Gross Suppression Of Science …Former NOAA Meteorologist Says Employees “Were Cautioned Not To Talk About Natural Cycles”
August 27, 2015
Former NOAA meteorologist David Dilley has submitted an essay below that has 2 parts: 1) How the government has been starving researchers who hold alternative opinions of funding, and 2) climate cycles show we are starting a cooling period.
Readers will recall that David Dilley is a 40-year meteorology veteran and the producer of the excellent video: “Is Climate Change Dangerous?“, which first was presented at NTZ. Since then the video has been viewed more than 10,000 times and the NTZ story shared in social media over 800 times.
Just more confirmation of what we have known for a while, that NOAA have become a corrupt and politicised organisation, which can longer be trusted.
8 Comments
Comments are closed.
Thanks, Paul.
“Just more confirmation of what we have known for a while, that NOAA have become a corrupt and politicised organisation, which can longer be trusted.”
Sadly, true.
David Rose should be talking to David Dilley pronto – the story needs maximum MSM coverage.
I’m guessing your last sentence should have been “…, which can no longer be trusted.”
Natural cycles, weather comes and goes, or as Thomas B. Gray former head Space Services branch at the NOAA and a researcher in NOAA’s Environmental Research Laboratories once said :
Dr. Tim Ball’s 2014 book “The Deliberate Corruption Of Climate Science” is a must read. Book review is here:
http://www.principia-scientific.org/review-the-deliberate-corruption-of-climate-science-by-dr-tim-ballreview-the-deliberate-corruption-of-climate-science-by-dr-tim-ball.html
He names the names, provides the data, explains the history, and drives nail after nail into the AGW coffin.
We won’t be hearing this on the BBC
Be sure to watch David Dilley’s ( the former NOAA meteorologist referenced) video on youtube “Is Climate Change Dangerous” . He is the master of climate cycles and relates temperature history to Milankovitch cycles of the Earth around the Sun and the Moon around the Earth, and the ocean cycles as well. Nicely explained. An excellent addition to my anti-AGW library.
Reblogged this on Climate Collections.