Skip to content

The Democrats’ Energy Disaster

June 18, 2022
tags:

By Paul Homewood

 

The New York Sun exposes the inherent contradictions in Biden’s green agenda:

 

 

 image

Biden demands energy companies invest tens of billions more in new drilling infrastructure, when everyone knows that tomorrow, when prices recede, Democrats are going to go right back to passing laws and regulations that undercut their business.


Democrats have spent decades warning that the United States must stop using the most efficient and affordable energy sources or it will be consumed by heat waves, fireballs and cataclysmic weather events.
Every flood, every hurricane — every natural event, really — is now blamed on climate change. We have burdened our children with an irrational dread over their future. Then again, many in The Cult of Malthus won’t even have children.
So, why, if we’re on the precipice of this apocalypse, if saving the planet trumps every other concern, is President Biden begging everyone to drill?
On the days Democrats aren’t blaming Vladimir Putin for rising gas prices (a cost the president not long ago argued was worth paying for “freedom”), they’re blaming oil companies for profiteering.
Wednesday, as the national average hit $5.014 (nearly $2 higher than last year), Mr. Biden sent letters to refining companies threatening to once again abuse his executive powers if they do not immediately alleviate high prices — a political appeal to the imaginary “greedflation.”
Mr. Biden, who promised a 100 percent “clean-energy economy” with “net-zero emissions” in a couple of decades, now demands energy companies, already at utilization rates above 90 percent, invest tens of billions more in new drilling infrastructure, when everyone knows that tomorrow, when prices recede, Democrats are going to go right back to passing laws and regulations that undercut their business.
Today, Democrats demand CEOs spend more; tomorrow, they will promise to “hold oil executives accountable” and drag them in front of congressional committees where they will be scolded by economically illiterate windbags.
That future is baked into today’s price. Because Democrats’ energy policy is a schizophrenic mess, oscillating from puerile to pernicious. You can’t spend decades working to undercut production and campaign on the promise of destroying an industry and then demand it turn on a dime when it’s politically convenient.
Democrats will argue that this is a unique emergency as prices have spiked to historic highs. Guess what? Energy prices will always be at historic highs when you create shortages, which is exactly what progressives have been advocating we do for years.
Virtually every left-wing energy proposal in the past two decades, if not longer, has been designed to create false scarcity, either through fabricated marketplaces and stringent regulations or by putting caps on production. This is what they wanted.
“No more drilling on federal lands,” Mr. Biden promised during the 2020 presidential campaign. “No more drilling, including offshore. No ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period, ends, number one.” Not number two. Number one. “No more — no new fracking,” the president also said. Blue states across the country have either banned fracking or are in the process of banning fracking projects.
And, on the first day of his presidency, Mr. Biden rejoined the Paris Agreement — an accord he is now working hard to break — revoking permits for Keystone XL, a 1,700-mile pipeline that was going to carry approximately 800,000 barrels of oil a day into the United States (also baked into the price).
Mr. Biden signed a slew of executive orders prioritizing climate change over energy production, halting oil and natural gas leases on all public lands. When a court blocked him, the Biden administration appealed the decision, even as indications of an energy spike were clear.
Rather than threatening price controls, the president should just rescind all his executive orders.
Of course, until some new technology is devised, implementing any policy that resembles the Green New Deal — the plan Biden says is the “framework” for his own efforts on “environmental justice” — would hold approximately the same economic consequences as having coronavirus economic shutdowns for 30 years straight.
That’s merely if we followed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recommendations on carbon emissions. Last year, with inflation already looming, Mr. Biden preached that it was a “moral imperative” to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent from 2005 levels by 2030 and 100 percent by 2050. That’s a policy that will have us fondly reminiscing about $5.00 a gallon.
Energy policy can’t be capriciously implemented and then abandoned every time the Democrats’ poll numbers flail. This is just a little taste of the Green New Deal. There is no sentient being that could accept the notion that Democrats are the party that is in favor of abundant fossil fuels. Hopefully, the price — even in small measure — for their green policies is so politically severe that they will moderate. Because we all have unattainable dreams.

https://www.nysun.com/article/the-democrats-energy-disaster?mc_cid=ba014b4410&mc_eid=4961da7cb1 

Many of us can see no way out of the Net Zero madness.

I am less pessimistic. I believe it will founder on the refusal of the USA finally to follow suit.

Unlike the UK, the policy is not slavishly embraced by all parties. The GOP, despite the likes of Mitt Romney being a bit wet, are strongly against abandoning fossil fuels,regardless of any expansion of renewable energy. Furthermore, the checks and balances in the Constitution make it very difficult for the Democrats alone to force through their plans.

And after their inevitable shellacking at the mid-terms in November, climate policies will be at a dead end for years to come. The current energy crisis has served to act as a warning to the American public of what Biden’s Green New Deal has in store for them.

If the US refuses to commit carbon hari-kari, it is unlikely the rest of the world will. It only remains to be seen how much longer the UK and EU will stay the course.

25 Comments
  1. eromgiw permalink
    June 18, 2022 4:21 pm

    Ultimate Government folly, trying to micromanage the economy.

    • June 19, 2022 2:29 pm

      …or the climate.

    • Gamecock permalink
      June 20, 2022 10:19 pm

      And when you hear of geoengineering, it’s these same people wanting to manage the atmosphere.

      Billions will die.

  2. William George permalink
    June 18, 2022 4:44 pm

    I believe we have been here before, with this duplicitous, senile Avatar, worked from the back by Obama and the green Blob. Sadly Bunter, who yesterday ran away to Kyiv, rather than face his Northern Regional Group of MPs, is equally duplicitous. He could not face the NRG call to open the Cumbrian mine. I hope your optimism Paul comes to fruition.

  3. John Wilson permalink
    June 18, 2022 4:45 pm

    Looks like the UK government is already changing course, encouraging drilling the North sea, with it’s new mantra of “energy security”. That won’t go down well with the “greens” !!!

    • catweazle666 permalink
      June 18, 2022 6:39 pm

      “Looks like the UK government is already changing course, encouraging drilling the North sea”

      That was before the tax-dodging spiv Sunak decided to hit them with eye-watering tax raid on the profits they made in the last year or so that had just about compensated them for the losses they made in the previous period.

      Now, one of the biggest players appears likely to pull out of the North Sea and move its focus to the Far East, probably Singapore.

      https://www.ft.com/content/521bf3f8-67cd-4417-ba56-cabf700f57e4

      • Phoenix44 permalink
        June 19, 2022 8:37 am

        Sunak is not a tax-dodger.

  4. June 18, 2022 4:52 pm

    There is a fundamental question to be asked and answered before any further commitment is made to act on Climate Alarmism.
    Are Man-made CO2 emissions a future problem at all ??

    Compared to water vapour and clouds in the atmosphere, CO2 is a minor Greenhouse gas, only contributing ~5-10% of the warming of the Greenhouse Effect. And as CO2 concentration increases its warming effect diminishes. There are cogent technical reasons why the warming effectiveness of CO2 has diminished radically as its concentration has increased. At the current concentration of CO2 of ~410parts / million in the atmosphere the warming effectiveness of CO2’s is almost saturated. Whatever the scale of any future Man-made CO2 emissions, those extra CO2 emissions can now have very little warming effect.

    On the other hand, higher levels of atmospheric CO2 are already having massive positive effects on plant growth Worldwide.

    Beyond the “developed” Western world, other Nations fully understand this and dismiss the fallacy of CO2 pollution. They have no interest in holding back the advance of their well-being trying to control what they recognise as a non-problem. So, they will continue to improve their well-being based on the use of their indigenous fossil fuels and emit whatever CO2 results.

    In the expectation that Weather Dependent power generation technologies would reduce emissions of Man-made CO2, the Western policy to combat “Climate Change / Global Warming / Net Zero / ESG (Environment Social and Governance)” is still to install, heavily subsidise and give massive preferential legal support to Weather-Dependent “Renewable” Wind and Solar power for power generation. The UK only produces ~1% and EU ~7.6% of World CO2 emissions.
    The Productivity of Weather-Dependent power generation is crucial when comparing the cost of providing the equivalent level of power to the Grid, as provided by conventional power generation technologies.

    Measured productivity over the past 10 years has in Europe has been:
    • Onshore wind power 22.5%
    • Offshore wind power 32.7%
    • Solar PV on grid 11.6%
    • Weather-Dependent generation in Europe overall 18.7%
    • whereas, conventional power generation working 24/7 performs at ~90% productivity, just accounting for normal maintenance.

    https://edmhdotme.wordpress.com/weather-dependent-power-generation/

    • Mike Jackson permalink
      June 18, 2022 5:23 pm

      With all due respect, edhoskins, we’ve been through this a hundred times. All my research (and it’s given me headaches at times because I am not a trained scientist) has led to CO2 not being a driver of atmospheric temperatures, that in any sort of possible natural concentration it cannot be anything but wholly beneficial because over the long term climate is self-adjusting and the oceans(and plant life) will sequester the stuff anyway.
      And since CO2 is fundamentally the activists’ main (if not only) target there is no justification for any action to reduce its presence in the atmosphere.
      And we’re getting nowhere with scientific argument because the argument is not science-based. The activists’ public stance is that we must put an end to the use of hydrocarbons because the CO2 they emit is slowly killing the planet; their underlying argument is that we must get rid of hydrocarbons because they underpin our current lifestyle which they claim to abhor (while happily making use of it when it suits them). Climate is not an environmental campaign; it’s a socio-political one based on a lie!
      Until we get that message across we are simply preaching to the choir!
      (Worth repeating: if they were genuinely in favour of reducing CO2 emissions why are they so opposed to nuclear generation of electricity? It’s a lot cleaner and when set alongside the emissions associated with wind/solar — read ‘The Realities of “Going Green” — it really should be ‘no contest’.)

    • lee5173 permalink
      June 19, 2022 12:59 am

      Real Science proves it: We could not raise the temperature of the Earth by any appreciable amount by burning fossil fuels, period. “Political” climate science will do immeasurable harm to ourselves, our children and our grandchildren. What will it take to stop this madness?

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      June 19, 2022 8:40 am

      Forget it. You wouldn’t win that. What we can win is the economics. Lots of MPs believe Net Zero can be done without ant real cost or with “somebody else” paying, not their constituents. The more who understand that’s not do, the more will turn away from Net Zero. MPs want to get re-elected. Voters made poor won’t do that.

  5. June 18, 2022 5:08 pm

    Standard socialist playbook: Command a sector of the economy, and when that turns to disaster, command it more to try and fix it. But guess what always happens? Insanity = repeat action hoping for a different result.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      June 19, 2022 8:45 am

      True, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin all blamed first the Whites, then the Kulaks, then “saboteurs” for their endless failures. It was never their fault, never their bad ideas or policies.

      2022 is the hundredth anniversary of von Mises’ amazing book “Socialism”. This predicted every failure of Socialism using just economic theory. It caused a huge uproar at the time as many young economists (including Hayek) believed Socialism was the way of the future. Still, 100 years later we have idiots making the same mistakes and blaming everyone but themselves.

  6. June 18, 2022 5:35 pm

    Cancelling the Keystone pipeline was a massive and arrogant own goal.

    • T Walker permalink
      June 18, 2022 11:39 pm

      Yes and I week before the election his VP told union leaders he wasn’t going to do it. They advised their members to vote for Biden.

      A good deal of buyer’s remorse apparently.

  7. June 18, 2022 5:41 pm

    This is just more political “Stop. GO! Halt. Proceed!” nonsense…is not unique to Donkeys. Both the rapid rate of change and the complexity of problems are overwheming organizations that have outgrown their effectiveness. Grow big, but act small ain’t working. The tools are macro, clumsy and ineffective. Think “fear”: Urbanization. Covid. Inflation. Disinformation. Globalism. Ageism. Digitization. Climate change. Privacy. Populism. Debt. The Internet.

    Tickets to Mars just about sold out.

  8. Harry Passfield permalink
    June 18, 2022 8:01 pm

    Romney a bit wet? You could wring him out in a bucket and STILL be able to wash a couple of cars!
    Maybe, just maybe, in the next but one after BJ, we’ll get someone with the guts to cut the links to the WEF. I wonder if that intake has someone with the Thatcher gene.

  9. John Hultquist permalink
    June 18, 2022 8:20 pm

    Companies will not be adhering to their fiduciary duty if they follow ol’Joe’s ramblings.

    {He fell while riding a bike, or getting off, or something.}

    • Gamecock permalink
      June 19, 2022 12:49 am

      You never forget how to fall off a bike.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      June 19, 2022 8:50 am

      Biden, OCS, Pelosi and the rest seem to sincerely believe inflation is caused by “greed”.

      Yer there’s a simple test that shows why they are wrong. Let’s say prices are reduced and capped. Consumers now have more money to spend elsewhere. Yet there’s still no more goods and services, so that extra cash no longer spent on fuel will now inflate something else.

  10. Harry Passfield permalink
    June 19, 2022 10:14 am

    Biden ‘promises’ to be net-zero and non-FF within 20 years. The man will be dead by then!! He won’t care. There should be a rule that no politician can promise an outcome that will have no effect on them personally.

  11. Robert Christopher permalink
    June 19, 2022 10:30 am

    Europe’s current heatwave is causing problems, on many fronts:

  12. June 19, 2022 9:08 pm

    Reblogged this on delboydave and commented:
    Fossil Fuels. The lifeblood of our modern society, yet these morons want to drag us back to the dark ages. Imbeciles.

Comments are closed.