potentially disprove an entire field of science, such as climate change? – Quora
Wake up before it’s too late!
(1034) TL Winslow’s answer to How would society and politics be affected if global warming was proven to be a hoax? – Quora
I wrote a scientific book on how to model atmospheric temperature without all the nonsense of most models (because it doesn’t affect the actual final result … it all cancels out). I was able to show the model worked for all planets of our solar system (good enough for a model on a single spreadsheet).
The whole aim of the book, was to present the science, with no snide comments or anything …. just present the science.
Then I realised that a book on atmospheric temperature had to have a chapter on what was found measuring temperature. And, that is where I hit the brick wall. Because there was no way to cover that subject in an honest impartial way, without making snide comments about the lies and fraud.
Then I realised, that so long as those academics in climate were such frauds, I might find that rather than contributing to the science, my work was adapted to make a model to push the climate lies.
Thus it remains unpublished, awaiting a better age when academics are actually interested in the science.
The politicised corruption of science is very lucrative these days, from climate, to human biology, it’s all fair game by those lacking in integrity
The Climerati mantra is ‘if nature and empirical science won’t support your nonsense theories, then make it all up, manipulate the data, produce biased models that do’
Thermogeddon headlines sums it up.