Skip to content

Back To You, Mr Carney

October 20, 2015

By Paul Homewood 



Readers will recall Alex Henney’s letter to Mark Carney, following the latter’s speech warning of the perils of climate change.


You may be surprised to learn he has had a quick response, but probably less so about its contents!




Alex has been quick off the mark with his reply!




  1. October 20, 2015 5:38 pm

    Great stuff. I wonder how many exchanges there will be before the BOE announce that it has nothing further to add to its previous answers.

  2. October 20, 2015 6:39 pm

    Excellent reply Alex. Perhaps this one will run more than we thought!

  3. October 20, 2015 7:08 pm

    How stunningly refreshing is Henney’s reply to underling Kucak’s patronizing gibberish–a verbal pat on the head form letter. I’m still laughing.

  4. October 20, 2015 10:20 pm

    Way to go. These guys think that we are all stupid. In fact it seems to be a trait of much of modern management to behave like this. It happens because they are completely divorced from reality of life, and the likes of Carney and his mates need a couple of months or more on a Scottish Island with enough food and fuel but a broken down generator (tools and parts supplied to fix it) and told to survive. Then they may just learn a bit of humility.

  5. Rick Bradford permalink
    October 20, 2015 11:35 pm

    Mr Kucak writes that the Bank of England is “the UK’s prudential regulator”.

    Can someone fluent in Bureaucratese translate that for me?

  6. Philip permalink
    October 21, 2015 12:41 am

  7. Philip permalink
    October 21, 2015 12:45 am

    The report, entitled,
2052: A Global Forecast for the Next Forty Years,
decries improving living standards in developing countries and warns that man-made climate change could eventually kill off humans entirely.

    Although the report has generated a deluge of coverage in the establishment media, not one of those news stories points out that the Club of Rome admittedly manufactured the “idea” of man-made global warming back in 1990.

    On page 75 of their 1990 publication entitled
The First Global Revolution, the organization outlined how they would manufacture ecological scares in order to manipulate the public into accepting the imposition of a dictatorial world government run by them.

    “In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself,” states the report, which can be read in full at the end of this article.

  8. Mark Hodgson permalink
    October 21, 2015 8:07 am

    Three observations:

    1. “The speech was not designed to provide a Bank of England or personal view on the fact or not or climate change as we are not scientists or climate change experts.” So why did he weigh in as he did? And note how the BBC seized on it with glee.

    2. “He also stated that there is always room for disagreement on scientific issues.” Slightly strange phrasing (“there is always room for…”) but again, note that these comments were not reported by the BBC.

    3. I used to write to the last Governor, Sir Mervyn (now Lord) King, pointing out that his policies were leading us to economic disaster (I think I’ve been vindicated on that one). He always showed me the courtesy of replying personally to my correspondence. I note that Mr Carney (despite his remuneration package being many times higher than that of his predecessor) is too busy to reply to correspondence personally and spends taxpayers’ money on a “Public Enquiries Group” to do so on his behalf.

  9. October 21, 2015 12:08 pm

    Reblogged this on WeatherAction News and commented:
    That is a great response. 😀

  10. BLACK PEARL permalink
    October 21, 2015 7:39 pm

    There are not interested
    All they are interested in is the £42 Billion, I think was, in emission taxes they rake in each year (re Pauls past link to the 2014 Office of National Statistics)
    Without that coming in Carney & Co would be stuffed, as well as the whole EU
    Even if Einstein were alive and pointed to Scientific Proof that they were all wrong he would be ignored or ‘approached’

    How long do you think it will be before CO2 ‘pollution’ slowly morphs into just a plain old pollution tax.
    Its probably already started with emphasizing of NOX levels on diesels


  1. Back To You, Mr Carney | ajmarciniak

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: