Skip to content

Discovery News (And Katharine Hayhoe) Spread Old Misinformation About Polar Bears

November 10, 2015

By Paul Homewood  

  

image

http://polarbearscience.com/2015/11/04/discovery-news-spreads-old-misinformation-about-w-hudson-bay-polar-bears/

 

Dr Susan Crockford lays bare more misinformation about polar bears:

 

In a just-released Discovery News piece, Kieran Mulvaney (4 November 2015, “In the polar bear capital, an uncertain future”) repeated three misleading statements about Western Hudson Bay polar bears that keep making the rounds, despite the fact they have been laid to rest by the latest scientific reports on  (Lunn et al. 2013, 2014; Stapleton et al. 2014). I reviewed these just a few weeks ago.

 

Western Hudson Bay bear, Wakusp National Park, August 2011.

Western Hudson Bay bear, Wakusp National Park, August 2011.

 

1) “Climate change is causing the bay’s ice to melt earlier and freeze later, causing bears to spend longer a shore.”

Not true. Lunn and colleagues stated explicitly that there has been no trend in either break up or freeze-up of WHB sea ice since 2001. Although there has been large variability in dates, that lack of trend that has continued to this year.

 

2 & 3) “As a consequence, Churchill’s polar bears are decreasing in number (from approximately 1,350 three decades ago to roughly 900-1,000 now) and in physical condition.”

This deliberately misleading statement avoids the fact that the latest surveys found roughly the same number of bears in 2011 as in 2004 (the estimate used by the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group for WHB is 1030) when different counting methods were taken into account. The ~900 bear estimate came from the mark-recapture survey, which left out a portion of the range that the aerial survey covered, hence the official estimate of 1030.

In addition, there has been no scientific assessment of body condition or cub survival since before the last population estimate in 2004 – polar bear “experts” keep telling journalists there are declines but have yet to produce any data to support those claims. The latest surveys did not collect data on body condition or cub survival.

 

Mulvaney’s misinformation is almost certainly the result of spending time in Churchill with activist Polar Bears International spokesperson Steve Amstrup and activist climate scientist Katherine Hayhoe doing webcasts (e.g. “Challenges of communicating climate change”). 

Mulvaney is clearly not a journalist or a science writer: if he was, he would do some research of his own and stop believing as gospel every word that activist scientists feed him. They are using him as a mouth-piece and sadly, Discovery News is buying it all and presenting it as science.

[Hayhoe, by the way, blocked me on twitter earlier this morning for making one observational comment, my first-ever to her account, in response to a conversation about polar bear population numbers. This is what I said that Hayhoe does not want her followers to know:

“Stop wanton slaughter, #’s go up, works for all species. S Beaufort #polarbear #s dipped due to thick spring #seaice”

[Both statements are true and supported by scientific literature. But Hayhoe is all about “climate communication” which appears not to allow science to intrude.]

 

The comments about Katharine Hayhoe are particularly pertinent. I am not sure if Hayhoe ever really had anything relevant to contribute on the scientific side. But, if she did, she has certainly left that well behind her, as time after time she has preferred to ignore the facts in favour of misleading propaganda.

The fact that she deletes messages from fellow scientists, who just happen to disagree with her, says it all rather eloquently.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. November 10, 2015 11:30 pm

    KH is incorrigible. She preaches CAGW to her fellow evangelical Christians. And polar bears are not the only facts she gets wrong. Her version of the hockey stick is worse than Mann’s. She was preaching eternal Texas drought until the rains and floods came. Blocking counterscience facts is absolutely par for her course. In the same damaging university cohort as Oreskes and McKibben.

  2. Joe Public permalink
    November 11, 2015 1:00 am

    Anybody would think there’s an impending ‘Climate’ conference in the offing, and public opinion needs to be influenced.

    • Password protected permalink
      November 11, 2015 4:02 am

      Exactly, quantity over quality. As an ex boss (engineer) used to say when he was in a tight spot: “baffle them with bull-sheet”

  3. November 11, 2015 8:26 am

    The meja are out in force to ram-home the impending doom that must be avoided, I have not heard one question raised about the misinformation.

    Repeat lies often enough and with enough conviction and they become “Virtual Truths”.

    Larry King was repeating all the rubbish about how “the 2 deg K rise must be avoided”, and how “more green energy is the answer” on Russia Today, which I had thought was less biased than the US controlled meja.

    Once the Ministry of Truth get control of Al Jazeera we are really doomed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: