The UK Offshore Wind Industry
By Paul Homewood
A year ago, I published an analysis of the state of the Offshore Wind industry in the UK here. This is an update of the situation, based on Renewable UK’s latest report, Offshore Wind Project Timelines.
Capacity
http://www.renewableuk.com/en/publications/reports.cfm/Offshore-Wind-Project-Timelines
This is what Renewable UK’s report shows. Ignoring the “In Development” category, most of which, even if it comes to fruition, will not come on stream until the late 2020’s, we are left with 20.3GW, nearly all of which should be operational by 2022.
Based on current capacity utilisation of 35%, 20.3GW of capacity would generate about 62TWh a year, about 18% of the UK’s total generation.
Not all of this, of course, will necessarily come to fruition, and, as the report mentions, other large projects such as the Atlantic Array, London Array 2 and the Argyll Array have been dropped in the past year.
Subsidy
The new system of strike prices, introduced under last year’s Energy Bill, came into effect for wind farms commissioned since April 2014.
Wind farms already in operation remain on the existing system of support under the Renewables Obligation. According to DECC,
These prices [CfD’s] are broadly comparable to the support levels available under the Renewables Obligation, with a number of adjustments to account for the benefits of CfD
If, on a conservative basis, we take the £140/MWh as being representative, and a wholesale price of electricity of £50/MWh, at today’s prices we are looking at a subsidy of about £97/MWh.
With output of 62TWh pa, this gives an annual subsidy of £6.0 billion by the time all the capacity is in place around 2022. And all guaranteed for 15 years.
This figure, of course, is only part of the extra costs being loaded onto our electricity bills. Nevertheless, apart from tidal/wave power, offshore wind is the most expensive renewable option.
Ownership
The full list of wind farms is in the Appendix, but the table below summarises ownership of all projects either operational, under construction, with planning permission or in the planning process.
Where there is joint ownership, I have assumed equal shares.
OPERATOR | COUNTRY | MWH | % |
CENTRICA | UK | 509 | 2.5 |
DONG | DENMARK | 2955 | 14.6 |
EDF | FRANCE | 547 | 2.7 |
EDPR | USA | 875 | 4.3 |
ENECO | NETHERLANDS | 485 | 2.4 |
EON | GERMANY | 1320 | 6.5 |
MAINSTREAM | IRELAND | 850 | 4.2 |
RWE | GERMANY | 1964 | 9.7 |
SCOT POWER | SPAIN | 794 | 3.9 |
SIEMENS | GERMANY | 592 | 2.9 |
SSE | UK | 2995 | 14.8 |
STATOIL | NORWAY | 1560 | 7.7 |
STAATKRAFT | NORWAY | 1560 | 7.7 |
STADTWERKE | GERMANY | 192 | 1.0 |
VATTENFALL | SWEDEN | 1190 | 5.9 |
MARUBENI | JAPAN | 86 | 0.4 |
REPSOL | SPAIN | 875 | 4.3 |
MASDAR | ABU DHABI | 157 | 0.8 |
LA CAISSE | CANADA | 158 | 0.8 |
FLUOR | USA | 525 | 2.6 |
The share of UK companies, Centrica and SSE, only amounts to 17.3%, meaning that the vast bulk of the subsidy will be sent abroad. In addition to the subsidy, of course, is the actual market price for power supplied.
Does any of this matter? Should we be chauvinistic?
In my view, the UK simply cannot afford what will be close to £10 billion a year being sucked out of the domestic economy in this fashion. We already know that the wind industry creates very little added value and very few jobs, while Siemens and Vestas dominate the manufacture of turbines.
Ed Davey likes to talk about how much “investment” his policies have attracted. The reality is that we will be paying for this investment many times over. To make matters worse, this “investment” only serves to replace perfectly good generating capacity.
This is economics of the madhouse for which the country will be paying dearly for many years to come.
APPENDIX
MW | ||
OPERATIONAL | ||
BLYTH | EON | 4 |
NORTH HOYLE | RWE | 60 |
SCROBY | EON | 60 |
KENTISH FLATS 1 | VATTENFALL | 90 |
BARROW | DONG/CENTRICA | 90 |
BURBO | DONG | 90 |
LYNN | CENTRICA | 194 |
RHYL | RWE | 90 |
GUNFLEET 1 & 2 | DONG/MARUBENI | 173 |
ROBIN RIGG | EON | 180 |
THANET | VATTENFALL | 300 |
WALNEY 1 & 2 | DONG/SSE | 367 |
ORMONDE | VATTENFALL | 150 |
GABBARD | SSE/RWE | 504 |
SHERINGHAM | STATKRAAFT/STATOIL | 317 |
LONDON ARRAY | EON/DONG/MASDAR/LA CAISSE | 630 |
TEESIDE | EDF | 62 |
LINCS | CENTRICA | 270 |
3631 | ||
UNDER CONSTRUCTION | ||
GWYNT | RWE/SIEMENS/STADTWERKE | 576 |
HUMBER | EON | 219 |
WESTERMOST | DONG | 210 |
DUDDON | DONG/SCOT POWER | 389 |
1394 | ||
CONSENTED | ||
DUDGEON | STATKRAAFT/STATOIL | 402 |
RACE BANK | DONG | 580 |
KENTISH FLATS EXT | VATTENFALL | 50 |
GALLOPER | SSE/RWE | 340 |
MORAY | EDPR/REPSOL | 1000 |
BEATRICE | SSE | 664 |
3036 | ||
IN PLANNING | ||
NEART | MAINSTREAM | 450 |
BURBO EXT | DONG | 258 |
EAST ANGLIA | SCOT POWER/VATTTENFALL | 1200 |
RAMPION | EON | 700 |
WALNEY EXT | DONG | 750 |
INCH CAPE | EDPR/REPSOL | 750 |
DOGGER BANK | SSE/RWE/STATOIL/STATKRAAFT | 4800 |
HORNSEA | SIEMENS/MAINSTREAM/DONG | 1200 |
NAVITUS | ENECO/EDF | 970 |
FIRTH OF FORTH | SSE/FLUOR | 1050 |
12128 |
Comments are closed.
Let’s hope Chris Booker picks up on your thread and publishes the data so that the wider public can also see the sheer madness and the lies about “more UK Jobs”.
As you say most of the work will be done abroad and most of the profits will go the same way while the Tax payers get screwed.
Of course every one of the damned things will require back up from conventional energy generation.
At least nuclear got a hat tip by 60 odd eminent biologists today, the voice of reason IS Out there… it’s just whispering at the moment!
There is a children’s song and activity called “We All Fall Down”.
The next to last part [The activity is spinning in place.] goes like this:
Let’s twirl!
Twirl around the circle.
Twirl around the circle.
Twirling twirling.
We all fall down.
When the towers fall down, who pays?
Paul is gridwatch, http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/ , out of date in terms of the wind capacity? I read somewhere that there is roughly twelve gig of wind power capacity.
Seems to be.
The latest DECC Q3 figures show 8.0 GW for onshore and 4.4 GW for off.
How can it be out of date as the info comes from the grid itself. On the gridwatch website it will tell you that about one third (an extra 50%) of wind power is not monitored by the grid as it comes from sources less than 100MW in size. That may account for the difference.
With this amount of wind power connected to the grid, the next problem will be system instability and loss of the synchronous lockstep. Result will be disconnections as has already happened in Germany.
What would the cost of the fossil fuel power stations be, with fuel of course, that would be needed to replace such wind output? I feel we can only judge how expensive things would be with a relative comparison.
But we need these fossil fuel plants anyway as back up.
The wholesale market price of electricity is less than £50/MWh, which more than covers the cost of power from gas and coal.
But the contract price for offshore is currently £155/MWH