Skip to content

How Big Water Projects Helped Trigger Africa’s Migrant Crisis

April 1, 2018

By Paul Homewood


Following up the Lake Chad post, this is a highly relevant contribution by science writer, Fred Pearce, in Yale 360 last October:



The Hadejia-Nguru wetland was once a large green smudge on the edge of the Sahara in northeast Nigeria. More than 1.5 million people lived by fishing its waters, grazing their cattle on its wet pastures, and irrigating their crops from its complex network of natural channels and lakes. Then, in the 1990s, the Nigerian government completed two dams that together captured 80 percent of the water that flowed into the wetland.

The aim was to provide water for Kano, the biggest city in northern Nigeria. But the two dams dried up four-fifths of the wetland, destroying its natural bounty and the way of life that went with it. Today, many of the people who lost their livelihoods have either headed for Kano, joined the Islamic terrorist group Boko Haram that is terrorizing northeast Nigeria – or paid human-smugglers to take them to Europe.

For the past three years, Europe has been convulsed by a crisis of migrants, some from Syria and the war-torn Middle East, but also hundreds of thousands coming from the arid Sahel region of Africa, including Nigeria, Mali, and Senegal. They are fleeing poverty and social breakdown caused by insurgent groups such as Boko Haram. But environmentalists and others in the region say that behind this social chaos lies serious water mismanagement in the drought-prone region.

Big dams intended to bring economic development to the Sahel are having the opposite effect. By blocking rivers, they are drying out lakes, river floodplains, and wetlands on which many of the poorest in the region depend. The end result has been to push more and more young people to risk their lives to leave the region.

The Manantali Dam is estimated to have caused the loss of 90 percent of fisheries and up to 618,000 acres previously covered by water.

Last year, I traveled with Wetlands International, a Dutch-based environmental NGO, along the valley of the River Senegal, which forms the border between Senegal and Mauritania. Farmers, herders, and fishermen told of their battles against the ecological breakdown that has followed the building of the Manantali Dam, which is located upstream in Mali and was completed in 1987. The dam holds back a large part of the river’s seasonal flood flow to generate hydroelectricity for cities and provide irrigation water for some farmers. But there have been more losers than winners.

Seydou Ibrahima Ly, a teacher in the bankside village of Donaye Taredji in Podor district, said that when he was young, “the river had a flood that watered wetlands where fish grew.” But “now there is no flood because of the dam… Compared to the past, there aren’t many fish. Our grandparents did a lot of fishing, but we don’t.” With their livelihoods gone, more than 100 people had left his village, he said. “In some villages, they are almost all gone.”

“The migrants know the boats [traveling to Europe] are dangerous, but they have a determination to go and find a better life,” said Oumar Cire Ly, deputy chief of neighbouring Donaye village, which has also seen an exodus of its young people.

Farmers once planted their crops in the wet soils as the waters receded. Pastoralists grazed their animals where forests and wildlife flourished. But the dam and its related projects are estimated to have resulted in the loss of 90 percent of the fisheries and up to 618,000 acres of fields that were previously covered by water from the rising river during the wet season, a system of natural irrigation known as flood-recession agriculture.

The Senegal River Basin Development Organization – the intergovernmental agency that is responsible for the dam project and is known by its French acronym, OMVS – conceded in 2014 that eliminating the river’s annual flood “has made flood-recession crops and fishing on the floodplain more precarious, which makes the rural production systems of the middle valley less diversified, and therefore more vulnerable.”

This is clearly at odds with the organization’s mandate to “ensure food security for all people within the river basin and region.” But Amadou Lamine Ndiaye, the OMVS’s director of environment and sustainable development, told me his agency regarded wetlands such as river floodplains primarily as a source of revenue for tourists, rather than as a lifeline for rural communities.

As many as a million Nigerians have lost livelihoods because of dams that once fed a wetland that flowed into Lake Chad.

Worse still is the crisis affecting the region around Lake Chad, which until half a century ago was Africa’s fourth largest lake, straddling the border between Nigeria, Niger, Chad, and Cameroon. The lake has lost more than 90 percent of its surface area since then. Initially, this was largely due to persistent droughts in the Sahel that often dried up the rivers supplying it with water. Since 2002, rainfall has improved markedly, but Lake Chad has not recovered.

That is because of dams on the rivers flowing into the lake from the wetter south, mainly in Cameroon and Nigeria. The Maga Dam in Cameroon has diverted 70 percent of the flow of the Logone river to rice farms. This has both dried up part of the floodplain pastures that once supported 130,000 people, and dramatically reduced inflow to Lake Chad.

In northern Nigeria, up to 1 million people have lost livelihoods because of dams on the River Yobe that once fed the Hadejia-Nguru wetland and flowed on into Lake Chad. In both cases, says Edward Barbier, an environmental economist at Colorado State University, the dams have had an overall negative effect on local economies, as losses to fishermen, pastoralists, and others exceeded gains from irrigation agriculture. 

The major wetlands and water basins of the Sahel region in Africa.

The major wetlands and water basins of the Sahel region in Africa. Wetlands International


The poverty is driving social breakdown and conflict all around the lake. Mana Boukary, an official of the Lake Chad Basin Commission, an intergovernmental body, told Duetsche Welle two years ago: “Youths in the Lake Chad Basin are joining Boko Haram because of lack of jobs and difficult economic conditions resulting from the drying up of the lake.”

The UN humanitarian coordinator for the Sahel region, Toby Lanzer, told a European Union-Africa summit that it was also fueling migration: “Asylum seeking, the refugee crisis, the environmental crisis, the instability that extremists sow — all of those issues converge in the Lake Chad basin.”

A Nigerian government audit of the lake basin in 2015 agreed. It concluded that “uncoordinated upstream water impounding and withdrawal” were among factors that had “created high competition for scarce water, resulting into [sic] conflicts and forced migration.” More than 2.6 million people have left the Lake Chad region since mid-2013, according to the International Organization for Migration.

At their greatest extent, wetlands cover one-tenth of the Sahel, the arid region stretching for 3,400 miles across northern Africa, immediately south of the Sahara desert. They are wildlife havens, especially notable for their birdlife. The Inner Niger Delta in Mali, for instance, is one of the world’s most important seasonal stops for migrating birds, hosting about 4 million waterbirds from Europe each winter. In addition, these wetlands are a source of sustenance for the region’s poor and the main sources of the region’s economic productivity outside the short wet season from June to September.

Dried-up wetlands are often blamed on climate change when the real cause often is more human interference in river flows.

Yet the decline of the wetlands and the resulting social and economic consequences remains a largely untold story. That is partly because dried-up wetlands are routinely, and often incorrectly, blamed on climate change, when the real cause is often more direct human interference in river flows. It is also partly because many development agencies still mostly think of dams as infrastructure development that furthers economic activity and wealth – and partly because many environmental groups concentrate on the ecological impacts of dried wetlands, while ignoring the human consequences.

In this climate of ignorance, more wetlands are under threat. The next victim is likely to be the Inner Niger Delta, a wetland in northern Mali that covers an area the size of Belgium. The delta forms where West Africa’s largest river, the Niger, spreads out across flat desert near the ancient city of Timbuktu.

The delta is a magnet for migrating European waterbirds. It is also currently one of the most productive areas in one of the world’s poorest countries. It provides 80 percent of Mali’s fish and pasture for 60 percent of the country’s cattle, and it delivers 8 percent of Mali’s GDP and sustains 2 million people, 14 percent of the population, says Dutch hydrologist Leo Zwarts. Its fish are exported across West Africa from Mopti, a market town on the shores of the delta.

In recent years the Mali government has been diverting water from the River Niger at the Markala barrage just upstream of the delta, to irrigate desert fields of thirsty crops such as rice and cotton. These diversions have cut the area of delta flooded annually by up to 7 percent, says Zwarts, causing declines in forests, fisheries, and grazing grasses. Some people have left the delta as a result, though it is unclear whether they have been among the Malians regularly reported to be in migrant boats heading from Libya to Italy.

The Markala Barrage in Mali, which diverts water from the River Niger for irrigating crops such as rice and cotton.  

The Markala Barrage in Mali, which diverts water from the River Niger for irrigating crops such as rice and cotton.  Fred Pearce/Yale e360


But this trickle of people from the delta could soon become a flood. In July this year, Mali’s upstream neighbour, Guinea, announced the go-ahead for Chinese firms to build a giant new hydroelectric dam, the Fomi Dam, in the river’s headwaters. Construction could begin as soon as December.

The Fomi Dam’s operation will replace the annual flood pulse that sustains the wetland’s fecundity with a more regular flow that the Mali government intends to tap for a long-planned tripling of its irrigation along the river. Wetlands International estimates that the combined impact of the dam and irrigation schemes could cut fish catches and pastures in the delta by 30 percent.

“Less water flowing into the delta means a lower flood level and a smaller flood extent”, says Karounga Keïta of Wetlands International in Mali. “This will have a direct impact on food production, including fish, livestock, and floating rice.” He fears that the inevitable outcome will be further human migrations from the wetland.

The links in the chain from water management through wetland health to social breakdown and international migration are complex. Wetland loss is certainly not the only reason for the human exodus from the Sahel. And migration is a long-standing coping strategy for people living in a region of extreme climate variability.

But the parlous state of the wetlands of the Sahel is changing the region. In the past, wetlands were refuges in times of drought or conflict. They were safe, and the water persisted even in the worst droughts. But today, with their waters diminished, these wetlands have become sources of outmigration. Now, migrations that were once temporary and local are becoming permanent and intercontinental.


Note his comment that “dried-up wetlands are often blamed on climate change when the real cause often is more human interference in river flows. “.

And that “since 2002, rainfall has improved markedly, but Lake Chad has not recovered.”


I have every sympathy for countries like Nigeria and Cameroon. They are between the proverbial rock and hard place,

They have growing populations, with ever growing expectations. For this they need, among other things, food and water supplies. On the other hand, these very things impact on the environment which ultimately sustains them.

There are no easy answers.

But blaming it all on climate change does nobody any favours.

  1. HotScot permalink
    April 1, 2018 9:39 pm

    My late father in law was a UN Senior Forester in the 50’s, 60’s, 70’s & 80’s.

    He despised the greens and the enthusiastic western charities that interfered with good work done by the UN, people like Geldof for example. He was horrified at the naive musicians approach, largely by-passing experienced and connected professionals to distribute aid to African communities.

    He recognised that a fraction of UN aid got to the people that needed it, never mind the minuscule amount, if any, the musicians could deliver, before reaching the pockets of the gangsters and politicians running these countries.

    I’m afraid that, irrespective of the pain caused by non western intervention, these countries need to find and fund their own solutions to their plights. The West managed it, it was bloody, but we did it, and it included two world wars.

    The more the west interferes in these countries matters, the more protracted the solution becomes.

    Don’t give them aid, let them mine their own coal and build their own power stations. Let them develop their own infrastructures and deal with their own population explosions. They know their own criminals and must deal with them themselves.

    As brutal as that might seem, I’m afraid the west managed it, why cant developing nations? Even China managed to harness enough of communism to convert itself to Westernism in all but name, and Russia abandoned communism altogether.

    But that’s still not good enough. Whilst China and Russia have their growing pains, the west is still demonising them politically and socially, whilst gobbling up goods, and natural resources from them.

    I really don’t understand what more they can do.

    Meanwhile the insane EU and leftist Americans are crippling the western worlds ability to compete commercially with…..well……anyone, by imposing self destructive economic policies largely founded on saving the planet, when there is no evidence whatsoever that the planet is at risk from mankind. Moreover, they are exporting the insanity to the countries that need energy to develop, e.g. Nigeria and Cameroon.

    Mankind might be at risk from mankind, but the planet will spit us out as soon as we threaten it. The planet is at no risk from mankind whatsoever, especially if we are producing excessive amounts of CO2. We might not like the stuff (or at least that’s what we’re told) but planet earth loves it, tons of it.

    ~pant, pant……rant over~

    • HotScot permalink
      April 1, 2018 9:51 pm

      Sorry, rant not quite over!

