Skip to content

No Julia – Rainfall Is Not Becoming More Intense

February 22, 2014

By Paul Homewood

 

 

 image

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/climate-change-storms-39-39-probed-115326104.html#ausLhCS

 

We keep hearing it claimed that a warmer world will lead to more intense daily rainfall events. I gather that Julia Slingo has organised a letter to the Times making the same claim, which was also made in the recent report issued by the Met Office, regarding the UK’s spell of wet weather.

 

Is there any evidence that this has been the case this winter? As far as the England & Wales Series is concerned, January has been much the wettest month this winter, with 184mm, so how does it compare with other heavy rainfall months in the past?

Daily rainfall totals are only available on the Series since 1931, which is unfortunate because it would have been nice to check against the much wetter 1929/30. But beggars can’t be choosers! So I have selected the four wettest “winter” months between 1931 and 1960, well before any warming set in.

 

 

  Dec 1934 Nov 1940 Jan 1948 Nov 1951 Jan 2014
Total Rainfall mm 183 196 176 180 184
Raindays >0.1mm 31 27 31 29 31
Av Rain/Rainday 5.9 7.3 5.7 6.2 5.9
Days > 10mm 5 8 4 5 4
Days > 20mm 0 2 1 1 0

 

 

November 1940 stands out as not only the wettest month, but also the month with many more heavy rainfall days. In contrast January 2014 is similar to December 1934, and sits pretty much at the bottom of the pack.

There is no evidence, therefore, that rainfall, this winter at least, has become more intense in the UK.

 

None of this should come as any surprise, as a previous analysis showed the same thing.

Slingo can play around with her models as much as she wants, but I prefer observations.

 

References

England & Wales Rainfall Series

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadukp/data/monthly/HadEWP_monthly_qc.txt

About these ads
14 Comments leave one →
  1. Andy DC permalink
    February 22, 2014 7:25 pm

    I don’t know how many times I have heard that “England is having a record rain” or
    “wettest winter in over 250 years of records”.

  2. Joe Public permalink
    February 22, 2014 8:31 pm

    One factor that appears to have been drowned out of the weather reports, is (in England at least) how unseasonably mild it’s been.

    This fact was however reported in the financial columns, as the explanation for British Gas’s drop in profits.

  3. Green Sand permalink
    February 22, 2014 10:39 pm

    Nice little word gaming on the Beebs national weather forecast tonight:-

    “as we have seen all winter higher temperatures mean wind and rain”

    Que? Higher temperatures mean higher temperatures, pressure differentials dictate wind and potential precipitation.

  4. February 22, 2014 11:20 pm

    Rainfall November 1940;
    In October and November 1940 there was up to 300% rain from southern England to The Netherlands and Austria, For area see: http://www.seaclimate.com/c/c4/images/buch/big/C4_1.jpg
    This had a big impact.
    “On 19th October plan “Yellow” for the invasion of France was finalised. On 7th November commencement of the invasion plan was postponed for the first time. A Blitzkrieg was not advisable with ‘General Mud’ in company. Hitler wanted to go ahead and would have sent the Wehrmacht across the boarders in late 1939, but for excessively wet autumn weather conditions made even Hitler think twice.”

    http://climate-ocean.com/book%202005/02_31-Dateien/02_31.html

    Quarterly JoRMetSoc. 1940, p.207/8 reported concerning Greenwich:
    “The total in October and November together -12.29 in. – has no pervious example in a corresponding period since records began at Greenwich; the nearest parallel is 9.75in in 1852”

    • February 23, 2014 6:55 am

      Thank goodness for that wet winter! Sally

    • February 23, 2014 1:05 pm

      For clarification: Text and image-link relates to October/November 1939! Sorry!

  5. Ben Vorlich permalink
    February 23, 2014 9:10 am

    It’s noticeable how careful the BBC is not to say wettest* month since Noah was a boy, but wettest January since whenever. Alternatively it is wettest winter in a specific part of the UK. There’s never a “but it’s not the wettest ever for/in…..”

    *always a nice vague statement! does that include snow in the highlands or not? With the BBC who knows.

  6. catweazle666 permalink
    February 23, 2014 3:49 pm

    Strange that despite having admitted that there has been no warming for over a decade and a half, the Met Office is still hell-bent on blaming every bit of weather even fractionally above or below average on AGW, isn’t it?

  7. tom0mason permalink
    February 24, 2014 11:15 am

    Autonomous mind blog has an interesting take on the whys and where fors –

    http://autonomousmind.wordpress.com/2014/02/22/flooding-the-baroness-young-and-rspb-connection-is-even-stronger-than-first-identified/

  8. Søren Fosberg permalink
    February 25, 2014 9:55 pm

    Paul Homewood gives a reference to England and Wales Rainfall Series. The link correctly gives monthly precipitation – i.a. average for all stations.

    I can’t see where Paul gets the other data (> 10 and 20 mm/day), but I found this:

    http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/interesting/2013-decwind

    where the precipitation data from 11. december 2013 to 10 January 2014 give this result:

    - Two stations in Scotland: 19 days above 20 mm/day (20-60 mm)
    - Two stations in England: 6 days above 20 mm/day (20-70 mm)

    According to Paul: 0 days above 20 mm.

    Anyway, Julias point is not that there is an increase of average precipitation, but an increase of the frequency of extreme bursts.

    “There’s evidence to say we are getting slightly more rain in total, but more importantly it may be falling in more intense bursts – which can increase the risk of flooding. (Julia Slingo)

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20896049

    So, Paul has no reason to lecture Julia. He hasn’t understood what she is talking about.

    • February 25, 2014 10:54 pm

      Please read all the article before you keep making a fool of yourself.

      The whole point of the post is about daily rainfall intensity, and not total rainfall. I have shown that, nationwide, daily intensity was no more than earlier similar episodes.

      I have also already addressed the issue of intense daily rainfall here.

      http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2014/01/24/corinne/

      And this was clearly referenced in the post, if you had taken time to read it properly.

      As far your examples, they are no more than localised rainfall. If you had read my post properly, you would have realised it referred to country wide rainfall, which is something totally different.

      Finally the BBC report you refer to refers to trends since 1960. Unfortunately, you obviously have not realised that the 1960-90 period is well known to proper scientists as an unusually dry one, so it is hardly surprising if we are getting more rain recently.

      http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/we-have-forgotten-just-how-normal-flooding-in-the-uk-is/

      Meanwhile it is noteworthy that the Met Office have failed to provide one piece of evidence that “daily rainfall this winter has become more intense”.

Trackbacks

  1. No Julia – Rainfall Is Not Becoming More Intense | The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)
  2. Paleofantasies | Skeptical Swedish Scientists

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: