Prince Charles Wants Military-Style Response To Climate Change
September 29, 2020
By Paul Homewood
Meanwhile potty Prince Charles wants us to go on a warlike footing!!
It was the US that paid for the Marshall Plan. Maybe Charlie would like to tell us who will pay for this one?
39 Comments
Comments are closed.
NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT 
Old Jug-ears at it again. Who’s going to tell the Chinese, Indians, Russians etc., etc. to adopt this plan?
Good luck, Charlie-boy!
I rather like Charles. He’s a bit eccentric, faintly bonkers; it’s rather charming.
I used to quite like him too. As someone who has always been an environmentally friendly sort of person, (don’t like cars, in favour of organic farming) I thought he did quite a lot of good. However in the past few months I have changed my opinion, and am beginning to think quite the opposite.
Organic farming? Seriously? You want to use far, far more land for farming so we have far, far less for forests, wild areas, and all the rest? You want food to be 2-3 times more expensive so the poor really suffer? You want farmers to use old-fashioned, damaging chemicals in large quantities that cause all sorts of indiscriminate problems rather than small amounts directly targeted? All for food that has been conclusively shown to be at best no better for us. Organic is anti-science snobbery.
But when he becomes king, will he then be coronated?
I think you’ve read him wrong. He’s an arrogant, self-important and pompous twit who thinks he’s far more intelligent than he is and that his options are far more insightful than they are. His long handwritten missives on every topic to ministers over the years drove them nuts. His environmentalism is of the classic upper-class “let them eat cake” variety – which Harry has inherited sadly. It’s as unscientific as his love of homeopathy. And all that before I start on his hypocrisy.
Yep. Charley boy is both stupid and arrogant. Dunning Kruger, with entitlement. Dangerous. As his mum knows.
When’s the little boy going to say the future king’s got no clothes?
Never, because the little boy IS the future king.
Wonder if he had time in his busy life to study statistics.
https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/09/23/emission-reduction-atmospheric-co2/
I dread to think what will happen when this idiot becomes King.
He doesn’t understand what he means by ‘Climate Change’ and nor does Attenborough, Harrabin, Stern, Greta, a teeming host of virtue-signallers, Extortion Rebellion and probably Boris.
Let’s party while the money flows.
A semester of paleobotany or geology would straighten all this out.
There’s no fool like an old fool
What with the UN Prof’s comment and Prince Charles now at it, this is how the perpetrators of oppression, and their “useful innocents” (I wouldn’t want to use the word “idiots”) always have to tell everyone what they are brewing up for us. Then they can make the excuse…”Well, we told you what we were going to do, but you chose not to believe us, so hard cheese!”
The UN has for decades being developing its Agenda 21/30/GreenNewDeal to be the excuse for a totalitarian world government. How long before we cease to be branded as “conspiracy theorists”?
I think we can rule out China, India, Pakistan, Japan, Indonesia, Sth. Korea, Vietnam, The Philippines, Malawi, Egypt, Morrocco, Sth. Africa, Botswana and Tanzania, all of whom are building coal fired powerstations as rushing to his call. Germany also as their ludicrous policies MUST mean more coal or gas fired stations to avoid the damage from a tsunami in the Rhine. And if Trump wins then the USA can be counted as unwilling to throw money away.
Perhaps Charlie is counting on his son Andrew to rally California to his aid, provided they can do so only during daylight hours, and someone else bails them out of bankruptcy..
You mean his brother Andrew. The one who likes ’em young.
what amuses me about him is that even his mother thinks he’s extravagant. Uses the royal train, private jets,helicopters etc; maintains Clarence House, Birkhall, Highgrove and Llwynwermod. Has he even considered his own carbon footprint? Come the revolution will he be saved like Soros, Gates, Gore etc? Or will he follow his predecessor Charles I?
Today, Boris appears to back Prince Charles, yet (pre Carrie Symonds) I understand he wrote for the Telegraph:
“We as a species, human beings have become so blind with conceit and self-love that we genuinely believe that the fate of the planet is in our hands — when the reality is that everything, or almost everything, depends on the behaviour and caprice of the gigantic thermonuclear fireball around which we revolve.”
How then has he fallen for the current Group-Think Climate Religion ? Utterly rootless and without character he appears to swither this way and that.
“Climate Change/Save-the-Planet” Religion is simply the Trojan Horse to enable international acceptance for Totalitarian Communism. Communists know full well how unpopular their real aim is, so through deception they hope that people unaware of who their enemy is, they will succumb at every attempt to resist them.
If you know neither the enemy, nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.’
Boris could have been lying in the Telegraph as that is one of the few things he is any good at.
Communism a la Chinese one may be preferable to the actual Fascism on offer, thank you.
There’s an old saying in Ireland – “You’re never finished with a fool”.
Pretty much sums up my feelings about Prince Charles.
Building on the accuracy of his earlier predictions of time to save the planet, do we see a new Ladybird book appearing: “How the clown-prince saved the world” maybe?
Roll those tumbrills.
Must have been watching Attenborough or Burke. The link popped up yesterday
There must be people out there that fall for this kind of show biz crap
“It was the US that paid for the Marshall Plan. Maybe Charlie would like to tell us who will pay for this one?”
It would certainly not be Donald Trump, but it could well be Mr. Biden urged onward by the Green Deal socialists to save the world. The cost would not be in currency but in lives lost.
I wonder if when Her Majesty goes to bed each night she says ‘that’s another day Charles isn’t king’.
At this rate Camilla will be way out front in the popularity stakes.
Terribly sad. I think of Farmer George III but Charles’ spells of madness aren’t caused by porphyria.
I wonder if the first stage of the ‘military style response’ will be to appoint a few climate ‘Gauleiters’ from among the usual suspects in the Leftwaffe and then re-enact a, at best metaphorical, Knight of the Long Knives? With RICO prosecutions of doubting Thomas’ being mooted in the colonies already, taking out we pesky undesirables of a skeptic persuasion would seem to be essential to maintain the narrative and seize full control. And, with increased media censorship of sceptical views, we are already on a slippery slope, a situation that would be greatly exacerbated in the West should a Biden/Harris government come to power in November.
HRH’s appeal may well lead to a military response, but given the increasingly angry mood in the nation at the way in which we are being ordered about and told what we can or cannot do, this is more likely to be of the kind that ended the reign of his ancester and namesake :Charles I.
The Earl of Manchester (In Cromwell):-
“Much has been said in this House about the so-called inequity of certain members being financially involved in national projects. Members have ascribed to this state of affairs dark and sinister motives. I say if we in Parliament cannot gain from ruling the country there’s really very little point in our being here at all.”
I guess nothing much changes, Royals and politicians consider themselves a breed apart!
Approximately 244 years ago, we had a military response to meddling English royals. It didn’t end well for them.
Charles has neither a clue, nor claws. He can harm himself more than others.
He’s reading it, look at his eye movements
I think my little dog named Charlie, is more than a little embarrassed at his namesake!!!
I don’t believe we are altering the climate much if any, but nowhere – NOWHERE – in the real science is there any claim, let alone any evidence, of these sorts of dire, immediate problems. There is no climate emergency in the science. There is no need for immediate, drastic action beyond what is already happening in the science.
These are political actions and have nothing whatsoever to do with science.
No wonder Harry is hooked by a manipulative, narcissist when he has the trauma of his mother’s death and an unfaithful, limp-minded father.
Times are hard…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54289715
The impact of lockdown on visitor numbers to venues such as Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle will lead to an estimated £15m loss of income over the next three years, the Keeper of the Privy Purse said.
And a 10-year £369m budget to refurbish Buckingham Palace is expected to be £20m short, Sir Michael Stevens added.”
Need to get some money from somewhere, more from the plebs eh?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jul/17/offshore-wind-auction-could-raise-millions-for-queen
“Industry experts expect the complex bidding process to raise record sums, which could increase energy bills and hand a windfall to the crown – potentially generating hundreds of millions for the Queen.
The Crown Estate, which manages the monarch’s property portfolio, holds exclusive rights to lease the seabed around the British Isles for wind and wave power. Its profits go to the Treasury, which then sends 25% back to the royal household in the form of the sovereign grant.
The sovereign grant was increased two years ago, from its previous level of 15%, in order to pay for extensive renovations at Buckingham Palace. It is to stay at 25% for a 10-year period, meaning the royal household should benefit directly from the money raised from the new leases.
The Crown Estate does not make its forecasts public. However, if the government’s 2030 target is met, the Queen [or King Charles, or King William] could be collecting more than £100m a year within a decade.”