Skip to content

Extreme Weather in 1903

May 6, 2023
tags:

By Paul Homewood

 

 image

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2023/04/24/1903-ulysses-storm-among-windiest-ever-in-british-isles/

I reported on the Ulysses Storm, but it was far from being the only extreme weather event that year.

After a wet spring, June turned out to be particularly wet, especially in the south and east of England. In its usual understated fashion, the Met Office at the time noted the month’s “remarkable character”:

image

The late Philip Eden, the leading weather historian of his time, summed it up well twenty years ago:

 

image

Not all Junes in southern England have been as warm, dry and sunny as this month. Exactly 100 years ago there was a prolonged downpour and flood without precedent in London’s meteorological history. In over 300 years of rainfall recording in the capital June 1903 ranks as the wettest individual month, yet there was no rain at all during the first week, nor during the last ten days. In other parts of the UK it was a very dry month with less than 25mm of rain in parts of the north Midlands, Lincolnshire, western and northern Scotland, and Northern Ireland.

The wetness of a wet June, at least in lowland Britain, usually derives from torrential short-lived dowpours, often localised and thundery, and frequently accompanied by great heat. In 1903, by contrast, June’s wetness was a consequence of long-continued steady rain lasting for many hours at a time, unaccompanied by thunder, and associated with unseasonably low temperature. It was the sort of rain more appropriate to autumn than to midsummer.

At Kew Observatory 183mm of rain fell during the middle fortnight of the month – over three times the normal amount for June, and nearly 30mm more than the next wettest. Even more rain fell in north and central Surrey, including 197mm at Waddon New Road in Croydon, 204mm at Addington, 206mm at Brimstone Barn, near Croydon, and 226mm at Carshalton. It is estimated that the rainfall averaged over what now constitutes Greater London was approximately 161mm, which converts to 288 million tons or 64 billion gallons of water, and that is more than 10,000 gallons per person.

Throughout the period a complex depression lay over France, southern Britain and the Low Countries, while high pressure was centred between Scotland and Iceland. The resulting north-easterly airflow fed very moist but very cool air from the southern North Sea across southeast England, so daytime temperatures rose little above 10C on the wettest days. During the middle of the wet period, from lunchtime on the 13th until late evening on the 15th, it rained continuously in central London for a period of almost 59 hours. This is the longest period of unbroken rain ever recorded in a populated part of the United Kingdom.

https://www.weatheronline.co.uk/reports/philip-eden/Non-stop-rain-for-59-hours.htm

Miniature Horseshoe Falls

Brentford Locks

Record Rainfall in Brentford

http://www.bhsproject.co.uk/pc_horseshoefalls1903_rw.shtml

The Met Office noted that July was “scarcely less remarkable”:

image

It remained wet in August, and the Met Office noted that rainfall in London for the first eight months of the year was already higher than the annual average:

image

Still the rain fell, and adding to the misery was a gale of unusual severity on 10th September:

 

image

But the worst weather was saved for October. Again the Met Office monthly report did not convey the full impact:

 

image

The simple reality was that October 1903 was by a long way the wettest of any months in England:

 

image

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/maps-and-data/uk-and-regional-series

Rainfall totalled 191.3mm, in comparison to the 170.8mm in November 2009, the wettest month this century.

I have no doubt that the Met Office will attempt to paint the weather this year as “Extreme”, even though we have experienced nothing out of the ordinary so far this year. After all, they do the same thing every year. They’ll mention one of their storms with a silly name, point to some mild weather and a couple of hot days.

But if anybody wants to know what extreme weather really looks like, they only have to look back to the weather 120 years ago.

10 Comments
  1. lordelate permalink
    May 6, 2023 3:24 pm

    That reminds me of bad flooding in both Dartford and Borough green in kent, if memory serves 1963 or thereabouts. It was of course bad weather back then. I have some old photos that my father took in dartford and the Borough Green papermill flood I have seen on’tinternet.

  2. Wrinkle permalink
    May 6, 2023 4:51 pm

    That heavy rainfall was once in 200 years so no trend there. Have there been more these last few years?

  3. TCHopalong permalink
    May 6, 2023 6:49 pm

    had this happened in 2023. Can you imagine the response of the climate crisis”” propaganda machine! The BBC et al would be in burn down mode. It would be interesting to see whether there were other extreme weather events elsewhere at the same time.

  4. M Fraser permalink
    May 6, 2023 11:59 pm

    bbc….’March, every day was unseasonably warm, hottest March for blah blah…..
    ‘April, no comments re unseasonably cold weather, frosts in the last week!
    How strange the bbc had nothing to say re project (climate) fear’ throughout April, they must have been beside themselves with anxiety that the climate wasn’t fitting their narrative.

    • dave permalink
      May 7, 2023 7:50 am

      “…anxiety…”

      When you are a ‘cherry-picker of data’ you are never really anxious, because the randomness of Nature will eventually produce something you can use.

  5. May 7, 2023 7:25 am

    200 years before storm Ulysses we had the great storm of 1703. One of the most powerful and destructive storms in recorded English history. At least 1,500 men were lost at sea as many ships, including the Royal Navy’s entire Channel Squadron, were sunk. I can’t imagine the Media response if we experienced anything like it today. This was of course when times were much colder as we were still in the grip of the Little Ice Age

  6. May 7, 2023 8:15 am

    ‘The wet June of 1903 would have been virtually impossible without climate change’ . . . . . . oh, wait, there WASN’T any anthropogenic climate change to speak of in 1903.

    Revise that:

    ‘If the wet June of 1903 were to happen today, it would be virtually impossible without climate change’.

  7. a c c bakker permalink
    May 7, 2023 12:02 pm

    Harvest must have been a bit tricky in 1903- has anyone got any record of this (my grandfathers diaries only go back to 1944) ?

  8. May 9, 2023 4:47 am

    June 1903 was exceptionally wet only in parts of England. In the EWP series which covers England and Wales as a whole, June 1903 was wet, but not exceptionally so – 83.7mm vs 151.8mm in June 1773, the wettest in the record.

    October 1903 is different – it is the wettest October in England & Wales, by a country mile: 218.1mm – the next nearest October is 188mm in 2000.

    1903 is the 8th wettest year in the series – but in recent times both 2000 and 2012 have been wetter (5th & 4th respectively).

Comments are closed.