Skip to content

David Whitehouse: Climate “out of control”? A reality check

October 13, 2023

By Paul Homewood

 

 

Why are many parts of the world so warm right now? Over the past four months we have seen record-breaking temperatures. September, globally-averaged, was 0.5°C above the previous record. 2023 is bound to be the warmest year of the instrumental record period. This is quite extraordinary, but what is behind this sudden spike in temperature?

Speaking on Channel 4, Piers Forster of the Climate Change Committee, said the sudden uptick in temperatures was 500 times bigger than climate scientists expected. He says the temperature record covered the whole world. Gavin Schmidt of the Goddard Spaceflight Center said 20% of the globe was setting new records. Others said it was just 12%. The Guardian’s front page said simply “Out of Control.”


It’s a state of affairs that has caused much confusion among climate scientists and commentators (often the same thing) many of whom attribute the sudden spike to climate change – but in doing so end up being rather muddled and contradictory. But is there anything really ‘out of control’? Is this abrupt climate change? Perhaps a transition, the crossing of a threshold?

There are some who look towards climate computer models for an explanation, saying that what we have seen over the past few months is in line with expected warming but at the upper end of the scale. This is highly unlikely because the events of a few months, especially during a strong El Niño year when there is so much variability going on, are not a climate change event, even though Zeke Hausfather has said that 2023 has been unusual for the climate. Actually if you view what has happened in terms of climate models it is a clear failure because none predicted the spike – once again showing their inadequacy.

In short, it’s not climate change because – as reputable climate scientists rightly emphasise – a sudden temperature spike or drop in a single year (or even in a number years) can and does happen quite frequently, although this year is a particularly unusual spike. Nevertheless, this sudden rise in temperature is on a far too short period to be driven by global warming which is a long-term trend.
Abrupt climate change is possible without human forcing and is not unusual in the climate record, even recently. Between 1976 and 1977, the Tropical Pacific underwent a rapid warming that had global impacts, including over North America, which was wetter than usual for the following two decades. Even today the cause of the 1976/77 climate shift is still debated.

The explanation for the recent event has not one cause but multiple.A major reason why parts of the world are so hot is the El Niño which warms the surface of much of the tropical Pacific. This typically raises the global average temperatures by about 0.1°C to 0.2°C, but it can be higher due to variability of the phenomenon. Having recently emerged from a triple La Nina, which cools the planet, it is perhaps understandable why this current El Niño is so intense.

Then there is also the new regulations regarding sulphur in ship fuels that has dramatically reduced the sulphur aerosol emission that has cleared the air over many oceans, especially the North Atlantic. Indeed sea surface temperatures in the North Atlantic are very high this summer after a period of rapid warming in the spring. Globally, the North Atlantic is far in excess of anything we’ve seen in that region.
Another contributing factor could be the Hunga Tonga eruption in the South Pacific last year. It injected large amounts of water vapour into the upper atmosphere probably increasing the greenhouse effect. Initial estimates are quite modest, but they could be revised as further work is done.

The Sun might also be playing a role, particularly since this current cycle has surprised astronomers by being more intense than expected. In addition to these we have seen persistent high-pressure systems over many land regions such as Australia and Western Europe.

Climate change means that these changes are acting on an increased global temperature baseline. However, it should be noted that climate change doesn’t explain why September 2023 is so much warmer than September 2022. The main difference is due to a combination of other factors.

The best time to judge what has happened over the past few months is to wait until the year after the current El Niño subsides. There is a significant chance that global temperatures will drop, just as they dropped after the last big El Niño spike in 2015/16.

23 Comments
  1. coecharlesdavid permalink
    October 13, 2023 12:06 pm

    If David Whitehouse can’t offer anything other than waffle, he might be better offering nothing at all!

    • gezza1298 permalink
      October 13, 2023 4:07 pm

      Are you reading a different article?? David Whitehouse is showing that there are a number of possible reasons for a hot September – although the veracity of it being the hottest evah is disputed – while pointing out it can’t be attributed to AGW.

      • coecharlesdavid permalink
        October 13, 2023 4:21 pm

        Yes. Its called weather.

  2. Tim Spence permalink
    October 13, 2023 12:22 pm

    Climate is indeed out of control, humans don’t control it.

    • October 13, 2023 3:32 pm

      I like that!
      Out of Human Control, as always, in Natural Self-Correcting Control.

      They don’t understand the “so called sudden warming”, they did not understand the “pause”, they don’t understand what caused ice ages to start or end, the list of what they don’t understand goes on and on. They thought were were going to already be in the next ice age by now.

      Alternating warm and cold periods have happened as far back as there is data and CO2 change followed the changes and could not have caused past climate change.

      This is the coldest warm time in all the past data but their consensus past data does start in the little ice age and of course there has been record warming compared to the little ice age.

  3. October 13, 2023 1:06 pm

    John Dee’s Climate Normal has been looking at global average temperature stats. It seems the
    global spread of weather stations with long-term temperature data is far too thin on ground, and/or in UTIs, and with most in the US to yield anything statistically relevant:
    https://jdeeclimate.substack.com/p/all-youve-ever-wanted-to-know-about?publication_id=1024952&post_id=137259107&isFreemail=true&r=b8or0

    • gezza1298 permalink
      October 13, 2023 4:04 pm

      Global average temperature is a complete joke given the paucity of weather stations even to this day. And then there are the oceans since the Hadcrut series includes them. The gridding used to fill the gaps amounts to using my temperature here is sunny Surrey and applying it to the Scottish Highlands. Note that there would never be the reverse application.

