Skip to content

Elon Musk: "Klaus Schwab Is LYING!!!"

November 13, 2022

By Paul Homewood

 

Elon Musk exposes the WEF:

 

 

 

22 Comments
  1. GeoffB permalink
    November 13, 2022 10:22 am

    Not sure that this actually helps our campaigns, while I have deep concerns of the motives of the UN, WEF and MSM, we should stick with promoting our climate change concerns, where we have a good grasp of the facts.

    • November 13, 2022 10:41 am

      I think I now have a good grasp of the facts about Big Pharma. More and more evidence how closely the Zero Covid and Zero Carbon scams are.

      • GeoffB permalink
        November 13, 2022 11:20 am

        You have to pick battles you can win, I have a degree in electrical engineering (1970) so 50 years experience mostly in manufacturing….I can argue without notes why the present plans for net zero in electricity generation will never ever give reliable, affordable electricity. (and its not very green when you take into account the manufacturing of the windmills, solar panels, batteries, together with maintenance difficulties and short life expectancy.)
        I have no medical qualifications other than “O” level biology, so while I read all the covid/vaccine articles on TCW I cannot analyse the validity.

      • November 13, 2022 11:47 am

        Fair point. But I recommend that an excellent (if not infallible) quick guide is to consider (a) Cui Bono? and (b) who is it that is absolutely blatantly lying or completely incompetent. (Think Professor Neil ‘Pantsdown’ Ferguson, Susan ‘Communist Party of GB’ Michie, Anthony Fauci etc etc.)

        Just as in Climate, it doesn’t take long to spot the liars who stuff their boots with your tax Pounds.

      • Micky R permalink
        November 13, 2022 11:21 am

        @ Martin Brumby

        The scams are about control. The UN has stated that

        ” The system of global governance represented by the United Nations, warts and all, thus remains crucial to global order, peace and development. ”

        i.e. the UN claims responsibility for global governance

        https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/global-and-national-leadership-good-governance

        Governance can be defined as ” the act or process of governing or overseeing the control and direction of something ” from

        https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/governance

        UN -> IPCC
        UN -> WHO

        There is a partnership between the UN and the WEF

        https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/06/world-economic-forum-and-un-sign-strategic-partnership-framework/

    • Gamecock permalink
      November 13, 2022 12:41 pm

      Fair points, Mr B. But never forget that you don’t need a PhD in maths to know that 2 +2 =4.

      I worked in manufacturing and manufacturing support for many years, also. I worked with dozens of electrical engineers. I paid attention. I learned pertinent facts from them, such that I knew what they knew about things that mattered.

      Didn’t make ME an engineer. But it didn’t matter.

      In fact, being a ‘climate scientist’ labels one as being LESS knowledgeable, insulated from facts that don’t fit the agenda. I.e., a ‘climate scientist’ CANNOT be a scientist, ‘climate’ becoming a term of negation.

      • catweazle666 permalink
        November 13, 2022 1:56 pm

        ‘climate scientist’ = Oxymoron.

  2. November 13, 2022 10:25 am

    Nice one.

    John Doran.

  3. Douglas Brodie permalink
    November 13, 2022 11:02 am

    The Powers That Be (TPTB) showed their true colours during their Covid “plandemic” and it wasn’t pretty.

    To me it is obvious that Covid was a premeditated, globally-coordinated TPTB plan to inflict grievous harm on the general public, launched as a “quick fire” action because their “climate change” scam wasn’t producing the results they wanted fast enough.

    It’s all a deliberate plan to impose financial misery on the people, to create energy and food deprivations in the name of “climate change” and to degrade public health via the toxic Covid injections. All so that they can pretend to make it all better by imposing their Great Reset.

    For my full analysis see https://metatron.substack.com/p/the-powers-that-be-who-rule-our-lives

    • Gerry, England permalink
      November 13, 2022 12:49 pm

      I disagree.

      We can be pretty certain that Moderna created it given they hold the patents for genetic sequences that appear in the virus and were somehow working on a vaccine for it before it arrived. The US funded the its creation at the Wuhan lab. There had been questions over the bio-security of that lab and you have to wonder at the stupidity of doing this sort of idiotic ‘Gain of Function’ research in a city and not out in the wilds. It is most likely that it escaped by accident but there is no denying that its spread was used to good effect to subvert the US election and that it allowed totalitarians to see how weak and submissive the mass population are when subjected to draconian laws.

      • catweazle666 permalink
        November 13, 2022 1:58 pm

        Yes, more a case of not letting a good crisis go to waste.

      • Douglas Brodie permalink
        November 13, 2022 2:38 pm

        How do you explain the global coordination of the how governments all around the world reacted to the arrival of Coronavirus? Evidence of coordinated pre-planning is everywhere, such as the Event 201 planning exercise and the construction of new virus containment facilities in his local NHS hospital in November 2019 because “something horrible is coming”, as reported by funeral director John O’Looney in a video which has now been removed.

        Incidentally, Sunak seems to have made most of his money by investing in Moderna. He probably knew that Coronavirus was coming years ago. See from 8 minutes in on this: https://rumble.com/v1qcrgu-who-is-rishi-sunak-rounding-the-news.html

    • Move on permalink
      November 16, 2022 5:21 am

      Perfectly said and I agree with everything

  4. November 13, 2022 11:24 am

    If you think this does not effect everyone and every thing, you would do well to look into Klaus Schwab and the one the WEF calls “the prophet”, Yuval Noah Harari. Harari has been quite open recently about the plans for the one world government. There are interviews with him where he spells out their plans. Bill Gates openly supports the reduction of the world’s population from ca. 8 billion to 500 million.

    Climate, pandemic, food shortages, etc. are but mechanisms for their march. They were on target with their 16 year plan to achieve one world governance with 8 years of Obama to be followed by 8 years of Hillary as the finisher. Donald Trump was the sand in their gears and set them back greatly. Now, along with the likes of Elon Musk, taking over one of their big media bull-horns for lying, things are again going off the tracks. You need not wonder why they are going crazy over Trump and Musk….and a few others.

    • Phil O'Sophical permalink
      November 13, 2022 12:28 pm

      Talking of prophets, remember that immortal line (the first honest answer ever on the topic) from Richard Branson, who, with Al Gore sitting next to him, was asked whether he thought Al Gore was a prophet. He said: ” Depends how you spell ‘prophet’.” My how they laughed.

  5. 2hmp permalink
    November 13, 2022 12:00 pm

    There is substantial evidence about a plan for global government, but it will not be defeated by scientific facts with little exposure. This political not scientific.

    • Jason permalink
      November 13, 2022 7:10 pm

      It’s actially spiritual.

  6. Broadlands permalink
    November 13, 2022 1:21 pm

    When it comes down to zero and net-zero emissions by 2050, the global markets will decide. The reality is that the world’s transportation still runs on the fuels they want to make disappear. The current energy crisis is a clear example. It has put the climate crisis in its proper “reset” perspective. Solar and wind “farms” are not delivered and installed with electric vehicles. Nor is the vegetation replanted and harvested for the ethanol that makes biofuels renewable but still 90% fossil fuel. The transition has a very long way to go.

  7. Hugh Sharman permalink
    November 13, 2022 4:22 pm

    Thanks Paul!
    It’s not really clear to me where Musk stands on “net zero” and this week’s agenda at COP27!
    Certainly, the social and environmental horrors of mining and refining of lithium, cobalt and nickel, etc etc and (thus surely?) the fast approaching melt-down in the global EV business will have profoundly negative consequences for especially European vehicle manufacture May I encourage

    • A+man+of+no+rank permalink
      November 13, 2022 7:23 pm

      Short addition to Hugh on ‘meltdown of EVs’.
      Bloke I know has a franchise with a well known parcel delivery firm. He looks after just one delivery area here in the North-West (UK). Last year he finished most rounds by 4.30pm, this year it is 7.30 pm – not good for family life is it? Last year he drove a diesel van and now its an EV with a needy midday charge. Technological advances should bring benefits to all of us and if they don’t then surely they cannot last.

  8. Hugh Sharman permalink
    November 13, 2022 4:26 pm

    May I encourage fellow fans of “Notalotta” to log into the Webinar transmitted by Finland’s Geological Survey this coming Friday morning from Helsinki, details at https://www.gtk.fi/en/research/time-to-wake-up/webinar/

    Ironically, this is also the last day of yackety yak yak at COP27!

  9. dennisambler permalink
    November 14, 2022 5:54 pm

    The push for global governance has a long history, before Schwab became involved. Now it seems Covid inspired them to show their intentions more publicly . The U.N. Environment Program (UNEP) began in Nairobi in 1972, under the founding directorship of Canadian socialist entrepreneur, Maurice Strong. The first Earth Summit, in Stockholm, was also in 1972, The United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, (UNCHE), with Maurice Strong as Secretary-General.

    The 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development (Second Earth Summit) in Rio, at which Strong was Secretary-General, led to the 1994 formation of the UN Framework on Climate Change, UNFCC.

    Gro Harlem Brundtland addressed the XIX Congress of the Socialist International. “Social Democracy in a Changing World” 15 -17 September 1992

    “At the Rio Conference on Environment and Development (1992) it was made clear that we are heading towards a crisis of uncontrollable dimensions unless we change course. Today we are faced with global challenges that can be addressed only through international cooperation.

    Securing peace, sustainable development and democracy requires that nations, in their common interest, establish an effective system of global governance and security. In an increasingly interdependent world, we must find new ways to live – both within our own countries and on a global level – that are socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable.

    What we need is a new social contract. Monetary stability will not suffice. And just as democracy originated in Europe some 2500 years ago, just as social democracy developed in Europe over the past 100 years, so must we again take the lead. We must curb population growth and reinforce the links between population, poverty-alleviation and the rights of women.

    A new social contract must be based on our overriding principles – freedom, solidarity and justice. To pursue social justice, freedom and democracy will require that we pool our collective experiences and national sovereignties.

    There is no alternative to obligatory coordination of financial and monetary policies.”

    Brundtland fronted the Brundtland Report in 1987, which led to the UN Commission on Sustainable Development, which led to Agenda 21 and the Millennium Development Goals, now Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals.

    COMMISSION ON GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, (CGG)
    “The CGG was established in 1992, after Rio, at the suggestion of Willy Brandt, former West German chancellor and President of the Socialist International.
    It recommended that “user fees” should be imposed on companies operating in the “global commons.” Such fees could be collected on international airline tickets, ocean shipping, deep-sea fishing, activities in Antarctica, geostationary satellite orbits, and electromagnetic spectrum. The main revenue stream would be carbon taxes, to be levied on all fossil fuels. “A carbon tax,” the report said, would yield very large revenues indeed.”

    The agenda rolls on behind the scenes and bit by bit, accord after accord, governments have locked their populations into what is already de facto global governance, enforced through WHO, WMO, World Bank and the whole range of UN agencies that control much of what we do on a daily basis.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: