Skip to content

Europe’s Self-Made Energy Crisis

February 1, 2022
tags:

By Paul Homewood

 

 image

The European energy crisis is poised to go from very bad to unimaginably worse. While all eyes are on Ukraine and Russia, Europe’s energy woes are largely self-made, not due to outside forces.

Europe has made its own bed, disassembling dispatchable fuel diversity by closing well-operating coal and nuclear power plants. In doing so it has deepened its already troubling reliance on an insecure and volatile natural gas market dominated by Vladimir Putin. Europe is, in fact, more dependent on Russian gas today than it was when Russia annexed Crimea in 2014.  

Meghan O’Sullivan, the director of the Geopolitics of Energy Project at Harvard University’s Kennedy School, toldThe Wall Street Journal, “For the foreseeable future, Europe will remain dependent—and possibly as dependent as ever—on Russian gas.”

Europe couldn’t have picked a worse bridge to its idealized energy future, and now European consumers are paying a galling price. In the 4th quarter of 2021, the International Energy Agency reported that average European wholesale electricity prices were more than four times their 2015-2020 average. Households are set to pay an average of 54% more for energy than they did two years ago. These are the prices before potential conflict erupts in Ukraine and an already tight European gas market is turned completely upside down. 

In the U.K., higher energy prices are poised to push an estimated 2 million additional households into fuel poverty, taking the total to 6 million, the highest level of fuel poverty in more than 25 years. What’s happening in Britain is playing out across the continent. And there’s growing acknowledgement that it didn’t have to be this way.

Europe’s renewable and natural gas obsession has paved the way for the loss of an astounding amount of coal and nuclear power capacity. As of March 2021, more than half of Europe’s coal capacity that was operating in 2016 had been retired or been scheduled for retirement by 2030. In the U.K., coal generation met 40% of power demand a decade ago – just a handful of coal plants are left on the grid today. Nuclear retirements and phaseouts – notably the nuclear phaseout in Germany – continue despite consumers drowning under soaring power and gas prices. Germany closed half its remaining nuclear power capacity in 2021 and its remaining three plants are scheduled for retirement this year.

Europe has wedged itself between a rock and a hard place. It’s stuck paying exorbitant prices for natural gas, and massive investments made in renewable power have left the E.U. in a continuous boom-bust cycle of weather-driven generation. Unfortunately, some of the coldest weeks are also those with the least wind and daylight.

Despite ongoing efforts to push remaining coal capacity aside, coal is playing an essential role in navigating the crisis. As Bloomberg reported just this week, “Coal will play a vital role in helping to keep the lights on in Europe this winter… The latest example of the fuel’s importance came on Monday as U.K.’s usage peaked at its highest level since March to help plug a gap in supplies.”

In Germany, coal also showed its importance in November and December, with power generation rising 16% from a year earlier. And in Spain, a coal plant forced into retirement three years ago has been given new life to keep the lights on and reduce gas consumption.

There’s no getting around it. Europe’s energy crisis is a failure of policy and a clear case study of the danger of disassembling the stability that comes with fuel diversity in a misguided, rushed and irresponsible approach to the energy transition. The warning for American energy and climate policy is impossible to miss. Whether policymakers learn the right lessons remains to be seen. 

https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2022/01/31/europes_self-made_energy_crisis_814587.html

37 Comments
  1. February 1, 2022 3:31 pm

    There is no cure for stupid, and politicians have it in spades – the more green they are, the more stupid they are. I would say there is a very strong correlation.

    • Robert Christopher permalink
      February 1, 2022 4:24 pm

      Don’t call it stupid: I cannot believe that no one knew what they were doing. It has involved many people, some of whom should have known, like the Engineers 🙂 , and BILLIONS of pounds.

      Others knew, but were ridiculed or prevented from being heard, the BBC being the most obvious communication obstacle.

      It should have been listed as a ‘known project risk’, and flagged to the project owner and resolved. It needs investigating, and the findings known, so it doesn’t happen again, and the culprits dealt with.

      • Mike Jackson permalink
        February 1, 2022 4:48 pm

        I would suggest Ed Berry’s ‘Climate Miracle’ for a succinct rundown on how we got where we are

      • jimlemaistre permalink
        February 1, 2022 6:19 pm

        NOBODY . . . in the corporate world has the BALLS to stand up to or against ‘The Big Green Propaganda Machine’ !!

        Long ago it became clear that you do so at the risk of being ‘Lynched’ in Public Opinion . . . By the Media . . . the Rulers of Green public policy . . .

        Sadly, to date, no self-respecting Media Representative wants to risk the Ire of their Peers or the Mandarins ruling the Environmental Movement or The Purveyors of Globalization in our New Social Construct. For they are ‘Brothers-in-Arms’, so to speak. Who wants to be the ONE to open Pandora’s Box? . . . It would be like pulling Hans Brinker’s finger from the Dyke or Killing the Goose that Lays the Golden Egg . . . The old adage . . .

        There are none so blind as those who will not see . . .

        Change MUST come as a ‘Grass Roots’ movement . . .

        Or . . . Public Policy will never change . . .

        I wrote the following paper over 5 years ago . . . the more things evolve, it seems . . . the worse they get . . . Public opinion built by the Media gets harder to confront every day . . .

        https://www.academia.edu/49676862/Social_Engineering_Environmentalism_and_Globalization_A_New_World_Order

        My Thoughts . . .

  2. Gamecock permalink
    February 1, 2022 3:34 pm

    ‘Households are set to pay an average of 54% more for energy than they did two years ago. These are the prices before potential conflict erupts in Ukraine and an already tight European gas market is turned completely upside down.’

    Ol’ Conor hasn’t been around long enough to understand he’s missed the real crisis: availability. High price will make you cry. Lack of availability will kill you.

  3. Philip Mulholland permalink
    February 1, 2022 3:42 pm

    What exactly is a “Policymaker” and what expertise do they have?
    How are they trained or did they just appear one day?
    Who allowed these self-appointed opinionists to become so dominant in national affairs?

    • Vernon E permalink
      February 1, 2022 3:45 pm

      Philip: Join the 21st century. There is a whole army of people in the western world who are recognised (and paid) for being “influencers”.

    • Thomas Carr permalink
      February 1, 2022 4:23 pm

      Policymakers read the sort of ‘authoritative’ stuff that has just been put before the readers of the New York Times, see
      https://www.nytimes.com/article/climate-change-global-warming-faq.html/?action=click

    • T Walker permalink
      February 1, 2022 10:50 pm

      “Who allowed these self-appointed opinionists to become so dominant in national affairs?”

      Philip, you and all who haven’t should read the excellent-

      The Age of Global Warming – A History by Rupert Darwall.

      You will learn a little bit about theory, not much – but you will learn the answer to your question – this is all 50 years in the making.

      • jimlemaistre permalink
        February 2, 2022 12:04 am

        Mr. Walker, thank you for the reference . . . Excellent I have ordered it.
        The evolution as described in the text is truly well researched and on point. Highly educational of the ‘Roots of Environmentalist Ideology’.

        Yet today there is Science that disputes that CO2 from humans burning fossil fuels has anything at all to do with Climate Change. I am one of the many who point out the False connection with research on the Science and a reflection on History of Climate Cycles dating back 10,000 years. With 18 cycles, 9 cycles of warming and 9 cycles of cooling to examine with NO CORRELATION to CO2 . . . There is something wrong with anyone connecting Climate Change to CO2. Pollution real pollution from burning fossil fuels is a serious problem . . . Granted ! . . . But NOT the CO2.

        The linkage is False

        https://www.academia.edu/49421861/CO2_Cradle_of_Life_on_Planet_Earth

        The IPCC in its own research produces a similar finding in a published graph “Global Natural and Anthropogenic Sources and Absorption of Greenhouse Gasses in the 1990’s”, finding, CO2 from natural causes is 793 billion tones, Man-Made sources is 23 billion tones. 23 divided by 793 is 2.9%. Again, no calculations are presented for summary or review.

