Unprecedented Amazon Drought?
By Paul Homewood
h/y Paul Kolk
Another “worse than ever” story!
The Amazon rainforest experienced its worst drought on record in 2023. Many villages became unreachable by river, wildfires raged and wildlife died. Some scientists worry events like these are a sign that the world’s biggest forest is fast approaching a point of no return.
As the cracked and baking river bank towers up on either side of us, Oliveira Tikuna is starting to have doubts about this journey. He’s trying to get to his village, in a metal canoe built to navigate the smallest creeks of the Amazon.
Bom Jesus de Igapo Grande is a community of 40 families in the middle of the forest and has been badly affected by the worst drought recorded in the region.
There was no water to shower. Bananas, cassava, chestnuts and acai crops spoiled because they can’t get to the city fast enough.
And the head of the village, Oliveira’s father, warned anyone elderly or unwell to move closer to town, because they are dangerously far from a hospital.
Oliveira wanted to show us what was happening. He warned it would be a long trip.
But as we turn from the broad Solimões river into the creek that winds towards his village, even he is taken aback. In parts it’s reduced to a trickle no more than 1m (3.3ft) wide. Before long, the boat is lodged in the river bed. It’s time to get out and pull.
"I’m 49 years old, we’ve never seen anything like this before," Oliveira says. "I’ve never even heard of a drought as bad as this."
After three hours of trudging up the drying stream, we give up and turn back.
"If it dries out any more than that, my family will be isolated there," Oliveira says.
To get in or out they’ll have to walk across a lakebed on the other side of the village. But that’s dangerous – there are snakes and alligators there.
The rainy season in the Amazon should have started in October but it was still dry and hot until late November. This is an effect of the cyclical El Niño weather pattern, amplified by climate change.
El Niño causes water to warm in the Pacific Ocean, which pushes heated air over the Americas. This year the water in the North Atlantic has also been abnormally warm, and hot, dry air has enveloped the Amazon.
"When it was my first drought I thought, ‘Wow, this is awful. How can this happen to the rainforest?’" says Flávia Costa, a plant ecologist at the National Institute for Amazonian Research, who has been living and working in the rainforest for 26 years.
"And then, year after year, it was record-breaking. Each drought was stronger than before."
She says it’s too soon to assess how much damage this year’s drought has done, but her team has found many plants "showing signs of being dead.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-67751685
.
How often do we see these sort of claims by locals, that they have never “seen anything like it before”? All amplified of course by the BBC, who fail to provide any actual data at all to support the claims.
In fact the data provided by the World Bank shows that the Amazon is actually getting wetter since 1960:
https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country-profiles
There is always drought in the region during strong El Nino events. But there is no evidence that this year’s is any worse than before.
.
Emissions
As an addendum, the World Bank report also says this about Brazil’s NDC submitted at Paris:
In reality emissions are still 28% higher than in 2005, and show little sign of coming down. A microcosm, I suspect of what is happening everywhere outside of the Western World:
BP Energy Review
Comments are closed.
‘Some scientists worry events like these are a sign that the world’s biggest forest is fast approaching a point of no return.’
Hasty generalization.
‘Some scientists worry’
Them scientists are an emotional lot.
But thankfully, most scientists are not worried about it.
Scientists should only worry about their next research grant, any other worry is unscientific and risks distortion.
I question the ‘some scientists’ I prefer scaremongers looking for more funding?
Emotion is alien to science. Science is dethatched. Yet, we are constantly led to believe from one “expert” quote to another about how “worried” “fearful” “shocked” “worried” and a whole bunch more snowflake terms they are claimed to be. I would suggest the few words from the few real scientists these cut and paste merchants encounter are filtered through an emotion generator before publication.
For example. “there is a fluctuation observed in the data” will morph into “Dire warning from scientists that climatageddon”. It is made deliberately impossible to check or attribute a quote to a real scientist or expert and that allows the propaganda machine in the BBC to “invent” with no fear of reproach. The few who are actually quoted I would welcome a discussion with because I am sure you will find that their words have been taken out of context OR they are after the next tranche of funding for their worthless climut studies.
Another local event extrapolated as global catastrophe.
Climate has been redefined as an average weather in 2023.
I guess this BBC report must have got misfiled somehow.
If it had appeared during the tyranical rule of far-righty Bolsonaro, we could all have believed every last dot and comma as the unvarnished truth.
But now, under the saintly crim Lula? No, no. Surely not. Why, the Beeb love him! They love the 3,000+ Brazilian Climate “Experts” who flew to Dubai for COP28!
After all, if there had been a real problem in the Amazon Basin, the “Experts” would obviously have left a few elderly delegates on a Zoom meeting with COP28 and the rest would have picked up buckets, spades, watering cans and marched off to help, surely?
The Beeb would have sent some of their finest Hamas enthusiasts to document their triumph over the naughty weather!
A dreadful mistake!
It is any wonder people say ‘is that true or did you hear it on the BBC?’
Whenever I read about a disaster with regard to the amazon basin forests, I am reminded of what happened to the Maya on the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico. Archaeologists are now discovering huge cities, perviously unknown, and it is beginning to be apparent that the Maya were much more prolific than formerly realised. They farmed the peninsula and gradually, as they expanded, cut down the Yucatan forests. Eventually, they became too large for the amount of food they could obtain from land that they farmed, and thus was their demise as the climate changed, both due to the lack of forest cover and a series of droughts caused by successive El Niños (sound familiar?). Many survived via the diaspora and there is of course a Maya nation alive and well today. Now – look at the Yucatan peninsula today – alive and well and covered in forest. There was no tipping point – the forest recovered.
As shown also in Brazil:
“Brazil: Ancient Amazon Actually Highly Urbanized” August 31st 2008
“The report in Friday’s edition of the journal Science, describes clusters of towns and smaller villages that were connected by complex road networks and were arranged around large central plazas. Researches also discovered signs of farming, wetland management and fish farms in the ancient settlements that are now almost completely covered by rainforest.”
http://en.mercopress.com/2008/08/31/brazil-ancient-amazon-actually-highly-urbanized
“Stone age etchings found in Amazon basin as river levels fall”: 10 November 2010 Guardian
“Archaeologists who have studied the photographs believe the art – which features images of faces and snakes – is another indication that thousands of years ago the Amazon was already home to large civilisations.
“Eduardo Neves, president of the Brazilian Society of Archaeology and a leading Amazon scholar, said the etchings appeared to have been made between 3,000 and 7,000 years ago when water levels in the region were lower. The etchings were “further, undeniable evidence” that the region had been occupied by a significant number of ancient settlements and people.””
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/10/amazon-brazil-stone-age-etchings?
It’s gaurenteed to be dramtic lies from the BBC scaremongers, like the UK Met Office lie monkeys, they are in bed with carbon brief. They totally ignore history any cold weather and the Sun. Both need defunding, and the met office should be paid on accuracy, they would not survive in the real world.
“The Met Office is a Trading Fund of the Department for Science, Technology and Innovation (DSIT)”
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who/management
Science is policy driven, if they don’t stick to the script they are in trouble.
The BBC and the Met office seem to give every one on a short list their turn at being the disaster location for the month. The floods in the Murray Darling catchment was Australia’s turn. The Chinese get more than one turn. Panama and the Mississippi are having their turn. The Swiss German Rhine is almost recovered from its turn.
As publishers might say weather extremes make for good copy.
And you missed the point that Hegarty flew out there as well for the BBC
Don’t worry lads- it’s going to be a short El Niño. Look at the NOAA forecasts. Cooling La Niña upcoming
“As the cracked and baking river bank towers up on either side of us, Oliveira Tikuna is starting to have doubts about this journey.”
Meanwhile, back in non BBC world, Mr. Tikuna is photographed on a turbulent body of water sailing past lush green vegetation.
More victims of Climate Change
Saffron supplies dry up as climate change shrivels Iran’s ‘desert gold’
https://www.ft.com/content/418a677c-8eaf-4537-9dd6-6ba311cb35ae
Perhaps time for the residents of Saffron Walden to start planting Crocus sativus again.
The Amazon is nearly the size of Australia. I expect quite variable weather across its area.
I also assume weather records for interior Amazon only go back a few decades.
The BBC report appears to have no purpose. There are droughts somewhere all the time. Why report this one?
Chestnuts “spoiled”?
How?
‘Flávia Costa says her team has found many plants that show signs of dying’
Y’all find any actually dead?
‘show signs of dying’ is absolutely meaningless. Perhaps a mashup during translation from Portuguese to English.
Scientists, especially environmental types, appear in general, to prostitute their opinions so as to support their grant funding.
How about a new website ‘BBC LIES FOR CHINA ON CLIMATE CRAP’?? I’ll put up £1000 to get the ball rolling if others will come on board to do it properly.
no more than 1m (3.3ft) wide.
33 every frikin time