Skip to content

The electric car crash will rival the dotcom bubble

May 7, 2024

By Paul Homewood

Even The Times is starting to get it!

 

 

The problem for ministers is that most consumers just won’t buy EVs

Ministers can’t get out much these days without being heckled, especially by green campaign groups such as Just Stop Oil. So no surprise that last week the secretary of state for energy security and net zero, Claire Coutinho, struggled to make herself heard above the din of demonstrators in the hall as she delivered a speech at a business conference.

Her message was definitely not what those demonstrators wanted to hear (though they aren’t in the listening business). Coutinho criticised what she called the “net zero leviathan of central planning” and said that products designed to meet this target should not be “forced on British consumers”.

In one respect the quietly formidable Coutinho has been as good as her word. The government has postponed by ten years (to 2035) the deadline after which households will be forbidden to install any new gas boilers. And last month Coutinho delayed, though only by a year, a policy of fining manufacturers for missing targets for the installation of heat pumps.

But in another respect there is a gaping chasm between the government’s rhetoric about the primacy of consumer choice “on the road to net zero” and its actual policies. This concerns the product most beloved of British consumers and on which they — we — have the strongest opinions. I refer, of course, to the car.

Although Rishi Sunak, in September, moved from 2030 to 2035 the date by which all manufacturers would be required to stop selling any new vehicles that were not purely electric, the elaborate system of penalties remained fully in place. So, this year, manufacturers are obliged to ensure that at least 22 per cent of their sales are of EVs, and for each and every non-electric car sold that breaches the target, they are liable to a fine of £15,000. The thing ratchets up every year, so that by 2030 their sales must be at least 80 per cent EVs (not even hybrids qualify), or else …

When it became clear Sunak would postpone the 2030 deadline (one of Boris Johnson’s vainglorious attempts to demonstrate Britain’s leadership in the “battle against climate change”), a number of manufacturers upbraided the PM. Ford UK’s chief, Lisa Brankin, remonstrated: “Our business needs three things from the UK government: ambition, commitment and consistency. A relaxation of 2030 would undermine all three.”

Stellantis, which owns Vauxhall, Peugeot, Citroën and Fiat, issued a statement warning that “clarity and reasonable anticipation are important”.

Seven months on, the company’s horn is sounding a very different note. Ten days ago its chairman, Carlos Tavares, said the law fining companies for selling cars that did not meet the EV quota was “terrible for the UK”, and that “I’m not going to sell cars at a loss”. The reason for Mr Tavares going from volt to volte-face is clear for all to see (now). Or, as he put it, EVs were “crashing in the world of reality”.

To no sensible person’s surprise, consumers have been deterred by a combination of higher purchase prices, “range anxiety” and plummeting resale values, largely due to increasing awareness of the prohibitive costs if the battery needs replacing. The Stellantis boss now concedes that the “natural” market share for EVs in the UK is about half what he is being required to sell under the regulations, which are starting to bite (indeed, taking great munches out of his company’s profit margins).

In other words, this is exactly the sort of “forcing” of products onto the consumer that Coutinho says the government shouldn’t be doing. This is not a British problem alone. The EU has an almost identical policy, yet in Germany the European election manifesto of the centre-right Christian Democrats declared: “We want to abandon the ban on combustion engines and preserve Germany’s cutting edge combustion technology.”

As things stand, China will be the only winner. It, uniquely, is able to sell EVs more cheaply than the equivalent combustion engine models, and is about to flood European markets. The EU will soon be forced to choose between its vaunted commitment to fighting climate change and the existence of its own car manufacturing businesses.

If only it — and our own government — had listened to Akio Toyoda. In January the chairman of Toyota (grandson of its founder) told employees in a Q&A session of the company’s booming sales of hybrid vehicles, and pointed out: “Customers and the market will decide, not regulations or political power.”

This has now dawned on one of the world’s biggest car leasing companies, Hertz — and its shareholders. Last week its share price fell by a quarter as it announced a sell-off of many thousands of Teslas that it had only recently acquired, absorbing a thumping loss. And Tesla itself has just announced it will be dumping 14,000 employees, with Elon Musk firing his entire team responsible for its “supercharger network”. What we are witnessing is an imminent business catastrophe impelled by a global corporate stampede: the herd was galvanised by governments, which have yet to recognise, let alone admit, their own responsibility.

In terms of global misallocation of capital, there has been nothing like it since the dotcom bubble. As far as the UK is concerned, the obvious thing for the government to do is to live up to Claire Coutinho’s words and abandon the attempt to force consumers to buy products they don’t entirely trust, which can only end terribly for the businesses involved.

However, it is not so simple. The problem is the commitment to make the UK “net zero” by 2050, a declarative piece of legislation insouciantly passed without proper debate in the dying days of Theresa May’s tenure of office, as her “legacy”. It means any successor government is liable to legal challenge if it makes decisions that can be construed as breaching that commitment.

https://a1e0.engage.squarespace-mail.com/r?m=663a38deb4790561a3c66857&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetimes.co.uk%2Farticle%2Fthe-electric-car-crash-will-rival-the-dotcom-bubble-b9d8gmfvk&w=656f411497ae14084ad8d03a&c=b_663a303460b1b502e784ba3e&l=en-US&s=uTWIUCxfpmAsR_ncbPUZv8NKi9k%3D

30 Comments
  1. timleeney permalink
    May 7, 2024 9:10 pm

    Repeal, repeal, repeal.

  2. stephanblackford permalink
    May 7, 2024 9:33 pm

    Wow, I had no idea the UK was so mad. Here in NZ there are no limits or requirements, however diesel vehicles pay an extra tax on purchase and EVs have a subsidy of several thousand (up to about 10% of EV purchase price). But I think even that program is being phased out by the right leaning government. And road user charges are coming in for EVs making them less attractive.

  3. Orde Solomons permalink
    May 7, 2024 9:33 pm

    Just what is the record of governments creating markets? I wonder?

  4. May 7, 2024 9:34 pm

    A bit of good news for a change. When will the message get through to the idiots in parliament that Net Zero is a scam and it must go?

    • saighdear permalink
      May 7, 2024 9:38 pm

      Hmmm, the idiots in parliament created the Scam: Would you ( they) admit to that ? Think not. Hence the suicidal tendency to escape from it. and in UK it seems like Labour is hell bent on being the virtuous idiot, Liberals ? and Green only keen on some other rubbish and bringing down governments

      • Robert Christopher permalink
        May 7, 2024 10:35 pm

        Here’s a surprisingly good account of why changing direction isn’t as easy as you think:

      • saighdear permalink
        May 7, 2024 10:43 pm

        Aye, Triggernometry, indeed.  Many of us are getting triggered by this nonsense these days: How long can Society put up with it: the next “Pandemic / Issue” ?  THink many responsible should face the trigger.  Why NOT ?

    • May 8, 2024 8:22 am

      When will the message get through to the idiots in parliament that Net Zero is a scam and it must go?

      If no political party with a presence at Westminister is going to take a non-believer’s position then the belief in the requirement for Net Zero should be undermined by publicising key facts within the medjia:

      No proven justification, increased financial cost, reduced energy security, increased movement restrictions, increased fire risk

  5. madmike33 permalink
    May 7, 2024 10:11 pm

    Can you imagine any government repealing this act? No, neither can I but, until one does, we will be in control of any eco-idiots that likes to use the law to force the Government to ruin the country. The marxists won’t care as they can always print enough money to carry out any hairbrained scheme that takes their fancy. Thanks Mrs May.

  6. Nicholas Lewis permalink
    May 7, 2024 10:17 pm

    If Tories are still here as the rest of this year unfolds i see Coutinho rowing back on this considerably especially as the only way to achieve it is to just buy in even more Chinese tat and extinguish what little motor industry we have.

  7. saighdear permalink
    May 7, 2024 10:24 pm

    Huh, well waddaja know…… UK found to be the most EV-suitable market in Europe and much more here.

  8. Will permalink
    May 7, 2024 10:34 pm

    we also have the ECHR and it’s insane judgement about lack of sufficient climate change action in Switzerland rebounding on UK and EU. Until we repeal all of the Climate Change acts and dependent legislation, and exit from the ECHR, we are doomed to a future of penury, eeking out a miserable existence with only intermittent electricity supply.

  9. May 7, 2024 10:36 pm

    O/T BUT…..If (?) this is true than I certainly will not be voting conservative anytime soon. Apparently Penny Mordaunt has released a “Guide for Members of Parliament and Candidates on Conspiracy Theories”

    So concepts such as “Climate change denial” are now conspiracy theories. Even Labour and the Grauniad think it is a good idea.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/may/07/what-conspiracy-theories-are-uk-mps-being-told-to-look-out-for

    Anyone able to find details or a copy of this “guide”? If half of the Graun article is true then you might as well wipe the Tories off the map.

    • Ian PRSY permalink
      May 8, 2024 8:46 am

      “Andrew Bridgen, the MP for North West Leicestershire, lost the Conservative whip after comparing the use of Covid vaccines to the Holocaust and has continued to voice extreme anti-vax rhetoric in parliament.”

      No he didn’t. They create conspiracy their own conspiracy theories!

  10. It doesn't add up... permalink
    May 7, 2024 10:48 pm

    It seems that Dominic Lawson did learn some useful things from his father.

    Meanwhile I note that German superiority in Vorsprung durch Technik has been dealt a blow by the Chinese.

    https://www.gbnews.com/lifestyle/cars/major-diesel-breakthrough-save-money-efficiency

    If it’s not BYD EVs, Europeans (or at least those living in sensible countries) will be buying Chinese diesels. The double plus good is that greater efficiency implies global fuel resources will last longer.

  11. Gamecock permalink
    May 7, 2024 10:50 pm

    In one respect the quietly formidable Coutinho has been as good as her word.

    Yeah, her delays are badass.

    Giving a bad idea another year, or ten, will turn it into a good idea?

    • Russ Wood permalink
      May 13, 2024 2:19 pm

      Maybe she’s thinking that given time, it’ll hatch?

  12. Gamecock permalink
    May 7, 2024 11:05 pm

    To no sensible person’s surprise, consumers have been deterred by a combination of higher purchase prices, “range anxiety” and plummeting resale values

    They have ALWAYS had higher purchase price. Range anxiety has ALWAYS been an issue. They have ALWAYS had crappy resale values. Search deeper for why the market has leveled off, Lawson.

    And your reports of the demise of the EV car are grossly exaggerated.

    The electric car crash will rival the dotcom bubble

    There’s going to be no crash, dumbass. EVs are a niche market. They have reached saturation. Leveling off around 20% of the market is not a crash.

  13. stephenpouncey permalink
    May 8, 2024 12:08 am

    A petition is needed that members of the House of Commons and House of Lords, AND the Climate Change Committee, should set an example by buying and using EVs at their own expense. Also for the garage below Parliament to be fitted out with EV chargers

  14. jeremy23846 permalink
    May 8, 2024 7:09 am

    What will trigger an EV crash is one blowing up when parked under a block of flats. It’s happened on ships and in car parks, and the media has suppressed any discussion. But when even a cheap bike can blow up in your hallway, mass importation of cheap Chinese cars will be a disaster waiting to happen.

    Coutinho has no idea. She voted for the Energy Act. She has a degree in maths with philosophy, a weak option.

  15. Iain Reid permalink
    May 8, 2024 7:34 am

    What does the climate change act say, does it state that the U.K. must be net zero by 2050? If the day of reckoning looms and we are nowhere near the target, as I expect, what then?

    It rather reminds me of King Canute.

    • Nigel Sherratt permalink
      May 8, 2024 8:20 am

      Net zero brought forward to 2050 was the final disastrous act of May’s term. Original (2008) target was 80% reduction from 1990 (mad enough).

      https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/explainers/what-is-the-2008-climate-change-act/

      Grantham funds this BS with profits from wood pellets and other eco scams.

    • May 8, 2024 9:04 am

      *What then* indeed. At the moment legal challenges just send the government back to do their homework again.

      any successor government is liable to legal challenge

      Is this anything more than a game of target revisions, with the occasional minor embarrassment of being told off in court for falling short of the latest nonsense?

  16. stephenpouncey permalink
    May 8, 2024 7:40 am

    Cnut was showing his sycophantic courtiers that he couldn’t control the tides.

    We need a Cnut to knock some sense into NZ activists.

  17. John Brown permalink
    May 8, 2024 8:55 am

    “In January the chairman of Toyota (grandson of its founder) told employees in a Q&A session of the company’s booming sales of hybrid vehicles, and pointed out: “Customers and the market will decide, not regulations or political power.”

    He’s wrong I’m afraid. CAGW and the “solution”, Net Zero, has nothing to do with CO2 but is designed to impoverish and control the West’s populations by destroying their access to cheap, abundant and reliable power and controlling them through the electrification of everything. So regulation and political power will be employed to transition from ices to evs to implement impoverishment and control.

    • Gamecock permalink
      May 8, 2024 11:15 am

      Correct. It is “dekulakization” of the West. The prosperous middle-class in the West is the barrier to world government. CCA/NZ is intended to force the people to spend all their money on stupid stuff, i.e., EVs, heat pumps, home insulation, etc.

      Wealth is freedom.

  18. John Brown permalink
    May 8, 2024 9:05 am

    “It means any successor government is liable to legal challenge if it makes decisions that can be construed as breaching that commitment.”

    Yes, the current government has already been taken to court at least once by the taxpayer funded ClientEarth resulting in a judge deciding in ClientEarth’s favour causing the Government to issue more stringent Net Zero plans.

    The CCA will need to be repealed, which means that, given our current Parliament, Parties and MPs we would need to have a referendum on the Net Zero issue to enact change.

  19. energywise permalink
    May 8, 2024 4:14 pm

    The sooner the better for UK plc & consumers

  20. Paul Shackleton permalink
    May 9, 2024 3:00 pm

    It’s time the country invested in rope, lots of it, plus apprenticeships for noose tiers. We already have the lampposts.

Trackbacks

  1. The electric car crash will rival the dotcom bubble | The Most Revolutionary Act

Comments are closed.