Skip to content

The electric car debacle shows the top-down economics of net zero don’t add up

September 1, 2023

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Paul Kolk

 

Blimey!! Ben Marlow has finally seen the light!

 

 

 image

Sadiq Khan’s controversial Ultra-Low Emissions Zone scheme for London was supposed to put the rocket-boosters under electric car demand.

With the Mayor pressing ahead with a highly-contentious scheme that forces non-compliant petrol and diesel car drivers to pay an eye-watering £12.50 a day to drive into the capital, the expectation was that hundreds of thousands of motorists would rush out to their nearest forecourt and snap up an electric version, triggering an explosion in sales of Nissan Leafs, Teslas and other battery-powered models.

There was a spike in registrations of electric vehicles in July but otherwise the electric car boom that politicians, manufacturers, and campaigners insist is around the corner, remains something of a myth.

True, sales are steadily increasing but not in the vast numbers that proponents of electrification anticipated or would like to see.

image

Proportion of cars on UK roads

 

In fact, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the car industry has misjudged the scale of demand quite badly. Vertu, which is one of Britain’s biggest car dealerships, has become the latest big name to admit that the sector is already suffering from a dramatic oversupply of battery-powered vehicles.

Indeed supply is outstripping demand to such an extent, that prices are tumbling rapidly.

The warning follows the extraordinary decision of German car titan Volkswagen in July to halt electric vehicle production at its sprawling Emden factory in north-west Germany and lay off a fifth of its 1,500 employees after sales of electric models fell 30pc short of forecasts.

Unwanted electric cars are piling up on American forecourts too leaving some dealers to refuse further deliveries until the backlog has eased.

One hopes politicians the world over are paying attention because what we are witnessing is another example of how the top-down economics of net zero increasingly don’t stack up: with the introduction of an entirely arbitrary 2030 ban on petrol and diesel cars, the Government is forcing manufacturers to churn out millions of vehicles, regardless of whether the market actually exists or not.

The deadline should be scrapped without further ado. This “cart before the horse” approach of trying to stimulate demand by creating supply is the wrong way round and almost never works in business.

Start-up Britishvolt tried something similar, promising to build a giant battery factory in Blythe, on the Northumbrian coast that would churn out enough batteries every year to power 300,000 cars.

Yet there was an even bigger flaw at the heart of its plans: it had failed to secure a single order – a situation that hadn’t changed by the time it ran out of money at the start of the year.

It’s hard to fault the intentions of the great net-zero crusade – a greener planet is something everyone should want to see. But far too much of it is built on hope rather than reality.

 

image 

The Government’s policy on wind energy has proved to be similarly divorced from fact. The Contracts for Difference scheme, which guarantees a fixed price for the electricity that is produced for 15 years, is an effective incentive during more benign times but when overheads are surging, as they are now, it quickly becomes an impediment to progress.

With ministers showing little willingness to bend on prices in the face of rampant cost increases, major projects are being ruthlessly abandoned.

The biggest setback has come off the Norfolk coast after Vattenfall announced it would shut down construction of its Boreas wind farm. The 1.4 gigawatt development was set to power around 1.5m homes but the Swedish energy outfit insists a 40pc surge in costs, driven by inflation, supply issues and rising wages means it is no longer viable.

Without more generous state subsidies others will surely follow suit, shattering Britain’s stated ambitions to nearly quadruple offshore wind capacity from 14GW currently to 50GW by the end of the decade.

Yet perhaps nothing underlines the Alice in Wonderland disconnection of ministers more than the campaign to force the population to green their homes with heat pumps.

Even a ban on the sale of new oil boilers from 2026 has failed to convince people to make the shift largely because the cost of converting your home can be huge, so too the disruption and upheaval from having one installed, while much of the technology suffers from several major flaws.

It might explain why, in spite of a Government scheme that pays bungs of between £5,000 and £6,000 per household, less than 14,000 vouchers have been claimed since it was launched in May last year.

Naive politicians aren’t the only ones. Virtuous investors have wasted huge sums on other ‘green’ innovations such as fake meat that have turned out to be busts.

Perhaps the venture capital industry has got better at picking winners, though that seems doubtful. At one stage it could hardly have been worse.

A study by the American academic Ben Gaddy in 2016 found that of the $25bn ploughed into so-called “clean-tech” ventures, 90pc were abject failures, and close to all of them could be considered poor investments.

Here in the UK, the problem is compounded by our willingness to remain silent as more productive hi-tech industries that Britain should be building its future on are auctioned off to the highest bidders.

The takeovers in quick succession of Cambridge-based biotech firm Abcam by an American rival and of Staffordshire drug IT specialist Instem by French private equity make a mockery of our ambition to be a life-sciences powerhouse. This country’s help-yourself attitude to opportunistic foreign raiders has to end.

Equally, perhaps the time has come to accept that the economics of net zero are more fantasy than reality. 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/09/01/electric-car-debacle-undermines-top-down-net-zero-economics/

It’s a pity Marlow and his likes were not banging the drum years ago, before we were lumbered with Net Zero nonsense.

46 Comments
  1. Gray permalink
    September 1, 2023 10:19 am

    Anybody see the disconnect between subsidising EV’s at the same time as National Grid are paying £3kw/h to stop using electricity, to keep the lights on?

    • September 1, 2023 11:57 am

      V2G: they want to use EV batteries as a source of peak time electricity.
      https://electriccarguide.co.uk/what-is-vehicle-to-grid-v2g/

      • Harry Passfield permalink
        September 1, 2023 12:09 pm

        The same idiots came up with that idea (v2g) as came up with idea that restricting kettles and toasters to 2kW would save electricity.

      • gezza1298 permalink
        September 1, 2023 3:15 pm

        If nothing else does, surely the idea of powering up the grid from car batteries proves that these people are mentally ill.

      • liardetg permalink
        September 1, 2023 5:43 pm

        How does 12volts or whatever become 240 volts 50 cycles? Do I have to do it? Can I just plug into the grid? Shower of sparks if it’s my usual competence

  2. In The Real World permalink
    September 1, 2023 10:30 am

    There is no economic plan for Net Zero . The whole idea is to destroy the economy and turn the world into a Marxist / Socialist state . https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism/
    And part of that is that the ordinary people will not be allowed to drive anyway .

    • gezza1298 permalink
      September 1, 2023 3:20 pm

      There is a growing problem with their plan for a world of fascism – BRICS. As more nations consider joining BRICS you can see the mutterings from the West increasing. France’s Macaroon was at it, trying to present it as a bad idea but is it? For the World Empire of Fascism it certainly is as it dents the influence they have over Africa. The old colonial nations are losing their influence in Africa as they look to Russia and China, particularly for help with energy supply while the western morons only promise loans for windmills and solar panels.

      • 186no permalink
        September 1, 2023 9:22 pm

        “The old colonial nations are losing their influence in Africa as they look to Russia and China…”

        If these “old colonial nations” reckon they got a bad deal from European colonial nations from the 1500’s onwards, not forgetting the payola roundabout as well as the bottomless pit of foreign aid that ended up in the Swiss bank accounts of the “dear leaders”, I think they ( and by that I mean the useless eaters of the populations at large) have a very rude awakening – Belt and Road is just the start…

  3. September 1, 2023 10:34 am

    EVs are no more green than military drones, which cause explosions and emit manmade CO2 having costa plenty.

    EVs manufacture and usage of scarce, diminishing resources, not to mention xs electricity needs, tyre and brake particulates, is as green as the Russian and similar agents pressing for EVs’ adoption.

  4. Realist permalink
    September 1, 2023 10:37 am

    People just need to stop going to London and those already there need to leave.
    Not only ULEZ, but look at what anti-car policiesin general by local councils have already done to “high street” shops. No business can survive without customers.

  5. Micky R permalink
    September 1, 2023 10:53 am

    ” local councils have already done to “high street” shops. ” . This applies to most of the UK, although there still some small towns with free, convenient parking and a reasonable range of shops.

  6. Adam Gallon permalink
    September 1, 2023 11:14 am

    Will we see more punitive taxes on those of us who don’t buy EVs?
    VED on my Gold 2.0 Tdi is a massive £20 a year.

    • gezza1298 permalink
      September 1, 2023 3:22 pm

      Eh???