        Meanwhile all the things we could do, to actually clean up the environment and the air we breathe with Scrubbers and Electrolytic Precipitators and Nitrous Oxide Burners . . . scientific solutions to remove over 90% of particulates from smoke stacks. . . do not get built because of our fetish with CO2. The Kyoto and Paris protocols call for a 20% reduction of Man-Made CO2 output. That’s 20% of 3%, that is 0.6% . . . Pure, Scientific Madness! Billions of dollars are being spent to reduce one of the most essential building blocks for life on planet earth by 0.6%. For more Data . . .

        https://www.academia.edu/51184433/Climate_Change_For_the_21_st_Century

        You want to clean up Planet Earth . . . Shut Up about CO2 and spend the money like they did at Belldune New Brunswick on the Coal Fired Electric power generating station . . . They even recycle the water used to clean the smoke stacks into gypsum board (Drywall). It cost $800 million Better that than the smog I would say . . . But environmentalists are so focused on CO2 . . . Smart solutions do NOT get built . . . NOT even suggested . . .
        See Page 7 & 8 . . .

        https://www.academia.edu/45570971/The_Environmentalist_and_The_Neanderthal

        Over 90% of these is what gets removed at that plant . . .

        1. Sulfur dioxide (SO2), which contributes to acid rain and respiratory illnesses.
        2. Nitrogen oxides (NOx), which contribute to smog and respiratory illnesses.
        3. Particulates, which contribute to smog, haze, and respiratory illnesses and lung disease.
        4. Mercury and other heavy metals linked to both neurological and developmental damage.
        5. Fly ash and bottom ash, that are residues created when power plants burn Coal.

        Nature Rules Climate Change . . .

        Pollution attached to CO2 going up the stack when fossil fuels are burned can be removed NOW. We have had the technology for over 30 years . . . Time to use it and spend the money NOW.

        Our western policies based on ‘Self-Flagellation’ and a belief that CO2 is the new Devil . . . has destroyed western economies, pushed all productivity to Third World Countries and China . . . and Global Pollution remains the same.

        My Thoughts . . .

  4. Robert Christopher permalink
    February 1, 2022 3:51 pm

    “Unfortunately, some of the coldest weeks are also those with the least wind and daylight.”

    That isn’t a 21st century revelation!

    We discussed this in 1974, in an undergraduate workshop about ‘just because it’s possible, it doesn’t mean it should be done’.

    What is unfortunate is that anyone with that understanding (and willing to inform others) has been labeled as not worthy to be heard, especially by the BBC.

  5. Broadlands permalink
    February 1, 2022 3:54 pm

    “For the foreseeable future, Europe will remain dependent—and possibly as dependent as ever—on Russian gas.”

    The same is true for gas that is used in conventional vehicles…renewable biofuels. And they are 90% fossil fuel. There is no way around that fact. It is true everywhere not just in Europe.

  6. David Waller permalink
    February 1, 2022 3:54 pm

    I am not sure how we will ever overcome the continued stupidity of our politicians of whatever hue. Anybody got any ideas?

    • Robert Christopher permalink
      February 1, 2022 4:25 pm

      Don’t call it stupid: see my earlier post for the reason.

    • Chilli permalink
      February 1, 2022 5:45 pm

      Unfortunately the public voted them (the LibLabCon) – not me personally – I’ve been voting for the only party with a sane energy policy: UKIP with Roger Helmer as energy spokesman. However since Farage scuttled UKIP I noticed he’s changed to spouting the same ‘we have to cut our carbon’ nonsense as everyone else. Probably a tactical decision, but the wrong one IMHO.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 2, 2022 8:42 am

      Yes. Stop governments being involved in everything. Politicians have always been vain, greedy, egotistical, ignorant people. But in 1900 it didn’t matter much because they didn’t have control over much day to day stuff. Now literally everything is part of what they do.

      Letting stupid people run important stuff is a bad idea. The only cure is to remove much of their power.

    • Vernon E permalink
      February 2, 2022 10:37 am

      I have frequently posted about my pessimism that the continuance of the collective insanity is inevitable largely because of the powerful forces driving it including the Rockefellers and the Men of Davos. But I see one tiny chink that might let light in. I don’t personnally like it but it has widespread political support. That is proportional representation in UK government. Think about it. I’d like to hear what others think.

  7. Greg61 permalink
    February 1, 2022 4:29 pm

    The Soviets and now Russians have been funding the various green groups since at least the 70’s. Initially to instigate support for communism in the west, as well as inspire violence. Now it’s a bit of that, but mostly so Putin can sell oil and gas, and take sanctions off the table for whatever evil they are perpetrating at the moment.

    • jimlemaistre permalink
      February 1, 2022 6:24 pm

      Very astute dear sir . . . very astute . . .

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 2, 2022 8:44 am

      And before that CND, which led directly to the anti nuclear power movement.

      Laughably the Greens whine about Russian influences in Trump and Brexit but by far the biggest influence has always been on the Greens.

      • Vernon E permalink
        February 2, 2022 10:41 am

        And the Trade Unions that made the UK the “sick man of Europe” in the 1960s and 1970s.

  8. February 1, 2022 5:09 pm

    I recall a few years ago when Australia started demolishing operational coal plants, Jo Nova was shocked that the energy suppliers would do that. Unfortunately, an existing coal plant produced power so much more cheaply and reliably than wind and solar, it was clear that the renewables would not be competitive. This is where the “certainty” needed to create a market for renewable kicked in. The rules were written to ensure that renewables would always make money and that the old reliable fossil fuel plants would not have sufficient utilization at the market prices allowed to ever make much if any money. So coal fired power plants were imploded and the owners were happy to see their money losing operations taken off the grid. With governing bodies writing the rules with the advice of eco advocates and suppliers with little input from consumers it’s not surprise that Europe is between a rock and a hard place. In the past however, governing bodies writing rule with suppliers to insure the profitability of the preferred supplier would have been called corruption. Now it’s called sustainability.

    • jimlemaistre permalink
      February 1, 2022 6:26 pm

      For thirty years public policy initiatives in western countries have led to our economic capitulation. All the things that cause pollution at home have been transferred to countries with little to no regulation . . . Global pollution remains THE SAME. Now, we look so good on paper . . . Success !

      Meanwhile things like Solar, Wind, Hydro and Bio fuels are accredited as ‘Green Sources’ of energy because they do not burn fossil fuels, on site . . . What goes into these technologies is completely overlooked . . . Worst in all of this, is the ‘Green Credits’ ascribed to these new sources of energy . . . tradable credits . . . 1 Trillion dollars worth are traded, Globally, annually. To immense profit for sellers and traders.

      Carbon Trade is Already Covering the Equivalent of one Half of all World Energy Emissions . . . A 1 Trillion-dollar Value . . .

      Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (ICE) has said that trading in carbon allowances reached a record volume in 2021 on its various markets — the volume of buying and selling reached the equivalent of about one half of ALL global energy emissions.

      A total of 18 billion tons of ‘Carbon Allowances’ was traded in 2021. Equivalent to an estimated $1 trillion in US dollars according to ICE. It trades by far the biggest market share in the global market, though other exchanges including the European Energy Exchange (EEX) brokers also handle sizable volumes, as well.

      Reflecting on how companies use these markets to manage and price ‘Climate Risk’, as well as meet their compliance obligations, the traded contracts included a record 15.2 billion tons of EU carbon allowances and a record 2.4 billion tons of California carbon allowances as well as 346 million tons of Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative allowances. Then also, following its launch in May 2021, the 255-million-ton U.K. carbon allowances.

      This year ICE will be expanding their carbon credit markets to value and support the preservation of ‘natural assets’, as well as launching their first carbon futures index on contract to provide access to the global cost of emissions in one instrument. Gordon Bennett, Managing Director of Utility Markets at ICE.

      A very large portion of these trades and exchanges are based on The Electric Car ‘Zero Emissions’ Fraud!

      https://www.academia.edu/52039545/All_Electricity_Poisons_Planet_Earth

      https://www.academia.edu/49057069/Electric_Cars_Burn_31_More_Energy_than_Gas_Cars

      This may well be the biggest ‘Fraud’ ever perpetrated on humanity in history . . .

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 2, 2022 8:47 am

      They were destroyed to make sure we couldn’t turn back. No rational person would do that. What if the sciencecwas wrong? What if new technologies didn’t work or took longer to appear? Keep the coal.

      But no, it has to be destroyed no matter, because this is about a revolution that for some bizarre reason requires coal and oil to vanish.

  9. David permalink
    February 1, 2022 5:17 pm

    To go back to basics, we should select our parliamentary candidates with a system of primaries to avoid your candidate being selected by the stitch up with local political parties.

    • Mike Jackson permalink
      February 1, 2022 7:35 pm

      How does that differ from each party selecting its candidate and you then voting for the one you prefer?
      I’ve said time and again that we are the ones who have got us into the political mess we are in. (And that’s not exclusive to the UK, by the way!) We have delegated our politics to the small cadre of activists who run the local branch with the result that they *are* the local branch. With no serious input from local voters (because we are no longer party members) they are susceptible to fielding whoever Central Office wants to put into parliament, ie yet another “professional politician”, ex-PPE degree, ex-intern, ex-gofer, ex-ministerial adviser, now getting his (usually ‘his’; women in parliament tend to be the ones who get there on their own merits) reward with a safe seat.
      It’s a form of political incest and it won’t change until we change it.
      Today’s report that Boris is abandoning the bonfire of EU red tape in order to concentrate on “net zero” fills me with deep gloom — but no surprise. Just maybe his party will recognise it as a step too far, but I’m not holding my breath.

      • Gerry, England permalink
        February 2, 2022 1:21 pm

        I am surprised that will all-women shortlists you think that they get MP jobs on merit. We have a bollywood dolly as ‘our’ MP – got the job as soon as the Tories selected her since the constituency is a walkover for them – who could only enhance her bingo card by being disabled and somebody who can’t work out what gender they are. Came from the Treasury and having got 2 out of 4 on her scorecard has already had the word ‘minister’ attached to her name. So we have no representation as she will do whatever the government want her to.

  10. Athelstan. permalink
    February 1, 2022 6:24 pm

    As I’ve said before, shouting ain’t going to do any good. We must surmize it that, the ptb wish to destroy the economy or they are allied to a set of external agencies who’s primary wish to destroy this nation via deindustrialization through expensive and intermittent energy supply.

    Here the thing is, what are we going to do about it and what could we possibly do about it?

    There is hint of a backlash – the car drivers are getting pretty uppity – what I cannot understand is why it has taken this long for the petrolheads to wake up. Wake up, we’ve got to do and action this time not shouting.

  11. ian miller permalink
    February 1, 2022 8:34 pm

    Interesting as it is how just as we were beginning to emerge from the corona-virus we find another variant ready to swoop, as if by the flick of a switch before our Christmas celebrations. The timing couldn’t have been better orchestrated. With the new multi variant fear stories , doubtless the totalitarian Chinese Communist Party will be interested in its UK progress, as an indication of how soon our similarly adopted Climate Change fear tactics can be used to subjugate the entire gullible British public into accepting future spiraling living costs and plunging living standards .
    Why without ever being asked, has the British public been required to sacrifice their living standards , dissipate its wealth on green projects and give its manufacturing to China and elsewhere to virtue signal to the world its green righteousness while the Countries benefiting from our largesse are building Coal-Fired Power Stations everywhere else ?

    • jimlemaistre permalink
      February 1, 2022 9:05 pm

      Well said . . . !!!
      Sadly . . . Our Media will NEVER hear this message . . . Shameful . . .

  12. Harry Passfield permalink
    February 1, 2022 9:20 pm

    Boris is getting crucified in the comments in the DT. Well over 3300 so far!
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/02/01/boris-johnson-scraps-brexit-bonfire-eu-red-tape-favour-net-zero/

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      February 2, 2022 8:49 am

      I’m unclear why he can’t do both?

      Johnson has no substance.

      • Gerry, England permalink
        February 2, 2022 1:08 pm

        The biggest cost to business by far is down to environmental legislation, that’s why. And most of that comes from EU Directives.

  13. markl permalink
    February 2, 2022 12:33 am

    The Russian revolution never ended. The Marxists just went underground to continue their goal of dominating the world with their ideology. Very stealth, and very successful so far in staying under the radar but eventually they must pop their heads above the parapet.

  14. It doesn't add up... permalink
    February 2, 2022 2:51 pm

    It looks like Boris has decided to inflct maximum net zero pain. The OFGEM cap us being announced hurriedly, and with the useful ways of cutting bills being completely ignored if the rumours are right.

    https://www.current-news.co.uk/news/ofgem-to-announce-new-price-cap-on-3-february

    • Gamecock permalink
      February 5, 2022 1:41 pm

      Price controls on energy . . . what could go wrong?

      ‘The disconnect between this and the soaring wholesale prices has significantly squeezed suppliers, with many who were unhedged unable to recoup the cost of energy. This led to 27 suppliers shuttering in 2021, as well as Bulb going into special administration due to its size.’

      I warn you again: your problem isn’t going to be price. It’s going to be availability.

      • jimlemaistre permalink
        February 5, 2022 1:48 pm

        Possibly that is the reason the UK government just approved a 54% increase in pricing . . . ?

Comments are closed.