    • catweazle666 permalink
      October 13, 2023 5:39 pm

      Try this:
      Currently: 57.35°F/14.08°C
      Deviation: 0.15°F/0.08°C
      Stations processed last hour: 67651
      Last station processed: Kuujjuaq, Canada
      Update time: 2023-10-13 16:38:17 UTC

      Temperature.Global calculates the current global temperature of the Earth. It uses unadjusted surface temperatures. The current temperature is the 12M average mean surface temperature over the last 12 months compared against the 30 year mean. New observations are entered each minute and the site is updated accordingly. This site was created by professional meteorologists and climatologists with over 25 years experience in surface weather observations.

      https://temperature.global/

      • Gamecock permalink
        October 13, 2023 5:54 pm

        Pretty good resolution: one thermometer per 7,500 square kilometers.

        How many on the oceans (71% of the surface)?

        “This site was created by professional meteorologists and climatologists with over 25 years experience in surface weather observations.”

        Did you mean this as a compliment?

  4. glenartney permalink
    October 13, 2023 1:12 pm

    When was the Climate under our control? Some have tried all have failed.

    • Martin Brumby permalink
      October 14, 2023 7:14 am

      Not so fast!

      They find a nice electronic probe “thermometer” and read it whilst three Tornado jets are taking off (as at Coningsby).
      Need higher still?
      Fetch more jets!
      Ignore or “adjust” some rural stations!
      Just tell barefaced lies!

      More than one way to “Control the Climate” and the MET are “Experts”.

      • Chaswarnertoo permalink
        October 14, 2023 8:21 am

        Typhoons, even hotter exhausts.

      • glenartney permalink
        October 14, 2023 10:15 am

        That’s only temperature, what about wind, rain, snow, clouds and actual tornadoes and tempests?

      • Martin Brumby permalink
        October 14, 2023 1:29 pm

        “what about wind, rain, snow, clouds and actual tornadoes and tempests?”

        What indeed? Or boring, dull, grotty weather?
        You name it, they have their tailor made “Worse than we thunk!”

        Just send more money. Although all this is “The Settled Science™”, we need much more funds!!

    • r45162e85841fe4 permalink
      October 14, 2023 9:44 am

      It takes a miracle just to change the weather.

  5. Gamecock permalink
    October 13, 2023 1:44 pm

    ‘Climate change’ isn’t scary any more.

    Next will be, “The sky is falling!”

    H/T Henny-Penny

  6. October 13, 2023 2:17 pm

    O/T What’s happening in university world ?
    “TOMORROW (Saturday) AT 1:30 PM
    Role of Geology in Achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals
    3 people going · University of Hull in Kingston upon Hull”

  7. madmike33 permalink
    October 13, 2023 4:20 pm

    So a 0.5C rise in temperature was 500 times what scientists were predicting. Was this the a 0.001C prediction that is reducing our children to neurotic shambles of humanity?

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      October 13, 2023 7:25 pm

      500 times a prediction is a complete and total failure of whatever was used to make the prediction. The “scientists” don’t seem to understand this and appear to be claiming that if they get the direction right but it’s hundreds of times more in that direction than forecast, they are in fact “more right”.

  8. Old Weatherman permalink
    October 13, 2023 5:23 pm

    Well if you are into one club golfing (and Climate Science is) and your only tool is a hammer then every happening with weather looks like a nail.

    It has to be CO2 and its worse than we thought!!!!!!! sarcoff/

    Cap Allon has an interesting piece a couple of days ago (10/10) on Electroverse.info referring to the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha-apai volcanic eruption back in January 2022. It is entitled “Its water vapor stupid”

    https://electroverse.info/cold-antarctic-plateau-japan-cools-its-water-vapor-stupid/

    The received wisdom about volcanic outpourings is that they cool the atmosphere due to particulate matter reducing incoming solar radiation. BUT on this occasion the eruption put massive amounts of H2O as far up as the Mesosphere – a record apparently. And as we all know CO2 is still in nappies compared to Water Vapour in terms of Greenhouse gases.

    This eruption may have caused warming not cooling a peer reviewed paper has stated. Even NASA JPL are on the case.

    • NORMAN PAUL WELDON permalink
      October 13, 2023 9:42 pm

      I can see 2 reasons why the extra water vapour in the stratosphere will not have an effect at the surface:
      1. at this height in the atmosphere the frequencies in which water vapour intercepts outgoing I/R radiation are going to be mostly saturated.
      Any interception that does take place is going to cause warming of the stratosphere and that has not happened.
      2. Any back radiation at this level is going to be intercepted by GHGs at lower levels – in effect the greenhouse effect in reverse.

  9. that man permalink
    October 13, 2023 6:03 pm

    “The Guardian
    Out of Control”
    —very appropriately worded.

  10. ancientpopeye permalink
    October 14, 2023 9:05 am

    “Another contributing factor could be the Hunga Tonga eruption in the South Pacific last year. It injected large amounts of water vapour into the upper atmosphere probably increasing the greenhouse effect. Initial estimates are quite modest, but they could be revised as further work is done.

    The Sun might also be playing a role.”

    So, not man-made after all, at last sanity seems to be breaking out at last?

Comments are closed.