      • liardetg permalink
        September 1, 2023 6:47 pm

        I have a Citroen Picasso diesel 1500cc with ADBLU and I pay £20 a year road tax because my car has such good emissions . Why therefore should I buy an EV? Oops ginormous 12 wheel artic diesel powered from Denmark full of bacon just passed!

      • gezza1298 permalink
        September 1, 2023 8:57 pm

        Wow! I didn’t know it could be so cheap. No reason to buy a useless battery car.

  7. September 1, 2023 11:35 am

    The Telegraph has gradually produced more sensible articles and fewer nonsense ones promoting Nut zero, climate change and so-called “green” issues. But it is too little and far too late.

    • Realist permalink
      September 1, 2023 12:38 pm

      What the Telegraph needs to do is reinstate James Delinpole and maybe also start reprints of his previous articles there

      • catweazle666 permalink
        September 1, 2023 5:22 pm

        And Christopher Booker.

    • 186no permalink
      September 1, 2023 9:25 pm

      …as with their ill judged articles on some, repeat some but very few, of the worst aspects of the SARS COV2 scamdemic. Christopher Booker would have either shredded the narrative or been sacked..

  8. Ian Wilson permalink
    September 1, 2023 11:50 am

    A good piece by Ben Marlow except for “it’s hard to fault the intentions of the great net-zero crusade”. The whole concept of net zero is utterly wrong – there is no evidence rising CO2 levels cause harmful warming, extreme weather or any of the other threats we are bombarded with daily.
    Indeed there is a strong case for arguing more CO2 is beneficial as it boosts food output and helps feed the 6 million more mouths we are adding every month.

    • Harry Passfield permalink
      September 1, 2023 12:13 pm

      I figure it was probably a requirement of his editor. It certainly didn’t fit the piece.

    • Gamecock permalink
      September 1, 2023 2:05 pm

      I balked at that, too.

      ‘a greener planet is something everyone should want to see’

      Greener than what? But, in fact, increased atmospheric CO2, allegedly created by Man, has indeed created a greener planet. So, why isn’t he happy?

      • Phoenix44 permalink
        September 1, 2023 2:48 pm

        It was a interesting choice of words- greener rather than cooler. I wonder if a Tory government could outflank Labour by shifting Net Zero 20 years into thd future but committing to lots of real environmental stuff instead?

      • gezza1298 permalink
        September 1, 2023 3:23 pm

        But more CO2 has already greened our planet much more….

    • 186no permalink
      September 1, 2023 9:30 pm

      Exactly what I am driving at with my earlier comment; it is as if they have one eye on the OFCOM censors – so these articles start well and then are destined for pusillanimous journalism 101 very rapidly – FFS either follow the narrative or do the right thing and go hung ho…?

  9. geoffb permalink
    September 1, 2023 12:04 pm

    If EVs outperformed petrol and Diesel and were cheaper, they would sell! It is just simple demand curves, basic economics. Sometimes a product can sell at a higher price, particularly if it offers more features and better performance. This is where Apple made their money, iPlayer and iPhone are still overpriced.

    • Realist permalink
      September 1, 2023 12:44 pm

      EVs need to be AT LEAST as practical as petrol and diesel. They might get away with higher prices then, but until they become practical they will never be what the market needs.
      How can you possibly expect less practical and simultaneously more expensive products to “succeed”? Taxing, regulating and banning competition is not the way. It is the product itself that needs fixing.

      • gezza1298 permalink
        September 1, 2023 3:25 pm

        No…to justify a higher price they need to be better than the current vehicles and other than being able to deliver high torque from zero, they have NO advantage whatsoever.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      September 1, 2023 2:51 pm

      Yes, commentators seem to think gheyfe uncovered a huge and exciting new truth, that consumers only buy innovations that are cheaper/better.

      We can be dumb in many ways as humans but we tend, on aggregate, ti be relatively economically rational.

  10. CheshireRed permalink
    September 1, 2023 12:07 pm

    At first glance Net Zero is the work of successive governments since the mid noughties, but if we look closer there’s just a handful of politicians who’ve had manifestly excessive influence.

    2006 Sir, now Lord Nicholas Stern, (Baron Stern of Brentford), who wrote the Stern Report, designed to remove ‘climate change’ from the debate and solely make the economic case for tackling climate change. How’s that going, your Lordship?

    2008 Climate Change Act, Ed Miliband. (With a dishonourable mention to his brother David, who I believe started the ball rolling, and Bryony, now Baroness Worthington, for co-writing the CC Act)

    2017-2019 Theresa May, who departed government in Brexit-wrecking disgrace but signed us up to Net Zero 2050 without any debate worth a fig. (She was assisted by her climate puppet Chris Skidmore, who signed Net Zero 2050 into law after the Maybot was disconnected and prevented from doing any more harm) The damage that creature has done to our country is incalcuble.

    2019-2022 Boris Johnson turned from sensible and amusing sceptic to raging eco-nutcase. He pulled forward the ICE vehicle ban to 2030, in the process consolidating the NZ stupidity. He has no excuse. To this day nobody knows what or who transformed Mr Johnson’s opinion. It will probably remain a complete mystery for all time.

    So that’s it. 6 or 7 people. Those were the main enablers for the worst piece of ‘regular’ legislation in UK history. (Lockdown was arguably even more insane) Perhaps behind the scenes there’s others, but a special place in Hell awaits these goons.

    The question now is can this monumental economic sabotage be overturned before it sinks our country without trace? With regret I suspect everyone on this forum already knows the answer.

    • devonblueboy permalink
      September 2, 2023 9:37 am

      Johnson’s mind was changed by Princess Nut Nuts, allegedly.

  11. Gamecock permalink
    September 1, 2023 2:12 pm

    Marlow’s screed attacking politicians is annoying. The problem is the British press. Politicians are only doing what the press has pushed them into. The bad guys are BBC, Guardian, and Marlow’s own Telegraph.

    Marlow’s indirection shields the source of the problem, hence, delays, or even PREVENTS, a solution. Politicians don’t fear Marlow.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      September 1, 2023 2:56 pm

      I don’t think that’s right. In the US, politicians lead the way, after Hansen’s infamous presentation, and Global Warming was heavily promoted by the sorts of groups our politicians pay heed to. The narrative was taken up eagerly by the Left in all its guises as a stick to beat its enemies with and the need to believe is entrenched across academia, quangos, the civil service, charities and even many businesses – including bizarrely those that are directly in the firing line such as airlines

      • Gamecock permalink
        September 1, 2023 5:25 pm

        We could argue “politicians control the press” vs “the press controls politicians.”

        I submit Obama and Biden* would never have been elected without huge support from the press.

        *Biden wasn’t elected. NFW he got 81 million votes. Hillary wasn’t elected because she didn’t cheat enough. Maybe St Peter will give her that at the Gate.

  12. September 1, 2023 2:45 pm

    The ZEV mandate completely blows up the UK car market and manufacturing in four months time. Toyota were at 0.4% for EV sales in 2022 compared with a 22% requirement in 2024. The £15,000 per vehicle fine under the 22% is obviously not practical unless you’re McLaren. Those close to the 22% can buy credits from those who are over 22% (basically Tesla and a little MG) but the likes of Toyota, Dacia, Ford and Land Rover are toast.

    Either net zero vehicle regulations get pushed back significantly or Toyota leave the UK and put the last nail in this crazy government’s rule. I don’t know how Land Rover or Ford continue either (perhaps Ford can get away with buying credits from Tesla for its higher cost cars).

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      September 1, 2023 3:00 pm

      I don’t think most Tory MPs care. They are resigned to losing a doing something else. Very few were ever committed Tories anyway, just chances that Cameron encouraged in to the party. Sunak would be just as happy in Labour or the LibDems – he’s only a Tory because he thought it was his best chance of becoming PM – though why he wanted to I don’t know. The rest are mediocre middle managers at best.

    • Realist permalink
      September 1, 2023 3:24 pm

      The ICE ban should not be happening in the first place, but which manufacturer (ideally all of them) will have the courage to close factories? The market needs and wants ICE vehicles. It does NOT need or want EVs. That ought to be obvious from sales figures.

      >>Either net zero vehicle regulations get pushed back significantly or Toyota leave the UK

    • Mr Pitchfork. permalink
      September 1, 2023 3:57 pm

      As I understand it, Tesla struggles to make money making cars, but their carbon credit sales are an absolute gold mine. Sums up the insanity of nut zero.

    • Dave Andrews permalink
      September 1, 2023 4:19 pm

      I asked the ducks if EV manufacturers were losing money?

      The first page came up with
      * AA survey of 15,000 drivers in Feb 23 found 18% plan to buy an EV next, down from 25% in 2022
      *EV start up Lucid is losing $500,00 for every car it sells
      * In 12 years of selling EVs Tesla has never made an annual profit
      * GM will lose money on its EVs until 2025
      * Ford says it will lose $3 bn on EVs in 2023

      Didn’t carry on, but pleased to see the EV revolution is doing so well 🙂

  13. Phoenix44 permalink
    September 1, 2023 3:04 pm

    Hauwk won the Nobel.Prize in 1974. The Nobel webpage says this:

    “From the 1930s, he highlighted the problems of central economic planning. His conclusion was that knowledge and information held by various actors can only be utilized fully in a decentralized market system with free competition and pricing.”

    Yet tine after time after time politicians believe they know better

  14. September 1, 2023 3:55 pm

    Not only here, but over there as well!

    On the one hand …..
    EVs are running out of customers — and some dealers don’t want them anymore

    https://www.businessinsider.com/dealers-turning-away-evs-velectric-cars-demand-cools-inventory-2023-8

    And on the other ……
    US PROVIDING UP TO $12 BILLION TO RETROFIT AUTO PLANTS FOR EVS

    https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/us-offers-12-billion-automakers-suppliers-make-advanced-vehicles-2023-08-31/

  15. Mr Pitchfork. permalink
    September 1, 2023 3:59 pm

    As I understand it, Tesla struggles to make money making cars, but their carbon credit sales are an absolute gold mine. Sums up the insanity of nut zero.

  16. John Brown permalink
    September 1, 2023 6:57 pm

    “The 1.4 gigawatt development [Boreas Wind Farm] was set to power around 1.5m homes but the Swedish energy outfit insists a 40pc surge in costs, driven by inflation, supply issues and rising wages means it is no longer viable.”

    There may just be sufficient energy in one year with a 40% capacity factor for the electricity for 1.5m homes. But there is no way that this wind farm can POWER 1.5m homes because there will be many times when the installed 1.4 GW will be only producing a small fraction of this power and no-one (yet) expects their electrical power to be intermittent.

    Both the Government and the wind (and solar) industries are lying when they use they describe how many homes can be “powered” by renewables. Renewables are parasitic energy needing a parallel system of gas generation to exist. Unless of course the plan is to reduce us to a third world status with intermittent supplies of electricity….

    As an exercise in the energy, power and costs of renewables, I have analysed the energy and power resulting from the Labour Party’s proposal to decarbonise our electricity by 2030 by quadrupling offshore wind, doubling onshore wind and trebling solar, plus some of the costings necessary to increase the installed power further to enable dispatchable power using either hydrogen or batteries for storage. It is based upon the demand, wind and solar data for 2022 downloaded from the Gridwatch website into an Excel spread sheet.

    For anyone interested to see the calculations, please email me at jbxcagwnz@gmail.com

  17. James Broadhurst permalink
    September 1, 2023 7:12 pm

    One hopes that Marlow examines the regular increase in standing charge? At the rate it is rising, it’ll be over £500 per dual fuel customer by next year which with 20 million or so dual fuel customers, we will be funding the upgrade of the Grid with £10bn per annum at least and on target to achieve ofgem’s £100bn grid upgrade that I first heard of a few months ago from Paul Homewood.

    Why are we nor forcing the people who build these wind and solar farms to pay for the grid connection? If I wanted to connect a manufacturing plant to the grid I had to pay to get the power to the plant and a maximum demand cost irrespective of what was actually consumed.

  18. energywise permalink
    September 1, 2023 10:25 pm

    I’ve lots of popcorn stocked to watch this comedy play out – at some point, a Govt will kick it into the long grass as Germany etc have done

  19. Mercury permalink
    September 3, 2023 12:30 am

    “Equally, perhaps the time has come to accept that the economics of net zero are more fantasy than reality. ”

    It is time to accept that climate change and its alleged dangers are more fantasy than reality. One of the best things the world could do for nature and the economy is to forget the whole concept of climate change and get back to reality.

Comments are closed.