      Doesn’t it seem extraordinarily coincidental to anyone but me that at precisely the time the planet is most threatened by complete destruction i.e. when atmospheric CO2 reaches life threatening levels (we have, I believe, in recent history reached 180 ppm atmospheric CO2 and meaningful plant life dies around 150 ppm) humankind happened along and harnessed fire.

      And if you think that’s a daft concept, try 2,000 years of worshipping a guy that supposedly rose from the dead!

      • John Palmer permalink
        April 2, 2018 6:24 pm

        Ooh… bashing two religious doctrines with one post, eh Hot Scot?
        We know where you’ll end up, don’t we!

    • Mike Jackson permalink
      April 2, 2018 8:32 am

      The other side of the “don’t give them aid” coin, HS, is “don’t get in the way of their own development decisions”.

      Indeed we did industrialise ourselves and they can too — more easily than we did because they have our experiences to draw on though they will also have to make their own mistakes. What they don’t need is eco-activists and people like the World Bank blocking the very things that gave us our indistrial revolution.

      As things are it looks very much as if they will have to await the demise of the Climate Cult before being allowed (!) to make sensible choices.

      (I wouldn’t cut off all aid. We have the money — well actually we don’t at the moment but you know what I mean — and the expertise which they need. It would be churlish to refuse them. But both need to provide genuinely sustainable progress towards the sort of development they envisage for themselves, not what the politically correct do-gooder tendency thinks they ought to want.)

      • Russ Wood permalink
        April 3, 2018 3:54 pm

        On “they can too” – don’t count on it. If Southern Africa is anything to go on, politicians and activists will deny the experience of the West, because “it’s too Eurocentric and colonial”. So, they’ll make their own mistakes (over and over), and finally call on the maligned West to help them out “because you owe us”.

  2. April 1, 2018 9:56 pm

    Reblogged this on Climate Collections.

  3. markl permalink
    April 1, 2018 11:26 pm

    Africa is plagued by corruption and lack of education. They are easy prey for grandiose projects involving vast sums of money and promises.

  4. Athelstan permalink
    April 1, 2018 11:35 pm

    Planners, big government and massive shiny projects, rampant corruption, massive EU grants, little or no consideration given to outcomes, geological conditions, water table, environment before and after…………

    erm, what could possibly go wrong?

    And of the people?

    No one hears their silent scream, but no one. As a kickstart to trouble and ‘relocation’, as a recruiting sergeant for guerillas the effect is enormous, the repercussions echo and resound world wide.

    Lo, behold.

    It is not as if there aren’t historical precedents, damming major river systems is fraught with uncertain outcomes and usually destroys rather than feeds, as we see.

    Yessum, this is the sepia tinted version and unfortunately, I’ll bet that most of Africa has seen this.

    Refugee crises, geopolitical consequences, wars, famine, and all for what?

    Damming rivers, gives a shot in the arm to local tribal chieftains politicians and the kickbacks will be considerable, the wider consequences are totally ignored and big value contracts for the European Architects and construction firms, mind you the Chinese have moved in on that lucrative stuff.

    Farmers, fishermen, local livelihoods – who cares, lets build a big dam and congratulate ourselves on a environmental insipired disaster – ‘green disaster’ – any which way round you think on it.

  5. April 2, 2018 1:44 am

    This is just the cargo cult. If you adopt big industrial projects then surely the ships will dock and the airplanes will land with loads of wonderful cargoes. Here in Africa we don’t need high status flagship projects. We need cheap energy from coal and fracking, but the EU has told us we can’t sell our products there unless we have x thousand hectares of bird choppers and bird fryers. So we erect our wonderful turbines just like we see the Danes and the Germans and the British do, and we wonder why first-world prosperity does not immediately descend upon our land. Still the ships do not dock and the airplanes do not land. Oh where are the cargoes?

  6. Max Sawyer permalink
    April 11, 2018 4:53 pm

    HotScot – …”deal with their own population explosions”.

    I fear that will be done by exporting them to the West. The population of Africa is predicted to double by 2050 – we have been warned.

    Re. aid – focus on clean water, educating women, free trade and disaster relief, all delivered by our Armed Forces (ie abolish DEFRA in its entirety) – leave it at that. And never, ever give money or tradeable goods.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: