Skip to content

James Bevan’s Ludicrous Sea Level Claims

June 12, 2022
tags:

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Dennis Ambler

 

 

I see that Alarmist in Chief, James Bevan, has been up to his tricks again:

 

 

image

A view of Fairbourne village in Gwynedd in Wales, Wednesday, Oct. 20, 2021. In north Wales, residents in the small coastal village of Fairbourne face being the U.K.'s first "climate refugees." Authorities say that by 2054, it would no longer be sustainable to keep up flood defenses there because of faster sea level rises and more frequent and extreme storms caused by climate change. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

Residents in the small coastal village of Fairbourne, North Wales, could become "climate refugees"

 

Some British coastal communities will "inevitably" be forced from their homes as climate change eats away at their shores, the head of England’s Environment Agency (EA) has warned.

Sir James Bevan, the EA’s chief executive, said that climate change means "some of our communities cannot stay where they are".

He told the Flood and Coast Conference in Telford on Tuesday: "While we can come back safely and build back better after most river flooding, there is no coming back for land that coastal erosion has taken away or which a rising sea level has put permanently or frequently under water."

Sir James said that this means the "right answer… will have to be to move communities away from danger rather than try to protect them from the inevitable impacts of a rising sea level".

Although he said it is "far too early to say which communities are likely to move in due course", the Welsh village Fairbourne has already been told it will have to relocate as Gywnedd Council cannot maintain flood defences indefinitely.

Meanwhile the low-lying Fens in eastern England, which account for 7% of England’s agricultural production, already lies partly below sea level due to drainage.

https://news.sky.com/story/climate-change-causing-britain-to-shrink-with-some-coastal-communities-condemned-to-be-swallowed-by-the-sea-12628943

 

 

 

In reality, there are very few communities which face Bevan’s threat that “they cannot stay where they are”, because of sea level rise, certainly not in our lifetime.

Even Fairbourne, which has been the subject of regular scare stories in recent years, is under no immediate threat. According to Wikipedia:

 

 

Fairbourne is part of the historic county of Meirionnydd. The area was originally salt marshes and slightly higher grazing lands. Before development began in the mid-19th century, there were three farms on the land.[2] The coastal area was originally known as Morfa Henddol, while the promontory outcrop now occupied by the Fairbourne Hotel was called Ynysfaig.

Circa 1865, Solomon Andrews, a Welsh entrepreneur, purchased the promontory. Over the next few years, he built a seawall for tidal protection and several houses.

 

Note that Fairbourne was originally built on a salt marsh, and protected by a sea wall; certainly not the sort of site where you would dream of building houses now. The definition of a salt marsh is:

Salt marshes are coastal wetlands that are flooded and drained by salt water brought in by the tides

 

 

Sea levels across the estuary at Barmouth have not risen at all since 2000, and as we know sea levels around Britain are typically rising at a long term rate of 2mm a year.

Plot of monthly mean sea level data at BARMOUTH.

Monthly Mean Sea Levels at Barmouth

https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/1771.php

 

What is more significant when it comes to sea flooding are the peak tides, usually the coincidence of storms and high tides. The last such peak was in the winter of 2013/14.

 

Ironically Sky themselves covered this story a few years ago, before they caught the global warming bug. They interviewed some of the villagers, who rubbished the alarmists claims, for instance:

Alan Jones finds the council’s decision on the village’s future ludicrous.

The 2014 storm, whose overspill preceded the decision, left, he says "one conservatory flooded".

"How can they predict what’ll happen in 40 or 50 years’ time? They can’t get the weather right for next week," he adds.

———————————–

Freelance angling journalist Mike Thrussell has been associated with the area for 61 years and says he can’t understand what the panic is about.

"People born and bred in the village have never seen the sea over the top," he says.

"There’s no denial about rising sea levels, but some of the statements about how quickly it’s rising don’t add up"

"Over last 100 yrs global sea levels have risen 20cm, yet we’re being told over the next 80-100 years we could see a metre to two metres. It’s not logical, is it?"

——————————

Former insurance broker Alan Wilde, 72, moved to Fairbourne "to get out of the rat-race" and describes it as "one of the most beautiful places in the world".

The village, he insists, is not at risk and has suffered only minor flooding since a major breach in the 1940s.

Again according to Wikipedia:

The best estimate at present is that the area will be abandoned between 2052 and 2062, though the range of uncertainty is between 2042 and 2072. This is based on a rise in critical sea level of 0.5 metres .

But at the current rate of rise, it will take 250 years to reach 0.5 metres.

As the villagers sensibly point out, why all the alarm now, which is hugely damaging to their property values. If the sea overwhelms the seas wall in a hundred years time, so what? That has no relevance to anybody living there today.

40 Comments
  1. LeedsChris permalink
    June 12, 2022 4:50 pm

    What this illustrates is the scope of the modern state to be completely immune to democracy. The type of government and rule we have now is not democratic – our MPs and our Government have little control. We now live in a bureaucratic state, in which the detail of every aspect of our lives is controlled by unelected bureaucrats. Working in the public sector over 40 years I saw a shift in the type of intake of officials. Increasingly they were obsessive for a particular view; extremists on a way, almost invariably left wing and green. This is the blob that now controls us. In the case of all the public agencies in the UK and the whole civil service, it is now a constitutional illusion to say politicians are in control: they are not. The bureaucrats are in control. Our elections now make no difference – witness this week that Hone Office civil servants are refusing to help make the Government’s plans for refugees plans work. I worked with Environment Agency staff for many years and the views on what they wanted our country to become would have caused alarm if known. I heard at that time senior civil servants openly saying we should abandon and relocate major cities. Just like they argued for rewildingour rivers back to how they were before the industrial revolution. This is what we are dealing with. We have had a Revolutionary take over, we just haven’t realised it. Elections are now almost irrelevant because this ‘deep state’ goes on.

  2. HotScot permalink
    June 12, 2022 5:07 pm

    Were it a problem I’m sure the Dutch would help us out if we asked.

  3. Tonyb permalink
    June 12, 2022 5:08 pm

    I know fairbourne very well.

    Most of it developed as a result of the main line railway and as a result of the growing tourism at barmouth across the estuary. As a result it acquired a ferry and a small steam train running from the ferry to the main railway station.

    It is very low lying and much of the land, being a former salt marsh is at or below sea level and relies on a very hefty sea wall of turf and stone.

    Being more rural than barmouth and cheaper it acquired sporadic often low grade houses
    To this day it is quite a shabby and down at heel village although in a spectacular location.

    Here is the nub of the problem. A cost benefit analysis would show the costs of a flood defence can not be justified by the low value of the houses and the very small number of businesses

    If it was decided fairbourne would be a splendid place for a few hundred up market houses or holiday lodges the equation would look quite different as the actual rise of sea level is quite small

    • Mittens permalink
      June 13, 2022 1:02 am

      And there’s the rub, too expensive to maintain so blame climate change and move the population. Wonderful world wide exposure of the menace of green house gases to ordinary people. Plus the governors get to look proactive and caring towards this population about to be inundated. Fooled the sheep again!

  4. June 12, 2022 5:23 pm

    Well I’ve amended the Wikipedia article to show a realistic sea level rise. Wonder how long it stays up. 😁

    • Cheshire Red permalink
      June 12, 2022 6:41 pm

      @David Guy-Johnson
      This is the current section including SLR. Is this as you left it?

      Managed retreat
      Fairbourne has been identified as unsustainable to defend, given predicted sea level rise.[6][7] The best estimate at present is that the area will be abandoned between 2052 and 2062, though the range of uncertainty is between 2042 and 2072. This is based on a rise in critical sea level of 0.5 metres (1.6 ft).[8] However, based on current rates of sea level rise it would take 250 years to reach 0.5 metres. There is an intent to maintain defences of the village for a period of 40 years from 2014. The policy of managed retreat was strongly opposed by local residents.[9][10][7]

      In November 2021, government officials declared that by 2052, it would no longer be safe/sustainable to live in the viilage.[11]

      In May 2022, Arthog Community Council approved a motion to reject the plans by Gwynedd County Council to decommission Fairbourne village, citing various failings in the decision making process.[12]

  5. LeedsChris permalink
    June 12, 2022 5:33 pm

    Always intrigues me why they focus on Fairbourne, because just a very few miles to the north of it is Harlech Castle. Funnily enough Harlech Castle was built 740 years ago and at that time stood right on the coastline and had its own harbour/ quayside for receiving supplies. Curiously, after more than seven centuries of sea level rise the castle is now a mile inland and the sea shore has retreated further to the west! Surely any expert should be able to observe from this (and plenty of other examples around our coasts) that sea level rise was and is only playing a minor role in the shape of our coast, whereas geology and human ingenuity are the power players. We only need to ‘abandon’ places if we choose to… The Environment Agency is another manifestation of the green blob.

    • Mark Hodgson permalink
      June 12, 2022 8:12 pm

      Speaking of Harlech Castle, and with apologies to Paul (I hope you don’t mind, Paul), I have written on just this topic, here:

      The Sands Of Time

      • LeedsChris permalink
        June 12, 2022 10:42 pm

        Excellent points in your article. I had forgotten about Beaumaris. But there are examples all over. Chester was a sea port in Roman times. But by medieval times the Dee estuary had silted and the sea port moved to Parkgate nearly 10 miles away. It is from that port on the Dee that Handel travelled to Dublin to conduct a performance of his Messaiah. That was in the 1700s. Nowadays only the very highest tides even reach Parkgate and mostly it looks out over salt marsh. All this despite rising sea levels.

      • Graeme No.3 permalink
        June 13, 2022 12:27 am

        The Watergate (Traitor’s Gate) in the Tower of London was built in 1285. Admittedly only accessible at high tide these days. I think the tide change is 4 metres at that point of the Thames.

      • Mark Hodgson permalink
        June 13, 2022 7:35 pm

        Thanks LeedsChris, I am glad that you enjoyed it. You’re welcome to visit Cliscep any time.

    • Chaswarnertoo permalink
      June 14, 2022 7:57 am

      The railway runs BELOW the sea gate. Sea level has DROPPED since it was in use 1000 years ago. Nobody wants to know, or explain.

  6. jimlemaistre permalink
    June 12, 2022 5:36 pm

    Planet Earth is a ‘Centrifuge’ . . . spinning at 1,670 km per hour as it circles the Sun at 108,000 km per hour . . . Remember . . . the Earth is ROUND . . . All the excess water going into the oceans accumulates at the ‘Gyers’ and along the Equator. All environmentalists who predict rising sea levels; first believe the Earth is Flat and Second they do not understand the science of ‘Centrifuges’. The wetter your laundry . . . the more water gets spun out of the washing machine . . . Pages 28 – 32 . . .

    https://www.academia.edu/45570971/The_Environmentalist_and_The_Neanderthal

    My Thoughts . . .

    • HotScot permalink
      June 12, 2022 5:50 pm

      A point I make frequently to alarmist’s. Just goes straight over their head, far too technical. They’re convinced there’s a small woman in their washing machine scrubbing their clothes.

      • jimlemaistre permalink
        June 12, 2022 5:55 pm

        Cute . . . I love it !!

    • MrGrimNasty permalink
      June 12, 2022 5:51 pm

      The whole earth bulges, the famous ‘trick’ quiz question on the furthest point from the centre.

      “Mount Chimborazo’s peak is the furthest point on Earth from Earth’s center. The summit is over 6,800 feet [2,072 meters] farther from Earth’s center than Mount Everest’s summit.”

  7. MrGrimNasty permalink
    June 12, 2022 5:39 pm

    We have the established retort to such nonsense, all before the invention of CAGW/climate change. The video of the church is very good.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-35549952.amp

  8. June 12, 2022 5:42 pm

    The BBC tried it on with this place earlier this year. Worth having a read about Fairbourne. It has only developed during the past 100 years. In 1891 the village did not exist. It is built on reclaimed swamp and tidal marsh reclaimed from the sea. What was above sea level back then was small.
    Originally there was a shingle ridge which created protection which naturally rolled inland. Fixing the shingle ridge set off a time bomb. It is protected by artificial sea defences which by nature of their construction set a time limit on how long they would last regardless of how much or how little sea level rise affected them. If this clown had bothered to read about it’s origins he would see its problems are not only see level rise but also water coming off the land. As usual with all the tripe pushed by the climate circus useful idiots, big on claims, short on detail. Funny how all the claimed science that these fools arm wave at is couched in emotional language when real science is explicitly unemotional.

    From Wikipedia:
    History
    Fairbourne is part of the historic county of Meirionnydd. The area was originally salt marshes and slightly higher grazing lands.

    Also a reasonably balanced description can be found here:

    Section 2:

    Click to access fairbourne-coastal-risk-management-learning-project.pdf

    So 170 years ago it was mainly salt marsh! The land was regularly flooded from landward and from seaward…… sure clear evidence of a “climate emergency”.

    • Lorde Late permalink
      June 12, 2022 9:32 pm

      Thank you, my thoughts as well. I understand Fairbourne as you say has been battling for decades with erosion and flooding issues, nothing to do with climate change at all.

  9. EPC1948 Rh permalink
    June 12, 2022 5:44 pm

    What is really alarming are new housing developments close to river estuaries for example, where no insurance company will offer flood cover… The builders are offering insurance for the short term to get them sold. In years to come these properties will flood and, yes you’ve guessed it, it will be down to global warming.

    Local councils decision to stop maintaining flood defences is another case of jumping on the bandwagon so save money.

    Good job the Dutch aren’t as dumb.

    • Mike Jackson permalink
      June 12, 2022 6:36 pm

      I seem to recall a year or two ago shock horror when a housing development at Fishlake flooded. Why do people keep falling for it?!

      • Mark Hodgson permalink
        June 12, 2022 8:13 pm

        Fishlake -I suspect the clue’s in the name.

  10. June 12, 2022 6:03 pm

    What’s happening to oceanfront property prices? Last I looked, they just weren’t coming down. Damn! https://silvercityburro.com/2019/07/28/zillows-white-house-crony/

  11. Gamecock permalink
    June 12, 2022 6:06 pm

    Stay out of it, government! The ocean is the problem of the people who own ocean front property! Whether the sea goes up or down is none of your #@*&ing business.

    “You knew it was ocean front when you bought it.”

    (Variant of “You knew I was a snake when you picked me up.”)

    If the people of Fairbourne need to move, they will. Shazam!

    • June 13, 2022 12:23 pm

      And yet, the wizards of smart such as Bill Gates and Barak Obama keep buying ocean front homes on Martha’s Vineyard and elsewhere (the Hampton’s comes to mind; also Carmel).

      Of course they know it is all a scam because they perpetrate it ad nauseum.

  12. John OReilly-Cicconi permalink
    June 12, 2022 6:12 pm

    Does it never worry you Mr Homewood that our useless leaders might believe all this nonsense?

    yrs j o’r-c ________________________________

  13. Mike Jackson permalink
    June 12, 2022 6:32 pm

    I like the idea of a Flood and Coast conference being held in Telford. About as far from the sea as you can get!

    • T Walker permalink
      June 12, 2022 7:57 pm

      You can’t take any chances Mike!!!

  14. Harry Passfield permalink
    June 12, 2022 6:58 pm

    If you were interviewing someone for the position of HEAD of the EA, you would want to be sure the applicant knew the difference between sea level and coastal erosion. He should be sacked!

    • Mike Jackson permalink
      June 12, 2022 8:22 pm

      I’m sure he does, Harry. He’s just banking on the likelihood that enough of we proles don’t.

    • tomo permalink
      June 12, 2022 11:12 pm

      He’s an improvement on the fat tw*t (and one time self styled fracking czar) Baron Smith of Finsbury who dreamed up a novel new type of rain to explain why his minions had messed up with flood prevention around the time of those Somerset floods.

  15. Aaron Halliwell permalink
    June 12, 2022 6:59 pm

    Johnson and Eustice have suddenly decided we should grow more of our own fruit an vegetables, yet nature quangos and eco-loon pseudo farmers are giving up coastal reclaimed land to the sea and productive farm land for rewilding.

    Either you want to be self-sufficient or you don’t; there’s no halfway house.

    What are the Netherlands doing? – are they taking the finger out of the dyke?

    • T Walker permalink
      June 12, 2022 8:01 pm

      BoZo thinks we can grow our fruit and Veggies under the solar panels, or amongst the wild flower meadows.

      The lack of joined up government is amazing, but just par for the course.

      • Gamecock permalink
        June 13, 2022 10:40 am

        The lack of continuity is a symptom of the Left chasing issues for publicity. In other words, they really don’t care about any issue.

        The Left has no soul.

  16. Martin Brumby permalink
    June 12, 2022 7:06 pm

    Am I alone in thinking that, in a just world, Sir James Bevan, the EA’s CEO, should be provided with an old shovel, a twisted wheelbarrow and a rammer with a mended shaft.

    He should then spend the rest of his worthless, miserable life, building a sea wall for the good people of Fairbourne.

    Let’s be fair, this COULD soothe the concerns of local residents that he has most inappropriately raised.

  17. alexei permalink
    June 12, 2022 8:30 pm

    Back in my far-off schooldays, I vaguely remember being taught that Britain was slowly moving westward, the west coast gaining land and the east progressively losing it. Might this explain much of sea level disparities?

  18. Ray Sanders permalink
    June 12, 2022 9:19 pm

    On BBC One just now at 9:12 the “C” word was used in what is allegedly a comedy programme (“Outlaws”)….how incredibly Woke of the BBC. So with due reverence to the current paradigm…I personally believe James Bevan is a “C” word. That must make me really on message eh?

  19. tomo permalink
    June 12, 2022 10:25 pm

    The Environment Agency up to tricks and lies?

    Who’d have thunk it?

    EA bad behaviour is simply what they do… – after a multi year investigation by The Ombudsman and quite simply appalling antics by officials the EA is ending up at Parliamentary Select Committee no doubt for censure … EA officials think they can do as they please with no danger that they will be held to account.

    This is a chronic problem – with the myriad of NDPBs (Non Departmental Public Body) where, since they are constituted as an “independent body” – nobody has any control over them and there is no statutory accountability or mechanism for bringing them to heel when they misbehave… In this case the EA have ignored DeFRA, The Ombudsman and George Eustace – essentially because they feel invulnerable…

    See a snapshot of the antics in the PHSO report here

  20. June 12, 2022 10:27 pm

    Cinque Ports anyone?
    “Sandwich is now 3 km (1.9 mi) from the sea and no longer a port.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinque_Ports

    • tomo permalink
      June 12, 2022 11:01 pm

      The EA have plans to enrich their mates with the TE2100 Thames Estuary scheme – the technical report has been withheld for nearly a decade – it is based on discredited UKMO projections which though trailed in the PR associated with TE2100 have not afaik actually been published.

      The EA is going to protect you – and no, we won’t answer any questions about the “why”

Comments are closed.