Skip to content

2021 had the fewest global hurricanes in the satellite era

January 17, 2022

By Paul Homewood

Good spot from Bjorn Lomborg:

 

 

 image

image

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1482384323013709831.html

All the data is sourced from:

 

 http://tropical.atmos.colostate.edu/Realtime/index.php?arch&loc=global

10 Comments
  1. Cheshire Red permalink
    January 17, 2022 10:26 am

    Lying by omission is endemic. It’s a hallmark of any effective propaganda machine.

  2. January 17, 2022 10:35 am

    Surely, this level of lying must be pandemic by now?

  3. Gerry, England permalink
    January 17, 2022 11:14 am

    How ironic that this comes up at the time the lefty luvvies are queuing up to say how great the BBC is and how wonderful its news reporting is while we know this will NEVER appear anywhere on anything BBC. Only if they can spin a global warming cause will it do so.

    • January 17, 2022 11:21 am

      I think that Lomborg is on that ‘Spawn of the Devil’ list that BBC ‘Climate Experts’ refer to before ignoring reality to publish their scare stories.

  4. January 17, 2022 12:09 pm

    In a La Niña dominated period like now and last year the Atlantic hurricane threat is supposed to increase, not decrease. But first there has to be one of course.

    La Niña also allows for the development of stronger than normal hurricanes in the Atlantic and equatorial Pacific areas.
    https://eartheclipse.com/climate-change/causes-and-effects-of-la-nina.html

  5. dearieme permalink
    January 17, 2022 12:57 pm

    A fine spot, Mr Homewood.

  6. Stuart Hamish permalink
    January 17, 2022 2:06 pm

    .

    ” climate – kitman ” is nicely alliterative Cheshire Red
    To complement Bjorn’s shrewd analysis Paul , consider that of the 41 year duration ” Number of Global Strong [ Cat 3 + ] Hurricanes ” series , 26 years cusp or sit below the 24 /yr average and 12 of the last 20 .. 63 .41 % of the Cat 3 + powerful hurricane dataset in the era of global satellite coverage comprise average or below average years. That’s some climate crisis update

  7. James Neill permalink
    January 17, 2022 4:06 pm

    How long is the data set used going to remain unadjusted after these results get noticed?

  8. avro607 permalink
    January 17, 2022 4:51 pm

    Pardon this “heads up Paul”.
    Todays D.Express,two pages 0f advertising a book just published by the one and only Peter Stott.titled:HOT AIR:The inside story of the battle against climatechange denial..Reading thru. it is so nonsensical that it will be very easy to show how so wrong he is.
    He uses the argument that he and his associates are not allowed to tell you their truth of climate change as they see it because they are shut down at every turn–very clever,as that is exactly what is happening to us.
    Harsh words for Nils Axel Morner(the best of the best) in my opinion,and also Richard Lindzen.
    I have just ordered a copy(yeah I know) but it will help in constructing a better refutation.
    I am still fuming.

  9. avro607 permalink
    January 17, 2022 4:53 pm

    AND SICKENED!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: