Skip to content

Afraid Of The Truth, Mikey?

March 29, 2016

By Paul Homewood 



Now you see it!


ScreenHunter_3864 Mar. 28 18.03



And now you don’t!





Mikey Mann has disappeared my inconvenient comment, just as he did with Tony Heller’s yesterday.


This is the graph he does not want his dopey little followers to see:



  1. It doesn't add up... permalink
    March 29, 2016 11:47 am

    The climate of censorship is rather more predictable than the climate of the earth.

  2. Broadlands permalink
    March 29, 2016 12:29 pm

    “When debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser” ~Socrates

  3. March 29, 2016 12:32 pm

    All magicians have to manage the angles from which they allow their audience to watch the stage. Your comment was unhelpful to his performance, Paul.

  4. March 29, 2016 1:06 pm

    Canadian, Mark Steyn, now living in the US, is a conservative author, speaker and often sub for Rush Limbaugh. He has earned the ire of Michael Mann for writing a book: “A Disgrace to the Profession”: The World’s Scientists–in Their Own Words–On Michael E. Mann, His Hockey Stick, and Their Damage to Science, Volume One– compiled and edited by Mark Steyn.

    As a result, Mikey has been suing Mark Steyn in the Washington, DC Superior Court for “defamation of a Nobel Prize winner” for the past 3 years, hoping to silence Mark. Mark credits Ross McKitrick and Steve McIntyre with doing more to demolish the global-warming “hockey stick” than anybody. McIntyre was the Canadian mathematician who sought to make sense of Mann’s treatise and ended up hacking into the CRU’s emails of Univ. of East Anglia, leading to “Climategate”.

    Mark Steyn and Judith Curry testified before a Senate sub-committee chaired by Senator Ted Cruz, December 8, 2015. Should you be interested in reading what Mark had to say, here is a link to his testimony.

    Click to access

    Dr. Curry’s testimony:

    Click to access curry-senate-testimony-2015.pdf

    • March 29, 2016 1:59 pm

      McIntyre did not hack, he just read the Emails that had been made public by person(s) unknown.

      • John F. Hultquist permalink
        March 29, 2016 2:44 pm

        My vote goes to “leak.”

  5. March 29, 2016 1:10 pm

    Maybe it’s because your comment did not illuminate anything except that you were being a snide asshole?

    • March 29, 2016 5:13 pm

      Have you actually read the post?

      Do you not understand what the graph is telling you?

      Have you asked yourself why Mikey is so keen to hide it from people?

      Are you not just a little concerned that a supposedly objective scientist is so keen to suppress information he does not like?

      Or are you just a bit thick?

  6. Bitter&twisted permalink
    March 29, 2016 6:58 pm

    Mann is a habitual liar.

  7. March 29, 2016 8:45 pm

    Well played, Paul. You and Tony both show Mann hiding from/deleting truthful observations. Be cautious with tide gauges. Most sit on land that is not geostationary. Battery Park is thought reasonably stable since roughly midway between Boston (isostatic rebound) and Norfolk (isostatic compensation subsidence) and about the average of the two. ‘True’ SLR cannot actually vary much along 450 miles of US East Coast Line. There are maybe 80-100 other such reasonably geostationary tide gauges around the world. Definitely hundreds that are not. Juneau Alaska has SLR ‘declining’ 10mm/year due to tectonic uplift. Not very plausible coming out of the LIA.

  8. Coeur de Lion permalink
    March 30, 2016 8:23 am

    It’s important not to rewrite history. The Climategate emails were clearly the product of an internal whistleblower who knew his her way around the Iniversity’s IT systems.

  9. March 31, 2016 2:52 am

    Reblogged this on Climate Collections.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: