Jim Dale Schooled Again!
December 5, 2023
By Paul Homewood
The media’s favourite climate alarmist, meteorologist Jim Dale, gets another lesson from climate scientist Paul Burgess, who is now getting more comfortable in his TV role:
Dale also gets his comeuppance against Richard Tice:
10 Comments
Comments are closed.
NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT 
Yep, Dale and the speccy Irish bloke are among the worst people they have on GB News but it is nice to see them being taken to task over their lies. and as I write this their news bulletin is showing the world’s most evil man Bill Gates speaking at the COP.
“There can only be science when a theory or assertion is supported by statistically significant empirical data produced by a falsifiable methodology.
There exists no statistically significant empirical data of any kind which supports claims that CO2 returned to the Carbon Cycle by the actions of man during the past 153 years since the end of the Little Ice Age can in any measurable way be show to be responsible for part or all of the current welcome warming” [h/t pardonmeforbreathing], so by extension Jim Dale has ZERO evidence of anything he claims. Not just that, but Dale just cannot accept that any evidence against ‘climate change’ is genuine, even denying that Norwegian report!
“Blush”! 🙂 It was correctly pointed out that I omitted the word “repeatable”. The statement more accurately should read by a “repeatable falsifiable methodology”.
I think one of the most wilful aspects of the outflow from the climate industrial complex sewer is lying by omission. By this I mean not pointing out EVER that the statistical output of models NEVER should be considered as empirical data and NEVER EVER should be used in place of empirical data when it exists.
An interesting discussion I had not so long ago with a number of people working in a range of fields of scientific endeavour highlighted how completely out of step climate “science” is with a range of other scientific disciplines in respect of the use of modelling. What was revealed was a general usage across Geology, Geophysics, Physics, Petrophysics and Palynology of empirical data for around 80% of work complimented by around 20% of modelling. The climate world is a total outlier indulging in a complete reversal of those numbers meaning 20% real data and 80% modeling. This is not how science works.
I would suggest this is a problem and the source of the so much of the hyperbole because input dictates output in modeling. It is only during modeling that humans can exert a major influence. Cynic that I am, could that be why the industry is so obsessed with using it because they can control it?
GBNews almost always relies on presenters to challenge the rubbish spouted by these idiots, which is a lost opportunity. I always mute the TV when I see his face.
I remember Jim Dale the comic actor from the Carry On films. This Jim Dale also made me laugh out loud. It always amuses me when they quote NASA, obviously having no idea of the GISS branch of that organisation, headed by Gavin Schmidt. The NASA “climate change” website actually carries the falsehood about “97 of climate scientists”, which is probably where Dale is quoting from.
People like him believe this stuff “To infinity and beyond”.
What is the idiot Dale smoking?
It would be nice if they were asked to explain exactly how CO2 can heat the planet.
Did you catch the Dale reference to ‘97% scientists cannot be wrong’. He needs to see the header on this page. No matter how much these claims are shown to be false, they still keep repeating them. Tice ran out of time correcting this lie, but he did have the knowledge at his fingertips. And for that reason, his Reform party just gained my vote!
Hello again, John. You might want to Tweet the video below featuring Richard Tice shredding a global warming alarmist today on GB News.
No mention of jet stream energy.
No mention of earth core activity.
Science to difficult for the Greta brains.